ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a prerequisite for many funding bodies and NHS research ethics approval. PPI in research is defined as research carried out with or by the public rather than to, about or for them. While the benefits of PPI have been widely discussed, there is a lack of evidence on the impact and outcomes of PPI in research. Objectives: To determine the types of PPI in funded research, describe key processes, analyse the contextual and temporal dynamics of PPI and explore the experience of PPI in research for all those involved. Mechanisms contributing to the routine incorporation of PPI in the research process were assessed, the impact of PPI on research processes and outcomes evaluated, and barriers and enablers to effective PPI identified. Design: A three-staged realist evaluation drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to understand how far PPI was embedded within health-care research in six areas: diabetes mellitus, arthritis, cystic fibrosis, dementia, public health and learning disabilities. The first two stages comprised a scoping exercise and online survey to chief investigators to assess current PPI activity. The third stage consisted of case studies tracked over 18 months through interviews and document analysis. The research was conducted in four regions of England. Participants: Non-commercial studies currently running or completed within the previous 2 years eligible for adoption on the UK Clinical Research Network portfolio. A total of 129 case study participants included researchers and PPI representatives from 22 research studies, and representatives from funding bodies and PPI networks. Results: In the scoping 51% ( n = 92) of studies had evidence of PPI and in the survey 79% ( n = 80), with funder requirements and study design the strongest influence on the extent of PPI. There was little transparency about PPI in publicly accessible information. In case studies, context–mechanism–outcome configurations suggested that six salient actions were required for effective PPI. These were a clear purpose, role and structure for PPI; ensuring diversity; whole research team engagement with PPI; mutual understanding and trust between the researchers and lay representatives; ensuring opportunities for PPI throughout the research process; and reflecting on, appraising and evaluating PPI within a research study. PPI models included a ‘one-off’ model with limited PPI, a fully intertwined model in which PPI was fully embedded and an outreach model with lay representatives linking to broader communities. Enabling contexts included funder, topic/design, resources, research host, organisation of PPI and, most importantly, relationships. In some case studies, lack of coherence in defining PPI persisted, with evidence of a dual role of PPI representative/study participant. Evidence of PPI outcomes included changes to study design, improvements to recruitment materials and rates, and dissemination. Conclusions: Six salient actions were required for effective PPI and were characterised by a shared understanding of moral and methodological purposes of PPI, a key individual co-ordinating PPI, ensuring diversity, a research team positive about PPI input and fully engaged with it, based on relationships that were established and maintained over time, and PPI being evaluated in a proactive and systematic approach. Future work recommendations include exploring the impact of virtual PPI, cost analysis and economic evaluation of the different models of PPI, and a longer-term follow-up study of the outcomes of PPI on research findings and impact on services and clinical practice. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
RAPPORT used realist evaluation and Normalisation Process Theory to examine patient and public involvement (PPI) in UK health research across six topic areas. It found PPI was unevenly embedded, often limited to early stages, and most likely to be sustained where funder requirements, resources, relationships, and dedicated coordination aligned.
Key findings
- Scoping found no evidence of PPI in 49% of 478 eligible UKCRN studies; information was obtained on 38% (182). The survey of 360 studies had a 28% response rate (101); 79% reported PPI, 17% reported no PPI, and 4% (n = 4) were unclear. IDD had the highest PPI presence (scoping 91%; survey 100%); mixed-methods designs had the highest incidence (61% scoping; 91% survey), followed by clinical trials (56%; 81%), basic science (21%; 67%), and tissue bank studies (33%; 43%).
- The study included 22 case studies (from 23 recruited; one withdrew), 206 interviews (119 initial, 77 tracking), and 278 documents. Three main PPI models were identified: one-off, outreach, and fully intertwined. Recruitment was the most frequently reported outcome (18/22 case studies), but only two case studies provided evidence of systematically appraising PPI.
- NPT constructs—coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring—helped explain embeddedness. Eight enabling contexts were identified: funder requirements, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI, research host, training, positive relationships, and positive experience. Reimbursement for time was rare; among five case studies reimbursing time, amounts ranged from £25 to £75 per meeting. Of 51 PPI representatives, 33 (64.7%) had a prior working relationship with the team, 9 (17.6%) had a distant acquaintance, and 9 (17.6%) were new.
- A dual role (study participant and PPI representative) was common. Training evidence was limited: 9% of scoping studies with PPI had evidence of training, 28% of survey studies with PPI provided training, and 43% had costed for training. Among 8 case studies completed during data collection, there was no evidence of immediate outcomes for research findings; five with clear PPI embedding identified further grant applications as an outcome.
Methods
- Design: realist evaluation using mixed methods and Normalisation Process Theory, conducted May 2011–February 2014 in three stages. Six purposively selected topic areas were arthritis, cystic fibrosis, dementia, diabetes mellitus, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and public health. The sample was confined to non-commercial research eligible for the UKCRN portfolio.
- Data: Stage 1 national scoping in England and Wales identified 478 eligible studies, with PPI information obtained on 182 (38%). Stage 2 was an online survey of chief investigators in four English regions; 360 studies were eligible and 101 responded (28%). Stage 3 comprised 22 case studies (23 recruited, one withdrew), with documentary analysis (278 documents), semistructured interviews, and tracking over 8–18 months; 206 interviews were completed with 129 participants (64 researchers, 48 PPI representatives, 7 PPI co-ordinators, 10 funders/network representatives).
- Analysis: thematic content analysis, NPT-informed coding, context–mechanism–outcome (CMO) configurations, and radar plots; interviews and documents were triangulated, and CMO configurations were iteratively tested and refined with stakeholders.
Limitations
- Stated: the survey response rate of 28% means results must be treated with caution; publicly accessible PPI information was limited; finding no evidence of PPI in 49% of scoping studies does not necessarily mean PPI was absent; PPI models could not be accurately assessed; some topic areas had very small numbers (e.g., CF); case studies could not capture longer-term outcomes, and only 8 completed during data collection; only two case studies had systematic appraisal.
- Stated: PPI impact was difficult to prove, and there was little systematic appraisal within case studies; many researchers and PPI representatives felt PPI was worthwhile but its impact was hard to demonstrate.
- Evident from the text: findings rely heavily on self-reported interviews and incomplete or inconsistent documentary evidence, with sparse recording of PPI activities and outcomes; definitions of PPI varied, and some respondents conflated involvement with participation or engagement.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 95 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
For both lay representatives and researchers, a positive experience created a virtuous cycle whereby PPI became increasingly embedded.
“For both lay representatives and researchers a positive experience created a virtuous cycle whereby PPI became increasingly embedded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A dual role of participation/involvement was sometimes used to capture the target population perspective.
“A dual role of participation/involvement was sometimes used to capture the target population perspective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
An assigned, resourced PPI co-ordinator role was important in sustaining PPI.
“An assigned, resourced PPI co-ordinator role was important in sustaining PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
Flexible approaches to enable use of lay representatives' individual skill sets and their personal circumstances were required.
“Flexible approaches to enable use of lay representatives' individual skill sets and their personal circumstances were required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingown data
There was some evidence that establishing and maintaining good relationships was hard to achieve when PPI was conducted purely through virtual media.
“There was some evidence that this was hard to achieve when PPI was conducted purely through virtual media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
There was little systematic appraisal within the case studies.
“There was little systematic appraisal within the case studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
Establishing and maintaining good relationships between researchers and lay representatives was crucial.
“Establishing and maintaining good relationships between researchers and lay representatives was crucial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
In newly formed groups of researchers and lay representatives, achieving agreement on the purpose of PPI may take time.
“In newly formed groups of researchers and lay representatives, this may take time to achieve.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingnone given
The lay representatives in the outreach model had strong links and networks with populations the research was aiming to recruit.
“The lay representatives in this model had strong links and networks with populations the research was aiming to recruit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Junior members of the research team tended to have more difficulties in differentiating between participation and involvement.
“Junior members of the research team tended to have more difficulties in differentiating between participation and involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingown data
Of the 478 eligible studies identified in the national scoping, information was obtained on 38% (n=182).
“Of the 478 eligible studies identified, we obtained information on 38% (n = 182).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All the case studies had evidence of PPI outcomes, including research priority/question setting, study marketing, changes to the design including interventions, ensuring participant safety and recruitment.
“All the case studies had evidence of PPI outcomes, including research priority/question setting, study marketing, changes to the design including interventions, ensuring participant safety and recruitment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The outreach model of PPI had regular points of contact between researchers and lay representatives throughout the research.
“This model had regular points of contact between researchers and lay representatives throughout the research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the one-off model of PPI, potential outcomes were limited by the researcher.
“In the one-off model of PPI, potential outcomes were limited by the researcher.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Higher levels of agreement on the purpose of PPI usually led to more embedded PPI.
“Higher levels of agreement on the purpose of PPI usually led to more embedded PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
- Findingown data
In total, 1464 studies in the six broad topic/exemplar areas were downloaded from the UKCRN database.
“In total, 1464 studies in the six broad topic/exemplar areas were downloaded from the UKCRN database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
- Findingown data
Thematic content analysis established how different contexts affected processes, mechanisms and outcomes of PPI.
“This established how different contexts (e.g.topic area, type of research and setting) affected processes (e.g.training and support), mechanisms (e.g.relationships and communication) and outcomes of PPI (e.g.evidence of changes, responsiveness to PPI input and impact on dissemination).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The scoping exercise obtained information about PPI from 182 studies out of a possible total of 478 (38%).
“The scoping exercise obtained information about PPI from 182 studies out of a possible total of 478 (38%) (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
- Findingown data
Even when the protocol was available on the funder's or study's website, there was little information about PPI.
“Significantly, even when the protocol was available on the funder's or study's website, there was little information about PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One of our findings from this initial scoping exercise is that there is minimal direct open access to such study documentation.
“Indeed, one of our findings from this initial scoping exercise is that there is minimal direct open access to such study documentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Replicating the findings from the RAPPORT study, the importance of relationships emerged as central in this study.
“Replicating the findings from the RAPPORT study, the importance of relationships emerged as central in this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Having a local person to co-ordinate PPI travel, expenses and other practical matters was found to be very important.
“Having a local person to co-ordinate PPI travel, expenses and other practical matters was found to be very important, as was accommodating preferences for written/hard copy materials rather than electronic communications:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the scoping we were unable to find evidence of PPI in 49% of studies.
“Within the scoping we were unable to find evidence of PPI in 49% of studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The original project's assumptions about the different roles, expectations and capacities of the various PPI representatives within the RAPPORT study needed revisiting over time.
“The original project's assumptions about the different roles, expectations and capacities of the various PPI representatives within the RAPPORT study needed revisiting over time: 'Being on an advisory group I found quite limiting'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was evidence of a dual role: study participants also acting as advisors either concurrently with being a participant, or sequentially.
“There was also evidence of a dual role: study participants also acting as advisors either concurrently with being a participant, or sequentially.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Co-researchers gained personally from carrying out the research, finding it stimulating.
“As found within the RAPPORT study, the co-researchers gained personally from carrying out the research: stimulating to get me back to using my brain a bit more and think about research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Paradoxically, open-text responses in the survey emphasised the challenge of representativeness.
“Paradoxically, open-text responses in the survey emphasised the challenge of representativeness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Study design alone was not a predictor of engagement with PPI.
“Study design alone was not a predictor of engagement with PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a short survey focused on gaining descriptive detail on the current extent of PPI, it was not possible to identify any specific rationale for not having PPI within a study.
“In a short survey focused on gaining descriptive detail on the current extent of PPI, it was not possible to identify any specific rationale for not having PPI within a study (see Chapter 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within the scoping we were unable to find evidence of any PPI in nearly half of the studies.
“Within the scoping we were unable to find evidence of any PPI in nearly half of the studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Respect for and accommodation of PPI representatives' different skill mixes and requirements was an issue.
“Respect for and accommodation of PPI representatives' different skill mixes and requirements was an issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There were some differences in how PPI was approached by research topic and study design.
“However, there were some differences in how PPI was approached by research topic and study design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over a 2.5-year study, illness meant that at times it was difficult for some PPI representatives to travel long distances or into London and be as involved in the RAPPORT study as they would have liked.
“Over a 2.5-year study, illness has meant that at times it was difficult for some PPI representatives to travel long distances or into London and be as involved in the RAPPORT study as they would have liked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
From the survey we found that nearly half of PPI representatives were already known to the study team when it invited them to be lay advisers.
“From the survey we found that nearly half of PPI representatives were already known to the study team when it invited them to be lay advisers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In both the scoping and survey it was clear that some respondents did not distinguish between involvement and study participation.
“In both the scoping and survey it was clear that some respondents did not distinguish between involvement and study participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Accommodating preferences for written/hard copy materials rather than electronic communications was found to be very important.
“Having a local person to co-ordinate PPI travel, expenses and other practical matters was found to be very important, as was accommodating preferences for written/hard copy materials rather than electronic communications:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
With some noteworthy exceptions, there was sparse evidence of systematic evaluation of PPI within studies.
“With some noteworthy exceptions, there was sparse evidence of systematic evaluation of PPI within studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
While still challenging for a number of studies and funders, recruiting a diverse range of lay people was enhanced when the study setting interfaced with a diverse population.
“While still challenging for a number of studies and funders, recruiting a diverse range of lay people was enhanced when the study setting interfaced with a diverse population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was relatively sparse evidence of systematic evaluation happening overall.
“However, there was relatively sparse evidence of systematic evaluation happening overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Survey results indicated that 29% of studies had 21 or more individual patient or public representatives involved.
“Survey results indicated that 29% of studies had 21 or more individual patient or public representatives involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The research approach did appear to influence what particular aspects of PPI were highlighted by respondents as challenging.
“The research approach did appear to influence what particular aspects of PPI were highlighted by respondents as challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Basic science or tissue bank design studies appear to have a limited role for PPI.
“Basic science or tissue bank design studies appear to have a limited role for PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were similar proportions of studies having PPI in the older studies (as measured by being 'closed' on the UKCRN portfolio) and in the open studies.
“There were similar proportions of studies having PPI in the older studies (as measured by being 'closed' on the UKCRN portfolio) and in the open studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
It was therefore not possible to make an accurate assessment about PPI models.
“It was therefore not possible to make an accurate assessment about PPI models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
A surprising finding was the existence of a dual role.
“A surprising finding was the existence of a dual role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Low levels of involvement were reported in data analysis, data collection and report writing in either the scoping study or the survey.
“Low levels of involvement were reported in data analysis, data collection and report writing in either the scoping study or the survey (Table 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is little difference in the overall range of activities between each topic area.
“However, Figure 7 shows that there is little difference in the overall range of activities between each topic area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Researchers' descriptions of 'usual suspects' as lay representatives reflected a perception of concerns about the professionalisation of PPI.
“In contrast, researchers' descriptions of 'usual suspects' as lay representatives reflected a perception of concerns about the professionalisation of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Seventy-nine per cent of researcher respondents said they knew of a local or regional and public group that had supported research.
“Seventy-nine per cent of researcher respondents said they knew of a local or regional and public group that had supported research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PPI was most likely to be embedded when hosted in well-resourced research centres with a dedicated budget and PPI co-ordinator.
“It was clear from the case studies that PPI was most likely to be embedded when hosted in well-resourced research centres with a dedicated budget and PPI co-ordinator.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most frequent type of answer given was 'the design stage/at the beginning/as early as possible'.
“The most frequent type of answer given was 'the design stage/at the beginning/as early as possible'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We also found evidence in the survey and case studies that a dual role of being both participant and lay representative was being undertaken.
“We also found evidence in the survey and case studies that a dual role of being both participant and lay representative was being undertaken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In both the scoping and the survey, IDD studies, compared with the other topic areas, had the highest percentage of studies with evidence of the presence of PPI (scoping 91%; survey 100%).
“In both the scoping and the survey, IDD studies, compared with the other topic areas, had the highest percentage of studies with evidence of the presence of PPI (scoping 91%; survey 100%) (Table 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
It also exemplified a 'one-off' model whereby PPI was limited to a single task.
“It also exemplified a 'one-off' model whereby PPI was limited to a single task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the survey there was an overall trend for much higher levels of PPI across all topic areas than in the scoping.
“However, in the survey there was an overall trend for much higher levels of PPI across all topic areas than in the scoping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This was further influenced by the topic area's history of PPI and the tacit models that had evolved.
“This was further influenced by the topic area's history of PPI and the tacit models that had evolved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
An unexpected finding was the invisibility of publicly accessible information on PPI in research studies.
“An unexpected finding was the invisibility of publicly accessible information on PPI in research studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The resulting impact was culturally sensitive, participant-focused research designs.
“The resulting impact was culturally sensitive, participant-focused research designs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main way in which the researchers said they had altered their practice had been by consulting PPI at proposal writing stage to 'define research questions' and making objectives 'more realistic' and 'patient-orientated'.
“The main way in which the researchers said they had altered their practice had been by consulting PPI at proposal writing stage to 'define research questions' and making objectives 'more realistic' and 'patient-orientated'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The four studies reporting this in the survey suggested the benefit of this was the provision of direct feedback which could be used to improve research processes and outcomes.
“The four studies reporting this in the survey suggested the benefit of this was the provision of direct feedback which could be used to improve research processes and outcomes:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The findings from the scoping and survey suggest that funder requirements and study design appear to be the biggest influences on the extent of PPI within a study.
“The findings from the scoping and survey suggest that funder requirements and study design appear to be the biggest influences on the extent of PPI within a study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Breakdown in this relationship had a profound effect on levels of PPI embeddedness over time.
“Breakdown in this relationship had a profound effect on levels of PPI embeddedness over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An important finding in both the survey and the case studies was the dual role, whereby the lay advisor was also a study participant.
“An important finding in both the survey and the case studies was the dual role, whereby the lay advisor was also a study participant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most common theme that emerged was recruitment and how to gain access to 'representative' service users, mentioned by about one-third of respondents.
“The most common theme that emerged was recruitment and how to gain access to 'representative' service users, mentioned by about one-third of respondents:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our analysis showed that various interpretations of PPI were apparent among researchers.
“Our analysis showed that various interpretations of PPI were apparent among researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fewer than half of the survey studies had actually costed for PPI in their proposals.
“We also expected that resources would also be an enabler of PPI and yet fewer than half of the survey studies had actually costed for PPI in their proposals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In testing whether or not topic area had an influence on the embedding of PPI, we found similarity between the nature of the clinician-patient relationship and the way PPI was enacted.
“In testing whether or not topic area had an influence on the embedding of PPI, we found similarity between the nature of the clinician-patient relationship and the way PPI was enacted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Particular PPI structures helped, including an outreach model with either a specific lay person or a co-ordinator acting as a bridge to a broader community.
“Particular PPI structures helped, including an outreach model with either a specific lay person or a co-ordinator acting as a bridge to a broader community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both mixed-methods and clinical trials had higher levels of PPI than basic science (scoping 21%, survey 67%), tissue bank (scoping 33%, survey 43%) and other (observational studies and 'cohort') (scoping 0%, survey 71%).
“Both of them had higher levels of PPI than basic science (scoping 21%, survey 67%), tissue bank (scoping 33%, survey 43%) and other (observational studies and 'cohort') (scoping 0%, survey 71%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies which were clinical trials had the highest proportion of respondents naming PPI as having the most impact at the design stage.
“Studies which were clinical trials had the highest proportion of respondents naming PPI as having the most impact at the design stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Topic area was therefore not predictive of the range of PPI roles within a study.
“Topic area was therefore not predictive of the range of PPI roles within a study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The survey results suggested that a minority of respondents were equating PPI with participation in research.
“However, the survey results suggested that a minority of respondents were equating PPI with participation in research:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The quality of such connections was important to create the context for involvement.
“The quality of such connections was important to create the context for involvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
How PPI was operationalised in individual studies could be traced back to the funder's ethos of PPI.
“In addition, how PPI was operationalised in individual studies could be traced back to the funder's ethos of PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For case studies not hosted by organisations with existing PPI structures, an alternative was to recruit an ad hoc, project-specific group of people or individuals to support the study as PPI.
“For case studies not hosted by organisations with existing PPI structures, an alternative was to recruit an ad hoc, project-specific group of people or individuals to support the study as PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CS08, the PPI respondent was also a study participant.
“This dual role was overt in another arthritis-related study (CS08) (Box 13), where the PPI respondent was also a study participant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clinicians who were also researchers had the added advantage of having ready access to patients as potential PPI representatives.
“Clinicians who were also researchers had the added advantage of having ready access to patients as potential PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Other funding bodies taking part in the RAPPORT study had only recently started to implement PPI strategies in their organisations.
“The other funding bodies taking part in the RAPPORT study had only recently started to implement PPI strategies in their organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Funding organisations that received government public funding as part of a national research agenda clearly articulated the reasons for PPI in methodological terms.
“The funding organisations that received government public funding as part of a national research agenda clearly articulated the reasons for PPI in methodological terms:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The systematic review design required more effort from the research team to ensure that parents were involved and the review was rigorous, compared with the ongoing qualitative research being undertaken in the programme of work.
“The study design (systematic review) (C3), compared with the ongoing qualitative research being undertaken in the programme of work, required more effort from the research team to ensure that parents were involved and the review was rigorous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Providing PPI infrastructure often involved having a designated lead for PPI.
“This often involved having a designated lead for PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Structures and processes for PPI within funder organisations varied and strongly reflected the influence of their core funding source, mission, scale and length of service.
“Structures and processes for PPI within funder organisations themselves inevitably varied and strongly reflected the influence of their core funding source, mission, scale and length of service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
If the whole team was not engaged with PPI, the loss of the PPI champion had a detrimental impact.
“If the whole team was not engaged with PPI, the loss of the PPI champion had a detrimental impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was a strong focus on positive relationships that were developed over time and enhanced by social activities.
“There was a strong focus on positive relationships (C5) that were developed over time and enhanced by social activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Continuity of personnel with responsibility for PPI was an issue.
“Continuity of personnel with responsibility for PPI was an issue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CS14, the distinction between being involved and being a research participant was often blurred, with PPI being understood by many respondents as a dual role.
“However, the distinction between being involved and being a research participant was often blurred in this case study, with PPI being understood by many of the respondents as a dual role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Case studies funded by NIHR funding streams were required to have PPI as a different way of working within the actual research process because of the emphasis on the methodological importance of PPI.
“Case studies funded by NIHR funding streams were required to have PPI as a different way of working within the actual research process because of the emphasis on the methodological importance of PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CS21 exemplified fully embedded PPI which was enabled by all eight identified contexts.
“Case study 21 exemplified fully embedded PPI which was enabled by all eight identified contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Six CMO configurations explained salient case study actions, potential contexts, plausible mechanisms and potential outcomes, both intended and unintended.
“We identified six CMO configurations that explained salient case study actions, potential contexts, plausible mechanisms and potential outcomes, both intended and unintended.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The difficulties for public health studies in accessing representative PPI were also linked to the setting (e.g. broad communities) in which they took place.
“The difficulties for public health studies was also linked to the setting (e.g.broad communities) in which they took place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CS21 demonstrated an 'entwined' model of PPI in which research and PPI were wrapped together much like a double helix.
“It also demonstrated an 'entwined' model of PPI in which research and PPI were wrapped together much like a double helix.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Two tissue bank studies also had lay representatives who advised but also had donated samples.
“Two tissue bank studies also had lay representatives who advised but also had donated samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Difficulties in accessing 'representative' PPI were particularly marked for public health studies when the focus was on healthy or 'at-risk' populations with particular lifestyles.
“Difficulties in accessing 'representative' PPI were particularly marked for public health studies when the focus was on healthy or 'at-risk' populations with particular lifestyles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Having someone to lead and co-ordinate was important in embedding PPI.
“As described in Purpose, structure and role of patient and public involvement, having someone to lead and co-ordinate was important in embedding PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even with funder expectations, only a limited number of case studies were reflecting on and evaluating PPI in an ongoing way to improve the quality of PPI processes and outcomes.
“However, even with funder expectations, only a limited number of case studies were reflecting on and evaluating PPI in an ongoing way to improve the quality of PPI processes and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The findings suggested there were eight enabling contexts for the mechanisms.
“The findings suggested there were eight enabling contexts for the mechanisms (Box 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Host organisations with an established PPI infrastructure, such as an established group or panel and access to training, facilitated the purpose, structure and role of PPI.
“It was also facilitated by host organisations with an established PPI infrastructure, such as an established group or panel, and access to training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses and time contributed to maintaining trust.
“Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses and time contributed to maintaining trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Having adequate resources to maintain the PPI group in terms of administration and reimbursement was vital for sustained engagement with PPI in research.
“Having adequate resources to maintain this group in terms of administration and reimbursement was vital for sustained engagement with PPI in research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
At the time of data collection, some topic areas (dementia and diabetes mellitus) provided this enabling context with network support for PPI.
“At the time of data collection, this enabling context was provided by some topic areas (dementia and diabetes mellitus) with network support for PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Three additional enabling contexts (training, positive relationships, positive experience) became visible during data collection and analysis.
“The other three (training, positive relationships and positive experience) became visible during data collection and analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The entwined model generated some research programmes that would not have been run without lay involvement.
“This generated some research programmes that would not have been run without lay involvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Novice researchers were more likely to be unable to fully distinguish PPI as separate from research participation.
“Novice researchers were more likely to be unable to fully distinguish PPI as separate from research participation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For some case studies, the purpose, structure and role for PPI were an inherent part of the research design.
“For some case studies, the purpose, structure and role for PPI were an inherent part of the research design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Funder requirements played a key role in influencing levels of reimbursement.
“We found that funder requirements played a key role in influencing levels of reimbursement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A major finding from interviews with funder representatives was that their stances or values (and thus PPI structures and processes) were actively shaped by the origin of their funding and their histories.
“A major finding from the interviews with funder representatives was that their stances or values (and thus PPI structures and processes) were actively shaped by the origin of their funding and their histories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The need for time to develop a PPI infrastructure that could support embedded PPI was also clear in CS22.
“The need for time to develop a PPI infrastructure that could support embedded PPI was also clear in CS22 (Box 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In CS13, the dual role was carefully constructed and managed in a longitudinal cohort study.
“In contrast, this dual role was carefully constructed and managed in a longitudinal cohort study (CS13, see Box 16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Host organisations, and in particular CLAHRCs, were instrumental in providing a PPI infrastructure.
“Host organisations, and in particular CLAHRCs, were instrumental in providing a PPI infrastructure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Medical charities reliant on fundraising spoke of PPI in terms of an ethical rationale.
“In contrast, the medical charities reliant on fundraising spoke of PPI in terms of an ethical rationale:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
A characteristic of studies with fully embedded PPI was that opportunities for PPI in all parts of the research process were fully exploited.
“A characteristic of studies with fully embedded PPI was that opportunities for PPI in all parts of the research process were fully exploited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The benefits of PPI representatives having the opportunity to get to know each other also provided support later in the project.
“The benefits of PPI representatives having the opportunity to get to know each other also provided support later in the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a varying sense of equality within the committee.
“As shown in CS04 (see Box 22), there was a varying sense of equality within the committee:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sustained feedback to PPI representatives was a clear enabler of trust and continued engagement.
“Sustained feedback to PPI representatives was a clear enabler of trust and continued engagement:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Those case studies which had high levels of PPI activity could achieve this through flexibility and allowing PPI representatives to 'dip in and out' as their other commitments also varied.
“Those case studies which had high levels of PPI activity could achieve this through flexibility and allowing PPI representatives to 'dip in and out' as their other commitments also varied:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was also some evidence that researchers felt concerned that some PPI representatives who lacked scientific understanding could jeopardise a study at the design stage.
“There was also some evidence that researchers felt concerned that some PPI representatives who lacked scientific understanding could jeopardise a study at the design stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Researchers often reported that the pressure to recruit research participants (during data collection) resulted in less capacity to enable involvement of PPI representatives.
“Researchers often reported that the pressure to recruit research participants (during data collection) resulted in less capacity to enable involvement of PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We found that the relationship between the researchers and PPI representatives was a key factor for successful PPI.
“We found that the relationship between the researchers and PPI representatives was a key factor for successful PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The distinctive characteristic of case studies that enabled involvement at all stages of the research process was the presence of a dedicated individual facilitating PPI (e.g. CS21, see Box 6).
“The distinctive characteristic of case studies that enabled involvement at all stages of the research process was the presence of a dedicated individual facilitating PPI (e.g.CS21, see Box 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
This was often enabled by the host organisation, such as a CLAHRC or research centre.
