The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research
Open accessAbstract
Intersectionality theory has recently emerged in the health sciences as a critical theoretical and methodical approach. Though some scholars have outlined explicit guidelines for applying intersectionality in research using quantitative methods, others have cited epistemological concerns and additive thinking to advocate for the analysis of intersectionality with qualitative methods. Thus, there remains a need for additional guidance and support for utilizing and applying intersectionality theory throughout the qualitative research process. With the goal of demystifying the process of utilizing intersectionality as a methodological approach in qualitative research in the health sciences, this paper provides researchers with recommendations, specific examples, and important considerations for incorporating intersectional approaches into study conceptualization, participant recruitment, data collection, and data analysis. Additionally, this paper reviews challenges that researchers may experience in conducting research using intersectional approaches and offers suggestions for overcoming challenges. This paper offers timely and relevant information that can be used to strengthen the theoretical and methodological rigor of qualitative health research, especially studies that seek to advance health equity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“Numerous scholars have discussed the utility of inter-sectional approaches in empirical research (Bauer, 2014; Berger and Guidroz, 2009; Cole, 2009; Else-Quest and Hyde, 2016a; Few-Demo, 2014; Hancock, 2007; McCall, 2005; Warner and Shields, 2013).”
BackgroundToward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“Though the concept of intersectionality is embedded in Black fem-inism, the explicit theorizing of intersectionality is a more recent development (Alexander-Floyd, 2012; Cho et al., 2013; Hancock, 2016).”
BackgroundNow I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research
Berger, R. (2015) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112468475 · Cited by 4,031 · cited 1×
“Re fl ex-ivity asks the researcher to re fl ect on their motivations, intentions, and assumptions – without re fl exivity a researcher may avoid self-censure and not deeply engage with the data collection and analysis processes (Berger, 2013).”
BackgroundQualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742
Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide
Robinson, O. C. (2014) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 · Cited by 3,232
Bowleg, L. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300750 · Cited by 2,996
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932 · cited 1×
“…restrict access or utilization of app or web-based platforms for some populations, such as older adults or homeless persons, as well as people in less developed regions, web-based recruitment e ff orts have been shown to net more diverse samples than traditional techniques (Gosling et al., 2004).”
BackgroundIntersectionality and research in psychology
Cole, E. R. (2009) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0014564 · Cited by 2,722
Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory
Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 · Cited by 2,528 · cited 1×
“…cancer treatment narratives (an experiential arena) relative to the medicalization of minority identities (a historical outcome or context), they may choose an inductive approach to coding that seeks to analyze how individuals make meaning of their experiences (Starks and Brown Trinidad, 2007).”
BackgroundBowleg, L. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z · Cited by 2,004
Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009 · Cited by 1,662 · cited 1×
“A relatively new innovation for research recruitment and data collection, Amazon's Mechanical Turk, has been shown to yield participants with greater demographic diversity, in terms of socioeconomic status and ethnicity, than traditional recruitment strategies research studies (Casler et al., 2013).”
BackgroundGender: An Intersectionality Perspective
Shields, S. A. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8 · Cited by 1,509
Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries
May, V. M. (2015) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9780203141991 · Cited by 771 · cited 2×
“And, building upon this imagery, May proposed that intersectional approaches require “ matrix ” thinking, rather than “ single-axis ” thinking, and that they are open-ended, dynamic, and “ biased toward realizing collective justice ” (May, 2015, p. 251).”
BackgroundAdvancing Health Disparities Research Within the Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework
Kilbourne, A. M., Switzer, G., Hyman, K., Crowley-Matoka, M., & Fine, M. J. (2006) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.077628 · Cited by 761 · cited 1×
“Per Kilbourne et al. (2006), health disparities research occurs in three phases: 1) de fi ning and detecting disparity populations, 2) understanding the determinants of disparities, and 3) reducing disparities through intervention and subsequent evaluation research.”
BackgroundBracketing in Research: A Typology
Gearing, R. E. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304270394 · Cited by 546 · cited 1×
“…of re-searcher biases) have been useful in helping researchers understand the in fl uence of their personal identities and associated biases on the research process, including study conceptualizing, participant recruitment, data collection, and data analysis (Gearing, 2004; Ortlipp, 2008).”
MethodBeal, F. M. (2008) · Meridians · doi:10.2979/mer.2008.8.2.166 · Cited by 511
Greene, M. (2014) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1106 · Cited by 471
The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011) · doi:10.4135/9781446251041 · Cited by 469
The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users
Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. P. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144804047513 · Cited by 411
Rodríguez, M., Valentine, J. M., Son, J. B., & Muhammad, M. (2009) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838009339756 · Cited by 153 · cited 1×
“…unique barriers to utilizing healthcare, including structural, interpersonal, and cultural factors related to help-seeking (Alegría et al., 2002; Rodríguez et al., 2009), focusing recruitment entirely at traditional health sites (e.g., hospitals, healthcare institutions, academic research…”
Background
Cited by
Merz, S., Jaehn, P., Mena, E., Pöge, K., Strasser, S., Saß, A.-C., Rommel, A., Bolte, G., & Holmberg, C. (2023) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2021.1951668 · Cited by 56
Quinn, K. G. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113784 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrams, J. A., Tabaac, A., Jung, S., & Else-Quest, N. M.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 258
- Pages
- 113138
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036136383
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 35.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.