Cited by 641Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity

Open access
Kolotkin, Ronette L., Crosby, Ross D., Kosloski, Karl D., Williams, G. Rhys·2001·Obesity Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obesity researchers have a growing interest in measuring the impact of weight and weight reduction on quality of life. The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life questionnaire (IWQOL) was the first self-report instrument specifically developed to assess the effect of obesity on quality of life. Although the IWQOL has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties, its length (74 items) makes it somewhat cumbersome as an outcome measure in clinical research. This report describes the development of a 31-item version of the IWQOL (IWQOL-Lite). RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: IWQOLs from 996 obese patients and controls were used to develop the IWQOL-Lite. Psychometric properties of the IWQOL-Lite were examined in a separate cross-validation sample of 991 patients and controls. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis provided strong support for the adequacy of the scale structure. The five identified scales of the IWQOL-Lite (Physical Function, Self-Esteem, Sexual Life, Public Distress, and Work) and the total IWQOL-Lite score demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. The reliability of the IWQOL-Lite scales ranged from 0.90 to 0.94 and was 0.96 for the total score. Correlations between the IWQOL-Lite and collateral measures supported the construct validity of the IWQOL-Lite. Changes in IWQOL-Lite scales over time correlated significantly with changes in weight, supporting its sensitivity to change. Significant differences in IWQOL-Lite scale and total scores were found among groups differing in body mass index, supporting the utility of the IWQOL-Lite across the body mass index spectrum. DISCUSSION: The IWQOL-Lite appears to be a psychometrically sound and clinically sensitive brief measure of quality of life in obese persons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2001.13

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolotkin, R. L., Crosby, R. D., Kosloski, K. D., & Williams, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Corresponding author
Kolotkin, Ronette L.
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
102-111
ISSN
  • 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8528
OpenAlex
W1993747099
Cited by
641
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 41
FWCI
44.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
obesity, quality of life, IWQOL-Lite, psychometric properties, self-esteem, sexual life, physical function, public distress, work, body mass index, weight loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review