Cited by 62Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Physician-assisted suicide in psychiatry and loss of hope

Berghmans, Ron, Widdershoven, Guy, Widdershoven-Heerding, Ineke·2013·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

In the Netherlands, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are considered acceptable medical practices in specific circumstances. The majority of cases of euthanasia and PAS involve patients suffering from cancer. However, in 1994 the Dutch Supreme Court in the so-called Chabot-case ruled that "the seriousness of the suffering of the patient does not depend on the cause of the suffering", thereby rejecting a distinction between physical (or somatic) and mental suffering. This opened the way for further debate about the acceptability of PAS in cases of serious and refractory mental illness. An important objection against offering PAS to mentally ill patients is that this might reinforce loss of hope, and demoralization. Based on an analysis of a reported case, this argument is evaluated. It is argued that offering PAS to a patient with a mental illness who suffers unbearably, enduringly and without prospect of relief does not necessarily imply taking away hope and can be ethically acceptable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.06.020

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berghmans, R., Widdershoven, G., & Widdershoven-Heerding, I.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Widdershoven, Guy
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
36
Issue
5-6
Pages
436-443
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999190166
Cited by
61
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, hopelessness, demoralization, psychological suffering
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Netherlands, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Assisted, Bioethical Issues, Value of Life, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review