Cited by 117Aging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

The mix matters: Complex personal networks relate to higher cognitive functioning in old age

Open access
Ellwardt, Lea, Van Tilburg, Theo G., Aartsen, Marja J.·2015·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Stronger engagement of older adults in social activities and greater embeddedness in networks is often argued to buffer cognitive decline and lower risks of dementia. One of the explanations is that interaction with other people trains the brain, thereby enhancing cognitive functioning. However, research on the relationship between personal networks and cognitive functioning is not yet conclusive. While previous studies have focused on the size of personal networks as a proxy of cognitive stimulation, little attention has been paid to the complexity of the personal network. Adults embedded in a broad range of network relationships (i.e., various relationship types) are likely to be exposed to a wider range of stimuli than adults embedded in a homogeneous network including similar relationship types. We expect that higher numbers of personal relationship types rather than a higher number of similar contacts relate to higher levels of cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline. Data are from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) and include 2959 Dutch participants aged 54 to 85 at baseline in 1992 and six follow-ups covering a time span of twenty years. Cognitive functioning is assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and for network complexity we use the Social Network Index. We test our expectations using fixed-effects regression models. The results reveal that a reduction in network complexity is associated with a reduction in cognitive functioning, which is neither explained by size of the network nor by presence of specific relationship types. However, enhanced complexity has only a marginal buffering effect on decline in cognitive functioning. We conclude that network characteristics and cognitive functioning are intertwined and that their association is mostly cross-sectional in nature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In older adults, more complex networks-marked by irregular contact with varied social roles, frequent friend interactions but not family ones, and lower density-correlate with healthier brain volume and connectivity and better cognition.

    “These effects of social bridging on the brain are consistent with recent studies indicating that greater network complexity, measured as irregular contact with a diversity of social roles, frequent interactions with friends (but not family members), and less densely connected networks are associated with healthy brain volume and connectivity, and better cognitive functioning in older adults.23–28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 117

Authors
Ellwardt, L., Van Tilburg, T. G., & Aartsen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Ellwardt, Lea
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
125
Pages
107-115
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988334941
Cited by
117
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
personal networks, network complexity, cognitive function, cognitive decline, older adults, social networks, relationship type, social engagement, dementia risk, social network index, Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review