Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides a consolidated overview of public and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards vaccination in Europe by bringing together for the first time evidence across various vaccines, countries and populations. The paper relies on an extensive review of empirical literature published in English after 2009, as well as an analysis of unpublished market research data from member companies of Vaccines Europe. Our synthesis suggests that hesitant attitudes to vaccination are prevalent and may be increasing since the influenza pandemic of 2009. We define hesitancy as an expression of concern or doubt about the value or safety of vaccination. This means that hesitant attitudes are not confined only to those who refuse vaccination or those who encourage others to refuse vaccination. For many people, vaccination attitudes are shaped not just by healthcare professionals but also by an array of other information sources, including online and social media sources. We find that healthcare professionals report increasing challenges to building a trustful relationship with patients, through which they might otherwise allay concerns and reassure hesitant patients. We also find a range of reasons for vaccination attitudes, only some of which can be characterised as being related to lack of awareness or misinformation. Reasons that relate to issues of mistrust are cited more commonly in the literature than reasons that relate to information deficit. The importance of trust in the institutions involved with vaccination is discussed in terms of implications for researchers and policy-makers; we suggest that rebuilding this trust is a multi-stakeholder problem requiring a co-ordinated strategy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
They typically consulted social networks of parents, including parent-lobby groups, for nonjudgmental discussion and access to the information they needed.
“They typically consulted social networks of parents, including parent-lobby groups, for nonjudgmental discussion and access to the information they needed.”
From Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy (2016) · cites this paper as Yaqub et al 2014
The children's pediatricians were generally not consulted, not because parents feared reproach, but because they felt that the physicians had to support the 'official' line.
“The children's pediatricians were generally not consulted in this process of inquiry, not because parents feared reproach, but because they felt that the physicians had to support the 'official' line (Leach and Fairhead 2007, 64; see also Evans et al 2001 and Yaqub et al 2014).”
From Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy (2016) · cites this paper as Yaqub et al 2014
Cites
Mills, E., Jadad, A. R., Ross, C., & Wilson, K. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.002 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks
Salathé, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0271 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates
Sallam, M. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9020160 · Cited by 2,128 · see citing works
The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey
Larson, H. J., de Figueiredo, A., Xiahong, Z., Schulz, W. S., Verger, P., Johnston, I. G., Cook, A. R., & Jones, N. S. (2016) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers
Paterson, P., Meurice, F., Stanberry, L. R., Glismann, S., Rosenthal, S. L., & Larson, H. J. (2016) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.042 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Vinck, P., Pham, P. N., Bindu, K. K., Bedford, J., & Nilles, E. J. (2019) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30063-5 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Vaccine Hesitancy: Clarifying a Theoretical Framework for an Ambiguous Notion
Peretti-Watel, P., Ward, J. K., Schulz, W. S., Verger, P., & Larson, H. J. (2015) · PLoS Currents · doi:10.1371/currents.outbreaks.6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy
Goldenberg, M. J. (2016) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00223 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Injection fears and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
Freeman, D., Lambe, S., Yu, L.-M., Freeman, J., Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Vanderslott, S., et al. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721002609 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Falling into the Echo Chamber: The Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter
Cossard, A., De Francisci Morales, G., Kalimeri, K., Mejova, Y., Paolotti, D., & Starnini, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7285 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Kim, S., Kim, K., & Wonjeong Jo, C. (2024) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102723 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N., & Chataway, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- St Mary's Hospital (GB)
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Yaqub, Ohid
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031092644
- Cited by
- 1,089
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 194 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Vaccines Europe
- Sanofi Pasteur
- UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- vaccine attitudes, vaccine hesitancy, public attitudes, healthcare workers, institutional trust, vaccine safety concerns, misinformation, social media, vaccine refusal
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Europe, Humans, Vaccination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review