Cited by 65Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and EducationCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An umbrella review of intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy

Open access
Amri, Michelle, Chatur, Ali, O'Campo, Patricia·2022·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Despite the widespread acceptance of the need for intersectoral and multisectoral approaches, knowledge around how to support, achieve, and sustain multisectoral action is limited. While there have been studies that seek to collate evidence on multisectoral action with a specific focus (e.g., Health in All Policies [HiAP]), we postulated that successes of working cross-sectorally to achieve health goals with one approach can glean insights and perhaps translate to other approaches which work across sectors (i.e., shared insights across HiAP, Healthy Cities, One Health, and other approaches). Thus, the goal of this study is to assemble evidence from systematic approaches to reviewing the literature (e.g., scoping review, systematic review) that collate findings on facilitators/enablers of and barriers to implementing various intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health, to strengthen understanding of how to best implement health policies that work across sectors, whichever they may be. This umbrella review (i.e., review of reviews) was informed by the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, yielding 10 studies included in this review. Enablers detailed are: (1) systems for liaising and engaged communication; (2) political leadership; (3) shared vision or common goals (win-win strategies); (4) education and access to information; and (5) funding. Barriers detailed were: (1) lack of shared vision across sectors; (2) lack of funding; (3) lack of political leadership; (4) lack of ownership and accountability; and (5) insufficient and unavailable indicators and data. These findings provide a rigorous evidence base for policymakers to inform intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to not only aid in the achievement of goals, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, but to work towards health equity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115469

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dos S Ribeiro, 2019, vol. 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Amri, M., Chatur, A., & O'Campo, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Amri, Michelle
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
315
Pages
115469
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307039695
Cited by
61
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords
multisectoral approach, health policy, Health in All Policies, healthy cities, One Health, barriers and facilitators, political leadership, funding, intersectoral collaboration, health equity, Sustainable Development Goals, health policy implementation
MeSH terms
Health Equity, One Health, Health Policy, Humans, Leadership, Social Responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review