“This was often enabled by the host organisation, such as a CLAHRC or research centre.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One finding from the case studies was that the majority of PPI representatives had a previous working relationship with the research team.
“One finding from the case studies was that the majority of PPI representatives had a previous working relationship with the research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Only two of the case studies provided any evidence of systematically appraising the PPI contribution to their study.
“Only two of the case studies provided any evidence of systematically appraising the PPI contribution to their study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Performing the necessary tasks for PPI appeared limited to certain stages of the research cycle.
“Performing the necessary tasks for PPI appeared limited to certain stages of the research cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
This was further enabled by having a pool of lay representatives (C6) with sufficient interest and expertise to contribute effectively at all stages of the research.
“This was further enabled by having a pool of lay representatives (C6) with sufficient interest and expertise to contribute effectively at all stages of the research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There were reservations from some researchers on the potential for PPI in the early work of basic science designs (C3).
“There were reservations from some researchers on the potential for PPI in the early work of basic science designs (C3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The relationship between the researchers and the PPI representatives was key to fully embedding PPI within the research study.
“The relationship between the researchers and the PPI representatives was key to fully embedding PPI within the research study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Despite it often being seen as good practice, there was little evidence that this relational integration was being formalised through job descriptions or contracts for the PPI representatives.
“Despite it often being seen as good practice, there was little evidence that this relational integration was being formalised through job descriptions or contracts for the PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Among the five case studies reimbursing for time, the amounts ranged from £25 per meeting to £75.
“Among the five case studies reimbursing for time, the amounts ranged from £25 per meeting to £75.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In more formal advisory or steering committee meetings, PPI representatives spoke of being specifically welcomed into the meeting (sometimes being met beforehand).
“In more formal advisory or steering committee meetings, PPI representatives spoke of being specifically welcomed into the meeting (sometimes being met beforehand).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Case study 15 exemplified how, even when resources were minimal for PPI, the very existence of mutual trust resulted in positive PPI impact.
“Case study 15 (Box 19) exemplified how, even when resources were minimal for PPI, the very existence of mutual trust resulted in positive PPI impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trust in CS16 was lost because of a lack of formal agreements about access and ownership of a database.
“However, trust in CS16 (Box 20) was lost because of a lack of formal agreements about access and ownership of a database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Hence, the host organisations that managed reimbursement and arrangements seamlessly made lay representatives feel a collegial partner with the organisation.
“Hence, the host organisations that managed reimbursement and arrangements seamlessly made lay representatives feel a collegial partner with the organisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Many researchers felt comfortable involving PPI representatives in the general review of study documents but not so certain about involvement in other parts of the research process.
“Many researchers felt comfortable involving PPI representatives in the general review of study documents but not so certain about involvement in other parts of the research process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The forum in which researchers and lay representatives came together was also an important enabling context for trust.
“The forum in which researchers and lay representatives came together was also an important enabling context for trust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Being unable to meet in person also caused problems in CS18, where the CI and lay representative were in different regions.
“As presented in Strategies for recruiting lay representatives, being unable to meet in person also caused problems in CS18, where the CI and lay representative were in different regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was evidence of an ongoing debate about whether or not the experience of a condition (direct or indirect) was seen as less legitimate because of that person's professional background, experience or training in research or health care.
“There was evidence of an ongoing debate about whether or not the experience of a condition (direct or indirect) was seen as less legitimate because of that person's professional background, experience or training in research or health care:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In contrast, host organisations (C7) that had embedded PPI infrastructures were more likely to evaluate and fine-tune PPI processes in a collaborative way.
“In contrast, host organisations (C7) that had embedded PPI infrastructures were more likely to evaluate and fine-tune PPI processes in a collaborative way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was evidence that this focus on evaluation, although not fully assessing and comparing impact, was resulting in some modification to the funder's PPI work, for example developing advice to support lay representatives on trial steering committees.
“There was evidence that this focus on evaluation, although not fully assessing and comparing impact, was resulting in some modification to the funder's PPI work, for example developing advice to support lay representatives on trial steering committees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Approaches to evaluating the outcomes and impact of PPI were shaped by the funding organisation's stance towards PPI.
“approaches to evaluating the outcomes and impact of PPI were shaped by the funding organisation's stance towards PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In addition to the outcomes which were identified in terms of the research project, the researchers and PPI representatives also identified personal outcomes associated with their PPI role.
“In addition to the outcomes which were identified in terms of the research project, the researchers and PPI representatives also identified personal outcomes associated with their PPI role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These five case studies were continuing to work with their lay representatives to generate further research questions.
“These five case studies were continuing to work with their lay representatives to generate further research questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In a longitudinal cohort study (CS14) there was evidence that being a case study within the RAPPORT study provided the opportunity for participants to reflect on PPI and plan things differently for the future.
“in a longitudinal cohort study (CS14) there was also evidence that being a case study within the RAPPORT study provided the opportunity for participants to reflect on PPI and plan things differently for the future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Data collection tools such as questionnaires were 'softened' by PPI representatives in terms of language and sensitivity (CS09, CS21).
“Data collection tools such as questionnaires were 'softened' by PPI representatives in terms of language and sensitivity (CS09, CS21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Lay representatives were also used as a link to recruit study participants.
“Lay representatives were also used as a link to recruit study participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PPI representatives made comments on the protocol and design of the study in 13 of the case studies, particularly regarding lay summaries, data collection instruments and study information.
“Patient and public involvement representatives made comments on the protocol and design of the study in 13 of the case studies, particularly regarding lay summaries, data collection instruments and study information (Box 31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In those studies which contained an intervention as part of their study design, PPI representatives helped to design or make suggestions to existing interventions to make them more acceptable/feasible.
“In those studies which contained an intervention as part of their study design, PPI representatives helped to design or make suggestions to existing interventions to make them more acceptable/feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A positive experience of PPI was often the start of the process to establish PPI as normal practice.
“A positive experience of PPI was often the start of the process to establish PPI as normal practice”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Three main models of PPI were identified: a bounded, one-off model, an outreach model and a fully intertwined model.
“Three main models of PPI were identified: a bounded, one-off model, an outreach model and a fully intertwined model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CS07 PPI representatives were involved in the validation of 260 pre-and post-questionnaires (which were used as part of the intervention).
“In another case study (CS07) PPI representatives were involved in the validation of 260 pre-and post-questionnaires (which were used as part of the intervention).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Researchers commonly attributed recruitment success to the PPI input to materials (suggestions on layout, size, language, colour, length, readability, clarity and design; evidenced by tracked changes/before and after versions of documents) used for recruitment (PIS, invitation letters, consent forms).
“Researchers commonly attributed recruitment success to the PPI input to materials (suggestions on layout, size, language, colour, length, readability, clarity and design; evidenced by tracked changes/before and after versions of documents) used for recruitment (PIS, invitation letters, consent forms).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our tracking interviews suggested that, in a number of cases where it had been planned that PPI representatives would be involved in dissemination, this had not happened.
“our tracking interviews suggested that, in a number of cases where it had been planned that PPI representatives would be involved in dissemination, this had not happened.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One of the most frequently stated outcomes for PPI in our case studies was a perceived increase in recruitment rates to the research study (18 of the 22 case studies).
“One of the most frequently stated outcomes for PPI in our case studies was a perceived increase in recruitment rates to the research study (18 of the 22 case studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Funders' requirements (C1) were a strong enabling context for evaluation.
“Funders' requirements (C1) were a strong enabling context for evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the eight completed case studies, we found no evidence of any immediate outcomes of PPI for the research findings.
“Among the eight that were completed, we found no evidence of any immediate outcomes of PPI for the research findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The case studies included in RAPPORT are sufficient to identify the impacts and outcomes of PPI in NIHR-funded research.
- Findingown data
There was no systematic appraisal of the observable impact of PPI by condition-specific medical charities.
“However, there was no systematic appraisal of this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Where managed carefully, such experience for both research teams and lay representatives was also evidenced in the RAPPORT study.
“Where managed carefully, such experience for both research teams and lay representatives was also evidenced in the RAPPORT study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our findings suggested that, in a minority of case studies, simply providing feedback on, for example, the study results, despite being one-way information giving, was seen by some participants as active involvement.
“Our findings suggested that, in a minority of case studies, simply providing feedback on, for example, the study results, despite being one-way information giving, was seen by some participants as active involvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In CS02, PPI views (through a national charity panel) changed the application to include a safety questionnaire.
“PPI views (through a national charity panel) changed the application to include a safety questionnaire”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some case studies agreed to be part of the RAPPORT study as an aid to meet the requirement to report on PPI.
“some case studies agreed to be part of the RAPPORT study as an aid to meet this requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Echoing the earlier survey of Barber et al., the RAPPORT survey findings suggested that some researchers still have difficulty in distinguishing between research participation and PPI activities.
“Echoing the earlier survey of Barber et al., 163 the RAPPORT survey findings suggested that some researchers still have difficulty in distinguishing between research participation and PPI activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barber et al., 163
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
There was evidence that researchers perceived an unintended outcome of PPI.
“However, there was also evidence that researchers perceived an unintended outcome of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A number of researchers also felt PPI was worthwhile to them personally beyond impact just on the research process and outcomes.
“A number of researchers also felt PPI was worthwhile to them personally beyond impact just on the research process and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The requirement to report on PPI when NIHR-funded projects were completed was a major incentive for researchers to review processes and benefits of PPI in the project.
“the requirement to report on PPI when NIHR-funded projects were completed was a major incentive for researchers to review processes and benefits of PPI in the project.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Involving patients' groups in the governance of a study had evidence of potentially improving patient safety.
“Involving patients' groups in the governance of a study had evidence of potentially improving patient safety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As presented in each CMO configuration, case study actions led to a number of methodological and moral impacts and outcomes.
“As presented in each CMO configuration, case study actions led to a number of methodological and moral impacts and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The case studies included in RAPPORT are sufficient to identify the impacts and outcomes of PPI in NIHR-funded research.
- Findingreasoning
Having developed over time, embedded PPI infrastructures also enabled positive relationships (C5) in which researchers and lay members could reflect honestly on what and what had not worked well.
“Having developed over time, embedded PPI infrastructures also enabled positive relationships (C5) in which researchers and lay members could reflect honestly on what and what had not worked well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The respondents most likely to confuse these terms were those less involved in submitting grant applications, such as research assistants or research nurses.
“The respondents most likely to confuse these terms were those less involved in submitting grant applications, such as research assistants or research nurses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
PPI as a dynamic process was significantly compromised when relationships broke down.
“PPI as a dynamic process was significantly compromised when relationships broke down.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PPI representatives also made a contribution to data analysis.
“Patient and public involvement representatives also made a contribution to data analysis (Box 33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Case studies involving marginalised groups, such as those with learning disabilities and IDDs, did not have particular problems in recruiting PPI representatives thanks to the existing infrastructure for PPI developed in these areas.
“Interestingly, those of our case studies which involved marginalised groups, such as those with learning disabilities and IDDs, did not have particular problems in recruiting PPI representatives thanks to the existing infrastructure for PPI developed in these areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
There was qualifying evidence that outcome measures had been changed or added to in the research design.
“There was qualifying evidence here that the outcome measures had been changed or added to in the research design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Patient and public involvement within a study was also partially shaped by the lay recruitment method.
“Patient and public involvement within a study was also partially shaped by the lay recruitment method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
A third stance (policy) was the initial trigger for many of the researchers and the centrally funded funders to engage with PPI.
“A third stance (policy) described in Chapter 2, was the initial trigger for many of the researchers and the centrally funded funders to engage with PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The quest to find a person (or a group) with characteristics as close as possible to a target study population was particularly challenging for research teams in public health studies, where the target population would not necessarily see themselves as having a health condition or need.
“The quest to find a person (or a group) with characteristics as close as possible to a target study population 173 was particularly challenging for research teams in public health studies, where the target population would not necessarily see themselves as having a health condition or need.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Beresford, 2005, Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research, Epidemiologia e Psychiatria Sociale source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Some case studies from the IDD topic area clearly presented a strongly coherent moral stance on PPI.
“In contrast, some case studies from the IDD topic area clearly presented a strongly coherent moral stance on PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of the data from these respondents suggested three pathways.
“Analysis of the data from these respondents suggested three pathways (see Figures 9 and 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Many of these groups were able to reimburse lay members for work in developing grant applications, a particularly challenging issue raised by many that could then be addressed.
“Many of these groups were also able to reimburse lay members for work in developing grant applications, a particularly challenging issue raised by many 17 that could then be addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Staniszewska, 2007, User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
This often shifted to a subsequent 'conversion' to PPI when researchers appraised outcomes of PPI as having had a benefit on the research outcomes.
“However, this often shifted to a subsequent 'conversion' to PPI when they appraised outcomes of PPI as having had a benefit on the research outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
How often PPI representatives were involved in successive research stages in our case studies could be presented as a decreasing double bell shape, with activity focused on project set-up and to a lesser extent the dissemination phase.
“How often PPI representatives were involved in successive research stages in our case studies could be presented as a decreasing double bell shape, with activity focused on project set-up and to a lesser extent the dissemination phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Overall quality of research improved through PPI.
“Overall quality of research improved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most common forum in our case studies was some form of study management committee.
“The most common forum in our case studies was some form of study management committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four case studies utilised PPI to provide links to the wider community.
“Four case studies utilised PPI to provide links to the wider community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
A frequently found narrative was of researchers 'having to do' PPI because of revised governance requirements.
“A frequently found narrative, illustrated in Figure 9, was of researchers 'having to do' PPI because of revised governance requirements.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Department of Health, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Five of the case studies reported that PPI representatives had been involved in research priority setting.
“Five of the case studies reported that PPI representatives had been involved in research priority setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The PPI costs required in a grant application proved a surprise to a minority of researchers.
“However, the PPI costs required in a grant application proved a surprise to a minority of researchers, suggesting that further work needs to be done in helping researchers understand the resource implications of supporting PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In CS02, the single lay representative on the steering committee consulted with a wider range of people from the study target population.
“Case study 02 exemplified this approach, with the single lay representative on the steering committee consulting with wider range of people from the study target population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Varying the methods of PPI recruitment was one means by which researchers tried to address the issue of PPI representativeness.
“Varying the methods of PPI recruitment was one means by which researchers tried to address the issue of PPI representativeness, an often-questioned issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The RAPPORT study was provided evidence of PPI impact in identifying research questions.
“We were provided evidence of PPI impact in identifying research questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Research teams advocated the use of PPI for outcome measures that were relevant to patients.
“Research teams advocated the use of PPI for outcome measures that were relevant to patients; this was particularly relevant to one arthritis study:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two main stances, methodological and moral, appeared to shape the ways in which respondents viewed and operationalised PPI.
“Two main stances, methodological and moral, appeared to shape the ways in which our respondents viewed and operationalised PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Two studies had PPI representatives involved directly in data collection.
“Two studies had PPI representatives involved directly in data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In many of these committees lay representatives felt well supported and that their voice was heard, often primarily enabled by relational work.
“In many of these committees lay representatives felt well supported and that their voice was heard, often primarily enabled by relational work (discussed in Contextual enablers for patient and public involvement: relationships).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We had no evidence of any of our lay respondents 'shopping around' for research projects to be involved in.
“Although we had no evidence of any of our lay respondents 'shopping around' for research projects to be involved in, it could also be seen that one of the condition-specific charities had framed the end-user of the research as being the consumer, and consequently including both patient and clinician as their 'user representatives'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The RAPPORT data suggested a far more dynamic framework than that of Oliver et al., 132, recognising subtle changes over time.
“However, the RAPPORT data suggested a far more dynamic framework (Figure 11) than that of Oliver et al., 132 recognising subtle changes over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliver et al., 132
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Despite the growing body of literature, there is relatively little evidence of PPI's impact and outcomes.
“Despite the growing body of literature outlined in the previous section, there is relatively little evidence of PPI's impact and outcomes.99”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Jagosh, 2014, Critical reflections on realist review: insights from customizing the methodology to the needs of participatory research assessment, Res Synthesis Methods source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Oliver et al. found detailed reports of 87 examples of PPI influencing the identification or prioritisation of research topics.
“They found detailed reports of 87 examples of PPI influencing the identification or prioritisation of research topics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Oliver, 2004, Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The RAPPORT study design, data collection, analysis, management and dissemination were conducted in partnership with lay co-applicants/co-researchers, service user reference groups and lay members of the study advisory group.
“The RAPPORT study design, data collection, analysis, management and dissemination have been conducted in partnership with two lay coapplicants/ co-researchers, one co-researcher, two service user reference groups and four lay members of the study advisory group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
One reason for the weak evidence on PPI impact is the difficulty that confused terminology or poor reporting poses for finding evidence of PPI impact in the literature.
“One reason for this is the difficulty that confused terminology or poor reporting poses for finding evidence of PPI impact in the literature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In addition, the majority of included reports were descriptive accounts written by researchers rather than service user representatives.
“In addition, the majority of included reports were descriptive accounts written by researchers rather than service user representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Oliver, 2004, Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The case study approach provided the methodological flexibility to generate theoretical insights from the results.
“It also provided the methodological flexibility to generate some theoretical insights from our results.147”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147] Marinetto, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
A co-researcher's independent inductive coding added to the rigour and validity of data analysis as similar themes emerged.
“This co-researcher devised her own set of inductive codes and analysed the transcripts using her own coding system.The use of this separate coding process added to the rigour and validity of data analysis as similar themes emerged:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The system of checking and critiquing the analysis was a way of more deeply interrogating the data and exploring alternative explanations, not merely promoting consensus.
“This system of checking and critiquing the analysis was not merely to promote consensus but was a way of more deeply interrogating the data and exploring alternative explanations.157”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Barbour, 2001, Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The survey findings suggested that certain topic areas and study designs have different influences on researchers when working with PPI representatives.
“In terms of NPT, this highlights the construct of collective action where the necessary tasks for PPI are performed; as per our hypothesis, the survey findings suggested that certain topic areas and study designs have different influences on researchers when working with PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In applying the NPT framework to the findings there were indications of barriers to embedding PPI.
“However, in applying the NPT framework to the findings there were indications of barriers to embedding PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It was also indicative of a lack of training or experience in PPI, particularly in novice researchers.
“It was also indicative of a lack of training or experience in PPI, particularly in novice researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Funders influenced PPI in subtly different ways depending on their organisational values.
“Hence, funders influenced PPI in subtly different ways depending on their organisational values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This level of resources was necessary for an entwined model of PPI.
“This level of resources was necessary for an entwined model of PPI (see Chapter 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This move towards 'virtual' contact as opposed to 'face to face' has implications for the establishment of relationships.
“However, this move towards 'virtual' contact as opposed to 'face to face' has implications for the establishment of relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
A relationship framed by trust was the minimum requirement for PPI to have a positive impact.
“A relationship framed by trust was the minimum requirement for PPI to have a positive impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As an enabling context for embeddedness, it was not necessarily how the PPI was organised but how much PPI representatives were encouraged to be involved and were exposed to different areas of the study throughout its stages where they could have an impact.
“As an enabling context for embeddedness, it was not necessarily how the PPI was organised but how much PPI representatives were encouraged to be involved and were exposed to different areas of the study throughout its stages where they could have an impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If PPI is limited to engagement, this precludes the full potential of involvement.
“If PPI is limited to engagement, this precludes the full potential of involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Longer-term outcomes influenced by PPI need an extensive time to detect.
“It is clear that, as in all evaluation of research impact, longer-term outcomes influenced by PPI need an extensive time to detect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 269
- May combine two claims. 320
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of researchers and PPI representatives felt that PPI is worthwhile but its impact difficult to prove.
“The majority of researchers and PPI representatives felt that PPI is worthwhile but its impact difficult to prove.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenTwenty-two case studies were included in the final stage.
“Twenty-two case studies were included”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 206 interviews were completed.
“A total of 206 interviews were completed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThese studies were also likely to demonstrate outcomes from the moral perspective, such as increased self-worth for lay representatives.
“These studies were also likely to demonstrate outcomes from the moral perspective, such as increased self-worth for lay representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRange of outcomes per case study was influenced by design and the model of PPI, and case studies with the most embedded PPI were likely to demonstrate the greatest number of PPI-related outcomes.
“Range of outcomes per case study was influenced by design and the model of PPI, and case studies with the most embedded PPI were likely to demonstrate the greatest number of PPI-related outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the survey stage, 360 eligible studies were identified, and following one e-mail reminder the response rate was 28% (n=101).
“We identified 360 eligible studies, and following one e-mail reminder had a response rate of 28% (n = 101).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe outreach model was an effective model of PPI, was less resource-intensive for researchers and was found in a range of research designs.
“This was an effective model of PPI, was less resource-intensive for researchers and was found in a range of research designs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIt was important that the research team did not abdicate PPI responsibility to the co-ordinator and was also fully committed to PPI.
“However, it was also important that the research team did not abdicate PPI responsibility to the co-ordinator and was also fully committed to PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe outreach model required finding lay representatives able to provide a link to the community and is unsustainable without appropriate funding for charities undertaking this role.
“However, it did require finding lay representatives able to provide this link and is unsustainable without appropriate funding for charities undertaking this role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the outreach model, although there tended to be fewer PPI representatives, they acted as a bridge between the research and the wider community.
“although there tended to be fewer PPI representatives, they acted as a bridge between the research and the wider community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGood relationships were established and maintained by regular communication, managing meetings to address power imbalances and providing opportunities for informal engagement.
“This was done by regular communication, managing meetings in order to address power imbalances and providing opportunities for informal engagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataObservable evidence of impact was more difficult to find, although one case study did report rises in recruitment rates since PPI representatives had made changes to participant information sheets.
“Observable evidence of impact was more difficult to find, although one case study did report rises in recruitment rates since PPI representatives had made changes to participant information sheets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNPT is a candidate MRT to inform the policy perspective on PPI, but in practice its constructs systematically inform all three viewpoints.
“Specifically, it is a candidate MRT to inform the policy perspective on PPI, but we found in practice that its constructs systematically inform all three viewpoints and therefore we used it explicitly to similarly inform our methodological approach”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe cases achieved appeared remarkably balanced.
“The cases we achieved appeared remarkably balanced, especially since the body of research in progress at any one time cannot be balanced according to our project's specifications, but will be dictated by wider historical and political trends, biases and service needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The body of research in progress at any one time is dictated by wider historical and political trends, biases and service needs, and cannot be balanced according to project specifications.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThese were then divided into the 478 included in the scoping, and 360 for the online survey.
“These were then divided into the 478 included in the scoping, and 360 for the online survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne hundred and two studies were excluded as not in the specific topic areas, 263 as more than 2 years old and 261 as commercially funded.
“One hundred and two were excluded as not in the specific topic areas, 263 as more than 2 years old and 261 as commercially funded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataDocuments received in response to requests for PPI information included 93 protocols, 12 journal articles, 64 e-mail replies, 10 interim/final reports and 3 IRAS forms.
“Documents received in response to requests for PPI information included 93 protocols, 12 journal articles, 64 e-mail replies, 10 interim/final reports and 3 Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) forms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe survey included 40% clinical trials, 33% quantitative and qualitative, 12% basic science and 7% tissue/bank database and a further 7% were coded 'other' (as insufficient information to classify).
“The survey included 40% clinical trials, 33% quantitative and qualitative, 12% basic science and 7% tissue/bank database and a further 7% were coded 'other' (as insufficient information to classify).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 28% survey response rate yields findings that are representative of the surveyed population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom the first e-mail there was a 17% response rate and following the reminder there was a total of 101 responses to the survey (28% response rate).
“From the first e-mail there was a 17% response rate and following the reminder there was a total of 101 responses to the survey (28% response rate) (Table 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 28% survey response rate yields findings that are representative of the surveyed population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 206 interviews were conducted: 119 initial interviews with researchers and PPI representatives and 77 tracking interviews.
“The researchers and PPI representatives from the case studies were interviewed a number of times over the course of the study while the funders/network were interviewed only once; this gave a total of 206 interviews comprising 119 initial interviews with researchers and PPI representatives and 77 tracking interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 101 studies surveyed ranged in sample size from 5 to 300,000, and grants awarded ranged from less than £50,000 (8% of sample) to 30 over £1M (30% of sample).
“The 101 studies surveyed ranged in sample size from 5 to 300,000, and grants awarded ranged from less than £50,000 (8% of sample) to 30 over £1M (30% of sample).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 28% survey response rate yields findings that are representative of the surveyed population.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningA total of 838 studies were included.
“A total of 838 studies were included (Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataForty-two per cent of the scoping studies were clinical trials, 33% were mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative non-clinical trials), 10% were basic science and 15% were tissue bank/database.
“Forty-two per cent of the scoping studies were clinical trials, 33% were mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative non-clinical trials), 10% were basic science and 15% were tissue bank/database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFunding was split evenly between NIHR (40%) and charities (40%).
“Funding was split evenly between NIHR (40%) and charities (40%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 28% survey response rate yields findings that are representative of the surveyed population.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe studies in the scoping had sample sizes ranging from 12 to 250,000, with a median of 250.
“The studies in the scoping had sample sizes ranging from 12 to 250,000, with a median of 250.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn total 129 participants were recruited for interview: 64 researchers, 48 PPI representatives, 7 PPI co-ordinators, and 10 funders/network representatives.
“In total 129 participants [64 researchers, 48 PPI representatives, 7 PPI co-ordinators (attached to six of the case studies) and 10 funders/network representatives] were recruited for interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn total 23 case studies were recruited in accordance with the sampling strategy.
“In total we recruited 23 case studies in accordance with our sampling strategy as shown in Table 8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe two main funders were NIHR (29%) and charities (29%).
“The two main funders were NIHR (29%) and charities (29%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo co-researchers had a history of working with the CI and the team based at the University of Hertfordshire, with prior shared understanding and trust that developed during the project.
“Two of the co-researchers had a history of working with the CI and the team based at the University of Hertfordshire: there was prior shared understanding and trust, and this developed during the time of the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFour PIRG members submitted initial ideas for the research proposal, and their contribution actively shaped and informed the proposal design.
“Four members of the University of Hertfordshire PIRG submitted initial ideas for the research proposal; their contribution actively shaped and informed the proposal design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRelationships had to develop with new members of the advisory group and with the reference groups, and these took time to establish.
“Relationships had to develop with new members of the advisory group and with the reference groups, and these took time to establish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne co-researcher was disappointed she was not able to do more interviews and had expectations of doing more than the research team were able to organise.
“One co-researcher (Co-researcher02) was 'disappointed' that she was not able to do more interviews and had expectations of doing more than the research team were able to organise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe co-researcher's disappointment was also because of her own problems with availability of dates and different topic areas.
“However, she acknowledged this was also because of her own problems with availability of dates and different topic areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo of the co-researchers had different qualitative data analysis skills, two PPI representatives did not use computers and preferred to receive and annotate paper copies, and one PPI representative on the advisory group asked for contact to be made by text.
“For example, two of the co-researchers had different qualitative data analysis skills, two of the PPI representatives did not use computers and preferred to receive and annotate paper copies and one PPI representative on the advisory group asked for contact to be made by text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPPI in the RAPPORT study was not tokenistic, and lay contributors were treated as colleagues making contributions of equal value to researchers.
“None of this [PPI] has been tokenistic and lay contributors were treated as colleagues making contributions of equal value to that of the researchers throughout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataHaving support for personal and practical queries improved inclusiveness and contribution.
“There was feedback that having support for personal and practical queries improved inclusiveness and contribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe project advisory group had 22 members, met in person every 6 months, and was well attended by five lay representatives and the lay chair.
“The project advisory group (a total of 22 members) met in person every 6 months and was well attended by the five lay representatives and the lay chair.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe scoping illustrated that there is a limited amount of publicly accessible information about PPI within research documentation and most of the information we obtained was through e-mailed requests to the study teams.
“The scoping illustrated that there is a limited amount of publicly accessible information about PPI within research documentation and most of the information we obtained was through e-mailed requests to the study teams (see Chapter 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-researchers copresented findings at four conferences and meetings, and one co-researcher attended two of the four national dissemination events; health needs prevented lay copresentation at all events.
“The co-researchers copresented findings at four conferences and meetings while the project progressed.They were also fully involved in the RAPPORT national dissemination events, where the CI gave a formal presentation and the intention was to have a lay copresenter on each occasion.However, health needs of co-researchers prevented this from happening.One co-researcher attended two of the four”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA co-researcher felt they had a lot in common with the respondent and that the connection made it feel more like a chat than an interview.
