The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,192
Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 2,980
Donovan, R., & Philosophy Documentation Center (1983) · International Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5840/ipq198323335 · Cited by 1,898
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke
Wardlaw, J. M., Murray, V., Berge, E., & del Zoppo, G. J. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000213.pub3 · Cited by 1,370
(2004) · Pragmatism and Educational Research · doi:10.5040/9798216401544.ch-004 · Cited by 1,091
Jarvie, I. C. (1983) · Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5424-3_4 · Cited by 942
Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.
Oromaner, M., & Mulkay, M. (1980) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577856 · Cited by 580
Green, B. S., Hollis, M., & Lukes, S. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578514 · Cited by 563
Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda
Boote, J., Telford, R., & Cooper, C. (2002) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00214-7 · Cited by 513
Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge
Barnes, B., & Bloor, D. (1982) · Cited by 495
Cited by
Patient apprehensions about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare
Richardson, J. P., Smith, C., Curtis, S., Watson, S., Zhu, X., Barry, B., & Sharp, R. R. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00509-1 · Cited by 424
Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how
Sacristan, J. A., Aguaron, A., Avendaño, C., Garrido, P., Carrion, J., Gutierrez, A., Kroes, R., & Flores, A. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s104259 · Cited by 363
ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study
Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., Poland, F., Staniszewska, S., Kendall, S., Munday, D., et al. (2015) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr03380 · Cited by 297
“However, while there is growing recognition of the importance of experiential knowledge being addressed alongside scientific understanding,(44) there is also clearly often an intrinsic resistance to acknowledging lay knowledge, particularly in the sphere of biomedical research.(44,45)”
Focus group research and “the patient's view”
Lehoux, P., Poland, B., & Daudelin, G. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016 · Cited by 278
Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research
Thompson, J., Barber, R., Ward, P. R., Boote, J. D., Cooper, C. L., Armitage, C. J., & Jones, G. (2009) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Caron-Flinterman, J. F., Broerse, J. E. W., & Bunders, J. F. G.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2575-2584
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972307981
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023
- The paper
- Caron-Flinterman, J. F., Broerse, J. E. W., & Bunders, J. F. G. (2005). The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
