Cited by 23Primary Care and Health OutcomesMedicine, History, and PhilosophyPsychology and Mental Health

Beyond symptoms: Defining primary care mental health clinical assessment priorities, content and process

Lynch, Johanna M., Askew, Deborah A., Mitchell, Geoffrey K., Hegarty, Kelsey L.·2012·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The assessment of undifferentiated psychological distress is a daily aspect of primary care practice. Primary care practitioners' underlying values influence the priorities, process and content of assessment. Currently there is a lack of definition of these values in primary care clinical mental health assessment. This paper presents the case for adopting the philosophical values and principles of holistic transdisciplinary generalism to influence practice worldwide. Furthermore, it raises awareness of current constraints on practice, including an overreliance on the psychiatric paradigm of care and resulting criteria-based diagnoses. Finally, the paper seeks to promote discussion among primary care practitioners and researchers globally about how to define primary care clinical mental health assessment priorities, process and content.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.043

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GPs are well versed in supporting people through life's common stressors, empowering patients to adapt and grow from adversity through long-term therapeutic relationships.

    “GPs are well versed in supporting people through life's common stressors, empowering patients to adapt and grow from adversity through long-term therapeutic relationships. 25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, J. M., Askew, D. A., Mitchell, G. K., & Hegarty, K. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Johanna M.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
143-149
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164773706
Cited by
23
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • University of Queensland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
primary care mental health, clinical evaluation, psychological distress, psychiatric paradigm, diagnostic criteria, assessment process
MeSH terms
Communication, Health Priorities, Humans, Mental Health, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Quality of Health Care, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review