The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retraction Note: When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately?
Tattersall, M. H. N., Gattellari, M., Voigt, K., & Butow, P. N. (2001) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s005200100291 · Cited by 64
RetractedDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences
Weeks, J. C. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.21.1709 · Cited by 1,319
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w · Cited by 1,308
Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer Patients
CASSILETH, B. R., ZUPKIS, R. V., SUTTON-SMITH, K., & MARCH, V. (1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832 · Cited by 1,144
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Degner, L. F. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540420081039 · Cited by 1,136
Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 · Cited by 1,008
Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres
Jenkins, V, Fallowfield, L., & Saul, J. (2001) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573 · Cited by 845
Fallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, G. P., & Baum, M. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575 · Cited by 750
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Giles, K. (2015) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000031 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review
Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004 · Cited by 849
Patient Engagement—What Works?
Coulter, A. (2012) · Journal of Ambulatory Care Management · doi:10.1097/jac.0b013e318249e0fd · Cited by 450
Advanced cancer patients’ prognostic information preferences: a review
Innes, S., & Payne, S. (2009) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216308098799 · Cited by 331
Ryan, R. E., Santesso, N., Lowe, D., Hill, S., Grimshaw, J. M., Prictor, M., Kaufman, C., Cowie, G., & Taylor, M. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007768.pub3 · Cited by 273
Chen, C. H., Kuo, S. C., & Tang, S. T. (2017) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216316663976 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaston, C. M., & Mitchell, G.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2252-2264
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018156827
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015
- The paper
- Gaston, C. M., & Mitchell, G. (2005). Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
