The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
Tsoukias, A., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1994) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2584151 · Cited by 8,370
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 4,595
Self-citationDecisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs
Kidd, J. (1977) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1977.126 · Cited by 1,743
Discrete choice methods with simulation
(2004) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(04)90100-9 · Cited by 1,196
Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models
Small, K. A., & Rosen, H. S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911129 · Cited by 1,188
On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
Williams, H. C. W. L. (1977) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a090285 · Cited by 1,030
Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety
Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1992) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/074391569201100202 · Cited by 795
Self-citationBest–worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it
Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J., & Coast, J. (2007) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002 · Cited by 784
Self-citation
Cited by
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Self-citationDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
de Bekker‐Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2012) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1697 · Cited by 1,329
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x · Cited by 851
Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs
Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640902827623 · Cited by 797
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancsar, E., Louviere, J., & Flynn, T.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1738-1753
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072415900
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007
- The paper
- Lancsar, E., Louviere, J., & Flynn, T. (2007). Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