“[I had a] lot in common with her . . .think the connection we made was important, both had daughter with [health condition] . . . it felt more like you were having a chat as opposed to doing an interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCo-researchers were embedded in the research project, whereas other lay contributors had episodic input.
“The co-researchers, as members of the research team, attended the advisory group, but their roles were different: they were 'embedded' in the research project, where other lay contributors had episodic input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSurvey respondents were more likely than scoping respondents to report PPI within their study (79%), but 17% reported they did not have PPI, and for a further 4% (n=4) it was unclear whether or not what was being described was PPI.
“Survey respondents were more likely than scoping respondents to report PPI within their study (79%), but 17% reported they did not have PPI, and for a further 4% (n = 4) it was unclear whether or not what was being described was PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-researchers saw all relevant paperwork and were kept informed of issues and progress.
“This has been made possible by ensuring we saw all relevant paperwork and were kept informed of issues as they arose and about progress as it took place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThree co-researchers were involved throughout the study, particularly in case study data collection and analysis.
“There were three co-researchers: the two coapplicants plus a mother of a child with CF.These three were involved throughout the study, but were particularly involved in case study data collection (interviewing) and analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne co-researcher commented on the challenge of keeping everyone in PPI in 'the loop' being a task with other PPI colleagues at a distance, but there was continued involvement and commitment to keeping all in touch and involved.
“One co-researcher commented on: the challenge of keeping everyone in PPI in 'the loop' being a taskwith our other PPI colleagues being at a distance, but there was continued involvement and commitment to keeping all in touch and involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProtocols obtained directly from research teams confirmed that there was little space or official requirement to record PPI, with only one-third of protocols including any PPI information.
“For example, protocols obtained directly from research teams confirmed that there was little space or official requirement to record PPI, with only one-third of protocols including any PPI information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was positive feedback that the RAPPORT project did not feel tokenistic.
“There was also positive feedback about the improvements over time: 'advisory groups have a bad reputation in PPI as having been tokenistic, this project did not feel like that'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-researcher02 enjoyed collaborating, particularly team and advisory meetings and methodological discussions, and felt thoroughly involved and appreciated.
“I enjoyed everything about collaborating in the study but particularly participating in all the team and advisory meetings, the discussion on methodological issues and theoretical approaches.I appreciated being involved in all aspects and felt thoroughly involved and appreciated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPPI members of an advisory group have a real role of accountability and PPI need to play a part in that.
“it was then acknowledged that 'they have a real role of accountability and PPI need to play a part in that'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, PPI has had a demonstrable impact on the RAPPORT study at all stages of the research cycle, particularly during the case study stage.
“Overall, PPI has had a demonstrable impact on the RAPPORT study at all stages of the research cycle, particularly during the case study stage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataCo-researchers' comments and suggestions were discussed and acted on where agreed appropriate.
“Our comments and suggestions have been discussed and acted on where it was agreed they were appropriate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSurvey respondents suggested that PPI impact is greatest in the early stages of research, although there were examples given of impact throughout the research process.
“Survey respondents suggested that PPI impact is greatest in the early stages of research, although there were examples given of impact throughout the research process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA respondent felt the PPI interviewer used careful and gentle questioning, encouraged reflection, and made them feel like a real person rather than an object of research.
“There was careful and gentle questioning, never intrusive, and she encouraged me carefully to think of other things I might have missed.Throughout the interviews I have had with her, I felt I was a real person and not an object of research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe co-researcher reflected on the difficulty of keeping a lay role and not getting carried away with theoretical and methodological aspects, and a recognition of her own bias.
“This co-researcher also reflected on the 'difficulty of keeping sometimes, a lay role and not getting carried away with all the theoretical and methodological aspects . . .and a recognition of my own bias'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEleven data analysis sessions were held with researchers and co-researchers, and only one further meeting was held without the co-researchers.
“Once the interviews were transcribed, 11 data analysis sessions (including training) were held with the researchers and the co-researchers (either individually or as a team).Only one further data analysis meeting was held without the co-researchers when they were unable to attend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBasic science or tissue bank design studies appeared to have a limited role for PPI, although there were examples in the survey where these designs had PPI present.
“Basic science or tissue bank design studies appeared to have a limited role for PPI, although there were examples in the survey where these designs had PPI present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFour PIRG members responded to the funding call, and two volunteered as co-applicants while two contributed informally.
“Details of the call [for funding] were circulated to the PIRG for comment and initial ideas; four members responded.Responses were fed into the pool of initial ideas about the proposal.Ideas were fed back to the PIRG as they developed and after two weeks of on-line discussion PIRG members were asked what level of continuing activity they would like to undertake in the proposal development.Two”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPeer interviews by PPI representatives had additional perceived benefits; PPI members often had more knowledge about a particular health condition than the researcher and could better relate to interviewees.
“Interviews carried out by PPI representatives (peer interviews) had some additional perceived benefits.PPI members often had more knowledge about a particular health condition than the researcher and could better relate to the interviewees:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCo-researchers carried out a total of 14 first interviews and three tracking interviews.
“Co-researchers were supported in carrying out the telephone interviews (the majority of interviews were by phone), either at the University of Hertfordshire or in the co-researchers' homes, and carried out a total of 14 first interviews and three tracking interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe two PPIRes members on the advisory group already had relationships with coapplicants at the University of East Anglia but not with the University of Hertfordshire or other research team members, and new relationships across institutions developed over time.
“The two PPIRes members on the advisory group already had relationships with coapplicants at the University of East Anglia but not with the University of Hertfordshire or other research team members, and new relationships across institutions developed over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe co-researcher felt she had let the team down by not keeping to deadline, though the research team did not see this as a problem.
“She also felt she had 'let the team down by not keeping to deadline' (this was not seen as a problem by the research team).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThere was lay involvement as soon as the funding call came out and in developing the proposal.
“Two quotes from the report of 2010 show that there was lay involvement as soon as the funding call came out and in developing the proposal:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA respondent felt the PPI interviewer's warm personality and humour made it easy to build rapport and encouraged contribution.
“I felt her [PPI's] warm personality and humour shone through, and this made it very easy to build up a rapport with her quickly, and therefore make more effort to contribute.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAs the study progressed, recording formative reflections proved difficult to maintain, with lay representatives reporting they did not do it immediately and then forgot to do it, so opportunities were instead created to prompt and audio-record reflections informally as conversations before or after certain meetings throughout the study.
“However, as the study progressed, this proved difficult to maintain, with lay representatives reporting they did not do it immediately and then forgot to do it, so opportunities were instead created to prompt and audio-record reflections informally as conversations before or after certain meetings throughout the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne co-researcher found framing data analysis through NPT constructs intellectually stimulating, while another found interpretive approaches and NPT's abstractions very challenging.
“One co-researcher found framing data analysis through NPT constructs 'intellectually stimulating' (Co-researcher02), while another found using interpretive approaches more generally (and NPT's abstractions in particular) to be very challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPaying attendance makes lay representatives feel valued, their time valued and respected.
“paying attendance makes me feel valued, my time feel valued and respected, it is a big thing for me, not just paying me enough for the day, they are paying me, respecting me and my time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were differences in how PPI was approached by research topic; IDD had evidence of PPI in the highest percentage of studies.
“There were differences in how PPI was approached by research topic; IDD had evidence of PPI in the highest percentage of studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe benefit of peer interviewing was not considered to have the same impact across data collection; one co-researcher was unsure user involvement made much difference in an interview because the interviewer was younger and not closely related to their experience.
“However, this benefit of peer interviewing was not considered to have the same impact across data collection.Not all experiences are shared: 'I'm not sure user involvement made much difference in this interview as she was only [in her twenties] and not closely related to my experience' (Co-researcher03, 18 October 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough three out of seven tissue bank studies did not have PPI, studies with a basic science or tissue bank design did provide evidence of embedded PPI.
“Although three out of seven tissue bank studies did not have PPI, studies with a basic science or tissue bank design did provide evidence of embedded PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataRe-designing the interview schedule to be more informal and chatty, involving people with real experience, helped make interviews more relaxed, open and reciprocal.
“One of the researchers commented that 're-designing the interview schedule so that it was more informal and chatty, involving people with real experience in talking to PPI reps in similar positions, helped make interviews more relaxed, open and reciprocal' (reflections July 2014) (Box 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe personal gains from carrying out the research did not apply to the same extent to those who were not co-researchers.
“However, this did not apply to the same extent to those who were not co-researchers:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningNot all activities could be undertaken as expected, and the team worked around to find solutions.
“Not all activities could be undertaken as expected, and the team worked around to find solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTwo of the co-researchers did provide paper records of their formative thoughts at the end of the project.
“Two of the co-researchers, however, did provide the paper records of their formative thoughts at the end of the project.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAlthough we were provided with very few examples, documents submitted as part of the scoping exercise did provide some evidence of thinking around systematically evaluating PPI.
“Although we were provided with very few examples, documents submitted as part of the scoping exercise did provide some evidence of thinking around systematically evaluating PPI:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe next most frequent was 'at every stage', and mixed methods had a higher proportion of respondents naming PPI as having the most impact at all stages.
“The next most frequent was 'at every stage', and mixed methods had a higher proportion of respondents naming PPI as having the most impact at all stages:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe necessary tasks for PPI did appear to have some slight differences in topic areas, but the scoping and survey were unable to capture these nuances in detail.
“The necessary tasks for PPI did appear to have some slight differences in topic areas, but the scoping and survey were unable to capture these nuances in detail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PPI information in the scoping documents/e-mails was very limited and it was difficult to access who the PPI members were, how many there were and how they had been recruited.
“However, the PPI information in the scoping documents/e-mails was very limited and it was difficult to access who the PPI members were, how many there were and how they had been recruited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFree-text responses clearly highlighted some positive appraisal of PPI.
“Free-text responses clearly highlighted some positive appraisal of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe found only 9% of studies from the scoping with any evidence of training, whereas over one-quarter (28%) of studies with PPI in the survey had provided training for their PPI members, and 43% had directly costed for training of PPI members in the grant application.
“We found only 9% of studies from the scoping with any evidence of training, whereas over one-quarter (28%) of studies with PPI in the survey had provided training for their PPI members, and 43% had directly costed for training of PPI members in the grant application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur findings suggested this was at odds with reality and with the advantages of the experienced lay representative being able to develop a number of skills that helped their role, and enabling a career trajectory for the lay person within PPI.
“However, our findings suggested this was at odds with reality and with the advantages of the experienced lay representative being able to develop a number of skills that helped their role, and enabling a career trajectory for the lay person within PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe influence of funders could also be seen in that higher levels of PPI were found in NIHR-funded studies (scoping 75%; survey 89%) and charity-funded studies (scoping 58%; survey 78%).
“The influence of funders could also be seen in that higher levels of PPI were found in NIHR-funded studies (scoping 75%; survey 89%) and charity-funded studies (scoping 58%; survey 78%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDevelopment of positive relationships underpinned by trust was the minimal requirement for any form of PPI; this led to improved self-worth for lay people, and increased researchers' confidence in their work.
“Development of positive relationships underpinned by trust was the minimal requirement for any form of PPI; this led to improved self-worth for lay people, and increased researchers' confidence in their work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEnthusiasm or buy-in to PPI was often evident in the free-text responses; however, the extent of this buy-in must be questioned when 17% of studies from the survey reported having no PPI.
“Enthusiasm or buy-in to PPI was often evident in the free-text responses; however, the extent of this buy-in must be questioned when 17% of studies from the survey reported having no PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBeyond describing where PPI potentially has the most impact in research, we also found some limited evidence of a systematic approach to evaluating PPI impact within research.
“Beyond describing where PPI potentially has the most impact in research, we also found some limited evidence of a systematic approach to evaluating PPI impact within research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile there was some evidence of systematic evaluation, overall evidence for this was sparse.
“While there was some evidence of systematic evaluation, overall evidence for this was sparse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPPI representatives were also recruited via voluntary organisations (40%) or from an established service user group (35%), and a quarter (25%) of survey respondents reported that their PPI representatives had replied to an open invitation.
“PPI representatives were also recruited via voluntary organisations (40%) or from an established service user group (35%), and a quarter (25%) of survey respondents reported that their PPI representatives had replied to an open invitation (respondents could choose more than one option).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was also some evidence of concern about PPI representatives losing the service user perspective through a process of socialisation into the research world.
“There was also some evidence of concern about PPI representatives losing the service user perspective through a process of socialisation into the research world:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough this had the benefit of real-time feedback about the impact of the research design and enhanced a sense of ownership of the study for lay respondents, there was also evidence of conflicts of interest and a blurring of roles.
“Although this had the benefit of real-time feedback about the impact of the research design and enhanced a sense of ownership of the study for lay respondents, there was also evidence of conflicts of interest and a blurring of roles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFor basic science and tissue banks reporting PPI, this work appeared particularly important in an area of research where PPI was less commonly found.
“For basic science and tissue banks reporting PPI, this work appeared particularly important in an area of research where PPI was less commonly found.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe survey revealed that IDD had the highest median level of activities, followed by arthritis and dementia (4.0 for IDD and 3.0 for arthritis and dementia).
“The possible activities were then totalled into a score and the survey revealed that IDD had the highest median level of activities, followed by arthritis and dementia (4.0 for IDD and 3.0 for arthritis and dementia).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataResearchers were also aware of the challenge of involving the public in a meaningful and real way.
“Researchers were also aware of the challenge of involving the public in a meaningful and real way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe found PPI in IDD studies to be framed by an empowerment model and resonant of the long history of partnership working between practitioners and service users.
“For example, we found PPI in IDD studies to be framed by an empowerment model and resonant of the long history of partnership working between practitioners and service users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFree-text responses in the survey identified challenges as recruitment, communicating the research to lay people, extra resources needed, the potential for tokenism, bureaucracy, confidence of individuals to participate, managing expectations of the PPI individuals and threats to long-term commitment (such as illness).
“Free-text responses in the survey identified challenges as recruitment, communicating the research to lay people, extra resources needed, the potential for tokenism, bureaucracy, confidence of individuals to participate, managing expectations of the PPI individuals and threats to long-term commitment (such as illness).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTraining or on-the-job experience not only helped researchers to differentiate between involvement and participation, but also enhanced an understanding of what both parties bought to the table.
“Training or on-the-job experience not only helped researchers to differentiate between involvement and participation, but also enhanced an understanding of what both parties bought to the table.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most frequently represented PPI activities were being on an advisory/steering committee (65% in the scoping study) and patient information leaflet development (73% in the survey).
“The most frequently represented PPI activities were being on an advisory/steering committee (65% in the scoping study) and patient information leaflet development (73% in the survey).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe survey findings for the three topic areas of arthritis, dementia and public health showed examples of all four types of study design, and in these topic areas even basic science and tissue bank studies included some PPI elements.
“However, the survey findings for the three topic areas of arthritis, dementia and public health showed examples of all four types of study design, and in these topic areas even basic science and tissue bank studies included some PPI elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataJust over a one-third gave any information about PPI recruitment and only around one-quarter of the studies gave any information about the number of PPI representatives.
“Just over a one-third gave any information about PPI recruitment and only around one-quarter of the studies gave any information about the number of PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataResearcher perceptions of what lay representatives could be expected to understand or be interested in, coupled with a lack of effort to communicate in an accessible way, sometimes led to limiting lay involvement in parts of the research process, potentially limiting impact.
“Researcher perceptions of what lay representatives could be expected to understand or be interested in, coupled with a lack of effort to communicate in an accessible way, sometimes led to limiting lay involvement in parts of the research process, potentially limiting impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWell-established PPI structures in some topic areas such as dementia provided a pragmatic source for the lay perspective, but we found unintended outcomes for this model, including the outsourcing of PPI to external parties with little researcher engagement.
“Well-established PPI structures in some topic areas such as dementia provided a pragmatic source for the lay perspective, but we found unintended outcomes for this model, including the outsourcing of PPI to external parties with little researcher engagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataContinued engagement with the research host organisation, equitable reimbursement, and social interaction with research teams are crucial to sustaining positive relationships in PPI.
“PPI groups and panels had continued engagement with the research host organisation, were reimbursed equitably and had social interaction with the research teams; these are crucial to the sustaining of positive relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe management of expectations about what the study could deliver was mentioned by some researchers, as was reconciling the sometimes competing priorities of researchers and PPI representatives.
“The management of expectations about what the study could deliver was mentioned by some researchers, as was reconciling the sometimes competing priorities of researchers and PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEvidence of PPI was further blurred because of inconsistencies in how PPI was defined.
“However, evidence of PPI was further blurred because of inconsistencies in how PPI was defined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIt was not clear whether this role was deliberately created or was due to a lack of understanding in the difference between participation and involvement.
“It was not clear whether this role was deliberately created or was due to a lack of understanding in the difference between participation and involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe scoping and survey did not provide enough information to give a clear sense of the organisation or models of PPI, or what part the host organisation was playing in embedding PPI.
“The scoping and survey did not provide enough information to give a clear sense of the organisation or models of PPI, or what part the host organisation was playing in embedding PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe also found in areas such as basic science and tissue banks, where PPI has traditionally been seen as having a limited role, that research teams were enabling PPI, leading to improved relevance of research priorities and questions.
“However, we also found in areas such as basic science and tissue banks, where PPI has traditionally been seen as having a limited role, that research teams were enabling PPI, leading to improved relevance of research priorities and questions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThis finding was replicated in the case studies.
“This finding was replicated in the case studies (see Chapter 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIt was also surprising that the relational work to embed PPI was so prominent.
“It was also surprising that the relational work to embed PPI was so prominent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThis NPT construct proved important in our case studies.
“This NPT construct proved important in our case studies (see Chapter 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataResearchers acknowledged that PPI is a relatively recent expectation from funders, and for some studies the external expectation was key to the development of PPI.
“Researchers acknowledged that PPI is a relatively recent expectation from funders, and for some studies the external expectation was key to the development of PPI:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSixty-three per cent had used such a group and 36% said that this group had altered their practice when writing the proposal.
“Sixty-three per cent had used such a group and 36% said that this group had altered their practice when writing the proposal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn some case studies the dual role was a deliberate PPI design; however, in others it clearly demonstrated that involvement was not understood as being different from participation, and highlighted the level of PPI drift away from INVOLVE definitions.
“In some case studies the dual role was a deliberate PPI design; however, in others it clearly demonstrated that involvement was not understood as being different from participation, and highlighted the level of PPI drift away from INVOLVE definitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTopic-specific issues were mentioned, with dementia studies identifying the extra time needed for PPI and diabetes mellitus studies the need to clearly explain information about the research.
“Topic-specific issues were mentioned, with dementia studies identifying the extra time needed for PPI and diabetes mellitus studies the need to clearly explain information about the research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWritten answers seemed to link this to the recognised need to build and sustain good relationships with patient groups in order to identify priorities and gain the research materials they needed.
“Written answers seemed to link this to the recognised need to build and sustain good relationships with patient groups in order to identify priorities and gain the research materials they needed:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe survey showed that 50% of PPI representatives involved in research projects were patients or service users known to the researcher/clinician and that very few were recruited via their local NHS comprehensive local research network or RDS.
“Furthermore, the survey showed that 50% of PPI representatives involved in research projects were patients or service users known to the researcher/clinician and that very few were recruited via their local NHS comprehensive local research network or RDS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither scoping nor survey found any relationship between sample size or geographical area and levels of PPI.
“Neither scoping nor survey found any relationship between sample size or geographical area and levels of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSecond highest were arthritis (60%) in the scoping and dementia in the survey (87%).
“Second highest were arthritis (60%) in the scoping and dementia in the survey (87%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCS13 was a well-resourced study with dedicated PPI staff and good organisation, and was run from community hospitals at the heart of local populations.
“This was a well-resourced study with dedicated PPI staff and good organisation, and was run from community hospitals at the heart of local populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis funding organisation's structure was less complex and was led by a member of staff responsible for both public involvement and engagement.
“The structure of this funding organisation was less complex and was led by a member of staff responsible for both public involvement and engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA government-funded research council had endorsed its PPI strategy only a year before and there was now a strategic vision around PPI.
“A government-funded research council had endorsed its PPI strategy only a year before and there was now a strategic vision around PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS08, the lay representative actively recruited participants through her own network and had a strong sense of purpose.
“While there are potential ethical conflicts here, this lay representative actively recruited participants through her own network and had a strong sense of purpose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCS22 captured the early days of study set-up and developing PPI, so radar plots were less full.
“This case study captured the early days of study set-up and developing PPI, so radar plots were less full.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFunder requirements for plain English summaries were bringing into sharp focus the need to be able to explain technical aspects of the research in an accessible way, and the most effective way of doing this was to work in partnership with lay representatives.
“Funder requirements (C1) for plain English summaries were bringing into sharp focus the need to be able to explain technical aspects of the research in an accessible way, and the most effective way of doing this was to work in partnership with lay representatives (C5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningResourcing PPI with a dedicated budget and co-ordinator enabled a fully entwined model of PPI, in which lay people and researchers worked seamlessly together, with research priorities and research questions created by lay people.
“Resourcing PPI in such a way also enabled a fully entwined model of PPI, in which lay people and researchers worked seamlessly together, with research priorities and research questions created by the lay people involved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenWithin funding organisations there was a growing interest in evaluating processes and outcomes of PPI within studies.
“Within funding organisations there was a growing interest in evaluating processes and outcomes of PPI within studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCase studies funded by charities tended to have less focus on a requirement for PPI in the actual research process, with structures in their organisation concentrated more on ensuring PPI in funding decisions.
“In contrast, those funded by charities tended to have less focus on a requirement for PPI in the actual research process, with structures in their organisation concentrated more on ensuring PPI in funding decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCS21 was hosted within a research centre primarily funded by a charity, with a topic area (children with severe cognitive disabilities) where active involvement of parents was seen as a prerequisite of meaningful research.
“It was hosted within a research centre primarily funded by a charity (C1) with a topic area (children with severe cognitive disabilities) (C3) where active involvement of parents was seen as a prerequisite of meaningful research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIf clearly articulated, funders' expectations of reimbursement were an enabling context, as was the topic area if reimbursement was normal practice.
“If clearly articulated, funders' expectations (C1) of reimbursement were an enabling context, as was the topic area (C3) if reimbursement was normal practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIf there was not a designated co-ordinator, this role was often carried out in addition to a junior researcher role and was not part of the original job description.
“If there was not a designated co-ordinator, this role was often carried out in addition to a junior researcher role and was not part of the original job description.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPPI structures had developed either quite systematically or more recently and organically as part of the overall PPI movement.
“PPI structures had developed either quite systematically or more recently and organically as part of the overall PPI movement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDifferent levels of commitment to the PPI lead role were found and PPI representatives spoke of often not having one 'designated person'.
“Different levels of commitment to this role were found and PPI representatives spoke of often not having one 'designated person'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSix of the case studies had a dedicated PPI co-ordinator who was separate from the research team, and a further case study had a research team member who took on the role of the PPI co-ordinator as part of their duties.
“Six of the case studies had a dedicated PPI co-ordinator who was separate from the research team, and a further case study had a research team member who took on the role of the PPI co-ordinator as part of their duties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataResearchers were particularly aware that when applying for specific grants there were even stronger imperatives to have PPI as a funding requirement.
“Researchers were particularly aware that when applying for specific grants there were even stronger imperatives to have PPI as a funding requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPublic engagement was seen as a key policy driver within this organisation, and strategically it focused on facilitating research teams to improve its public engagement, with PPI being seen as operationalised at research team level.
“Public engagement was seen as a key policy driver within this organisation, and strategically it focused on facilitating research teams to improve its public engagement, with PPI being seen as operationalised at research team level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenPPI was recognised as a part of the contemporary research landscape.
“PPI was recognised as a part of the contemporary research landscape”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn CS13, the impact of the dual role included both increased public engagement with the study and improved participant retention.
“The impact of this role included both increased public engagement with the study and improved participant retention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHost organisations had a key role in providing resources for reimbursement and ensuring payment was smooth.
“Host organisations (C7) had a key role in providing resources (C4) for reimbursement and ensuring payment was smooth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTopic area was an enabling factor and respondents from two national networks covering dementia and diabetes mellitus both held a list of names of interested PPI representatives.
“Topic area (C3) was an enabling factor and respondents from two national networks covering dementia and diabetes mellitus both held a list of names of interested PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCS21 had a colocated co-ordinator who, as a non-researcher, was seen to bridge the gap between researchers and the public.
“Case study 21 (Box 6) had a colocated co-ordinator who, as a non-researcher, was seen to bridge the gap between researchers and the public:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe topic area of CF had little history of established PPI structures, and the study designs are more commonly towards basic science.
“The topic area of CF had little history of established PPI structures, and the study designs are more commonly towards basic science.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis organisation had a PPI panel of around 20 members who were offered the opportunity to be involved in particular funded projects; alternatively, the organisation would ask specific medical charities to nominate lay representatives for particular condition-specific projects.
“This organisation had a PPI panel of around 20 members who were offered the opportunity to be involved in particular funded projects; alternatively, the organisation would ask specific medical charities to nominate lay representatives for particular condition-specific projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAnother large national funder, financed through endowments, had a different stance on PPI, focusing more on public engagement.
“Another large national funder, financed through endowments, had a different stance on PPI, focusing more on public engagement:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningStudies taking place in settings with ready access to patients had greater potential for recruiting both participants and PPI representatives onto their studies.
“Those studies taking place in settings with ready access to patients obviously had greater potential for recruiting both participants and PPI representatives onto their studies:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningA distinct action of case studies where PPI was embedded was engagement of the whole team with PPI, and having the skill set to do this.
“A distinct action of case studies where PPI was embedded was engagement of the whole team with PPI, and having the skill set to do this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataResources included the time researchers needed to work with parents on the systematic review.
“Resources also included the time researchers needed to work with parents on the systematic review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis needed time to achieve and could also be helped through specific training.
“This needed time to achieve (C4) and could also be helped through specific training (C2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOther case studies sometimes had to craft a PPI structure from new because of the funder's requirements.
“Other case studies sometimes had to craft a PPI structure from new because of the funder's requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe centre was part of a CLAHRC with a vibrant PPI community and resources for PPI, and parents were reimbursed for their time and received training for their role.
“The centre was also part of a CLAHRC with a vibrant PPI community and resources for PPI (C4), and parents were reimbursed for their time and received training (C2) for their role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFunder respondents asserted that PPI both in research and at funder and system level had developed significantly over the previous 5 years, though there was still some way to go until it was fully embedded as normal practice.
“Overall, the funder respondents clearly asserted that PPI both in research and at funder and system level had developed significantly over the previous 5 years, describing a journey along a continuum of learning and understanding of PPI, despite noting that there was still some way to go until it was fully embedded as normal practice:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn CS08, the action-orientated approach to PPI resulted in a fuller quadrant in the radar plot denoting a positive appraisal of the PPI within CS08.
“This action-orientated approach to PPI resulted in a fuller quadrant in the radar plot denoting a positive appraisal of the PPI within CS08 (see bold outline in box figure).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCS03 and CS23 were funded to coproduce an intervention (self-management website and mobile phone applications for young people with diabetes mellitus).
“For example, CS03 (see Box 10) and CS23 (see Box 21) were funded to coproduce an intervention (self-management website and mobile phone applications for young people with diabetes mellitus).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEmbedding PPI to this level required not only resources but also time to develop.
“However, embedding PPI to this level required not only resources but also time to develop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth networks had ready access to around 150-250 regularly involved and engaged PPI representatives; had been approached by researchers for PPI in protocol development, funding before the application stage, help with PPI budgets and recruitment; and often organised local focus groups to gather PPI views.
“Both networks had ready access to around 150-250 regularly involved and engaged PPI representatives; had been approached by researchers (in this topic area and beyond) for PPI in protocol development, funding before the application stage, help with PPI budgets and recruitment; and often organised local focus groups to gather PPI views.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne network had a formal registration process on its website (updated annually, around 3000 names) and the other had a more informal, dynamic list based on personal relationships.
“One network had a formal registration process on its website (which was updated annually and had around 3000 names) and the other spoke of a more informal, dynamic list based on personal relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile formal training had a part to play in helping both researchers and the public to understand each other's roles in research, positive relationships sustained over time led to PPI as a positive experience and the development of trust, which was key for this action.
“While formal training (C2) had a part to play in helping both researchers and the public to understand each other's roles in research, positive relationships (C5) sustained over time led to PPI as a positive experience (C8) and the development of trust, which was key for this action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAt the start of data collection PPI was already embedded in CS21, so there was no change in the tracking radar plots over time.
