CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 471Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis

Chinn, Deborah·2011·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Though there has been a considerable expansion of interest in the health literacy concept worldwide, there has also been criticism that this concept has been poorly defined, that it stretches the idea of "literacy" to an indefensible extent and more specifically, that it adds little to the existing concerns and intervention approaches of the better established discipline of health promotion. This paper takes as a starting point the expanded model of health literacy advanced by Nutbeam (2000) and addresses these concerns by interrogating the concept of "critical health literacy" in order to draw conclusions about its utility for advancing the health of individuals and communities. The constituent domains of critical health literacy are identified; namely information appraisal, understanding the social determinants of health, and collective action, and as far as possible each are clearly delineated, with links to related concepts made explicit. The paper concludes that an appreciation of work undertaken in a range of different disciplines, such as media studies, medical sociology, and evidence-based medicine can enhance our understanding of the critical health literacy construct and help us understand its usefulness as a social asset which helps individuals towards a critical engagement with health information. There is some evidence that aspects of critical health literacy have indeed been found to be a resource for better health outcomes, but more research is needed in this area, both to develop quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluating health literacy skills, and to offer convincing evidence that investment in programmes designed to enhance critical health literacy are worthwhile.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 94 references

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zola, 1983, The medicalizing of society, Socio-Medical Inquiries: Recollections, Reflections and Reconsiderations, 24

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 470

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chinn, D.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chinn, Deborah
ORCID
Chinn, Deborah
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
60-67
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004
OpenAlex
W2081960713
Cited by
471
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
36.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Tower Hamlets Primary Care Trust Research and Development Committee
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
critical health literacy, health literacy, information evaluation, social determinants of health, collective action, health promotion, health information, health literacy interventions
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Health Status Disparities, Consumer Health Information, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review