Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,008

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?

Degner, Lesley F., Sloan, Jeffrey A.·1992·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Blanchard, 1988, Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients, Soc Sci Med, 27, 1139, 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cassileth, 1980, Information and participation preferences among cancer patients, Ann Intern Med, 92, 832, 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ende, 1989, Measuring patients' desire for autonomy, J Gen Intern Med, 4, 23, 10.1007/BF02596485 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Vertinsky, 1974, Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision making, Health Serv Res, 9, 121
  5. Degner, 1988, Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer, Res Nurs Health, 11, 367, 10.1002/nur.4770110604 · DOI
  6. McKenna, 1981, Weighting the seriousness of perceived health problems using Thurstone's method of paired comparisons, Int J Epidemiol, 10, 93, 10.1093/ije/10.1.93 · DOI
  7. McCorkle, 1978, Development of a sympton distress scale, Cancer Nurs, 1, 373, 10.1097/00002820-197810000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. McCorkle, 1989, A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients, Cancer, 64, 1375, 10.1002/1097-0142(19890915)64:6<1375::AID-CNCR2820640634>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Moinpour, 1989, Quality of life end points in cancer clinical trials: Review and recommendations, J Natl Cancer Inst, 81, 485, 10.1093/jnci/81.7.485 · DOI · Paper page
  10. McCullagh, 1980, Regression models for ordinal data, J R Stat Soc, 42, 109, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Annas, 1980, Breast cancer: The treatment of choice, Hastings Cent Rep, 10, 27, 10.2307/3561276 · doi:10.2307/3561276
  12. Beisecker, 1990, Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors, Med Care, 28, 19, 10.1097/00005650-199001000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sutherland, 1989, Cancer patients: Their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions, J R Soc Med, 82, 260, 10.1177/014107688908200506 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Northouse, 1990, Models of helping and coping in cancer care, Patient Educ Counsel, 15, 49, 10.1016/0738-3991(90)90008-9 · DOI
  15. Lidz, 1983, Barriers to informed consent, Ann Intern Med, 99, 539, 10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-539 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-539
  16. Beisecker, 1988, Aging and the desire for information and input in medical decisions: Patient consumerism in medical encounters, Gerontologist, 28, 330, 10.1093/geront/28.3.330 · DOI
  17. Robinson, 1985, Improving the efficiency of patients' comprehension monitoring, Soc Sci Med, 21, 915, 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90148-0 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,008

Metadata

Authors
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
941-950
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155030706
Cited by
1,008
References
0
FWCI
23.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9
The paper
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1992). Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.