“At the start of data collection PPI was already embedded in CS21, so there was no change in the tracking radar plots over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenTwo overarching programme management organisations and two research programmes funded by central government had, over a number of years, developed similar, embedded structures for PPI within their organisations.
“Working closely with INVOLVE, two overarching programme management organisations and two research programmes that are funded by central government had, over a number of years, developed similar, embedded structures for PPI within their organisations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor the public undertaking the dual role in CS13, there was a sense of ownership of the study, with subsequent sustained engagement.
“For the public undertaking this dual role, there was a sense of ownership of the study, with subsequent sustained engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe sheer volume of applications to process could potentially result in PPI representatives having to work with a conveyor belt approach.
“However, the sheer volume of applications to process could potentially result in the PPI representatives having to work with a conveyor belt approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFunder requirements were a significant enabling context and had resulted in a more structured approach to PPI.
“Funder requirements were a significant enabling context, and had resulted in a more structured approach to PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAnother possibility was for research teams to access external PPI groups or panels.
“However, another possibility was for research teams to access external PPI groups or panels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough respondents in CS08 were comfortable with the dual role, it was operationalised in an ad hoc manner that was unlikely to lead to any embedding of PPI.
“Although respondents in CS08 were comfortable with this dual role, it was operationalised in an ad hoc manner that was unlikely to lead to any embedding of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIt was particularly evident as an action in the IDD topic area.
“It was particularly evident as an action in the IDD topic area (C3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS13, a rolling PPI panel was drawn from study participants and the role was clearly defined and separated.
“A rolling PPI panel was drawn from study participants and the role was clearly defined and separated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe research centre had an established PPI system including a funded co-ordinator who supported parents and undertook extensive outreach work.
“The research centre (C7) had an established PPI system (C6) including a funded co-ordinator who supported parents and undertook extensive outreach work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe formal term 'steering committee' put some PPI representatives off.
“However, the formal term 'steering committee' put some PPI representatives off:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne paid charity representative said her workload was such that she did PPI work in her own time.
“One paid charity representative said her workload was such that she did PPI work in her own time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA complementary or alternative approach was having a lay coapplicant who was fully involved from the inception of the design, and sometimes undertook an outreach role, or worked as an integral part of the research team.
“A complementary or alternative approach was having a lay coapplicant who was fully involved from the inception of the design, and sometimes undertook an outreach role, or worked as an integral part of the research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningThe study focus on processes of care also enabled coherence in CS07.
“The study focus on processes of care (C3) also enabled coherence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough none of our case studies was user-led, as described in the previous section some did have lay representatives as coapplicants or co-researchers (CS04, CS19, CS21 and CS23), although levels of involvement also varied.
“Although none of our case studies was user-led, as described in the previous section some did have lay representatives as coapplicants or co-researchers (CS04, CS19, CS21 and CS23), although levels of involvement also varied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere were concerns that this was becoming the 'gold-standard' of PPI and people questioned if all study designs are suited to having PPI representatives as coapplicants.
“There were concerns that this was becoming the 'gold-standard' of PPI and people questioned if all study designs are suited to having PPI representatives as coapplicants:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCase study 07 was enabled through an established diabetes network group housed in the host organisation.
“Case study 07 was enabled through an established diabetes (C3) network group (C6) housed in the host organisation (C7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe challenges of building and sustaining relationships through virtual contact were also raised by a funder.
“The challenges of building and sustaining relationships through virtual contact were also raised by a funder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA PPI co-ordinator working in a medical setting and talking about CTIMP research observed that, because some researchers believed patients have difficulty in understanding the science and bench side of research, they find it hard to engage and have meaningful PPI.
“A PPI co-ordinator working in a medical setting and talking about CTIMP (clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product) research observed that, because some researchers believed patients have difficulty in understanding the science and bench side of research, they find it hard to engage and have meaningful PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCo-ordinating such involvement was a significant workload, which was difficult to predict and cost for. However, as this was adapted to over time, the tracking radar plot became fuller.
“Co-ordinating such involvement was a significant workload, which was difficult to predict and cost for.However, as this was adapted to over time, the tracking radar plot became fuller.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNational charity representatives reported that they were being asked to be involved with an increasing number of research studies, which is not necessarily the main part of their work.
“National charity representatives reported that they were being asked to be involved with an increasing number of research studies, which is not necessarily the main part of their work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataBeyond stages of research, respondents identified themselves as working at different 'levels' or degrees of consultation and collaboration.
“Beyond stages of research, respondents identified themselves as working at different 'levels' or degrees of consultation and collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn most case studies there was significant PPI during study set-up, but this often decreased as the research progressed, for example when patient recruitment or data collection started.
“In most case studies there was significant PPI during study set-up, but this often decreased as the research progressed, for example when patient recruitment or data collection started.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough PPI was not embedded within CS14, the relationship between lay representatives and the clinician was based on trust built up from a clinician-patient relationship with continuity over time.
“Although PPI was not embedded within CS14 (see Box 26), the relationship between lay representatives and the clinician was based on trust built up from a clinician-patient relationship with continuity over time:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of our case studies had PPI representatives as members of steering committees (one or more lay representatives per study) which met every 3 or 6 months to advise the research team but did not necessarily have a 'hands-on' role with the research.
“The majority of our case studies had PPI representatives as members of steering committees (one or more lay representatives per study) which met every 3 or 6 months to advise the research team but did not necessarily have a 'hands-on' role with the research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReimbursing lay representatives for their time is intuitively an enabler of trust and seen as normal good practice, yet payment for time was surprisingly rare in the case studies, although all were paid for out-of-pocket expenses.
“Reimbursing lay representatives for their time is intuitively an enabler of trust and seen as normal good practice, yet payment for time was surprisingly rare in the case studies, although all were paid for out-ofpocket expenses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Reimbursing lay representatives for their time is an enabler of trust and normal good practice.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCase study 23 provided an example of virtual PPI with young adults, and also demonstrated how this medium provided an outreach model.
“Case study 23 (Box 21) provided an example of virtual PPI with young adults, and also demonstrated how this medium provided an outreach model (see Discussion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRelationships took time to establish, which was particularly difficult at the beginning of research (or even before the proposal is written).
“Relationships took time to establish, which was particularly difficult at the beginning of research (or even before the proposal is written).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIndeed CS17 (Box 23) successfully involved PPI in approving bench research proposals in genetic epidemiology through a panel model whereby the PPI representatives are presented with lay protocols written specifically for the panel.
“Indeed CS17 (Box 23) successfully involved PPI in approving bench research proposals in genetic epidemiology through a panel model whereby the PPI representatives are presented with lay protocols written specifically for the panel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThese separate meetings were envisaged to be a series of evening, face-to-face meetings with monies allocated to cover travel expenses. However, in reality, as a result of competing demands placed on the attention of this age group, the group did PPI 'virtually'.
“These separate meetings were envisaged to be a series of evening, face-to-face meetings with monies allocated to cover travel expenses.However, in reality, as a result of competing demands placed on the attention of this age group, the group did PPI 'virtually'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSocial elements were important in encouraging and maintaining continual engagement in the research study and should not be underestimated by researchers.
“Social elements were important in encouraging and maintaining continual engagement in the research study and should not be underestimated by researchers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis issue appeared midway through data collection and the impact can be quite clearly seen on the radar plots tracked over time.
“This issue appeared midway through data collection and the impact can be quite clearly seen on the radar plots tracked over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe lay representative in CS15 had an impact on recruitment processes for the study and provided a valid argument to present to the ethics committee for this approach.
“The lay representative in CS15 had an impact on recruitment processes for the study and provided a valid argument to present to the ethics committee for this approach:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile this impeded an understanding of what PPI could offer to the research process, other researchers and PPI representatives provided a variety of reasons for carrying out PPI including gaining insight into the lived experience of a particular health condition, and to provide reassurance for researchers that their research question resonates with the patient community.
“While this impeded an understanding of what PPI could offer to the research process, other researchers and PPI representatives provided a variety of reasons for carrying out PPI including gaining insight into the lived experience of a particular health condition, and to provide reassurance for researchers that their research question resonates with the patient community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the meeting, successful PPI was being 'genuinely' listened to and their comments taken on board.
“Most importantly, during the meeting, successful PPI was being 'genuinely' listened to and their comments taken on board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPatient and public involvement representatives reported that meetings needed to have a 'flat structure' where PPI representatives felt free and at ease to speak.
“Patient and public involvement representatives reported that meetings needed to have a 'flat structure' where PPI representatives felt free and at ease to speak.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe impact can also be seen in the way the PPI was appraised (hatched box); because of this experience the charity would get legal documents drawn up before working with researchers again.
“The impact can also be seen in the way the PPI was appraised (hatched box); because of this experience the charity would get legal documents drawn up before working with researchers again.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis impacted most on relational aspects, with changes evident in this sector of the NPT radar plots.
“This impacted most on relational aspects, with changes evident in this sector of the NPT radar plots.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIt can be clearly seen how M10 appears as a peak in the collective action section of the radar plot.
“It can be clearly seen how M10 appears as a peak in the collective action section of the radar plot (bold square).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis study was housed in an organisation with no PPI infrastructure and with minimal resources for PPI despite the study being funded by the NIHR.
“This study was housed in an organisation with no PPI infrastructure and with minimal resources for PPI despite the study being funded by the NIHR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOther researchers also felt that involving PPI representatives in 'technical' discussions about certain research designs was tokenistic, as they were able to contribute very little.
“Other researchers also felt that involving PPI representatives in 'technical' discussions about certain research designs was tokenistic, as they were able to contribute very little:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenResearch studies can be placed along these axes; however, within one research study there may be a mixture of individuals with varying skills and perspectives.
“Research studies can be placed along these axes; however, within one research study there may be a mixture of individuals with varying skills and perspectives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS07, lay representatives were not reimbursed for their time because of bureaucratic difficulties; rather, they were taken out for a social meal.
“However, lay representatives were not reimbursed for their time because of bureaucratic difficulties; rather, they were taken out for a social meal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough CS17 (see previous section) did involve lay representatives at all stages, researchers also raised as an issue the move towards lay representatives as coapplicants.
“Although CS17 (see previous section) did involve lay representatives at all stages, researchers also raised as an issue the move towards lay representatives as coapplicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhile the insider/outsider debate was articulated in a number of case studies, those that had embedded PPI were likely to have sustained engagement with the same group of PPI representatives over a long time.
“While the insider/outsider debate was articulated in a number of case studies, those that had embedded PPI were likely to have sustained engagement with the same group of PPI representatives over a long time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis was not only because of financial restraints but also reflected a continuing debate from a minority of respondents on how payment fitted with the notion of volunteerism.
“This was not only because of financial restraints but also reflected a continuing debate from a minority of respondents on how payment fitted with the notion of volunteerism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHowever, we found that, with appropriate training (C2) and experience, lay representatives were effectively contributing to funding decisions for basic science studies, and prioritisation for tissue bank studies.
“However, we found that, with appropriate training (C2) and experience, lay representatives were effectively contributing to funding decisions for basic science studies, and prioritisation for tissue bank studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataResearch teams spoke of initial meetings where everyone got to know each other and having these times of informality before starting on the 'academic' business.
“Research teams spoke of initial meetings where everyone got to know each other and having these times of informality before starting on the 'academic' business.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenHowever, another funder challenged assumptions about the ability of experienced PPI to review less applied, more basic science applications.
“However, another funder challenged assumptions about the ability of experienced PPI to review less applied, more basic science applications:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDifferent research teams made different uses of their steering committee members, with some members making comments only during the meeting and others who were asked to comment on documents throughout the study.
“However, different research teams made different uses of their steering committee members, with some members making comments only during the meeting and others who were asked to comment on documents throughout the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSimilarly, one funder suggested PPI was more compatible with applied science.
“Similarly, one funder suggested PPI was more compatible with applied science:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome of the case studies also ran social events outside the research, which again helped to build and maintain relationships.
“Some of the case studies also ran social events outside the research, which again helped to build and maintain relationships:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNevertheless, some felt that funding was more likely with a PPI representative as coapplicant; but this was not confirmed by any of our funder respondents.
“Nevertheless, some felt that funding was more likely with a PPI representative as coapplicant; but this was not confirmed by any of our funder respondents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the start of the study researchers often clarified expected commitments to attending meetings; other PPI input was often less formalised.
“However, at the start of the study researchers often clarified expected commitments to attending meetings; other PPI input was often less formalised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough only subtly different, the radar plots show a change in all quadrants but particularly in collective action, where M10 (trust in each other's PPI work and expertise is maintained) is included as a mechanism.
“Although only subtly different, the radar plots show a change in all quadrants but particularly in collective action (bold box), where M10 (trust in each other's PPI work and expertise is maintained) is included as a mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMaintaining arm's length relationships was acknowledged to be difficult for the army of remote lay reviewers, and they found it difficult to sustain any more active involvement.
“Maintaining arm's length relationships was acknowledged to be difficult for the army of remote lay reviewers, and they found it difficult to sustain any more active involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCase study 04 (Box 22) had one experienced lay member as coapplicant; this was enabled by the research topic being focused on a patient evaluation tool, and by having an established PPI group with experienced lay members.
“Case study 04 (Box 22) had one experienced lay member as coapplicant; this was enabled by the research topic being focused on a patient evaluation tool, and by having an established PPI group with experienced lay members.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSome researchers recognised the importance of having PPI before studies were funded but acknowledged the difficulty of finding appropriate PPI representatives in a short time frame.
“Some researchers recognised the importance of having PPI before studies were funded but acknowledged the difficulty of finding appropriate PPI representatives in a short time frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRelationships could change over time, either through loss of trust or as trust developed, as illustrated in CS19.
“Relationships could change over time, either through loss of trust or as trust developed, as illustrated in CS19 (Box 18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur findings suggested that defining PPI as a discrete and commonly understood component of research was difficult but the range of PPI representatives can be summarised through a fourfold typology based on an insider/outsider perspective (on one axis) and a range of research skills (on the other).
“Our findings suggested that defining PPI as a discrete and commonly understood component of research was difficult but the range of PPI representatives can be summarised through a fourfold typology based on an insider/outsider perspective (on one axis) and a range of research skills (on the other) (Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe research setting (ICU) provided particular challenges: consent and recruitment difficulties in a high-stress environment; difficulty in recruiting lay representatives, as they were often traumatised by their time in ICU; and lack of resources, as there was no large charitable funder.
“The research setting [intensive care unit (ICU)] provided particular challenges: consent and recruitment difficulties in a high-stress environment; difficulty in recruiting lay representatives, as they were often traumatised by their time in ICU; and lack of resources, as there was no large charitable funder.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenHowever, there was clearly a lack of reflection on whether or not having lay coapplicants made any particular impact on the research process and outcomes.
“However, there was clearly a lack of reflection on whether or not having lay coapplicants made any particular impact on the research process and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven within well-funded host organisations such as HEIs, researchers related institutional barriers to paying lay representatives within institutional systems reliant upon inappropriate standardised status classifications (such as lay people having to be classed as visiting lecturers), electronic forms and difficulties dealing with cash refunds, as well as payments affecting lay volunteers' benefi
“However, even within well-funded host organisations such as HEIs, researchers related institutional barriers to paying lay representatives within institutional systems reliant upon inappropriate standardised status classifications (such as lay people having to be classed as visiting lecturers), electronic forms and difficulties dealing with cash refunds, as well as payments affecting lay”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFunders and some researchers espoused stereotypical assumptions about the limitations of PPI in certain research designs, such as basic science, which has traditionally been an area with little PPI.
“Funders and some researchers espoused stereotypical assumptions about the limitations of PPI in certain research designs, such as basic science, which has traditionally been an area with little PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne lay representative said that they always wanted an initial face-to-face meeting to make any following (virtual) meetings easier.
“One lay representative said that they always wanted an initial face-to-face meeting to make any following (virtual) meetings easier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCase study 23 also had an advisory PPI group made up of four young people with the condition. At their request, this group was hosted separately from the research team meetings and deliberately had an 'informal feel'.
“Case study 23 also had an advisory PPI group made up of four young people with the condition.At their request, this group was hosted separately from the research team meetings and deliberately had an 'informal feel'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPPI members in CS07 met regularly and were involved in a number of projects which helped promote sustained engagement.
“PPI members met regularly and were involved in a number of projects which helped promote sustained engagement (C5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese included increased self-confidence and mental challenge.
“These included increased self-confidence and mental challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe outcome of PPI in CS02 was reassurance for patients in terms of safety and also improved recruitment rates, and a 3-month visit (for reassurance) was added to the study design for participants.
“The outcome of PPI here was reassurance for patients in terms of safety and also improved recruitment rates, and a 3-month visit (for reassurance) was added to the study design for participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA negative experience of PPI could hold up the process of establishing PPI as normal practice for some time.
“Equally, a negative experience of PPI could hold up this process for some time”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis case study (Box 26) was supported by minimal PPI infrastructure but the impact of reflection can be seen in the tracking radar plots.
“This case study (Box 26) was supported by minimal PPI infrastructure but the impact of reflection can be seen in the tracking radar plots (bold box).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPPI processes may be articulated within grant applications, there is no corresponding documentation providing evidence of monitoring or how the PPI strategy within a study may have changed as the research developed.
“PPI processes may be articulated within grant applications, there is no corresponding documentation providing evidence of monitoring or how the PPI strategy within a study may have changed as the research developed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS23 the CI felt that the PPI representatives had steered the project off course, and that the interventions developed were neither innovative nor adequately focused on the research question.
“In CS23 the CI (who was also a clinician) felt that the PPI representatives had steered the project off course, and that the interventions developed were neither innovative nor adequately focused on the research question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhile some researchers appear not to understand the differences between involvement, engagement and participation in research, there is also developmental evidence of some explicit merging of research participant and PPI roles, in which patients undertake a dual role as participants and also as lay representatives.
“While some researchers appear not to understand the differences between involvement, engagement and participation in research, 167 there is also developmental evidence of some explicit merging of research participant and PPI roles, in which patients undertake a dual role as participants and also as lay representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167] INVOLVE, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor lay representatives, a positive appraisal of PPI was shaped not only by a positive experience (C8), but also by personal outcomes.
“For lay representatives, a positive appraisal of PPI was shaped not only by a positive experience (C8), but also by personal outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor funding organisations framing PPI more in the engagement paradigm, evaluation was focused on the impact of public engagement activities, and a web-based tool was used for researchers to record their public engagement activities and outcomes.
“For the funding organisations framing PPI more in the engagement paradigm, evaluation was focused on the impact of public engagement activities, and a web-based tool was used for researchers to record their public engagement activities and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEven in research settings with minimal PPI infrastructure, there was clear evidence that establishing and maintaining relationships was crucial and required time.
“Even in research settings with minimal PPI infrastructure, there was clear evidence that establishing and maintaining relationships was crucial and required time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe found little evidence within the literature of the dual role, and discussions at our dissemination events also suggested that this was seen as very unusual, if not 'bad' practice.
“We found little evidence within the literature of the dual role, and discussions at our dissemination events also suggested that this was seen as very unusual, if not 'bad' practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe researcher co-ordinating PPI 'measures' the extent of PPI against published best practice guides to assess if PPI can be of use in further phases of the research.
“The researcher co-ordinating PPI 'measures' the extent of PPI against published best practice guides to assess if PPI can be of use in further phases of the research:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA dual role (participant/involvee) was relatively common, and an unintended consequence of the evolving national and regional PPI structure was an outsourcing of PPI, with associated researcher disengagement.
“It was also clear that a dual role (participant/involvee) was relatively common, and that an unintended consequence of the evolving national and regional PPI structure was an outsourcing of PPI, with associated researcher disengagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile the majority of our survey respondents and case studies did report having some form of PPI, they varied considerably in how many research stages and which levels of PPI activity this involved, with a few case studies showing PPI as entailing only minimal, one-off activity.
“While the majority of our survey respondents and case studies did report having some form of PPI, they varied considerably in how many research stages and which levels of PPI activity this involved, with a few case studies showing PPI as entailing only minimal, one-off activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome responses received in the scoping, survey and case studies indicated that, although the UK has one of the most extensive PPI research infrastructures in the world, there was evidence of a persisting lack of coherence in understanding and defining PPI.
“some responses received in the scoping, survey and case studies indicated that, although the UK has one of the most extensive PPI research infrastructures in the world, 165 there was evidence of a persisting lack of coherence in understanding and defining PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [165] All-Party Parliamentary Group, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of the case studies reflected on their PPI approaches only informally towards the end of the study, so there was minimal evidence of any changes within actual case studies.
“The majority of the case studies reflected on their PPI approaches only informally towards the end of the study, so there was minimal evidence of any changes within actual case studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The absence of documentary evidence of PPI changes indicates that such changes did not occur or were minimal.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor condition-specific medical charities, there was anecdotal evidence of where PPI has had an observable impact.
“For the condition-specific medical charities, again perhaps shaped by their moral stance on PPI, there was anecdotal evidence of where PPI has had an observable impact”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor others it was a sense of giving something back to the health-care system.
“For others it was a sense of giving something back to the health-care system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenOne researcher reported that PPI changes increased recruitment by 1 or 2%.
“One researcher felt able to quantify the increase in recruitment because of such PPI changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor the majority of case studies, either modifications to PPI approaches would be operationalised in future studies, or the influence of that particular case study was affecting PPI approaches within other studies.
“For the majority of case studies, either modifications to PPI approaches would be operationalised in future studies, or the influence of that particular case study was affecting PPI approaches within other studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhile the radar plots indicate a comparatively embedded level of PPI, future potential impact of PPI is constrained by researchers' beliefs.
“While the radar plots indicate a comparatively embedded level of PPI, future potential impact of PPI is constrained by researchers' beliefs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenWithin the tracking radar plot, the impact of questioning the value of the PPI in this study is marked.
“Within the tracking radar plot, the impact of questioning the value of the PPI in this study is marked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApproaches cited, however systematic, seemed descriptive and biased towards 'good news': the collection of illustrative case studies and the specific identification of PPI in the final research report.
“Approaches cited, however systematic, seemed descriptive and biased towards 'good news': the collection of illustrative case studies and the specific identification of PPI in the final research report, as described below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo of the studies had PPI input regarding study logos, and in the first study the logo was changed.
“Two of the studies had PPI input regarding study logos, and in the first study the logo was changed (Box 30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOut of these eight studies, five had demonstrated clear embedding of PPI and it was these studies that clearly identified the outcome as developing further grant applications, as more research was required.
“However, out of these eight studies, five had demonstrated clear embedding of PPI and interestingly it was these studies that clearly identified the outcome as developing further grant applications, as more research was required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHowever, funders' requirements (C1) for an evaluation of PPI in the final report were beginning to have an influence, but any evaluative work was less commonly a collaborative endeavour for a research team.
“However, funders' requirements (C1) for an evaluation of PPI in the final report were beginning to have an influence, but any evaluative work was less commonly a collaborative endeavour for a research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOf the two case studies with systematic appraisal, CS13 (see Box 16) had an annual evaluation, with a review of the PPI contribution and model at the panel annual general meeting.
“Of the two case studies with systematic appraisal, CS13 (see Box 16) had an annual evaluation, with a review of the PPI contribution and model at the panel annual general meeting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataData from programme management organisations strongly resonated with the methodological argument for PPI; hence, the organisations were actively seeking ways of evaluating the impact of PPI on research outcomes.
“The data from the programme management organisations strongly resonated with the methodological argument for PPI; hence, the organisations were actively seeking ways of evaluating the impact of PPI on research outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome of our PPI respondents reported feeling disengaged from projects because of long periods of silence, and, if results of studies were not fed back, disenchanted with research overall.
“Some of our PPI respondents reported feeling disengaged from projects because of long periods of silence, and, if results of studies were not fed back, disenchanted with research overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor some researchers a lack of robust evidence on the value of PPI was a problem.
“For some researchers a lack of robust evidence on the value of PPI was a problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn CS10 (Box 25) it was explicitly recognised that what was seen as 'worthwhile' by the general public might not be seen in the same way by researchers.
“In CS10 (Box 25) it was explicitly recognised that what was seen as 'worthwhile' by the general public might not be seen in the same way by researchers:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCase study 21 provided the RAPPORT study with numerous documents which recorded PPI activities and impact but currently did not formally evaluate PPI.
“Case study 21 provided the RAPPORT study with numerous documents which recorded PPI activities and impact but currently did not formally evaluate PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSuch connections with other groups of members of the public or service users proved to be valuable in recruitment, and in harnessing a wider range of (less accessible) PPI representatives/experiences, reassuring researchers who were concerned about the PPI representatives not being a 'typical' lay person.
“Such connections with other groups of members of the public or service users proved to be valuable in recruitment, and in harnessing a wider range of (less accessible) PPI representatives/experiences, reassuring researchers who were concerned about the PPI representatives not being a 'typical' lay person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenValues quite clearly shaped this understanding, and there was some questioning of whether or not PPI was appropriate in all study designs.
“Values quite clearly shaped this understanding, and there was some questioning of whether or not PPI was appropriate in all study designs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataResearchers spoke of PPI bringing them closer to patients or service users, and reminding the researcher about the real aim of the research.
“Researchers spoke of PPI bringing them closer to patients or service users, and reminding the researcher about the real aim of the research”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe rather mixed view on the value of PPI within CS10 can be seen in the radar plot in the case study summary.
“The rather mixed view on the value of PPI within CS10 can be seen in the radar plot in the case study summary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEight of the 22 case studies concluded during the RAPPORT data collection period, so participants could provide summative assessments of the impact and also possible longer-term outcomes of PPI.
“Eight of the 22 case studies concluded during the RAPPORT data collection period, so participants could provide summative assessments of the impact and also possible longer-term outcomes of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhile confusion between participation and involvement still persists among some junior and indeed some senior staff, the boundaries between 'engagement' and 'involvement' were sometimes even less firmly defined.
“While confusion between participation and involvement still persists among some junior and indeed some senior staff, the boundaries between 'engagement' and 'involvement' were sometimes even less firmly defined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWhen the intervention was a questionnaire (CS04, CS07) the questionnaire was altered to include items not previously considered by the researcher.
“When the intervention was a questionnaire (CS04, CS07) the questionnaire was altered to include items not previously considered by the researcher”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo of the case studies (CS17 and CS21) mentioned that the PPI representatives had presented the study findings at conferences, and six examples of academic papers with PPI representatives as coauthors were submitted to the RAPPORT study.
“Two of the case studies (CS17 and CS21) mentioned that the PPI representatives had presented the study findings at conferences, and six examples of academic papers with PPI representatives as coauthors were submitted to the RAPPORT study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PPI role helped people to keep mentally active in retirement or unemployment and provided the possibility of leading to other roles or responsibilities.
“The PPI role helped people to keep mentally active in retirement or unemployment and provided the possibility of leading to other roles or responsibilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhile the CS17 tracking radar plot showed minimal change in the reflexive monitoring segment, if expanded to the research environment in which it was hosted then a far more significant change could be noted.
“Hence, while the CS17 (see Box 23) tracking radar plot showed minimal change in the reflexive monitoring segment, if expanded to the research environment in which it was hosted then a far more significant change could be noted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThese outcomes included increased understanding of their health condition.
“these outcomes included increased understanding of their health condition”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTwo of the case studies felt that having PPI helped their ethics submission by saying that materials had been viewed and approved by PPI representatives.
“Two of the case studies felt that having PPI helped their ethics submission by saying that materials had been viewed and approved by PPI representatives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS19 PPI advice was not taken on board, as the logo had been already commissioned and developed by the team (and PPI coapplicant), but it was later criticised as being potentially insensitive by steering group PPI representatives.
“However, in CS19 PPI advice was not taken on board, as the logo had been already commissioned and developed by the team (and PPI coapplicant), but it was later criticised as being potentially insensitive by steering group PPI representatives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS03 one PPI representative suggested there should be more content on pre-pregnancy and diabetes mellitus, and the documentation confirmed that more was added into the resource intervention (Box 32).
“In CS03 one PPI representative suggested there should be more content on pre-pregnancy and diabetes mellitus, and the documentation confirmed that more was added into the resource intervention (Box 32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenHowever, the case study site was actively involved in piloting an evaluative framework for PPI with clear intentions to change its PPI practices in future to include systematic appraisal.
“However, the case study site was actively involved in piloting an evaluative framework for PPI with clear intentions to change its PPI practices in future to include systematic appraisal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExtensive future changes to PPI approaches could be inhibited by a lack of understanding of what is possible, as exemplified by CS09.
