The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety
Abstract
With social issues again close to the top of the research agenda for marketers, policy makers are increasingly likely to be presented public opinion research findings that suggest the public is very concerned about issues within their jurisdiction. Such findings have some shortcomings as a basis for policy decision making however. It is often difficult to interpret the practical importance of consumers’ expressed levels of concern, and concern alone tells nothing about what actions will be seen as ameliorating the problem. Alternative methods, borrowed from more mainstream marketing research, can readily overcome these shortcomings. To illustrate, the authors report the findings of a low cost study designed to identify what citizens want a government department to do in response to polling suggesting high levels of concern about food safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., Bresnahan, B. W., Kanninen, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 · Cited by 1,799
What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey
Dumbrell, N. P., Kragt, M. E., & Gibson, F. L. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.002 · Cited by 141
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption
F. Burke, P., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0294 · Cited by 111
Kim, B., Kim, S. (., King, B., & Heo, C. Y. (2019) · Journal of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/1356766718757789 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 12-25
- ISSN
- 0743-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7207
- OpenAlex
- W2909224716
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/074391569201100202
- The paper
- Finn, A., & Louviere, J. J. (1992). Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569201100202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.