The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Public Management et professions dans l’État : au-delà des oppositions, quelles recompositions ?
Open accessAbstract
La multiplication de reformes, au sein des administrations, mobilisant des principes et des instruments inspires de la doctrine du New Public Management (NPM), a provoque protestations et mobilisations collectives de la part de nombreux groupes professionnels dans de nombreux secteurs (sante, education, justice, travail social, recherche…). Ces phenomenes font surgir des interrogations sur le devenir des groupes professionnels inscrits dans les services publics en particulier sur la remise en cause de leur autonomie par les reformes NPM. L’opposition entre NPM et professions, pour heuristique qu’elle soit, n’epuise pas l’analyse. Faut-il penser ces changements en termes de declin des professions, de retrecissement des autonomies professionnelles, de mutations des modeles professionnels, de recomposition du professionnalisme, etc. ? Ces questions se situent au carrefour d’une actualite vive — en France et en Europe — et de reflexions sociologiques continues. Elles sont developpees et traitees ici a partir de terrains empiriques, d’echelles d’analyse et d’experiences de recherche variees. Les contributions a ce dossier explorent ainsi les declinaisons des tensions entre NPM et professions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS
HOOD, C. (1991) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x · Cited by 10,159
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877
Bucher, R., & Strauss, A. (1961) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/222898 · Cited by 821
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline
Grey, C. (1994) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038594028002007 · Cited by 583
The Recent History of Professionalism in Relation to Social Structure and Social Policy
Marshall, T. H. (1939) · Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science · doi:10.2307/137036 · Cited by 224
New Labour, modernisation and the medical labour process
HARRISON, S. (2002) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279402006694 · Cited by 214 · cited 2×
“Dominent d’abord les réformes du NHS en Grande-Bretagne qui ont donné lieu à de multiples analyses (Allsop, 2006 ; Currie et al., 2009 ; Dent, 2003 ; Harrison, 2002 ; Harrison et Pollitt, 1994 ; Moran, 2000 ; Morrell, 2006).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bezes, P., Demazière, D., Le Bianic, T., Paradeise, C., Normand, R., Benamouzig, D., Pierru, F., & Evetts, J.
- Venue
- Sociologie du Travail
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-348
- ISSN
- 0038-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982470818
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 51.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Public Management et professions dans l’État : au-delà des oppositions, quelles recompositions ? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soctra.2011.06.003
- The paper
- Bezes, P., Demazière, D., Le Bianic, T., Paradeise, C., Normand, R., Benamouzig, D., Pierru, F., & Evetts, J. (2011). New Public Management et professions dans l’État : au-delà des oppositions, quelles recompositions ? Sociologie du Travail. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2011.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.