“Nevertheless, extensive future changes to PPI approaches could be inhibited by a lack of understanding of what is possible, as exemplified by CS09 (Box 27)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn other case studies PPI representatives were consulted over study design; for example, they were asked whether a RCT or partial randomised control design should be used, and PPI representatives' suggestion of a RCT design (CS07) was accepted.
“In other case studies PPI representatives were consulted over study design; for example, they were asked whether a RCT or partial randomised control design should be used, and PPI representatives' suggestion of a RCT design (CS07) was accepted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataImpact and/or outcomes were described within 13 stages of the research cycle/process and there were a range of topic areas with evidence of impact and outcomes (Table 18).
“Impact and/or outcomes were described within 13 stages of the research cycle/process and there were a range of topic areas with evidence of impact and outcomes (Table 18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOur case studies offered examples of PPI approaches adopting such methods, such as focus groups.
“Our case studies offered examples of PPI approaches adopting such methods, such as focus groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe input from CS23 was used as a basis for a practice-focused article and informed the development of the study.
“This input was used as a basis for a practice-focused article and also informed the development of the study (Box 29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe basic science studies in the RAPPORT study that did have a firm PPI underpinning adopted a partnership approach, even though at times this partnership came under strain, particularly over issues of who had more say in decisions about the use of data.
“The basic science studies in the RAPPORT study that did have a firm PPI underpinning adopted a partnership approach, 105 even though at times this partnership came under strain, particularly over issues of who had more say in decisions about the use of data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Lasker, 2001, Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage, Milbank Q source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne case study (CS01) recorded only a one-off narrowly defined PPI input, which reflected the CI's reservations about any benefits of PPI.
“For example, one case study (CS01) recorded only a one-off narrowly defined PPI input, which reflected the CI's reservations about any benefits of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne of the condition-specific charities had framed the end-user of the research as being the consumer, and consequently including both patient and clinician as their 'user representatives'.
“Although we had no evidence of any of our lay respondents 'shopping around' for research projects to be involved in, it could also be seen that one of the condition-specific charities had framed the end-user of the research as being the consumer, and consequently including both patient and clinician as their 'user representatives'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome respondents were embedded in the moral paradigm and their pathways can be depicted in Figure 10.
“Of course, some respondents were embedded in this moral paradigm and their pathways can be depicted in Figure 10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA variation in this pathway identified not only a 'conversion' in terms of the methodological benefits of PPI, but also a move towards the moral value set whereby PPI became a process that one should do because it is 'right'.
“A variation found in this pathway, also demonstrated in our analysis, identified not only a 'conversion' in terms of the methodological benefits of PPI, but also a move towards the moral value set whereby PPI became a process that one should do because it is 'right'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe research centre hosting CS21 has a large PPI group encouraged to put forward research questions, and CS21 originated from one of the parents.
“For example, the research centre hosting CS21 has a large PPI group who are encouraged to put forward research questions, and this particular case study originated from one of the parents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe centrally funded programme management organisations placed a clear focus on developing ways of capturing the methodological impact of PPI, in contrast to the condition-specific charities, which followed a clear moral imperative to involve the people who put coins into the tin.
“The centrally funded programme management organisations placed a clear focus on developing ways of capturing the methodological impact of PPI, in contrast to the condition-specific charities, which followed a clear moral imperative to involve the people who put coins into the tin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningValues could be seen to shape the way PPI was organised within funding bodies, with impact on how they evaluated PPI within their funded projects.
“It was specifically notable that values could be seen to shape the way PPI was organised within funding bodies, with impact on how they evaluated PPI within their funded projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome researchers were particularly vexed by the perceived repeated recruitment of the same group of lay people, rather than of those able to bring a fresh outsider perspective.
“However, what particularly vexed some researchers was the perceived repeated recruitment of the same group of lay people, rather than of those able to bring a fresh outsider perspective (discussed in Impact of involvement on patient and public representatives).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS17, the panel had input into deciding which research should be funded, but the study received no documentary evidence of the impact on decision-making.
“For example, the panel in CS17 had input into deciding which research should be funded, although we received no documentary evidence to show the impact on decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur analysis suggested that underpinning this assertion were several researcher beliefs, including that lay representatives would not be comfortable with the more basic science and that they lack the knowledge to understand it.
“However, our analysis suggested that underpinning this assertion were several researcher beliefs, including that lay representatives would not be comfortable with the more basic science and that they lack the knowledge to understand it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPatient organisation members recommended changes to the draft proposal, which were incorporated into the final version and current protocol.
“members recommended changes to the draft proposal and these were incorporated into the final version and into the current protocol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFunder representatives from condition-specific charities articulated PPI as a moral imperative and had given little to no thought to if and how their PPI strategies should be evaluated as appropriate or successful.
“In particular, the funder representatives from condition-specific charities articulated PPI as a moral imperative and, perhaps paradoxically, had given little to no thought to if and how their PPI strategies should be evaluated as appropriate or successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationValue sets greatly influence PPI processes within a study; and the model of PPI in each study was seen to be influenced by the CI's desired outcomes from the PPI input.
“Value sets greatly influence PPI processes within a study; and relatedly, in turn, the model of PPI in each study was seen to be influenced by the CI's desired outcomes from the PPI input.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Smith, 2008, Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice, Int J Nurs Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS18, the PPI representative was involved in data analysis; she was asked because of her cultural knowledge and to reassure the researchers that the analysis resonated with her experience of the ethnic 'community'.
“The PPI representative in CS18 was involved in data analysis; she was asked because of her cultural knowledge and to reassure the researchers that the analysis resonated with her experience of the ethnic 'community':”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataRespondents reported that the change of emphasis was fed into clinical guidelines.
“Respondents also reported that this change of emphasis was fed into clinical guidelines, which may have an impact on patient experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOur data suggested a metaphor of an 'industrialised' scale of research.
“The metaphor of an 'industrialised' scale of research suggested by our data echoes the similar argument of Ward et al. 39 that the trend towards consumerism has shaped the commodification of research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNot everyone believed that PPI was essential to each stage of a study or was persuaded that benefits far outweighed potential risks, particularly for studies nearer the laboratory end of the 'bench to bedside continuum'.
“Not everyone believed that PPI was essential to each stage of a study or was persuaded that benefits far outweighed potential risks, particularly for studies nearer the laboratory end of the 'bench to bedside continuum'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExisting groups or panels were a pragmatic source of recruitment for many researchers, and had benefits such as PPI members having some basic knowledge about the research process, providing more than one voice and having support mechanisms in place.
“Our data also suggested that existing groups or panels were a pragmatic source of recruitment for many researchers, and had benefits such as PPI members having some basic knowledge about the research process, providing more than one voice and having support mechanisms in place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn CS21, PPI involvement in data collection was deliberately not utilised because of ethical considerations; many study participants would have been known to the PPI representatives.
“In one case study where this PPI role could have been applicable but was not utilised (CS21), this was a deliberate restriction because of ethical considerations; many of the study participants would have been known to the PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn terms of amount of activities, PPI was most likely to be limited in basic science studies, where lay knowledge was generally seen by researchers as less useful in this kind of research.
“In terms of amount of activities, PPI was most likely to be limited in basic science studies, where lay knowledge was generally seen by researchers as less useful in this kind of research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn some committees, other PPI representatives reported feeling lost by language, procedures and lack of support, and unable to contribute effectively to these committees.
“However, in some committees, other PPI representatives reported feeling lost by language, procedures and lack of support, and unable to contribute effectively to these committees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAs well as seeing PPI as a given, the approach taken by researchers from these case studies was an open one, actively seeking to explore ways of capturing the impact of PPI on their research outcomes.
“However, as well as seeing PPI as a given, the approach taken by researchers from these case studies was an open one, actively seeking to explore ways of capturing the impact of PPI on their research outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe RAPPORT findings on current views of funder organisations did not reflect funders having many anxieties about PPI; the main concern from our data was the potential to overload lay representatives with reviews.
“This was not reflected in the RAPPORT findings on current views of funder organisations; the main concern from our data was the potential to overload lay representatives with reviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a general feeling that NIHR needs to 'self-publicise' and help the public understand what patient and public is and how to get involved.
“There was a general feeling the NIHR needs to 'self-publicise' and help the public understand what patient and public is and how to get involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe gender balance at the dissemination events was roughly twice as many females as males.
“The gender balance was roughly twice as many females as males.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTraining for researchers came out as a clear top priority at the London dissemination event.
“There was a variety of feedback to the RAPPORT study findings from the small group work; training for researchers came out as a clear top priority at the London event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataValues were seen to have a major influential role in all the data, and narratives offered evidence that values can and do change over time.
“While values were seen to have a major influential role in all our data, narratives also offered evidence that values can and do change over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA PPI representative suggested breaking down women's views into subgroups based on experience, which revealed big differences between the groups.
“When I initially did a straight comparison women's views versus health professional's views, [PPI02] suggested I break down the women, into those that had experience with [xxx] or [xxxx], compared them to women who haven't had any problem [xxxx] and we found quite big differences between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe need to widen participation and representativeness of PPI representatives was repeated at each dissemination event.
“The need to widen participation and representativeness of PPI representatives were repeated at each event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn total 221 people attended the four dissemination events, with roughly twice as many researchers/health professionals (n = 147) as PPI representatives (n = 74).
“In total 221 people attended the events and the mixture was roughly twice as many researchers/health professionals (n = 147) as PPI representatives (n = 74).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe RAPPORT data supported a typology of PPI in research based on who the PPI representatives were, what the forums for the PPI representative-researcher interface were, and the approaches used.
“The RAPPORT data supported a typology of PPI in research based on:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research has been criticised as poorly reported and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.
“The relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research 29 has been criticised as poorly reported 21 and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Staniszewska, 2011, The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research, Int J Technol Assess Health Care source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Staniszewska, 2011, Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact, Int J Consum Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile these reports highlighted the collective experience of research programmes in involving patients and the public, gaps were identified in training and preparing lay people.
“While these reports highlighted the collective experience of research programmes in involving patients and the public, gaps were identified in training and preparing lay people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Oliver, 2004, Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe review also highlighted multiple barriers to service users' ideas influencing research agendas, and a lack of collaborative working between the research programmes and lay people to address the way forward in collective decision-making.
“It also highlighted multiple barriers to service users' ideas influencing research agendas, and a lack of collaborative working between the research programmes and lay people to address the way forward in collective decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Oliver, 2004, Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious evaluations have failed to use methodologies that take into account PPI's complexity, arising from PPI being an interconnected, multifaceted social process, making it difficult to pinpoint specific impacts and contributions.
“First, previous evaluations have failed to use methodologies that take into account its complexity, 100 arising from PPI being an interconnected, multifaceted social process, making it difficult to pinpoint specific impacts and contributions.19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [100] Macaulay, 2011, Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review, Global Health Promot source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is little systematic appraisal and reporting of PPI impact and outcomes, further constrained by the conventions of academic publishing.
“Second, there is little systematic appraisal and reporting of PPI impact and outcomes, 101 further constrained by the conventions of academic publishing.21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [101] Shippee, Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework [published online ahead of print June 3 2013]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Staniszewska, 2011, The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research, Int J Technol Assess Health Care source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a notable lack of evidence on outcomes and impact of PPI, and what little evidence there is tends to be observational evaluations which rarely consider the links between context, models of PPI and outcomes.
“Not only is there a notable lack of evidence on outcomes and impact of PPI, 31 but what little there is tends to be observational evaluations which rarely consider the links between the context (when and where PPI happens), models of PPI (how it functions) and the outcomes of PPI (what difference it made).32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] Barber, 2011, Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study, Int J Consum Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Staley, 2014, ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRE research is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, under what conditions and for whom.
“RE research is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, under what conditions and for whom.115,123”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [115] Pawson, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [123] Wilson, 2006, Critical Realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development, Nurs Philos source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PIRICOM review included 90 papers published between 1995 and 2009.
“Ninety papers published between 1995 and 2009 were included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe partnership synergy model proposes that synergistic partnerships between PPI representatives and researchers lead to high-quality research plans with more chance of a successful outcome.
“we also drew on the partnership synergy model of Lasker et al., 105 which proposes that synergistic partnerships (between PPI representatives and researchers) lead to high-quality (research) plans with more chance of a successful outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Lasker, 2001, Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage, Milbank Q source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBarnes et al. caution against interpreting context as a purely external factor, arguing that context is shaped by actors as much as it constrains their activities.
“Barnes et al., 128 for example, also caution against interpreting context as a purely external factor, arguing that context is shaped by actors as much as it constrains their activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] Barnes, 2003, Evidence, understanding and complexity: evaluation in non-linear systems, Evaluation source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe body of literature describing PPI processes and the architecture required to enable PPI continues to grow, but still provides only comparatively weak evidence for impact and outcomes.
“However, while the body of literature describing PPI processes and the architecture required to enable PPI continues to grow, it still provides only comparatively weak evidence for impact and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe state of PPI evidence reflects significant methodological challenges in evaluating PPI as a complex intervention, and the length of time before impact may become visible.
“This reflects the significant methodological challenges in evaluating PPI as a complex intervention, and the length of time before impact may become visible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe methodological paradigm depicts PPI in research as leading to improved outcomes for the research and for all those involved.
“As the methodological paradigm also depicts PPI in research as leading to improved outcomes for the research and for all those involved”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationControlled trial designs are less able to identify how exactly variables combine to create outcomes or to fully explain the processes through which programmes actually work.
“Although such designs are well suited to assess the effectiveness of clinical treatments, it has long been recognised 110 that such research designs are less able to identify how exactly variables combine to create outcomes 111 or to fully explain the processes through which programmes actually work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [110] Fulop, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [111] Fiss, 2007, A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations, Acad Manag Rev source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationData were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).
“Data were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs in Staley's review, the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.
“As in Staley's review, 19 the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningControlled trials are by definition unable to examine the dynamic nature of interventions that evolve over time, nor to explore the effect and complexity of the wider social systems within which PPI takes place.
“Furthermore, controlled trials are, by definition, able neither to examine the dynamic nature of those interventions which, will, of necessity, evolve over time nor to explore the effect and complexity of the wider social systems within which PPI takes place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRealist evaluation is rooted in the philosophy of science situated between extremes of positivism and relativism, known as realism.
“Realist evaluation is rooted in the philosophy of science situated between extremes of positivism and relativism, known as realism.115,122”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [115] Pawson, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [122] Delanty, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile there was some evidence around the impact of PPI on influencing research questions, design, data collection, dissemination, implementation and research ethics, the most substantial body of evidence was on PPI's impact on recruitment.
“While there was some evidence around the impact of PPI on influencing research questions, design, data collection, dissemination, implementation and research ethics, the most substantial body of evidence was on PPI's impact on recruitment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationProviding a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.29,30”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Staniszewska, 2011, Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact, Int J Consum Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPPI can be defined through three different perspectives: moral, methodological and policy.
“As described in Chapter 2, PPI can be defined through three different perspectives: moral, methodological and policy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBecause of the nature of the evidence available, inconsistent reporting and the context-dependent nature of PPI, it was not possible to carry out an in-depth analysis of different kinds of impact, or to judge the quality of the evidence and determine how generalisable the results were.
“However, as with Oliver et al.'s review, 102 because of the nature of the evidence available, inconsistent reporting and the context-dependent nature of PPI, it was not possible to carry out an in-depth analysis of different kinds of impact, or to judge the quality of the evidence and determine how generalisable the results were.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] Oliver, 2004, Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.
“Hence, while there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDifferent models of PPI need to be evaluated and compared through a standardised design.
“and that different models of PPI need to be evaluated and compared through a standardised design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThey did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.
“They did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPPI within a research study may shift and develop with time, so there is a need for a longitudinal approach.
“that PPI within a research study may shift and develop with time so that there is a need for a longitudinal approach”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe evidence on PPI impact tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, comparative multiproject evaluations or studies employing quantitative designs.
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, 19,29,106 with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, 15 comparative multiproject evaluations 107 or studies employing quantitative designs.108”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [106] Boote, 2012, ‘Talking the talk or walking the walk?’ A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009, Health Expect
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Howe, 2010, Public involvement in health research: a case study of one NHS project over 5 years, Prim Health Care Res Dev source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [107] Kreis, 2013, Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth RE and NPT are theoretically informed approaches that can help researchers to further investigate, develop and refine middle-range theories (MRTs) to explain specific parts of programmes and interventions.
“Both RE and NPT are theoretically informed approaches that can help researchers to further investigate, develop and refine middle-range theories (MRTs) to explain specific parts of programmes and interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticular gaps in evidence were found on PPI impact around grant-funding decisions, and on involvement in data analysis apart from qualitative methodology.
“However, particular gaps in evidence were found on PPI impact around grant-funding decisions, and on involvement in data analysis apart from qualitative methodology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was some evidence of both positive and negative impacts of PPI on the public and researchers involved, and there were examples of positive impact for research participants in terms of PPI influencing a better research process, and impact on the wider community.
“There was some evidence of both positive and negative impacts of PPI on the public and researchers involved, and there were examples of positive impact for research participants in terms of PPI influencing a better research process, and impact on the wider community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRE is concerned with finding out about what mechanisms work, in what conditions, why, to produce which outcomes and for whom.
“Rather than identifying simple cause-and-effect relationships, RE is concerned with finding out about what mechanisms work, in what conditions, why, to produce which outcomes and for whom.124”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] Rycroft-Malone, 2010, A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStaley's review included 89 articles (71 published papers and 18 from grey literature).
“A total of 89 articles (71 published papers and 18 from 'grey' informally published literature) were included in the review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Staley
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe bodies of literature on empirical applications of both RE and NPT are relatively recent, especially NPT; its third and final development phase was reported only in 2009.
“The bodies of literature on empirical applications of both these approaches are relatively recent, 112 especially NPT; its third and final development phase was reported only in 2009.121”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] May, 2009, Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory, Sociology source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMRTs are sufficiently abstract to be applied to differing spheres of social behaviour and structure, but do not offer a set of general laws about these at societal level.
“MRTs are thus sufficiently abstract to be applied to differing spheres of social behaviour and structure, but do not offer a set of general laws about these at societal level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningBoth RE and NPT can be applied across different types of social programmes at different scales.
“both approaches (RE and NPT) can be applied across different types of social programmes at different scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationAn appropriate methodological approach to evaluating PPI must be sensitive to context and processes and their influence on outcomes.
“Key messages from the cumulative reviews of evidence on PPI in research suggest that an appropriate methodological approach must be sensitive to context and processes and their influence on outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe evaluation of PPI in research necessitates a method of enquiry capable of capturing the interplay between outcomes and processes and the context in which PPI is conducted.
“In conclusion here, the evaluation of PPI in research necessitates a method of enquiry capable of capturing the interplay between outcomes and processes and the context in which PPI is conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPPI in research is a complex social phenomenon and can act as an 'intervention'.
“PPI in research is a complex social phenomenon, and can act as an 'intervention'.109”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Medical Research Council, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOf the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.
“Of the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenRealism understands the world as an open system, with structures and layers that interact to form mechanisms and contexts.
“Realism understands the world as an open system, with structures and layers that interact to form mechanisms and contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrett et al. argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.
“Brett et al. 29 argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone givenBecause causal mechanisms are always embedded within particular contexts and social processes, their complex relationship with the effect of context on their operationalisation and outcome needs to be understood.
“Because causal mechanisms are always embedded within particular contexts and social processes, their complex relationship with the effect of context on their operationalisation and outcome needs to be understood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth a published literature review and critical discussions in the applied literature cite several methodological challenges associated with a RE approach, including deciding what constitutes a mechanism, and differentiating between what is a mechanism and what is context.
“Both a published literature review 112 and critical discussions in the applied literature cite several methodological challenges associated with a RE approach, including deciding what constitutes a mechanism, 127 and indeed differentiating between what is a mechanism and what is context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [112] Marchal, 2012, Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research, Evaluation source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [127] Astbury, 2010, Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation, Am J Eval source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhen coding via NPT constructs and components, a code for 'other' issues is always needed.
“If you are doing some form of coding via NPT constructs and components, you always need a code that is 'other', as in, issues and topics that do not clearly fit within the NPT.151”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] May, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, and this was used to underpin the survey design.
“Although the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, 133 and this was used to underpin the survey design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [133] Boote, 2006, Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis, Health Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenConsiderable efforts were made to balance the recruitment of case studies according to region, topic area and research design.
“Considerable efforts were made to balance the recruitment of case studies according to region, topic area and research design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll scheduled interviews were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed, and researchers checked transcripts for accuracy and anonymised them upon receipt.
“All scheduled interviews were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed for analysis, and researchers checked them for accuracy and anonymised them upon receipt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe sampling enabled maximum variation and allowed comparison within and between region, topic area and type of research.
“This enabled maximum variation, but also allowed comparison within and between region, topic area and type of research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationData generated through interview were triangulated with study documents to corroborate, elaborate, contradict or complement other data.
“Data generated through interview were triangulated (including with study documents) to corroborate, elaborate, contradict or complement other data, 155 in order to interpret PPI processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] Brannen, 2005, Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process, Int J Soc Res Methodol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA meeting was held to discuss coding of each sample interview, address inconsistencies, and refine collective understanding, increasing inter-rater reliability.
“A meeting was then held to discuss the coding of each sample interview, to address inconsistencies in the application of the coding categories and to refine collective understanding of them (increasing inter-rater reliability).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA subset of initial interview transcripts was coded independently by multiple team members, both deductively and inductively.
“A subset sample of initial interview transcripts of interviews with both researchers and PPI representatives as conducted by various team members were coded independently (manually) by team members (PW, EM, JK, MC and DM).This was done both deductively, using an initial adapted version of the 16 NPT components, and inductively, capturing unforeseen themes which emerged within the data relating to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA sampling frame developed from previous stages was used to purposively select up to 20 case studies to ensure typicality and sufficient variation across topic areas, types of research and geographical regions.
“To ensure typicality and sufficient variation across topic areas, types of research and geographical regions, a sampling frame (Figure 5) developed from the previous stages was used to purposively select up to 20 case studies where the case is a single research study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenRadar plots supported our understanding of changes within case studies over time and ongoing comparison between them.
“Radar plots supported our understanding of changes within case studies over time and ongoing comparison between them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCase study methods have been seen to be more robust when theoretical propositions to guide data collection and analysis have been previously developed.
“Of relevance in the RAPPORT study, and discussed in the following sections, is that case study methods have been seen to be more robust when theoretical propositions to guide data collection and analysis have been previously developed.136”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] McDonnell, 2000, Practical considerations in case study research: the relationship between methodology and process, J Adv Nurs source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe team was skilled in working in sensitive areas and with these groups, although few such participants were involved with or recruited to the case study phase of this research.
“The team was skilled in working in sensitive areas and with these groups, although few such participants were involved with or recruited to the case study phase of this research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAn initial summary of the NPT analysis and a realist evaluation were written for each case study and shared within the team to check consistency in usage of coding categories.
“An initial summary of the NPT analysis and a RE were then written for each case study and shared within the team to check consistency in usage of the coding categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis project had NHS approval (REC reference: 11/EM/0332), obtaining favourable approval by Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 1 Proportionate Review Sub-Committee on 13 August 2011 with no changes to the research protocol.
“This project had NHS approval (REC reference: 11/EM/0332), obtaining favourable approval by Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 1 Proportionate Review Sub-Committee on 13 August 2011 with no changes to the research protocol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningCoding categories captured where participants were reported not to have something as well as where they did, and such instances were not labelled based on judgements or assumptions.
“In addition, given that NPT is an action theory, we ensured that coding categories captured where participants were reported not to have something as well as where they did have it, and that such instances were not labelled based on judgements or assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe analysis utilised a similar approach to Schierhout et al. and Rycroft-Malone et al.
“Utilising a similar approach to those of Schierhout et al. 152 and Rycroft-Malone et al., 153 the analysis involved the following steps:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [152] Schierhout, 2013, Evaluating the effectiveness of a multifaceted, multilevel continuous quality improvement program in primary health care: developing a realist theory of change, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [153] Rycroft-Malone, 2013, Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory, J Health Serv Res Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWe over-recruited case studies in order to compensate for any potential dropout.
“Reflecting our emphasis on PPI processes and the tracking element of our research design, we over-recruited case studies in order to compensate for any potential dropout from the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBecause PPI in research is not an entirely new innovation, intervention, programme or phenomenon, but also is not yet fully normalised within contemporary research practice, it has been suggested that NPT offers unique potential for helping theorise how PPI is/is not routinely operationalised and sustained in practice.
“Because PPI in research is not an entirely 'new' innovation, intervention, programme or phenomenon, but also is not yet fully normalised within contemporary research practice, it has been suggested 15 that NPT offers unique potential for helping theorise how PPI is/is not routinely operationalised (embedded) and sustained (or not) in practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Howe, 2010, Public involvement in health research: a case study of one NHS project over 5 years, Prim Health Care Res Dev source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNPT has been developed for using in a flexible and dynamic way and can both direct and sensitise the practical and analytic trajectories of a research project.
“Normalisation Process Theory has been developed for using in a flexible and dynamic way and can both direct and sensitise the practical and analytic trajectories of a research project.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInformed consent was taken from all participants participating in interviews in stage 3.
“Informed consent was taken from all participants participating in interviews in stage 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe initial coding frame was informed by NPT, but this did not preclude exploring other avenues in the data.
“Semistructured interview schedules for this study were informed by NPT, as was the initial coding frame, but, in line with guidance given regarding coding data using NPT, this did not preclude us from exploring other avenues in the data or limit our thinking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe realist evaluation summaries and radar plots acted as aides-memoires and helped maintain the specificity and wholeness of each case study.
“Both the RE summaries and radar plots acted as aides-memoires for the research team throughout the research and also helped to maintain the specificity and wholeness of each case study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThese domains map across to the RE, and are most significant in theorising PPI mechanisms and outcomes, and to some extent the context, but were combined with additional questioning and coding to inductively explore other emerging significant themes.
“In effect, these domains map across to the RE, and are most significant in theorising PPI mechanisms and outcomes, and to some extent the context, but, as discussed below, were combined with additional questioning and coding to inductively explore other emerging significant themes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe repeatedly read, viewed, discussed and compared data from each case study at regular team meetings to develop our analysis and identify emerging features of CMO across case studies.
“We repeatedly read, viewed and discussed and compared data from each case study at regular team meetings to develop our analysis and to identify emerging features of CMO across case studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResearch team data analysis meetings provided a productive environment for generating themes, collective sense-making and enriched understanding.
“Research team data analysis meetings provided a productive environment for generating themes, collective sense-making and enriched understanding through all stages of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationDrawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.
“Drawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, 29 a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Brett, 2014, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningWe have used NPT constructs and domains both to direct our data collection and to guide our analysis, particularly within our case study work.
“We have used NPT constructs and domains both to direct our data collection and to guide our analysis, particularly within our case study work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWhere studies had been put to PPI panels that advise on a wider portfolio, it was deemed they would have little to say regarding one of many studies they had reviewed.
“In addition, where studies in their development had been put to PPI panels that advise on a wider portfolio of research proposals [e.g.case study 01 (CS01)], it was deemed that they would have little to say regarding one of many studies they had reviewed in recent years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is currently no published review of NPT's empirical application, but it has been seen to have been applied to good effect in a number of social and health-care settings.
“There is currently no published review of its empirical application, but it has been seen to have been applied to good effect in a number of social and health-care settings.121,134,135”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [121] May, 2009, Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory, Sociology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134] May, 2011, Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit, BMC Health Serv Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] May, 2009, Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory, Implement Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWe tested CMO configurations across the data set as a whole, accepting, rejecting or refining them through discussion.
“We then tested CMO configurations across the data set as a whole, accepting, rejecting or refining CMO configurations through discussion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAs an 'action' theory, NPT sharpens analytical focus on the actual work that people performing PPI do, rather than people's attitudes or intentions.
“As an 'action' theory, NPT also sharpens our analytical focus on the actual work that people performing PPI do, or do not do, rather than people's attitudes (how they feel about what they do) or their intentions (what they say they are going to do).134”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] May, 2011, Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit, BMC Health Serv Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDocuments or e-mail replies were then reviewed by two team members independently for background study information and any evidence of the nature, extent and activities of PPI.
“Documents or e-mail replies were then reviewed by two team members independently for background study information and any evidence of the nature, extent and activities of PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe expression of embeddedness is a function of the PPI design: the fuller the radar plots, the more fully embedded the PPI.
