The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137
When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?
Gattellari, M., Voigt, K. J., Butow, P. N., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.2.503 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework
Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002 · Cited by 314
Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: beyond the micro‐social
Morant, N., Kaminskiy, E., & Ramon, S. (2016) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12392 · Cited by 129
Deep, K. S., Griffith, C. H., & Wilson, J. F. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6 · Cited by 83
Association between physicians’ beliefs and the option of comfort care for critically ill patients
Schenker, Y., Tiver, G. A., Hong, S. Y., & White, D. B. (2012) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2671-4 · Cited by 79
Hong, Y., Tauscher, J., & Cardel, M. (2018) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31052 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Wirtz, V., Cribb, A., & Barber, N.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-124
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018035540
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.017
- The paper
- Wirtz, V., Cribb, A., & Barber, N. (2006). Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of models. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
