Cited by 74Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

A comparative review of mobile health and electronic health utilization in sub-Saharan African countries

Bervell, Brandford, Al-Samarraie, Hosam·2019·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This study distinguished between the application of e-health and m-health technologies in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries based on the dimensions of use, targeted diseases or health conditions, locations of use, and beneficiaries (types of patients or health workers) in a country specific context. It further characterized the main opportunities and challenges associated with these dimensions across the sub-region. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 66 published peer reviewed articles. The review followed the scientific process of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of identification, selection, assessment, synthesis and interpretation of findings. The results of the study showed that m-health was prevalent in usage for promoting information for treatment and prevention of diseases as well as serving as an effective technology for reminders towards adherence. For e-health, the uniqueness lay in data acquisition and patients' records management; diagnosis; training and recruitment. While m-health was never used for monitoring or training and recruitment, e-health on the other hand could not serve the purpose of reminders or for reporting cases from the field. Both technologies were however useful for adherence, diagnosis, disease control mechanisms, information provision, and decision-making/referrals. HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal (postnatal and antenatal) healthcare were important in both m-healt…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.024

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bervell, B., & Al-Samarraie, H.
Affiliations
University of Cape Coast (GH)
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
232
Pages
1-16
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940642480
Cited by
74
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
mobile health, e-health, sub-Saharan Africa, health technology utilization, HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal health, health information provision, medical records management, rural health care
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Smartphone, Communicable Disease Control, Health Workforce, Health Promotion, Humans, Inservice Training, Patient Compliance, Preventive Health Services, Referral and Consultation, Telemedicine, Africa South of the Sahara, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review