“It must be noted that the expression of embeddedness is, of course, a function of the PPI design on different projects: the fuller the radar plots, the more fully embedded the PPI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCase study methods are a recognised and well-established approach to conducting research in a variety of 'real life' settings including health care.
“Case study methods are a recognised and well-established approach to conducting research in a variety of 'real life' settings including health care.145”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] Exworthy, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe research team's previous experience of using online survey tools suggested that good response rates are achieved when the survey remains focused, it takes no longer than 15 minutes to complete and rapid feedback is promised to participants.
“The research team's previous experience of using online survey tools suggested that good response rates are achieved when the survey remains focused, it takes no longer than 15 minutes to complete and rapid feedback is promised to participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNPT addresses two important problems that face service improvers as they try to get innovations into practice: process problems about implementation of new ways of thinking, acting and organising, and structural problems about integration of new systems of practice into existing organisational and professional settings.
“NPT addresses two important problems that face service improvers as they try to get innovations into practice: l process problemsabout the implementation of new ways of thinking, acting and organising l structural problemsabout the integration of new systems of practice into existing organisational and professional settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe interactive approach to data collection and analysis allowed theory development grounded in empirical evidence, which was the main strength of the design.
“We were thereby able to adopt an interactive approach to data collection and analysis, allowing theory development grounded in empirical evidence, which was the main strength of this design.148”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Hartley, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenWe built quality and rigour into the research process, from the method of sampling research studies for each stage, through data collection, to the 'audit trail' created during analytic phases.
“We built quality and rigour into the research process, from the method of sampling research studies for each stage, through data collection, to the 'audit trail' created during analytic phases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The six selected exemplar areas capture the full continuum of PPI in health research.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNPT distinguishes action according to a set of four constructs, each representing a generative mechanism of social action.
“NPT distinguishes action according to a set of four constructs.Each of these represents a generative mechanism of social action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe were careful to remain neutral in our reactions to reports of practice, while also probing carefully in order to clarify understandings and gain fuller explanations.
“We also foresaw that there might also be sensitivities in discussing experiences of a project with the potential to expose bad practice and misuse of PPI, so we were careful to remain neutral in our reactions to reports of practice, while also probing carefully in order to clarify understandings and gain fuller explanations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo increase validity and reliability, transcripts were shared and coding was frequently and rigorously discussed and amended as analysis proceeded, maintaining reflexivity.
“To make the analytic phase both transparent and rigorous, to increase the validity and reliability of our findings, transcripts were shared and coding was frequently and rigorously discussed and amended as analysis proceeded, maintaining reflexivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPeer-to-peer interviews by co-researchers were expected to add value by allowing themes to emerge that were different from or additional to those captured by other means.
“This was expected to add value to the study by allowing themes to emerge that were different from or additional to those captured by other means, even though the co-researchers were also involved in reflective analysis of the whole data set, not just their own interviews.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88][89][90]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPPI in the RAPPORT study was a standing agenda item at each advisory group meeting to ensure feedback was welcomed and concerns raised openly, adding to reflective material to assess impact.
“The topic of PPI in the RAPPORT study was also an additional standing agenda item at each meeting, to ensure that feedback was welcomed and queries or concerns raised openly; this added to the reflective material utilised to assess impact within the study itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe number of peer interviews was lower than originally planned because of difficulties in finding mutually convenient times and because co-researchers had less availability and flexibility than other team members.
“The numbers of peer interviews were lower than originally planned because of difficulties in finding mutually convenient times for co-researchers and respondents.In reality, co-researchers had less availability and flexibility to accommodate interviews that other members of the research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRelationships are key to making people feel included, getting their fullest contributions and solving practical problems.
“The key findings reflect those of the study itself: that both embedded PPI and periodic inputs can be valuable in different ways; and that relationships are key to making people feel included, getting their fullest contributions and solving practical problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataInitial meetings agreed coding structures and compared individually coded transcripts; subsequent meetings tested CMO configurations within and across case studies, and PPI co-researchers individually coded transcripts.
“The initial meetings were used to agree on coding structures and the use of NPT and to compare individually coded transcripts.Subsequently, data analysis meetings tested out the CMO configurations within and across the various case studies.PPI co-researchers also individually coded interview transcripts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe disappointing response rate of 28% means that the results from the survey must be treated with caution.
“Although within the normal parameters of an electronic survey, 158 the disappointing response rate of 28% means that the results from the survey must be treated with caution (see Chapter 8, Reflections on and limitations of the research).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] Mathie, 2014, Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey, Int J Consum Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFour regional dissemination events were held where provisional findings were presented and facilitated small group discussions were used to confirm or refine CMO configurations.
“Four regional dissemination events were held towards the end of the study.RAPPORT participants, local PPI and research groups attended (see Appendix 5).Our provisional findings were presented, and facilitated small group discussions were used as a means to confirm or refine CMO configurations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTranscripts were checked for accuracy and anonymised to protect identities.
“Upon receipt, transcripts were checked for accuracy and anonymised to protect the identities of the participating studies (personnel and place names, for example, were changed/removed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPPI representatives reviewed all documentation, commented on emergent findings and study progress, and meetings were minuted in detail so PPI contributions were included.
“As for all advisory group members, PPI representatives reviewed all documentation concerning the research, and commented on emergent findings and study progress; meetings were minuted in detail so PPI contributions were included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth embedded PPI and periodic inputs can be valuable in different ways.
“The key findings reflect those of the study itself: that both embedded PPI and periodic inputs can be valuable in different ways; and that relationships are key to making people feel included, getting their fullest contributions and solving practical problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenCo-researchers were actively involved throughout the analysis, and emerging findings were discussed with an advisory group including PPI representatives and an IDDs reference group.
“The co-researchers on the core research team were actively involved throughout the analysis and emerging findings/analysis discussed with an advisory group, which included PPI representatives, and with an IDDs reference group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCMO configurations were further refined through discussions with case study respondents, reference groups, the advisory group, and four regional events.
“Context, mechanism and outcome configurations were further refined through discussions with case study respondents, the reference groups and the RAPPORT advisory group, and four regional events conducted at the end of the study (see Appendix 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenProject-specific secure drives were set up at both universities, accessible only to the research team, and backed up centrally each day.
“Project-specific secure drives were set up at both the University of Hertfordshire and the University of East Anglia; only the research team had access to them.Both drives were backed up centrally each day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll interview data recorded on digital devices were uploaded onto university secure servers as soon as possible and deleted from devices.
“All interview data recorded on digital devices were uploaded onto university secure servers as soon as possible after interviews and deleted from devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAnalysis was informed by the research questions and realist evaluation, with methodological triangulation during analysis and interpretation of results.
“Analysis was informed by the research questions and RE, with methodological triangulation occurring during analysis and interpretation of results.156”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] O’Cathain, 2010, Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataSufficient flexibility is needed for people whose other work or health may not allow predictable inputs.
“Clarity about different roles is important when there is more than one type of input from lay people into a project, and sufficient flexibility is needed for people whose other work or health may not allow predictable inputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA strong emphasis on dialogue and feedback may assist both developing relationships and a sense of mutual respect and engagement, and allow concerns to be aired early.
“A strong emphasis on dialogue and feedback may assist both developing relationships and a sense of mutual respect and engagement, and allow concerns to be aired early.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPrevious experiences of PPI work may colour ongoing expectations, and may be worth exploring early on.
“Previous experiences of PPI work may colour ongoing expectations, and may be worth exploring early on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThere will not be one long-lasting coherent view of PPI; rather there is a need for renegotiation and flexibility.
“This comment resonates with the debate about 'professionalisation' of lay participants, and perhaps shows that there will not be one long-lasting 'coherent' view of PPIrather a need for renegotiation and flexibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningClarity about different roles is important when there is more than one type of input from lay people into a project.
“Clarity about different roles is important when there is more than one type of input from lay people into a project, and sufficient flexibility is needed for people whose other work or health may not allow predictable inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe inability to find evidence of PPI in 49% of studies does not necessarily mean there was no PPI; rather, it may be indicative of the lack of accessible PPI-specific evidence.
“This does not necessarily mean there was no PPI; rather, it may be indicative of the lack of accessible PPI-specific evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe avoided presenting too much data to respect confidentiality and protect research case studies.
“We have honoured our duty to respect confidentiality and protect research case studies by avoiding presenting too much data, which could be overly revealing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThis is one of the first studies to contribute significantly to our understanding of PPI as a concept, through the analysis of a large number of case studies, selected to capture varying levels of PPI embeddedness, in order to understand how it may change over time during the research process.
“This is one of the first studies to contribute significantly to our understanding of PPI as a concept, through the analysis of a large number of case studies, selected to capture varying levels of PPI embeddedness, in order to understand how it may change over time during the research process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese comments may suggest that some researchers feel that the PPI representatives currently volunteering for research studies are not necessarily those they feel should be involved, are not authentically representing the views of others or do not offer enough diversity.
“These comments may suggest that some researchers feel that the PPI representatives currently volunteering for research studies are not necessarily those they feel should be involved, are not authentically representing the views of others or do not offer enough diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis is a particular issue in research which might not bring benefits in the lifetime of the PPI representatives.
“This is a particular issue in research which might not bring benefits in the lifetime of the PPI representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhen applied to the 22 case studies, NPT had sufficient explanatory power to predict which case studies had PPI embedded as normal practice; therefore, it predicted both policy outcomes and the processes and infrastructure required for effective PPI that had positive outcomes both methodologically and morally.
“When applied to the 22 case studies, NPT 121,134 had sufficient explanatory power to predict which case studies had PPI embedded as normal practice; therefore, it predicted both policy outcomes and the processes and infrastructure required for effective PPI that had positive outcomes both methodologically and morally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [121] May, 2009, Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory, Sociology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134] May, 2011, Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit, BMC Health Serv Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis lack of information has implications for transparency, evaluability and accountability.
“This lack of information has implications for transparency, evaluability and accountability (see Chapter 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRelational work is a key element of the collective action construct within NPT and was perhaps even more important to focus on in research designs such as basic science, where there was an inevitable distance between researcher and end beneficiary of the study.
“Relational work is a key element of the collective action construct within NPT and, as illustrated above, was perhaps even more important to focus on in research designs such as basic science, where there was an inevitable distance between researcher and end beneficiary of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA lack of coherence in understanding the purpose and positive impact of PPI could potentially create a number of tensions.
“A lack of coherence in understanding the purpose and positive impact of PPI could potentially create a number of tensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHaving formalised PPI as a requirement was beneficial, as experience of good PPI usually leads to more in the future.
“some reflected that having formalised PPI as a requirement was beneficial, as experience of good PPI usually leads to more in the future”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationFive enabling contexts (funder, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI, research host) were expected based on the literature and shaped the sampling framework to ensure a range of case studies as a test-bed.
“Five of these (funder, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI and research host) were expected, based on the literature, and shaped our sampling framework to ensure a range of case studies as a test-bed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Five enabling contexts (funder, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI, research host) were expected based on the literature.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAfter a year and despite focused work by a PPI champion, the radar plots remained unchanged, suggesting that embedding PPI requires a significant amount of time: at least 5 years.
“After a year and despite focused work by a PPI champion, the radar plots remained unchanged, suggesting that embedding PPI requires a significant amount of time: at least 5 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe limited impact of PPI in CS22 may reflect the very early stages of a research study, or may indicate a neophyte PPI structure which is not enabling a fuller impact.
“The limited impact of PPI may reflect the very early stages of a research study; however, as other case studies show significant impact in the early stages of the research cycle, it may also be indicative of a neophyte PPI structure which is not enabling a fuller impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThrough an iterative process, candidate CMO configurations were tested within each case study and discussed with case study respondents in tracking interviews, reference groups, and four regional events.
“As described in Chapter 3, through an iterative process we tested candidate CMO configurations within each case study and discussed our findings with case study respondents in the tracking interviews, with our reference groups and finally at the four regional events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe CS13 model of PPI was enabled by topic area (public health with healthy participants) and the longitudinal design, which allowed relationships to be developed and sustained over time.
“This model of PPI was enabled by topic area (public health with healthy participants) and the longitudinal design, which allowed relationships to be developed and sustained over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAs the bedrock for trust, lay representatives and researchers needed to have a shared understanding of the purpose of PPI.
“As the bedrock for trust, lay representatives and researchers needed to have a shared understanding of the purpose of PPI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis led to a positive experience of PPI for all involved and the sustaining of a virtuous cycle whereby PPI became increasingly embedded.
“This led to a positive experience of PPI (C8) for all involved and the sustaining of a virtuous cycle whereby PPI became increasingly embedded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningLonger-term outcomes of a study could not be included in CMO configurations because they evolve over a longer period of time.
“It was not possible to include longer-term outcomes of a study, as these evolve over a longer period of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRather than being polarised, these approaches could be used interchangeably throughout the project.
“Rather than being polarised, these approaches could be used interchangeably throughout the project:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe notion of wanting the right person with a short distance between direct experience and its interpretation but who also can feel comfortable in a research environment is maybe a contradiction in itself.
“This notion of wanting the right person with a short distance between direct experience and its interpretation but who also can feel comfortable in a research environment is maybe a contradiction in itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis reflects clarification of roles and the improving relationship and trust in the PPI work.
“This reflects clarification of roles and the improving relationship and trust in the PPI work:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe researchers needed certain social skills, which included being approachable, good listening skills and group work skills.
“The researchers needed certain social skills, which included being approachable, good listening skills and group work skills:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe obvious advantage of having a previous relationship meant that PPI could start as soon as possible within the research project, whereas more time was needed to establish relationships through informal small meetings if the lay representatives and researchers had not previously met.
“The obvious advantage of having a previous relationship meant that PPI could start as soon as possible within the research project, whereas more time was needed to establish relationships through informal small meetings if the lay representatives and researchers had not previously met.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis reinforces findings presented earlier where potential PPI impact was inhibited by boundaries set by the research team.
“This reinforces findings presented earlier where potential PPI impact was inhibited by boundaries set by the research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenImpact and outcomes are applicable only to certain research designs and are a function of the original PPI objectives and overall goal.
“Impact and outcomes are applicable only to certain research designs and, of course, are a function of the original PPI objectives and overall goal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere are likely to be longer-term outcomes of studies that were not possible to capture within the time scale of the RAPPORT study.
“However, it should be recognised that there are likely to be longer-term outcomes of studies that were not possible to capture within the time scale of the RAPPORT study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCollective understanding about the purpose and role of PPI was an important mechanism leading to positive outcomes, and was enabled by training and certain topics and study designs.
“Collective understanding about the purpose and role of PPI was an important mechanism leading to positive outcomes, and was enabled by training and certain topics and study designs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUnderstanding PPI as a different way of working was needed particularly to enable a clear role, purpose and structure for PPI, and to ensure lay representatives were recruited who would have an understanding of the diverse viewpoints of the study population.
“understanding PPI as a different way of working was needed particularly to enable a clear role, purpose and structure for PPI, and to ensure lay representatives were recruited who would have an understanding of the diverse viewpoints of the study population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWard et al. argued that the trend towards consumerism has shaped the commodification of research.
“The metaphor of an 'industrialised' scale of research suggested by our data echoes the similar argument of Ward et al. 39 that the trend towards consumerism has shaped the commodification of research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Ward, 2010, Critical perspectives on ‘consumer involvement’ in health research: epistemological dissonance and the know–do gap, J Sociol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConflict or tension, while posing difficulties to resolve, is not necessarily undesirable and, indeed, is evidence of engagement, so much so that where it was managed well, through, for example, clear guidelines, dialogue and consensus, it was seen to add to the strength of the case study in terms of how embedded PPI was.
“Conflict or tension, while posing difficulties to resolve, is not necessarily undesirable and, indeed, is evidence of engagement, 105,174 so much so that where it was managed well, through, for example, clear guidelines, dialogue and consensus, it was seen to add to the strength of the case study in terms of how embedded PPI was.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [105] Lasker, 2001, Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage, Milbank Q source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [174] Snape, 2014, Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study, BMJ Open source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA project running at the same time as the RAPPORT study explored values in more depth and suggested three value sets: normative (termed 'moral'), substantive (termed 'methodological') and process.
“A project running at the same time as the RAPPORT study explored values in more depth and suggested three value sets: normative (which we have termed 'moral'), substantive (which we have termed 'methodological') and process.25,175”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Gradinger, Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review [published online ahead of print December 10 2013]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [175] PiiAF Study Group
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKreindler argues that the consumer paradigm is predicated on consumer satisfaction, so that methods for implementing PPI will centre on feedback.
“Kreindler 27 also argues that the consumer paradigm is predicated on consumer satisfaction, so that methods for implementing PPI will centre on feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Kreindler, 2009, Patient involvement and the politics of methodology, Can Public Admin source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationScott suggests a number of rules and norms that govern such forums: regulative, normative, cultural-cognitive.
“Scott 179 suggests a number of rules and norms that govern such forums:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Scott, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBarnes et al. argued that representativeness in providing perspectives was achieved by merit of the lay representative's personal experience, particular characteristics or links with other networks.
“As argued by Barnes et al., 178 representativeness in providing perspectives was achieved by merit of the lay representative's personal experience, particular characteristics (e.g.being an older person) or links with other networks (e.g.representatives from local or national charities).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [178] Barnes, 2004, Power, participation, and political renewal: theoretical perspectives on public participation under New Labour in Britain, Social Politics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn contrast to previous observations that PPI conceptualisations have not addressed the dynamic nature of PPI within research, our analysis, and the framework that it underpins, is able to take into account a dynamic concept of PPI within a research study.
“In contrast to previous observations 18 that PPI conceptualisations have not addressed the dynamic nature of PPI within research, our analysis, and the framework that it underpins, is able to take into account a dynamic concept of PPI within a research study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Smith, 2008, Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice, Int J Nurs Stud source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPolicy was then no longer required as the main trigger, so PPI activity became a self-sustaining virtuous cycle.
“Policy was then no longer required as the main trigger, so PPI activity became a self-sustaining virtuous cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationO'Donnell and Entwistle and van Bekkum and Hilton suggest that funders had many anxieties about PPI such as its 'distorting' the research agenda.
“It should also be noted that O'Donnell and Entwistle 176 and van Bekkum and Hilton 177 suggest that funders had many anxieties about PPI such as its 'distorting' the research agenda.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [176] O’Donnell, 2004, Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded, Health Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [177] van Bekkum, 2014, UK research funding bodies’ views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study, Health Serv Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationRegulative rules may be written and formalised, for example in research governance frameworks, but may not be understandable to lay representatives even if documents are provided.
“Regulative rules may be written and formalised, for example in research governance frameworks, but may not be understandable to lay representatives even if documents are provided.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent value sets are seen to lead to diverse constructions of PPI and can affect whether or not and how PPI is evaluated.
“However, whichever labels are used to define value sets, it is clear that different value sets are seen to lead to diverse constructions of PPI, 28,174 and can affect whether or not and how PPI is evaluated.52”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] Thompson, 2009, Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research, Health Expect source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [174] Snape, 2014, Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study, BMJ Open source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] McKevitt, 2013, Experience, knowledge and evidence: a comparison of research relations in health and anthropology, Evid Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn CS23, PPI bridging to the wider population (younger people) was done via social media and was an effective way of getting one-off input from an often less-heard group.
“In CS23, this PPI bridging role to the wider population (in this case younger people) was done via social media and was an effective way of getting one-off input from an often less-heard group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn earlier study on funders suggested that charities and centrally funded organisations adopted different approaches and rationales for PPI.
“An earlier study on funders also suggested that charities and centrally funded organisations adopted different approaches and rationales for PPI.176”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] O’Donnell, 2004, Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded, Health Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe structure of the research centre and the priority it gives to PPI ensure that ideas relevant to service users are carried out.
“The structure of the research centre and the priority that this organisation gives to PPI ensure that the ideas relevant to service users are carried out:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe RAPPORT typology is not dissimilar to the conceptual framework suggested by Oliver et al. 132.
“This typology is not dissimilar to the conceptual framework suggested by Oliver et al. 132”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oliver et al. 132
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOne influence on shifts in values was the model of PPI used; the model is often triggered by one value set and then either reinforced over time or a subsequent shift in values leads to a new model being adopted.
“One influence on such shifts was from the model of PPI used, which, as seen earlier, is often triggered by one value set and then either the model is reinforced over time or a subsequent shift in values leads to a new model being adopted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Normalisation Process Theory provides four main areas of work to embed a complex intervention such as PPI as normal practice.
“Normalisation Process Theory suggests four main areas of work to embed as normal practice a complex intervention such as PPI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The six selected exemplar areas capture the full continuum of PPI in health research.
“we purposively selected six exemplar areas that by their focus and research tradition could capture the full continuum of PPI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The UKCRN portfolio is a sufficient and representative source for identifying relevant PPI studies.
“To ensure relevance to the NHS and scientific robustness, studies were limited to those registered with the UKCRN portfolio, excluding commercially funded studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 28% survey response rate yields findings that are representative of the surveyed population.
“following the reminder there was a total of 101 responses to the survey (28% response rate)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The body of research in progress at any one time is dictated by wider historical and political trends, biases and service needs, and cannot be balanced according to project specifications.
“The cases we achieved appeared remarkably balanced, especially since the body of research in progress at any one time cannot be balanced according to our project's specifications, but will be dictated by wider historical and political trends, biases and service needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PPI can be interpreted as a complex intervention.
“Using NPT as a MRT developed out of health service research, we directly interpreted PPI as the complex intervention, which then shaped our data collection tools and analytical framework (see Chapter 3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Five enabling contexts (funder, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI, research host) were expected based on the literature.
“Five of these (funder, topic area and design, resources, organisation of PPI and research host) were expected, based on the literature, and shaped our sampling framework to ensure a range of case studies as a test-bed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reimbursing lay representatives for their time is an enabler of trust and normal good practice.
“Reimbursing lay representatives for their time is intuitively an enabler of trust and seen as normal good practice, yet payment for time was surprisingly rare in the case studies, although all were paid for out-ofpocket expenses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of documentary evidence of PPI changes indicates that such changes did not occur or were minimal.
“Very little supporting documentary evidence, not clear what specific changes PPI made to intervention booklets or PIS for qualitative study.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The case studies included in RAPPORT are sufficient to identify the impacts and outcomes of PPI in NIHR-funded research.
“The following section provides evidence of PPI methodological impact and outcomes with specific examples from the 22 case studies.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The success of PPI in this study may relate to several factors, including patient partners' prior training, researchers' experience, and good relationships.
“The success of the PPI in this study may relate to several factors. Firstly, the patient partners had received training around research methods in previous studies and were actively involved in a patient and public involvement group attached to the University of Warwick Medical School. Furthermore, the researchers were experienced at involving patient partners in their research [22]. Finally, good”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
It is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each GRIPP2 item because the current evidence base is not advanced enough.
“While GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF aim to guide consistent reporting, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each item, as the current evidence base is not advanced enough to make this possible [2–4, 21].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Stage 1 geographic eligibility is inconsistent
MinorThe stage 1 sample is described as studies undertaken in England, but the scoping method says it included studies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
“Our sample here included current studies or those completed in the previous 2 years in the six exemplar areas and being undertaken in England.”
“For studies not covered by the online survey, that is running outside the four selected geographical regions, including studies in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, direct requests were made.”
Cites
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,631 · see citing works
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,612 · see citing works
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461 · see citing works
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Bock, K. E., & Merton, R. Κ. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091967 · Cited by 6,721 · see citing works
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190 · cited 1× · see citing works
“addressed the complexity of PPI by utilising a realist review design.(104) Focusing on participatory research, which they define as the ‘co-construction of research between researchers and people affected by the issues under study .”
Knowledge and Human Interests.
Parsons, H. L., Habermas, J., & Shapiro, J. J. (1972) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106475 · Cited by 2,614 · see citing works
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This system of checking and critiquing the analysis was not merely to promote consensus but was a way of more deeply interrogating the data and exploring alternative explanations.(157) The co-researchers on the core research team were actively involved throughout the analysis and emerging findings/analysis discussed w…”
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225 · see citing works
Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038509103208 · Cited by 2,115 · cited 4× · see citing works
“A key MRT that informed our research approach was NPT.(121) Specifically, it is a candidate MRT to inform the policy perspective on PPI, but we found in practice that its constructs systematically inform all three viewpoints and therefore we used it explicitly to similarly inform our methodological approach (see Table…”
InfluentialDeveloping and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance
Craig, P., Dieppe, P. A., MacIntyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. P. (2006) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1,877 · see citing works
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x · Cited by 1,598 · cited 6× · see citing works
“More recently there has been a growing emphasis on making attempts to assess the impact of PPI.(19,29,31,32,159) While fairly limited in the amount of evidence this would elicit about the benefits of PPI in research, the survey included an open question where respondents could write about at which stage they felt PPI…”
InfluentialSelf-citationThree techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587 · Cited by 1,584 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Analysis was informed by the research questions and RE, with methodological triangulation occurring during analysis and interpretation of results.(156)”
Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
May, C. R., Mair, F., Finch, T., MacFarlane, A., Dowrick, C., Treweek, S., Rapley, T., Ballini, L., Ong, B. N., Rogers, A., et al. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 · Cited by 1,409 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is currently no published review of its empirical application, but it has been seen to have been applied to good effect in a number of social and health-care settings.(121,134,135) Of relevance in the RAPPORT study, and discussed in the following sections, is that case study methods have been seen to be more rob…”
Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design
Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B., Krasny, M., et al. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04705-170229 · Cited by 1,317 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, as in social housing, longer-term impacts of PPI are rarely measured and noticeable long-term outcomes may occur only 10 years or more after the project has been set up.(201) Nevertheless, evaluation of PPI within social housing and conservation suggests that PPI enables positive outcomes in:”
The Competent Boundary Spanner
Williams, P. (2002) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00296 · Cited by 1,311 · see citing works
JAGOSH, J., MACAULAY, A. C., PLUYE, P., SALSBERG, J., BUSH, P. L., HENDERSON, J., SIRETT, E., WONG, G., CARGO, M., HERBERT, C. P., et al. (2012) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x · Cited by 1,268 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, as with the earlier reviews, Jagosh et al.(103) highlight the limited reporting of PPI and also suggest that negative outcomes are less likely to be reported.”
Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation.
Sprinker, M., & Bhaskar, R. (1987) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905327 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?
Oliver, M. (1992) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/02674649266780141 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00203 · Cited by 1,053 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These relationships are framed by trust, mutual respect and responses between researchers and lay representatives being framed by synergistic team membership.(105)”
Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy
Collier, A. (1994) · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Greene, J., & Hibbard, J. H. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Unpacking black boxes: mechanisms and theory building in evaluation
Astbury, B., & Leeuw, F. L. (2010) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214010371972 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014) · The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Self-citationResearch governance framework for health and social care
Taylor, M. (2002) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00336.x · Cited by 798 · see citing works
The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein
Tritter, J. Q., & McCallum, A. K. (2005) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008 · Cited by 795 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The temporal aspect of relationship building supported the development of trust.(192) For researchers this could mean trusting the PPI representative to not derail the project, behave according to the rules and norms of that context(179) and/or make a positive contribution to the study.”
Kontos, P. C., & Poland, B. D. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-1 · Cited by 760 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We employed an overarching critical realist framework(116,117) focused on the mechanisms embedded within PPI, to facilitate our understanding of outcomes present or absent depending on how they were triggered, blocked or modified.(118,119) RE,(115) which draws upon this perspective, was used to inform the research des…”
Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process
Brannen, J. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570500154642 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Institutions and Organizations
Barzelay, M., & Scott, W. R. (1997) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/591930 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology
Prior, L. (2003) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00339 · Cited by 478 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, while there is growing recognition of the importance of experiential knowledge being addressed alongside scientific understanding,(44) there is also clearly often an intrinsic resistance to acknowledging lay knowledge, particularly in the sphere of biomedical research.(44,45)”
Marchal, B., van Belle, S., van Olmen, J., Hoerée, T., & Kegels, G. (2012) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389012442444 · Cited by 476 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Realist evaluation (RE) is one of several theory-based approaches to evaluation developed within the social sciences, which seeks to address dynamism and context, rather than control for them, to explain more adequately how and, importantly, under what circumstances programmes, interventions or innovations will ‘work’…”
Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?
Davis, R. E., Jacklin, R., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Oliver, S., Clarke-Jones, L., Rees, R., Milne, R., Buchanan, P., Gabbay, J., Gyte, G., Oakley, A., & Stein, K. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8150 · Cited by 400 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The systematic review by Oliver et al.(102) was the first to examine the evidence base on the impact of PPI on identifying and prioritising possible topics for research and development.”
