Online and in-person health-seeking for infertility
Abstract
Using data from Wave 1 (2004-2006) of the National Survey of Fertility Barriers (NSFB), a national probability sample of women ages 25-45, we examine online information-seeking among ever-infertile women. Of the 1352 women who met criteria for infertility, 459 (34%) neither talked to a doctor nor went online for information, 9% went online only for information, 32% talked to a doctor but did not go online, and 25% did both. Guided by Chrisman's Health-Seeking Model and previous research on Internet use to obtain health information, we employ multinomial logistic regression to compare these four groups of ever-infertile women. Findings generally support Chrisman's model. Infertile women tend to seek information online as a complement to, rather than as a substitute for, in-person health-seeking. Greater faith in the ability of medical science to treat infertility and greater perceived stigma were associated with higher odds of using the Internet to obtain information about infertility. In general, women who perceived the symptoms of infertility as more salient had higher odds of using both online and in-person or only in-person health-seeking compared to online health-seeking. Women with greater resources had higher odds of using online sources of information. Strong network encouragement to seek treatment was associated with higher odds of in-person health-seeking and combining in-person and online health-seeking compared to only going online or doing nothing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have reported narrowed focus on infertility and excessive information seeking as behavioural features of anxiety.
“A few studies have also reported on women’s narrowed focus on infertility to the exclusion of other activities, as well as excessive information seeking as behavioural features of anxiety.24–26”
From Infertility-related distress and clinical targets for psychotherapy: A qualitative study (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Slauson-Blevins, K. S., McQuillan, J., & Greil, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Alfred University (US)
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 110-115
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162951835
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD044144)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- infertility, online health information seeking, health-seeking behavior, perceived stigma, infertility treatment, women's health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, United States, Internet, Information Seeking Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review