The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we examine the application of informed consent to ethnographic research in health care settings. We do not quarrel with either the principle of informed consent or its translation into the requirement that research should only be carried out with consenting participants. However, we do challenge the identification of informed consent with the particular set of bureaucratic practices of ethical review which currently operate in Canada, the US and elsewhere. We argue that these anticipatory regulatory regimes threaten the significant contribution of ethnographic research to the creation of more efficient, more effective, more equitable and more humane health care systems. Informed consent in ethnographic research is neither achievable nor demonstrable in the terms set by anticipatory regulatory regimes that take clinical research or biomedical experimentation as their paradigm cases. This is because of differences in the practices of ethnographic and biomedical research which we discuss. These include the extended periods of time ethnographers spend in the research setting, the emergent nature of ethnographic research focus and design, the nature and positioning of risk in ethnographic research, the power relationships between researchers and participants, and the public and semi-public nature of the settings normally studied. Anticipatory regulatory regimes are inimical to ethnographic research and risk undermining the contribution of systematic inquiry to understanding whether institutions do what they claim to do, fairly and civilly and with an appropriate mobilisation of resources. We do not suggest that we should simply ignore ethics or leave matters to the individual consciences of researchers. Rather, we need to develop and strengthen professional models of regulation which emphasise education, training and mutual accountability. We conclude the paper with a number of suggestions about how such professional models might be implemented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Handbook of Qualitative Research.
DeVault, M. L., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076551 · Cited by 6,282
The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
Mol, A. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822384151 · Cited by 4,381
Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800403262360 · Cited by 2,671
Beecher, H. K. (1966) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196606162742405 · Cited by 1,914
(1965) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,510
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781848608337 · Cited by 1,159
The Oxford handbook of public management
Thompson, F. (2007) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20238 · Cited by 1,049
Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure.
Broadhead, R. S., & Bosk, C. L. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066542 · Cited by 822
Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
Kiple, K. F., & Jones, J. H. (1982) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1870318 · Cited by 814
Cited by
Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b3425 · Cited by 111
My Entire Life is Online: Informed Consent, Big Data, and Decolonial Knowledge
O'Connell, A. (2016) · Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice · doi:10.48336/ijbioj2019 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2223-2234
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995696082
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008
- The paper
- Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.