The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?
Caron-Flinterman, J. F., Broerse, J. E. W., & Bunders, J. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, while there is growing recognition of the importance of experiential knowledge being addressed alongside scientific understanding,(44) there is also clearly often an intrinsic resistance to acknowledging lay knowledge, particularly in the sphere of biomedical research.(44,45)”
Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods
Goodwin, N. (2002) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.03832.x · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research
Entwistle, V. A., Renfrew, M. J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. M., & Lamont, T. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463 · Cited by 376 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The PPI in health has its roots in the increasing unease with and challenges to the medical institution.(12) The ethical argument for PPI grew and was taken up by policy-makers as characterised by the phrase ‘nothing about me without me’.”
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This reflected the overall low quality of reporting PPI in studies.(21) Paradoxically, while DOI: 10.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMartin, G. P. (2007) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x · Cited by 359 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This right to be involved as a citizen has been further developed internationally,(11) but it has also been criticised as often comprising too narrow a view of citizens, with the reality that the involved citizen is generally retired, white, middle-class and highly educated.(38) An alternative viewpoint is the ethical…”
Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation
Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. T. (2003) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00352 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research
Oliver, S. R., Rees, R. W., Clarke‐Jones, L., Milne, R., Oakley, A., Gabbay, J., Stein, K., Buchanan, P., & Gyte, G. M. (2008) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x · Cited by 344 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This typology is not dissimilar to the conceptual framework suggested by Oliver et al.(132) However, the RAPPORT data suggested a far more dynamic framework (Figure 11) than that of Oliver et al.”
Costa, J., Borges, M., David, C., & Carneiro, A. V. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38793.468449.ae · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Review: Engaging Patients as Vigilant Partners in Safety
Schwappach, D. L. B. (2009) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558709342254 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Evaluating health promotion : a health worker's guide
Hawe, P., Degeling, D., & Hall, J. P. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits
HEWLETT, S. E., de Wit, M. P. T., Richards, P., Quest, E. M., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.22091 · Cited by 272 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PPI not only increases researchers’ confidence in their studies(72) but perhaps most importantly fosters their greater understanding of the service user or patient perspective.(81,98)”
World Alzheimer Report 2012: Overcoming the Stigma of Dementia
Mittelman, M. S., & Batsch, N. (2012) · Cited by 242 · see citing works
May, C. R., Finch, T. L., Ballini, L., MacFarlane, A. E., Mair, F. S., Murray, E., Treweek, S., & Rapley, T. (2011) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · doi:10.34961/10032 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement
Gibson, A., Britten, N., & Lynch, J. (2012) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1363459312438563 · Cited by 232 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Habermas’s work, alongside others, is used by Gibson et al.(130) to develop an emancipatory concept of PPI.”
Researching recovery from psychosis: a user-led project
Pitt, L., Kilbride, M., Nothard, S., Welford, M., & Morrison, A. P. (2007) · Psychiatric Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.bp.105.008532 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The RAPPORT study sample was limited to six topic areas; while these were purposively selected to provide a broad range in terms of designs, settings and target participant populations, we acknowledge that this does not include areas where, for example, there is a growing body of user-led research, such as in mental h…”
Boote, J. D., Wong, R., & Booth, A. (2012) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12007 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Evidence, Understanding and Complexity: Evaluation in Non-Linear Systems
Barnes, M., Matka, E., & Sullivan, H. (2003) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563890030093003 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research
Thompson, J., Barber, R., Ward, P. R., Boote, J. D., Cooper, C. L., Armitage, C. J., & Jones, G. (2009) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x · Cited by 208 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A few researchers perceived a threat of the lay person taking over, an anxiety reported in other studies.(28) The supposed menace of experiential, subjective knowledge overturning scientific notions of neutrality, objectivity and distance(173) has been described in terms of a clash of two worlds.”
PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship?: Table 1
Ives, J., Damery, S. L., & Redwood, S. (2012) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100150 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., Sakala, C., Sanger, S., Strid, J., Thomas, V., et al. (2010) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.034835 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in the new NHS
Martin, G. P., & Carter, P. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315310817-7 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
The impact of community engagement on health and social outcomes: a systematic review
Milton, B. S., Attree, P., French, B., Povall, S., Whitehead, M. M., & Popay, J. (2011) · Community Development Journal · doi:10.1093/cdj/bsr043 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Staniszewska, S., Adebajo, A., Barber, R., Beresford, P., Brady, L.-M., Brett, J., Elliott, J., Evans, D., Haywood, K. L., Jones, D., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x · Cited by 182 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.(29,30) More conventional approaches to empirical evaluation would seek to examine whether or not programmes, interventions or innovations are effective using controlled trial designs to measure specified effec…”
Self-citationWhat does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study
Telford, R., Boote, J. D., & Cooper, C. L. (2004) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Healthcare in a land called PeoplePower: nothing about me without me
Delbanco, T., Berwick, D. M., Boufford, J. I., Edgman‐Levitan, Ollenschläger, G., Plamping, D., & Rockefeller, R. G. (2001) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00145.x · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The ethical argument for PPI grew and was taken up by policy-makers as characterised by the phrase ‘nothing about me without me’.(13) Politically, PPI is also seen as a way of addressing the democratic deficit by giving voice to the public in publicly funded health organisations and research.”
A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care
Rycroft-Malone, J., Fontenla, M., Bick, D., & Seers, K. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-38 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Jagosh, J., Pluye, P., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Herbert, C. P., Green, L. W., Greenhalgh, T., & Macaulay, A. C. (2014) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1099 · Cited by 165 · cited 3× · see citing works
“BOX 3 Definition of CMO configurations (adapted from Pawson and Tilley(115) and Jagosh et al.(99))”
InfluentialAdvocacy groups as research organizations: the PXE International example
Terry, S. F., Terry, P. F., Rauen, K. A., Uitto, J., & Bercovitch, L. G. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1991 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Ward, P. R., Thompson, J., Barber, R., Armitage, C. J., Boote, J. D., Cooper, C. L., & Jones, G. L. (2010) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783309351771 · Cited by 164 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In terms of amount of activities, PPI was most likely to be limited in basic science studies, where lay knowledge was generally seen by researchers as less useful in this kind of research.(39) Callard et al.”
InfluentialPassionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums
Barnes, M. (2008) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018308095280 · Cited by 162 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This included sharing personal narratives, which Barnes(197) argues is important in ensuring mutual recognition, and allows the researcher to understand where the PPI representative is ‘coming from’.(193) In the theoretical conceptualisation of PPI by Gibson et al.”
The Expert Patients Programme: a paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance
Wilson, P. M., Kendall, S. A., & Brooks, F. M. (2007) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.x · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationWilson, P. M. (2001) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00289.x · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationThe NHS and Community Care Act 1990
Angunawela, I. I., Barker, A., & Nicholson, S. (2000) · Psychiatric Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.24.5.177 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Beresford, P. (2005) · Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale · doi:10.1017/s1121189x0000186x · Cited by 145 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The RAPPORT study sample was limited to six topic areas; while these were purposively selected to provide a broad range in terms of designs, settings and target participant populations, we acknowledge that this does not include areas where, for example, there is a growing body of user-led research, such as in mental h…”
We are all boundary spanners now?
Williams, P. (2013) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/09513551311293417 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory
(1986) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-18149-0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Conservation and Management Applications of the Reef Volunteer Fish Monitoring Program
Pattengill‐Semmens, C. V., & Semmens, B. X. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0299-7_5 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
All trials must be registered and the results published
Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., & Godlee, F. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f105 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Callard, F. J., Rose, D. S., & Wykes, T. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00681.x · Cited by 130 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Callard et al.(172) argue that failing to have PPI in the early stages of translational research may result in failing to capitalise on the potential contributions lay representatives could make, including ensuring that the end product of bench research must be appropriately designed for the end-user, and that ethical…”
Krieger, J. W., Allen, C., Cheadle, A. D., Ciske, S. J., Schier, J. K., Senturia, K., & Sullivan, M. (2002) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810202900307 · Cited by 129 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Within community-based public health research, benefits of PPI are also reported in enhancing the capacity of community-based organisations to raise their value to their communities.(86)”
Koops, L., & Lindley, R. I. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7361.415 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Critical Realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development
Wilson, V., & McCormack, B. (2006) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1466-769x.2006.00248.x · Cited by 119 · cited 1× · see citing works
“RE research is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, under what conditions and for whom.(115,123) The approach employs three key terms, for which definitions are provided in Box 2.”
Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S., Manthorpe, J., Brearley, S., Sitzia, J., & Beresford, P. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.010 · Cited by 113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Value sets greatly influence PPI processes within a study; and relatedly, in turn, the model of PPI in each study was seen to be influenced by the CI’s desired outcomes from the PPI input.(18) For example, one case study (CS01) recorded only a one-off narrowly defined PPI input, which reflected the CI’s reservations a…”
User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts<sup>1</sup>
Staniszewska, S., Jones, N., Newburn, M., & Marshall, S. (2007) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationThompson, J., Bissell, P., Cooper, C., Armitage, C. J., & Barber, R. (2012) · Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1363459312441008 · Cited by 111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although this was not articulated by any of our PPI respondents, in the ethnographic study conducted by Thompson et al.(46) they describe the balancing act carried out by the PPI respondents to have enough knowledge to be able to contribute within a trial steering committee, but also to remain credible.”
Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study
Barber, R., Boote, J. D., Parry, G. D., Cooper, C. L., Yeeles, P., & Cook, S. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00660.x · Cited by 109 · cited 3× · see citing works
“It should be noted that, while the RAPPORT studies did provide evidence of PPI impact on research design, the research stakeholder (including PPI) consensus study by Barber et al.(159) concluded that it was not possible to evaluate PPI impact in this area.”
Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study
Barber, R., Beresford, P., Boote, J., Cooper, C., & Faulkner, A. (2011) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01017.x · Cited by 107 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Dissemination of research findings is also reported as gaining from PPI networks to increase access to peers(81) and relevant sections of the community,(15) and making information more broadly readable.(31,72) There are fewer published claims for PPI as playing a significant role in implementing findings, but, in a US…”
Boote, J., Barber, R., & Cooper, C. (2006) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.03.012 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
The impact of service user involvement in research
Minogue, V., Boness, J., Brown, A., & Girdlestone, J. (2005) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/09526860510588133 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Evans, S., & Scarbrough, H. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Conservation and Management Applications of the Reef Volunteer Fish Monitoring Program
Pattengill‐Semmens, C. V., & Semmens, B. X. (2003) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1023/a:1021300302208 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Health and Health Care in Britain
Baggott, R. (2004) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-11638-3 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base
Staniszewska, S. H., Herron‐Marx, S., & Mockford, C. (2008) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn044 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationThe realist approach to evaluation research: an introduction
Hewitt, G., Sims, S., & Harris, R. G. (2012) · International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.5.250 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“FIGURE 2 Stages in the RE process (adapted from Pawson and Tilley(115) and Hewitt et al.(126)).”
Rycroft-Malone, J., Wilkinson, J., Burton, C. R., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Graham, I., & Staniszewska, S. (2013) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819613498859 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Client Interviewers on Client-Reported Satisfaction With Mental Health Services
Clark, C. C., Scott, E. A., Boydell, K., & Goering, P. N. (1999) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.50.7.961 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Patient Participation in Health Research: Research With and for People With Spinal Cord Injuries
Abma, T. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305282382 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Comparative analysis of health policy implementation:
Shaw, S. E., Elston, J., & Abbott, S. (2004) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/0144287042000288451 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation
Barnes, M. (2005) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x04002508 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Schneider, B., Scissons, H., Arney, L., Benson, G., Derry, J., Lucas, K., Misurelli, M., Nickerson, D., & Sunderland, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732303262423 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
A Case Study in the Use of Community‐Based Participatory Research in Public Health Nursing
Savage, C. L., Xu, Y., Lee, R., Rose, B. L., Kappesser, M., & Anthony, J. S. (2006) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00585.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Staley, K., Buckland, S. A., Hayes, H., & Tarpey, M. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12017 · Cited by 94 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Not only is there a notable lack of evidence on outcomes and impact of PPI,(31) but what little there is tends to be observational evaluations which rarely consider the links between the context (when and where PPI happens), models of PPI (how it functions) and the outcomes of PPI (what difference it made).(32) As out…”
Patient and public involvement: models and muddles
Forbat, L., Hubbard, G., & Kearney, N. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Practical considerations in case study research: the relationship between methodology and process
McDonnell, A., Jones, M. L., & Read, S. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01487.x · Cited by 93 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Of relevance in the RAPPORT study, and discussed in the following sections, is that case study methods have been seen to be more robust when theoretical propositions to guide data collection and analysis have been previously developed.(136) We have used NPT constructs and domains both to direct our data collection and…”
Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research
Kreis, J., Puhan, M. A., Schünemann, H. J., & Dickersin, K. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00722.x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Preston, J., Popay, J., Britten, N., Collins, M., Froggatt, K., Gibson, A., Lobban, F., Wyatt, K., et al. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Values were a key mechanism in shaping PPI within a research project and, at funder level, a finding consistent with a previous study.(174) Funding organisations often drew a focus on either the moral or the methodological rationale for PPI, and this shaped requirements for PPI within research projects.”
Lindenmeyer, A., Hearnshaw, H., Sturt, J. A., Ormerod, R., & Aitchison, G. (2007) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00451.x · Cited by 88 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, the most frequently cited claim for the value of PPI is in recruitment to studies,(78) most commonly by ensuring that protocols and participant information are more relevant and accessible to participant groups.(70) PPI input is also seen as having importance in shaping the recruitment strategy by bringing lo…”
Wright, D. N. M., Corner, J. L., Hopkinson, J. B., & Foster, C. L. (2006) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00353.x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Barnes, M. (2004) · Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxh034 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Barnes et al.(178) argue that these rules and norms have specific effects on such forums.”
Involving burn survivors in agenda setting on burn research: An added value?
Broerse, J. E. W., Zweekhorst, M. B. M., van Rensen, A. J. M. L., & de Haan, M. J. M. (2009) · Burns · doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.004 · Cited by 83 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition to influencing researchers’ priorities, PPI has increasingly played a part in advising funding bodies on priority setting, for example in medical products,(65) spinal cord injury(66) and burns research.(67) Lay involvement in the review of research grant applications is seen to raise issues not previously…”
Assessing the benefits of participatory research: a rationale for a realist review
Macaulay, A. C., Jagosh, J., Seller, R., Henderson, J., Cargo, M., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Salsberg, J., Green, L. W., Herbert, C. P., et al. (2011) · Global Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/1757975910383936 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the complex nature of PPI means it is challenging to pinpoint its impact and distinct contributions to research studies.(19,100) The varied nature of PPI in terms of structures, roles and relationships required a methodology capable of exploring and evaluating context-specific mechanisms.”
A service users’ research advisory group from the perspectives of both service users and researchers
Rhodes, P., Nocon, A., Booth, M., Chowdrey, M. Y., Fabian, A., Lambert, N., Mohammed, F., & Walgrove, T. (2002) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00376.x · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Being involved with a research team also provides service users and the public with a means of becoming more knowledgeable about health conditions, services and the research process.(58,93,95) Within community-based public health research, benefits of PPI are also reported in enhancing the capacity of community-based…”
Dewar, B. J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01162.x · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PPI not only increases researchers’ confidence in their studies(72) but perhaps most importantly fosters their greater understanding of the service user or patient perspective.(81,98)”
A theory‐based model of translation practices in public health participatory research
Clavier, C., Sénéchal, Y., Vibert, S., & Potvin, L. (2011) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01408.x · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Clavier et al.(186) propose three aspects of bridging: cognitive translation, strategic translation and logistic practices (Table 19).”
Vale, C. L., Thompson, L. C., Murphy, C., Forcat, S., & Hanley, B. (2012) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-9 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dissemination of research findings is also reported as gaining from PPI networks to increase access to peers(81) and relevant sections of the community,(15) and making information more broadly readable.(31,72) There are fewer published claims for PPI as playing a significant role in implementing findings, but, in a US…”
Consumer involvement in health research: a <scp>UK</scp> scoping and survey
Mathie, E., Wilson, P., Poland, F., McNeilly, E., Howe, A., Staniszewska, S., Cowe, M., Munday, D., & Goodman, C. (2014) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12072 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Papers Two PPI coauthors contributed to a scoping and survey paper published in the International Journal of Consumer Studies (January 2014).(158) One co-researcher also submitted a piece on RAPPORT to Balance (Diabetes UK’s patient magazine) in August 2013; it was published in May/June 2014.”
Self-citationEdwards, V., Wyatt, K. M., Logan, S., & Britten, N. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00652.x · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are also claims that PPI improves the overall design in trials,(72) particularly by ensuring the design is acceptable for potential participants.(73) Contributing to the design of interventions is reported as being an important aspect of PPI; examples include stroke research interventions(74) and advising on the…”
Schierhout, G., Hains, J., Si, D., Kennedy, C., Cox, R., Kwedza, R., O’Donoghue, L., Fittock, M., Brands, J., Lonergan, K., et al. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-119 · Cited by 67 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Utilising a similar approach to those of Schierhout et al.(152) and Rycroft-Malone et al.”
Ocloo, J. E., & Fulop, N. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00695.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Public Involvement in Breast Cancer Research: An Analysis and Model for Future Research
McCormick, S., Brody, J. G., Brown, P., & Polk, R. (2004) · International Journal of Health Services · doi:10.2190/hpxb-9rk8-etvm-rvea · Cited by 65 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Being involved with a research team also provides service users and the public with a means of becoming more knowledgeable about health conditions, services and the research process.(58,93,95) Within community-based public health research, benefits of PPI are also reported in enhancing the capacity of community-based…”
Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2011) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.1092 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Speaking for Patients and Carers
Baggott, R., Allsop, J., & Jones, K. L. (2005) · DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80185-1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
An Examination of Opportunities for the Active Patient in Improving Patient Safety
Davis, R. E., Sevdalis, N., Jacklin, R., & Vincent, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0b013e31823cba94 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction?
Telford, R., Beverley, C., Cooper, C. L., & Boote, J. D. (2002) · British Journal of Clinical Governance · doi:10.1108/14664100210427606 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The survey by Telford et al.(162) of 66 NHS research and development leads had a 73% response rate but fewer than 25% reported any PPI in research activity within their respective NHS organisations.”
Martin, G. P. (2011) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01910.x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation
Tolson, D., McIntosh, J., Loftus, L., & Cormie, P. (2006) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in research: future challenges
Staniszewska, S. H., & Denegri, S. (2013) · Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101406 · Cited by 58 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This has been further encouraged through the integration of patient and public involvement (PPI) by most of the main UK funders of health research.(7) This drive towards public involvement in research is not limited to the UK; internationally there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of involving pati…”
Self-citationThere is no paradox with PPI in research
Staley, K. (2013) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100512 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Evaluating complex public health interventions: theory, methods and scope of realist enquiry
Connelly, J. B. (2007) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00790.x · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We employed an overarching critical realist framework(116,117) focused on the mechanisms embedded within PPI, to facilitate our understanding of outcomes present or absent depending on how they were triggered, blocked or modified.(118,119) RE,(115) which draws upon this perspective, was used to inform the research des…”
Power Relations and Reciprocity
Ben-Ari, A. T., & Enosh, G. (2012) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732312470030 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Paterson, C., Allen, J. A., Browning, M., Barlow, G., & Ewings, P. (2005) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2004.12.008 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Contributing to the design of interventions is reported as being an important aspect of PPI; examples include stroke research interventions(74) and advising on the timing of interventions within Parkinson’s disease research.(75) PPI also has a role in ensuring that research tools are refined to more closely reflect th…”
Iliffe, S., McGrath, T., & Mitchell, D. J. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00728.x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded
O’Donnell, M., & Entwistle, V. (2004) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.04.004 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“An earlier study on funders also suggested that charities and centrally funded organisations adopted different approaches and rationales for PPI.(176) It should also be noted that O’Donnell and Entwistle(176) and van Bekkum and Hilton(177) suggest that funders had many anxieties about PPI such as its ‘distorting’ the…”
Andejeski, Y., Bisceglio, I. T., Dickersin, K., Johnson, J. E., Robinson, S. I., Smith, H. S., Visco, F. M., & Rich, I. M. (2002) · Journal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine · doi:10.1089/152460902317586010 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lay involvement in the review of research grant applications is seen to raise issues not previously identified and challenges scientist reviewers to think more about the service user perspective within their deliberations.(68,69) DOI: 10.”
Wand, T., White, K., & Patching, J. (2010) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00488.x · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such social science approaches highlight, specifically, how it can be the reasoning and actions of people (social actors), rather than inherent characteristics of the interventions themselves, that make them work.(113)”
Public Involvement in Setting a National Research Agenda
Oliver, S. R., Armes, D. G., & Gyte, G. M. (2009) · Patient · doi:10.2165/11314860-000000000-00000 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In particular, PPI is seen as being key to the development of plain English summaries as a requirement in many grant applications.(24,62) There are also claims that PPI improves the overall design in trials,(72) particularly by ensuring the design is acceptable for potential participants.”
Elberse, J., Pittens, C. A. C. M., Buning, T. D. C., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2012) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.05.014 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Immigrant Women Implementing Participatory Research in Health Promotion
Meyer, M., Torres, S., Cermeño, N., MacLean, L. M., & Monzón, R. (2003) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945903256707 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Patient involvement and the politics of methodology
Kreindler, S. A. (2009) · Canadian Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00062.x · Cited by 47 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Some respondents, including a funder, had changed their view on this, and after initial surprise reported now seeing their lay representatives as being able to understand and offer more than originally envisaged.(27)”
Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey
Barber, R., Boote, J. D., & Cooper, C. L. (2007) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00457.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Differing perspectives on patient involvement in patient safety
Entwistle, V. A. (2007) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.020362 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Arguments for PPI in patient safety include providing a final ‘buffer’ to prevent errors(214) and reinforcing the moral argument that patients should be included in processes regarding their own care and treatment.(216) However, what is surprising is the lack of consideration of PPI in health-care research acting as t…”
Handbook of Service User Involvement in Nursing and Healthcare Research
Morrow, E. M., Boaz, A., Brearley, S. A., & Ross, F. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444347050 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Patient and public involvement: the policy argument Although some parts of the scientific community have contested what knowledge is credible,(46) the public crisis in confidence in the way health and care services were being run contributed towards a policy shift through the 1990s whereby governance moved towards par…”
Guarino, P., Elbourne, D. R., Carpenter, J. R., & Peduzzi, P. N. (2006) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774506cn133oa · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies,(19,29,106) with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies,(15) comparative multiproject evaluations(107) or studies employing quantitative designs.(108) This reflects the significant methodological…”
Involving users in evaluation: The social relations of user participation in health research
Truman, C., & Raine, P. (2001) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581590110066667 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research
Stevens, T., Wilde, D., Hunt, J. W., & Ahmedzai, S. H. (2003) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00214.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
McKevitt, C., Fudge, N., & Wolfe, C. D. A. (2009) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00573.x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Boote, J. D., Dalgleish, M., Freeman, J., Jones, Z., Miles, M. W., & Rodgers, H. (2012) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00771.x · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, PPI can ensure that the patient and carer perspectives are explicitly addressed within the research questions,(62) and may result in research questions being further refined(17,63) or even abandoning a research application if PPI suggests that the research questions are not meaningful for the target patie…”
Langston, A. L., McCallum, M., Campbell, M., Robertson, C., & Ralston, S. H. (2005) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774505cn065oa · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PPI input is also seen as having importance in shaping the recruitment strategy by bringing local knowledge,(79) or important links to the target population.(80) There are also examples where PPI has contributed to accessing marginalised and seldom heard populations(81,82) and those with rare conditions,(83) and playe…”
Crisis Tendencies, Legitimation and the State
Held, D. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_11 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Partners in projects: Preparing for public involvement in health and social care research
Parkes, J. H., Pyer, M., Wray, P., & Taylor, J. (2014) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.014 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
van Bekkum, J. E., & Hilton, S. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-318 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Eliciting users' views of ECT in two mental health trusts with a user-designed questionnaire
Philpot, M. P., Collins, C., Trivedi, P., Treloar, A. J., Gallacher, S., & Rose, D. S. (2004) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638230410001729843 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
To what extent can people with communication difficulties contribute to health research?
Palmer, R., Paterson, G., Merriman, T., Palmer, R., Sudworth, T., Merriman, I., & Sudworth, K. (2013) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2013.01.20.3.12.c9491 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Burrus, B., Liburd, L. C., & Burroughs, A. (1998) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1023/a:1018718803890 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are also examples where PPI has contributed to accessing marginalised and seldom heard populations(81,82) and those with rare conditions,(83) and played a role in promoting acceptance of researchers by previously sceptical communities.(84) More active involvement in mainly qualitative data analysis has been iden…”
Critical perspectives on user involvement
Swain, J. (2012) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.695523 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Consumers as researchers – innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research
Caldon, L. J. M., Marshall‐Cork, H., Speed, G., Reed, M., & Collins, K. (2010) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00907.x · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. T. (2004) · University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Carter, P., Beech, R., Coxon, D., Thomas, M. J., & Jinks, C. (2013) · Contemporary Social Science · doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.767468 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Overall, making PPI explicit within the research proposal development is seen as lending more credibility to the proposal and hence offering a greater chance of funding.(70,71) In particular, PPI is seen as being key to the development of plain English summaries as a requirement in many grant applications.”
Creative Engagement in Palliative Care
Jarrett, L., & Jayaraman, S. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315380049 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Howe, A. C., MacDonald, H., Barrett, B., & Little, B. (2006) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1191/1463423606pc269oa · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, E., Cook, A., Alexander, H., Cooper, S., Hubbard, G., Morrison, J., & Petch, A. (2006) · Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Williamson, T., Brogden, J., Jones, E., & Ryan, J. (2010) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00909.x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Shaping Health PolicyCase Study Methods and Analysis
Exworthy, M., Peckham, S., Powell, M. A., & Hann, A. (2011) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847427588.001.0001 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Case study methods are a recognised and well-established approach to conducting research in a variety of ‘real life’ settings including health care.(145) Yin(146) defines case study research as ‘an empirical study that investigates contemporary phenomena within a real life context, when the boundaries between the phen…”
Self-citationForbes, L. J. L., Nicholls, C. M., Linsell, L., Graham, J., Tompkins, C. N. E., & Ramirez, A. J. (2010) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-110 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several researchers have identified that PPI has helped them address ethical dilemmas,(17,71,78,85,91) for example ethically appropriate ways of contacting women with recently diagnosed breast cancer and the use of routine patient data.(92) There is also some suggestion that lay co-researchers have a role to play in h…”
The Stream Doctor Project: Community-Driven Stream Restoration
Middleton, J. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0293:tsdpcd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Desired longer-term outcomes for PPI in this arena include sustained conservation(202) and empowerment for the public involved.(203) However, as in social housing, longer-term impacts of PPI are rarely measured and noticeable long-term outcomes may occur only 10 years or more after the project has been set up.”
Goodman, C. M., Mathie, E., Cowe, M., Mendoza, A., Westwood, D., Munday, D., Wilson, P. M., Crang, C., Froggatt, K. A., Iliffe, S., et al. (2011) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/1472-684x-10-20 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is also some suggestion that lay co-researchers have a role to play in helping safeguard potentially vulnerable participants.(82)”
Self-citationPublic involvement in health research: a case study of one NHS project over 5 years
Howe, A., Delaney, S., Romero, J., Tinsley, A., & Vicary, P. (2010) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423609990405 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationManaging Public Involvement in Healthcare Purchasing
Baines, D. L. (1999) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.0040d.x · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, with the advent of the 1990s and a procession of significant changes to the NHS(48) there began a concerted effort to involve patients and the public in key decisions about the purchasing and delivery of health and care services.(49) The pace of policy change speeded up considerably with the new Labour govern…”
Wilson, P. M., & Goodman, C. (2011) · Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1752-9824.2011.01105.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationExperience, knowledge and evidence: a comparison of research relations in health and anthropology
McKevitt, C. (2013) · Evidence and Policy · doi:10.1332/174426413x663751 · Cited by 19 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Criticisms of PPI include tokenism and power asymmetries between researcher and lay representative.(27,52,173) However, Ben-Ari and Enosh(194) suggest that focusing on such exchanges is too simplistic and that, within health research, reciprocity between researcher and the lay representative occurs less through the ex…”
Nathan, S., Stephenson, N., & Braithwaite, J. (2013) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1363459312473617 · Cited by 18 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This issue also illuminates the ongoing debate on what constitutes PPI success.(205) Attaining seemingly small PPI impacts on research processes may mark important steps in achieving greater change within the complex system of health research.”
