Exploring the relationship between sanitation and mental and social well-being: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis
Abstract
The WHO defines health not as the absence of disease but as a "state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being." To date, public health research on sanitation has focused mainly on the impact of sanitation on infectious diseases and related sequelae, such as diarrhea and malnutrition. This review focuses on the mental and social well-being implications of sanitation. We systematically searched leading databases to identify eligible studies. Qualitative studies were assessed using a 17-point checklist adapted from existing tools, while quantitative studies were assessed using the Liverpool Quality Appraisal Tool. We followed a best-fit framework synthesis approach using six a priori well-being dimensions (privacy, shame, anxiety, fear, assault, and safety), which were examined using line-by-line coding. Two additional dimensions (dignity and embarrassment) inductively emerged during coding for a total of eight well-being outcomes. We then synthesized coded text for each dimension into descriptive themes using thematic analysis. For quantitative studies, we extracted any measures of association between sanitation and well-being. We identified 50 eligible studies covering a variety of populations and sanitation contexts but many studies were conducted in India (N = 14) and many examined the sanitation experience for women and girls (N = 19). Our synthesis results in a preliminary conceptual model in which privacy and safety, including assault, are root well-being dimensions. When people perceive or experience a lack of privacy or safety during open defecation or when using sanitation infrastructure, this can negatively influence their mental and social well-being. We found that perceptions and experiences of privacy and safety are influenced by contextual and individual factors, such as location of sanitation facilities and user's gender identity, respectively. Privacy and safety require thorough examination when developing sanitation interventions and policy to ensure a positive influence on the user's mental and social well-being.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
WASH can affect other non-infectious-disease health outcomes-including physical and sexual trauma from violence, bodily injury such as from water carriage, mental health, and general wellbeing-particularly among women and girls.
“WASH can affect other non-infectious-disease health outcomes—including physical and sexual trauma from violence, bodily injury such as from water carriage, mental health, and general wellbeing—particularly among women and girls.15, 50, 51”
Safe and reliable drinking water, sanitation that separates excreta from human contact, and handwashing with soap at key times have positive effects on health and social and economic wellbeing.
“Safe and reliable drinking water, sanitation that separates excreta from human contact, and handwashing with soap at key times, such as after potential faecal contact and before eating or preparing food, have positive effects on health and social and economic wellbeing.1, 2, 3, 4, 5”
A lack of sanitation privacy can influence women's well-being.
“As Sclar et al (2018) find from their meta-synthesis, a lack of sanitation privacy can influence women’s well-being”
From ’It’s like a burden on the head’: Redefining adequate menstrual hygiene management throughout women’s varied life stages in Odisha, India. (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
A lack of ability to conceal menstruation due to pain, washing, leaks, and restricted behaviors is likely to influence women's well-being.
“so it follows that a lack of ability to conceal menstruation due to pain, washing, leaks, and restricted behaviors is likely to do the same [58].”
From ’It’s like a burden on the head’: Redefining adequate menstrual hygiene management throughout women’s varied life stages in Odisha, India. (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Sclar, G. D., Penakalapati, G., Caruso, B. A., Rehfuess, E. A., Garn, J. V., Alexander, K. T., Freeman, M. C., Boisson, S., Medlicott, K., & Clasen, T.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- CARE USA (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Sclar, G.D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 217
- Pages
- 121-134
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891026690
- Semantic Scholar
- 7a52258ad7b7153caf5b007a219c750a686cc8a3
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- WHO (HQPHE1611466 - 64083)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
- Keywords
- sanitation, psychological well-being, social well-being, privacy, safety, shame, anxiety, fear, assault, human dignity, embarrassment, open defecation, women and girls, gender identity, sanitation facilities, conceptual model
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Sanitation, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review