Cited by 119Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Exploring the Patterns of Use and the Feasibility of Using Cellular Phones for Clinic Appointment Reminders and Adherence Messages in an Antiretroviral Treatment Clinic, Durban, South Africa

Crankshaw, Tamaryn, Corless, Inge B., Giddy, Janet, Nicholas, Patrice K., Eichbaum, Quentin, Butler, Lisa M.·2010·AIDS Patient Care and STDs

Abstract

In preparation for a proposed intervention at an antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic in Durban, South Africa, we explored the dynamics and patterns of cellular phone use among this population, in order to ascertain whether clinic contact via patients' cellular phones was a feasible and acceptable modality for appointment reminders and adherence messages. Adults, who were more than 18 years old, ambulatory, and who presented for treatment at the clinic between October-December 2007, were consecutively recruited until the sample size was reached (n = 300). A structured questionnaire was administered, including questions surrounding sociodemographics, cellular phone availability, patterns of use, and acceptability of clinic contact for the purpose of clinic appointment reminders and adherence support. Most respondents (n = 242; 81%) reported current ownership of a cellular phone with 95% utilizing a prepaid airtime service. Those participants who currently owned a cellular phone reported high cellular phone turnover due to theft or loss (n = 94, 39%) and/or damage (n = 68, 28%). More females than men switched their cell phones off during the day (p = 0.002) and were more likely to not take calls in certain social milieus (p ≤ 0.0001). Females were more likely to share their cell phone with others (p = 0.002) or leave it in a place where someone could access it (p = 0.005). Most respondents were willing to have clinic contact via their cellular phones, either verbally (99%) or via text messages (96%). The use of cellular phones for intervention purposes is feasible and should be further investigated. The findings highlight the value of gender-based analyses in informing interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/apc.2010.0146

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short weekly reminders were significantly more effective than no, daily, or longer text reminders.

    “The authors conclude that short weekly reminders were significantly more effective than no, daily, or longer text reminders.”
  • RCTs such as those reported by Pop-Eleches, Lester, and their colleagues provide strong evidence of the utility of mHealth to address the HIV prevention and treatment cascade.

    “RCTs, such as those reported by Pop-Eleches, Lester, and their colleagues [20,21], provide strong evidence of the utility of mHealth to address the HIV prevention and treatment cascade.”
  • Several articles found that mHealth tools were helpful for managing care by improving attendance to medical appointments through text reminders and community health worker support.

    “several articles [20,31,32,35-37] found that mHealth tools were helpful for managing care by improving attendance to medical appointments, during some of which one would assume CD4 testing took place, through text reminders and community health worker support.”
  • Pop-Eleches et al. found that treatment adherence improved significantly among patients randomized to receive weekly text message reminders during a 48-week intervention period in Kenya.

    “Pop-Eleches et al. found that treatment adherence improved significantly among patients randomized to receive weekly text message reminders during a 48-week intervention period in Kenya [20].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crankshaw, T., Corless, I. B., Giddy, J., Nicholas, P. K., Eichbaum, Q., & Butler, L. M.
Affiliations
  • McCord Hospital (ZA)
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Crankshaw, Tamaryn
Venue
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
Published
2010-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
729-734
ISSN
  • 1087-2914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7449
OpenAlex
W1993705273
Cited by
119
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS Patient Care and STDs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
mobile phone use, appointment reminders, medication adherence, antiretroviral therapy, HIV/AIDS, text messaging, mobile health, feasibility, acceptability, mobile phone ownership, gender differences, Durban
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Appointments and Schedules, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, South Africa, HIV Infections, Reminder Systems, Anti-HIV Agents, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review