Cited by 241Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCrime Patterns and Interventions

Living under surveillance: Gender, psychological distress, and stop-question-and-frisk policing in New York City

Sewell, Alyasah Ali, Jefferson, Kevin A., Lee, Hedwig·2016·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

A growing body of research highlights the collateral consequences of mass incarceration, including stop-and-frisk policing tactics. Living in a neighborhood with aggressive policing may affect one's mental health, especially for men who are the primary targets of police stops. We examine whether there is an association between psychological distress and neighborhood-level aggressive policing (i.e., frisking and use of force by police) and whether that association varies by gender. The 2009-2011 New York City (NYC) Stop, Question, and Frisk Database is aggregated to the neighborhood-level (N = 34) and merged with individual data from the 2012 NYC Community Health Survey (N = 8066) via the United Hospital Fund neighborhood of respondents' residence. Weighted multilevel generalized linear models are used to assess main and gendered associations of neighborhood exposures to aggressive police stops on psychological distress (Kessler-6 items). While the neighborhood stop rate exhibits inconsistent associations with psychological distress, neighborhood-level frisk and use of force proportions are linked to higher levels of non-specific psychological distress among men, but not women. Specifically, men exhibit more non-specific psychological distress and more severe feelings of nervousness, effort, and worthlessness in aggressively surveilled neighborhoods than do women. Male residents are affected by the escalation of stop-and-frisk policing in a neighborhood. Living in a context of aggressive policing is an important risk factor for men's mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.024

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research on mental health and inequality demonstrates that external social structures condition mental health above and beyond individual experiences.

    “Prior research on mental health and inequality demonstrates that external social structures condition mental health above and beyond individual experiences (Sewell et al., 2016; Huyser et al., 2018; Williams, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sewell, A. A., Jefferson, K. A., & Lee, H.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Sewell, Alyasah Ali
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
159
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2336632514
Cited by
241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
69.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
psychological distress, gender differences, police use of force, surveillance, neighbourhood policing, men's mental health, New York City
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Police, Multilevel Analysis, Sexism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review