Studies of the Policy Process: A Case Analysis
Marinetto, M. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15 · see citing works
McNichol, E., & Grimshaw, P. (2014) · International Practice Development Journal · doi:10.19043/ipdj.41.008 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Peckham, S., Wilson, P. M., Williams, L. A., Smiddy, J., Kendall, S. A., Brooks, F. M., Reay, J., Smallwood, D., & Bloomfield, L. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02440 · Cited by 14 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Peckham et al.(57) defined engagement as a commitment to respond or interact.”
InfluentialSelf-citationInvolving patients as advisors in pharmacy practice research: what are the benefits?
Sutton, J. W., & Weiss, M. (2008) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1211/ijpp.16.4.0005 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Working with the public and service users is found to be a process whereby researchers learn to share control and develop facilitation skills.(88,97) PPI not only increases researchers’ confidence in their studies(72) but perhaps most importantly fosters their greater understanding of the service user or patient persp…”
Involving patients in clinical research: the T elescot P atient P anel
Fairbrother, P., McCloughan, L. B., Adam, G., Brand, R., Brown, C. A., Watson, M., Cotter, N., MacKellaig, J. M., & McKinstry, B. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12132 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Badger, F. J., Daly, W. M., & Clifford, C. (2012) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.010 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the case of the latter, this may be caused by less uptake of research training.(166) Many of our senior researcher respondents were also unlikely to have received any formal preparation for PPI, but the actual process of submitting bids (particularly for NIHR funding applications) requires increasingly detailed des…”
Consumers are helping to prioritise research
Royle, J., & Oliver, S. R. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.48/a · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lay involvement in the review of research grant applications is seen to raise issues not previously identified and challenges scientist reviewers to think more about the service user perspective within their deliberations.(68,69) DOI: 10.”
Reconstructing consumer participation in evidence‐based health care: a polemic
Jordan, Z., & Court, A. (2010) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00906.x · Cited by 11 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, despite this, PPI is poorly defined and conceptualised,(20,21) with varied definitions and terms used to describe it.(22)”
The UK Diabetes Research Network—an opportunity and a challenge
Matthews, D. R., Kennedy, E. D., Darbyshire, J. H., & Johnston, D. G. (2007) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02005.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Authoritative consumers or experts by experience? User groups in health and social care
Barnes, M. (2009) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847421814.003.0012 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While such groups are often organised in relation to a specific health condition (such as diabetes mellitus) or a shared experience (such as domestic violence), the overall movement has questioned conventional assumptions of, for example, disability, and also provided the means for advocacy, political lobbying, provis…”
Public health policy: Between victim blaming and the nanny state ‐ will the third way work?
Connelly, J. (1999) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442879908423766 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
We need to move the debate on open clinical trial data forward
Thompson, M., & Heneghan, C. J. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e8351 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
How to Make Health and Social Care Research Radical and Really, Really Useful
Purtell, R., & Gibson, A. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446288757.n8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Authoritative consumers or experts by experience?
Barnes, M. (2018) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt9qgp0r.18 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
May, C. R., Finch, T., Ballini, L., MacFarlane, A., Mair, F., Murray, E., Treweek, S., & Rapley, T. (2011) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-245 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“There is currently no published review of its empirical application, but it has been seen to have been applied to good effect in a number of social and health-care settings.(121,134,135) Of relevance in the RAPPORT study, and discussed in the following sections, is that case study methods have been seen to be more rob…”
Reciprocity: combining youth involvement, engagement and participation in health research
Goodman, A., Roberts, H. M., & Green, J. (2013) · LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) · doi:10.17037/pubs.01410529 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- Department of Health, 2004, Patient and Public Involvement in Health: The Evidence for Policy Implementation
- Department of Health, 2008, Stronger Voice, Better Care
- Department of Health, 2012, Liberating the NHS: No Decision about Me without Me. Government Response to the Consultation
- Department of Health, 2006, Best Research for Best Health
- National Institutes of Health, Director’s Council of Public Representatives
- Consumers Health Forum of Australia, What We Do
- World Health Organization, Ninth Futures Forum on Health Systems Governance and Public Participation
- Staley, Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research
- Hayes, 2012, Briefing Notes for Researchers: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research
- Boote, Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS) [published online ahead of print October 1 2013]
- Gradinger, Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review [published online ahead of print December 10 2013]
- HM Government, 2001, The Royal Liverpool Children’s Inquiry: Summary and Recommendations
- HM Government, 2001, The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995: Learning from Bristol
- Hunt, 1981, Settling accounts with the parasite people: a critique of ‘A Life Apart’ by E.J. Miller and G.V. Gwynne, Disability Challenge, 1, 37
- Barnes, 2012, Critical Perspectives on User Involvement, 143
- Barnes, 2012, Critical Perspectives on User Involvement, xv
- Baxter, 2001, Small Voices Big Noises: Lay Involvement in Health Research. Lessons from Other Fields
- Expert Patients Programme, 2010, Self-Care Reduces Costs and Improves Health: The Evidence
- Staley, 2013, A Series of Case Studies Illustrating the Impact of Service User and Carer Involvement on Research
- Walker, Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation [published online ahead of print September 19 2013]
- Fairbrother, 2013, Involving patients in clinical research: the Telescot Patient Panel [published online ahead of print September 30 2013]
- Hofmann, Expectations of new treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: developing a patient-generated questionnaire [published online ahead of print April 25 2013]
- Faulkner, 2007, Beyond Our Expectations: A Report of the Experiences of Involving Service Users in Forensic Mental Health Research
- Shippee, Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework [published online ahead of print June 3 2013]
- Pawson, 2001, Realistic Evaluation
- Pawson, 2004, Realist Evaluation
- Delanty, 1997, Beyond Constructivism and Realism
- Brett, 2010, The PIRICOM Study: Systematic Review of the Conceptualization, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research
- Department of Health, Valuing People Now: A New Three-Year Strategy for Learning Disabilities
- Royal College of Psychiatry, Clinical Syndromes Associated with Learning Disability
- Great Britain, 1998, Data Protection Act
- May, 2010, Normalization Process Theory On-Line Users’ Manual and Toolkit
- National Institute of Health Research, 2011, Making the Difference
- All-Party Parliamentary Group, 2014, Patient Empowerment: For Better Quality, More Sustainable Health Services Globally
- INVOLVE, 2012, What Is Public Involvement in Research?
- National Voices, Patient Involvement
- Department of Health, 2011, Innovation Health and Wealth, Accelerating Adoption and Diffusion in the NHS
- National Cancer Research Institute, 2012, Action on Access: Widening Patient Participation in Clinical Trials
- PiiAF Study Group, Public Involvement Assessment Framework (PiiAF)
- Habermas, 1984, Theory of Communicative Action Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society
- Habermas, 1987, Theory of Communicative Action Volume Two: Lifeworld and System. A Critique of Functionalist Reason
- INVOLVE, Cost Calculator Tool
- Titmuss, 1970, The Gift Relationship
- Cairncross, 2001, Tenants Managing: An Evaluation of Tenant Management Organisations in England
- Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2011, Decisions on Assessing Research Impact
- Cystic Fibrosis Trust, Cystic Fibrosis: Investing in Research to Change Lives
- Hunn, 2013, Patient and Public Engagement Project: Patient and Public Dialogue Workshops
- Armes, 2011, Mental Health Researchers’ TOOLKIT for Involving Service Users in the Research Process
- Research Design Service London, 2010, Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research: A Handbook for Researchers by Research Design Service London
- British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, 2013, Patient and Public Involvement: Guidance for Researchers Supported by the BPSU
- McGrath, Patient and Public Involvement Guidance Document for ESRC
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Guidance
- Patient and Public Involvement Solutions, 2010, Patient Participation: Community Voices Project to Support Practice Based Commissioning
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983 · see citing works
Self-citationStaniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Self-citationManafò, E., Petermann, L., Mason-Lai, P., & Vandall‐Walker, V. (2018) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
“• Initiate and maintain partnerships between researchers and stakeholders [24, 42, 44, 55]”
BackgroundInfluentialPatient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews
Price, A., Albarqouni, L., Kirkpatrick, J., Clarke, M., Liew, S. M., Roberts, N., & Burls, A. (2018) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12805 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Atwere, P., Campbell, P., Chalkidou, K., Chang, S., Crowe, S., et al. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
“explore what works, for whom, why, and in what context [45].”
BackgroundShen, S., Doyle‐Thomas, K. A. R., Beesley, L., Karmali, A., Williams, L., Tanel, N. L., & McPherson, A. C. (2016) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12490 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Staniszewska, S. H., Denegri, S., Matthews, R., & Minogue, V. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
“22 Underpinning these concepts is support for the principles of co-production as the basis of the NIHR’s approach in the future.”
MethodSelf-citationHow to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research
Hoddinott, P., Pollock, A., O’Cathain, A., Boyer, I., Taylor, J., MacDonald, C., Oliver, S. R., & Donovan, J. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15162.1 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Madden, M., & Speed, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2017.00007 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“’s (Wilson et al., 2015) indings that patients involved in health research are most oten involved in steering committees with uncertain powers to steer or in reviewing participant information lealets.”
BackgroundCrocker, J. C., Boylan, A., Bostock, J., & Locock, L. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12479 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about
Duffett, L. D. (2016) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Tembo, D., Hickey, G., Montenegro, C., Chandler, D., Nelson, E., Porter, K., Dikomitis, L., Chambers, M., Chimbari, M., Mumba, N., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n178 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationBlackburn, S. J., McLachlan, S., Jowett, S. M., Kinghorn, P., Gill, P. S., Higginbottom, A., Rhodes, C., Stevenson, F. A., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0100-8 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Recent research has identified the characteristics of effective PPI [11] and the mechanisms required to sustain it [12].”
BackgroundStaley, K., & Barron, D. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“Through mutual learning [8], researchers”
BackgroundInfluentialBoylan, A. R., Locock, L., Thomson, R., & Staniszewska, S. H. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12883 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationRolfe, D. E., Ramsden, V. R., Banner, D., & Graham, I. D. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in dementia research in the European Union: a scoping review
Miah, J., Dawes, P., Edwards, S., Leroi, I., Starling, B., & Parsons, S. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1217-9 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review
Grill, C. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“For instance, funders like the British National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) made stakeholder involvement an indispensable condition for funding research projects since 1996.”
Gibson, A., Welsman, J. R., & Britten, N. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12486 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Integrative review of the social determinants of health in older adults with multimorbidity
Northwood, M., Ploeg, J., Markle‐Reid, M., & Sherifali, D. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13408 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this?
Green, G. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“There is also evidence that public involvement is positively associated with recruitment into studies on the NIHR Mental Health Research portfolio [37] and this was also reported in the RAPPORT study [33].”
BackgroundInfluentialMathie, E., Wythe, H., Munday, D., Millac, P. A. H., Rhodes, G., Roberts, N., Smeeton, N., Poland, F. M., & Jones, J. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12684 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationInterdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science.
Tebes, J. K., & Thai, N. D. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000281 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“…basic science describe partnerships to study arthritis, dementia, diabetes, and sight-loss and discuss how engagement can inform research priorities, improve designs, and sharpen how scientists communicate about their work (Dobbs & Whitaker, 2016; Petit-Zeman & Locock, 2013; Wilson et al., 2015).”
Anderson, M., Pitchforth, E., Asaria, M., Brayne, C., Casadei, B., Charlesworth, A., Coulter, A., Franklin, B. D., Donaldson, C., Drummond, M., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00232-4 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Patient and Public Involvement in research: A journey to co-production
Price, A., Clarke, M., Staniszewska, S., Chu, L., Tembo, D., Kirkpatrick, M., & Nelken, Y. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.021 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationConsensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data-Intensive Health Research
Aitken, M., Tully, M. P., Porteous, C., Denegri, S., Cunningham‐Burley, S., Banner, N. F., Black, C., Burgess, M., Cross, L., van Delden, J. J. M., et al. (2019) · International Journal for Population Data Science · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“There is now broad recognition of the value of public knowledge and expertise in relation to science, technology and medicine [4, 5] and PI&E is increasingly part of the contemporary landscape of health research and health care innovation [6, 7].”
BackgroundFarooqi, A. M., Jutlla, K., Raghavan, R., Wilson, A. M., Uddin, M. S., Akroyd, C., Patel, N., Campbell-Morris, P. P., & Farooqi, A. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01489-2 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“Reciprocal arrangements with community and voluntary sector groups for their time should also be considered, such as, undertaking education sessions for their groups on health topics or presenting information about your research [28].”
BackgroundFacilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research
Maccarthy, J., Guérin, S., Wilson, A. G., & Dorris, E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216600 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice?
Liabo, K., Boddy, K., Bortoli, S. H. D., Irvine, J., Boult, H., Fredlund, M., Joseph, N., Bjornstad, G. J., & Morris, C. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-0183-x · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Chambers, E., Gardiner, C., Thompson, J., & Seymour, J. E. (2019) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216319858247 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Dawson, S., Ruddock, A., Parmar, V., Morris, R., Cheraghi‐Sohi, S., Giles, S. J., & Campbell, S. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in designing and conducting doctoral research: the whys and the hows
Tomlinson, J., Medlinskiene, K., Cheong, V., Khan, S., & Fylan, B. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0155-1 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Ethical Considerations for the Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research
Rivera, S. C., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Ives, J., Draper, H., Mercieca‐Bebber, R., Ells, C., Hunn, A., Scott, J. A., Fernandez, C. V., Dickens, A., et al. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.6421 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
South, A., Hanley, B., Gafos, M., Cromarty, B., Stephens, R. J., Sturgeon, K., Scott, K., Cragg, W. J., Tweed, C., Teera, J., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1488-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Howe, A. C., Mathie, E., Munday, D., Cowe, M., Goodman, C. M., Keenan, J., Kendall, S. A., Poland, F. M., Staniszewska, S. H., & Wilson, P. M. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, J., Cowe, M., Marks, S. A., McAllister, T., Mendoza, A., Ponniah, C., Wythe, H., & Mathie, E. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“A scoping exercise of PPI in research in the UK [22], published in 2014 as part of the RAPPORT study [20], found that 51% of the182 research studies included in the scoping exercise reported some element of PPI in the research conducted.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPatients as Research Partners; How to Value their Perceptions, Contribution and Labor?
Smith, E. M. R., Bélisle‐Pipon, J., & Resnik, D. B. (2019) · Citizen Science Theory and Practice · doi:10.5334/cstp.184 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability
Jinks, C., Carter, P., Rhodes, C., Taylor, R., Beech, R., Dziedzic, K., Blackburn, S. J., Hughes, R. W., & Ong, B. N. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0015-1 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Since completing our evaluation the RAPPORT study [11] has been published which outlines six salient actions that are required for positive outcomes and impact of PPI.”
BackgroundMann, C., Chilcott, S., PLUMB, K. H. M., Brooks, E., & Man, M. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Our experience also aligns with the findings of the RAPPORT study [7], which identifies six conditions most influential in establishing effective PPI.”
BackgroundResultPatient and Public Involvement in Identifying Dementia Research Priorities
Bethell, J., Pringle, D. M., Chambers, L. W., Cohen, C. A., Commisso, E., Cowan, K., Fehr, P., Laupacis, A., Szeto, P., & McGilton, K. S. (2018) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.15453 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Datta, S., Pink, J., Medley, G. F., Petrou, S., Staniszewska, S. H., Underwood, M. R., Sonnenberg, P., & Keeling, M. J. (2019) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-019-4108-y · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationEngaging consumers in health research: a narrative review
Anderst, J., Conroy, K. M., Fairbrother, G., Hallam, L., McPhail, A., & Taylor, V. (2020) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah19202 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Lindblom, S., Flink, M., Elf, M., Laska, A. C., von Koch, L., & Ytterberg, C. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13233 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“43 Furthermore, the roles, responsibilities and objectives should have been more clearly defined to facilitate partnership and engagement.”
BackgroundJohnson, H., Ogden, M., Brighton, L. J., Etkind, S. N., Oluyase, A. O., Chukwusa, E., Yu, P., de Wolf‐Linder, S., Smith, P. A., Bailey, S., et al. (2020) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216320956819 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
PPI in research: a reflection from early stage researchers
Biggane, A. M., Olsen, M., & Williamson, P. R. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0170-2 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“This will enable them to champion meaningful PPI, and to produce more valid and relevant research evidence [28].”
BackgroundCluley, V., Ziemann, A., Feeley, C., Olander, E. K., Shamah, S., & Stavropoulou, C. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13437 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Cooke, J., Langley, J., Wolstenholme, D., & Hampshaw, S. M. (2016) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2017, 6(6), 345–348 347 or practice to translate across culturally defined boundaries.”
BackgroundInfluentialKearney, A., Williamson, P. R., Young, B., Bagley, H., Gamble, C. L., Denegri, S., Muir, D., Simon, N. A., Thomas, S., Elliot, J., et al. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12583 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Deep experiential knowledge: reflections from mutual aid groups for evidence-based practice
Noorani, T. N., Karlsson, M., & Borkman, T. J. (2019) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/174426419x15468575283765 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees
McCoy, M. S., Jongsma, K. R., Friesen, P., Dunn, M., Neuhaus, C. P., Rand, L. Z., & Sheehan, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105088 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Wilson, P. M., Mathie, E., Poland, F. M., Keenan, J., Howe, A. C., Munday, D., Kendall, S. A., Cowe, M., Staniszewska, S. H., & Goodman, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819617750688 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationPate, A., Emsley, R., Ashcroft, D. M., Brown, B. C., & van Staa, T. P. (2019) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1368-8 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
How to involve children and young people in what is, after all, their research
Preston, J., Stones, S. R., Davies, H. T., & Phillips, B. (2019) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2018-315118 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: Impact, resources and recommendations
Coupe, N., & Mathieson, A. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12976 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Dalkin, S. M., Hardwick, R., Haighton, C., & Finch, T. L. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00172-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“[18] described embedding of patient and public involvement as part of the RAPPORT study [16, 20] but in this paper, used NPT only to focus on the embedding of patient and public involvement processes within the RAPPORT project as a case study (for which applying a Realist approach would likely have been limited).”
InfluentialWesterink, H. J., Oirbans, T., Garvelink, M. M., van Uden‐Kraan, C. F., Zouitni, O., Bart, H. A. J., van der Wees, P. J., & van der Nat, P. B. (2023) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104946 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
South, A., Hanley, B., Gafos, M., Cromarty, B., Stephens, R. J., Sturgeon, K., Scott, K., Cragg, W. J., Tweed, C., Teera, J., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1567-y · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Crocker, J. C., Pratt-Boyden, K., Hislop, J., Rees, S., Locock, L., Olszowski, S., Chant, A., Treweek, S. P., Cook, J. A., Woolfall, K., et al. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3183-0 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Hovén, E., Eriksson, L. E., D’Souza, Å. M., Sörensen, J., Hill, D. W., Viklund, C., Wettergren, L., & Lampic, C. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00207-4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“This is in line with the National Institute for Health Research funded RAPPORT study [38], which emphasizes establishment of relationships maintained over time as a key characteristic for effective PPI that goes beyond the consultation level.”
ResultThe role of patient and public involvement leads in facilitating feedback: “invisible work”
Mathie, E., Smeeton, N., Munday, D., Rhodes, G., Wythe, H., & Jones, J. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00209-2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“The skills needed to facilitate between the needs of both researchers and PPI contributors are numerous [6, 32] and Wilson et al. (2015) found Patient and Public Involvement was more strongly embedded if there was a person with a designated responsibility for co-ordinating and facilitating PPI [7].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationon behalf of the BRIGHTLIGHT Team, Taylor, R. M., (YAP), Y. A. P., Whelan, J. S., Gibson, F., Morgan, S. J., & Fern, L. A. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Although there is now an increasing body of literature available addressing the evaluation of PPIE [7] this is quite recent and was not available at the start of our study.”
BackgroundThe burden of proof: The process of involving young people in research
Dovey‐Pearce, G., Walker, S. L. M., Fairgrieve, S., Parker, M., & Rapley, T. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12870 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Hashem, F., Calnan, M., & Brown, P. R. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12594 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Having a clearly defined role is paramount for NICE to be able to carve out a bespoke function for patient experts, to understand where in the decision- making framework patient experts reside and what purpose their contribution makes at the appraisal meetings and within wider STA deliberations.(36)”
BackgroundCo-production: a kind revolution
Staniszewska, S. H., Hickey, G., Coutts, P., Thurman, B., & Coldham, T. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“High quality relationships build trust [18], and attendees saw this as vital to effective co-production.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBéland, S., Lambert, M., Delahunty‐Pike, A., Howse, D., Schwarz, C. M., Chouinard, M., Aubrey‐Bassler, K., Burge, F., Doucet, S. A., Danish, A., et al. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13542 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“In a realist evaluation on patient and public involvement in 23 clinical research studies, Wilson et al.(42) found that the relationship between academic researchers and patient partners was a key factor for successful patient engagement and that relationships took time to build.”
BackgroundHaywood, K. L., Lyddiatt, A., Brace-McDonnell, S. J., Staniszewska, S. H., & Salek, S. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1465-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationVat, L. E., Warren, M., Goold, S. D., Davidge, E., Porter, N., Schuitmaker‐Warnaar, T. J., Broerse, J. E. W., & Etchegary, H. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00206-5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Additional, qualitative, items were adapted from the RAPPORT study tools [8] to complement the closed-ended questions.”
MethodInvolving Patients in Health Economics Research: “The PACTS Principles”
Hawton, A., Boddy, K., Kandiyali, R., Tatnell, L., Gibson, A., & Goodwin, E. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00461-4 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“As other researchers have found, taking the time to establish strong working relationships, typified by shared understanding and trust, can generate greater positive impacts from involvement [17, 20, 22].”
BackgroundPatient and public involvement in research
Beresford, P., & Russo, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108855464.009 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Gorman, R., & Davies, G. F. (2020) · Social & Cultural Geography · doi:10.1080/14649365.2020.1814850 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Health Research and medical research charities, now only fund research developed through involving patients (Wilson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundShé, É. N., Cassidy, J., Davies, C., Brún, A. D., Donnelly, S., Dorris, E., Dunne, N., Egan, K., Foley, M., Galvin, M., et al. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00220-7 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Impact of involving people with dementia and their care partners in research: a qualitative study
Miah, J., Parsons, S., Lovell, K., Starling, B., Leroi, I., & Dawes, P. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039321 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research
Sanchez, S., Thorburn, R., Rea, M., Kaufman, P., Schwartz, R., Selby, P., & Chaiton, M. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13975 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“52,53 One of the most commonly stated benefits of engaging youth in research is that they provide unique perspectives that help enhance research questions and priorities.”
BackgroundPatient and public involvement in health literacy interventions: a mapping review
Wilsher, S. H., Brainard, J. S., Loke, Y. K., & Salter, C. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0081-z · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Lander, J., Langhof, H., & Dierks, M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204187 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bethell, J., Puts, M. T. E., Sattar, S., Andrew, M. K., Choate, A. S., Clarke, B., Cowan, K., DeAngelis, C., Elliott, J. B., Fitch, M. I., et al. (2019) · Canadian Geriatrics Journal · doi:10.5770/cgj.22.336 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Seeralan, T., Härter, M., Koschnitzke, C., Scholl, M., Kohlmann, S., Lehmann, M., Eisele, M., Braunschneider, L., Marx, G., Scherer, M., et al. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13039 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Shields, G., Brown, L., Adrian Wells, A., Capobianco, L., & Vass, C. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Patient and public involvement activities have been linked to improved recruitment materials [50], more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies [47] and an increased likelihood of recruiting the necessary”
BackgroundPatient and Public Involvement in Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Lorgelly, P. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00505-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“This followed the consumerist movement in the 1980s where patients and the public were asked to provide feedback to understand if health care systems were meeting service users’ needs (akin to customer satisfaction) [2].”
BackgroundMathieson, A., Brunton, L., & Wilson, P. M. (2025) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-025-00725-w · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationThe public and patient involvement imperative in Ireland: Building on policy drivers
Gilfoyle, M., MacFarlane, A. E., Hannigan, A., Niranjan, V. R., Hughes, Z., & Salsberg, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038409 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“(40), Ireland can benefit from other countries’ successes in relation to optimal approaches to PPI in health research (18, 41, 42).”
BackgroundPublic involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society
Hunter, D. J., Kieslich, K., Littlejohns, P., Staniszewska, S. H., Tumilty, E., Weale, A., & Williams, I. (2016) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-04-2016-0057 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationCostello, W., & Dorris, E. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12972 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Health for the People, by the People
OECD (2021) · OECD health policy studies · doi:10.1787/c259e79a-en · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Snowball, E., Loughlin, R. F., Eagleson, H., Barnett, K. M., McLellan, E., O’Connor, D., Kelly, C. M., Thelker, C., McGilton, K. S., & Bethell, J. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00359-5 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“It is also advocated as a human right, whereby the public, and particularly people impacted by the research, can have a say in publicly funded research [8].”
BackgroundMah, H., Dobson, R., & Thomson, A. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70205 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
the D1 Now Type 1 Diabetes Young Adult Study Group, O’Hara, M. C., Cunningham, Á., Keighron, C. N., Allen, G., Caulfield, A., Duffy, C., Long, M., Mallon, M., Mullins, M., et al. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0068-9 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Crocker-Buqué, T., Edelstein, M. L., & Mounier‐Jack, S. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0824-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model
Evans, B. A., Porter, A. M., Snooks, H. A., & Burholt, V. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0671-6 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Mathie E, Wilson P, Poland F, McNeily E, Howe A, Staniszewska S, Cowe M, Munday D, Goodman C. Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey.”
BackgroundInfluentialGilfoyle, M., Melro, C. M., Koskinas, E., & Salsberg, J. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Reflections and experiences of a co-researcher involved in a renal research study
Marks, S. A., Mathie, E., Smiddy, J., Jones, J., & Silva‐Gane, M. D. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0120-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Two recent studies which focused on PPI involved co-researchers in interviewing and data analysis [20, 21].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBroadening diversity through creative involvement to identify research priorities
Tierney, S., Dawson, S., Boylan, A. R., Richards, G., Park, S. E., Turk, A., & Babatunde, O. O. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00244-z · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Baxter, S. K., Muir, D., Brereton, L., Allmark, C., Barber, R., Harris, L., Hodges, B., Khan, S., & Baird, W. O. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0027-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
Staley, K., & Elliott, J. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0080-0 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Evaluating health information technologies: A systematic review of framework recommendations
Neame, M. T., Sefton, G., Roberts, M., Harkness, D., Sinha, I. P., & Hawcutt, D. B. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104247 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Keenan, J., Poland, F. M., Boote, J. D., Howe, A. C., Wythe, H., Varley, A., Vicary, P., Irvine, L., & Wellings, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215953 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationMoving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research
Turner, G., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Price, G. W., Skrybant, M., & Calvert, M. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/0141076819890551 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Vanderhout, S. M., Nevins, P., Nicholls, S. G., Macarthur, C., Brehaut, J. C., Potter, B. K., Gillies, K., Goulão, B., Smith, M. P., Hilderley, A. J., et al. (2023) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20220198 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kendall, C., Fitzgerald, M., Kang, R. S., Wong, S. T., Katz, A., Fortin, M., Dionne, É., Kuluski, K., O’Brien, M. A., Ploeg, J., et al. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0132-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Kaisler, R. E., Kulnik, S. T., Klager, E., Kletečka-Pulker, M., Schaden, E., & Stainer-Hochgatterer, A. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045618 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., Poland, F., Staniszewska, S., Kendall, S., Munday, D., Cowe, M., & Peckham, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hertfordshire (GB)
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Patricia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Services and Delivery Research
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 1-176
- ISSN
- 2050-4349 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2218926431
- Semantic Scholar
- 232b2a8cdc3b068aa80ca689a03261df336244dc
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 177
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 35.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Services and Delivery Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) Programme (10/2001/36)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, health research, research ethics approval, funder requirements, barriers and facilitators, research funding, arthritis, cystic fibrosis, dementia, learning disabilities, Normalisation Process Theory, research transparency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review