Reasoning for autonomous suicide? A qualitative approach to pre-suicidal decision-making
Open accessAbstract
The article presents empirical data concerning the meaning of freedom and autonomy in the emotional-cognitive processes that govern pre-suicidal decision-making. The data is derived from a qualitative interview study conducted between December 2012 and July 2014 on an intensive care unit in Germany. Twelve patients (three male, nine female; seven with pre-diagnosed mental illness) who had attempted suicide by intoxication were included. The narrative biographical approach chosen allows to capture the individuals' experiences preceding their decisions for suicide and provides insights into the biographical contexts of their decisions. Most strikingly, the narratives underline the essential importance of interpersonal relationships as well as an ambivalent reciprocity of cognitive and emotional processes in pre-suicidal reasoning, while ideas of autonomy and decision-making capacity traditionally address rational deliberation. This divergence between patients' subjective perceptions and scholarly conceptualisations of autonomous suicide is in line with increasing criticism of conventional approaches, given that they ignore essential elements of human existence, such as values, emotions, and social interdependence. The empirical findings suggest moving beyond the idea of autonomous decision-making for suicide as a rational procedure and instead conceptualise the pre-suicidal decision-making process as a highly emotional phenomenon within a relational context. Acknowledging that…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protection from inappropriate use of suicide assistance requires a thorough assessment of decision-making capacity and whether the request is voluntary, free of undue external pressure, thoroughly considered and stable.
“This requires a thorough assessment whether the person has the required decision-making capacity (19,28) and whether the request is voluntary, i.e., free of undue external pressure or influences, thoroughly considered and stable.”
From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
The gender paradox in suicidal behavior and its impact on the suicidal process
Schrijvers, D. L., Bollen, J., & Sabbe, B. G. C. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.050 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
When unbearable suffering incites psychiatric patients to request euthanasia: qualitative study
Verhofstadt, M., Thienpont, L., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2017) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.117.199331 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Physician-assisted suicide in psychiatry and loss of hope
Berghmans, R., Widdershoven, G., & Widdershoven-Heerding, I. (2013) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.020 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Is the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to physician-assisted suicide discriminatory?
Hatherley, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105546 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marckmann, G., & Pollmächer, T. (2024) · Annals of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.21037/apm-23-472 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mrozynski, H., & Kuhn, E.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- University Hospital Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mrozynski, Hannah
- ORCID
- Kuhn, Eva
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 296
- Pages
- 114764
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210447545
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- decision-making capacity, autonomy, meaning of freedom, interpersonal relationships, mental illness, intensive care unit patients, despair, marginalization, physician-assisted suicide
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Suicide, Attempted, Suicide, Assisted, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review