CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112Smoking Behavior and CessationReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Public and private domains of religiosity and adolescent smoking transitions

Nonnemaker, James, McNeely, Clea A, Blum, Robert Wm·2006·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We used data from a nationally representative sample of US adolescents in school grades 7 through 12 to explore the effects of public and private religiosity on initiation, escalation, and cessation of smoking. We found that adolescents' decisions to experiment with smoking are influenced by both their individual practice of their faith and by participation in a larger faith community. However, the effects of private and public religiosity are specific to different decision points on the smoking uptake process. Private religiosity was protective against initiation of regular smoking among nonsmokers. It also was protective against initiation of experimental smoking but only when the young person frequently attended religious services or a religious youth group. Although private religiosity appeared to discourage the uptake of smoking, it was unrelated to reduction or cessation once a young person has become addicted to cigarettes. In contrast, public religiosity did predict reduction and cessation of cigarette use among regular smokers. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the domains in which religiosity are important extend beyond the individual and include religious institutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.052

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. DiIulio, 2004, Religion and social policy II: Getting faith-based programs right, The Public Interest, Spring, 75

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nonnemaker, J., McNeely, C. A., & Blum, R. W.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Nonnemaker, James
ORCID
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
62
Issue
12
Pages
3084-3095
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.052
OpenAlex
W1988388748
Cited by
112
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
adolescent smoking, religiosity, public religiosity, private religiosity, smoking initiation, smoking cessation, religious service attendance, religious organizations, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Attitude to Health, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Religion and Psychology, Risk-Taking, Smoking, Social Conformity, Social Desirability, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, United States, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review