Cited by 2Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and ResearchComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsNeural Networks and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EpyNN: Educational python for Neural Networks

Open access
Malard, Florian, Danner, Laura, Rouzies, Emilie, Meyer, Jesse G., Lescop, Ewen, Olivier-Van Stichelen, Stéphanie·2022·SoftwareX

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Summary Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have achieved unequaled performance for numerous problems in many areas of Science, Business, Public Policy, and more. While experts are familiar with performance-oriented software and underlying theory, ANNs are difficult to comprehend for non-experts because it requires skills in programming, background in mathematics and knowledge of terminology and concepts. In this work, we release EpyNN, an educational python resource meant for a public willing to understand key concepts and practical implementation of scalable ANN architectures from concise, homogeneous and idiomatic source code. EpyNN contains an educational Application Programming Interface (API), educational workflows from data preparation to ANN training and a documentation website setting side-by-side code, mathematics, graphical representation and text to facilitate learning and provide teaching material. Overall, EpyNN provides basics for python-fluent individuals who wish to learn, teach or develop from scratch. Availability EpyNN documentation is available at https://epynn.net and repository can be retrieved from https://github.com/synthaze/epynn . Contact Stéphanie Olivier-Van-Stichelen, solivier@mcw.edu . Supplementary Information Supplementary files and listings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101140

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Muzio, 2021, Biological network analysis with deep learning, Brief Bioinform, 22, 1515, 10.1093/bib/bbaa257 · DOI
  2. Paszke, 2019, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 32, 8026
  3. Howard, 2020, Fastai: a layered API for deep learning, Information, 11, 108, 10.3390/info11020108 · DOI
  4. Wulff-Fuentes, 2021, The human o-glcnacome database and meta-analysis, Sci Data, 8, 1, 10.1038/s41597-021-00810-4 · DOI
  5. Malard, 2021, Automatization and self-maintenance of the o-glcnacome catalog: a smart scientific database, Database, 2021, 10.1093/database/baab039 · DOI
  6. Van Der Walt, 2011, The numpy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation, Comput Sci Eng, 13, 22, 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Harris, 2020, Array programming with numpy, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Naylor David, Finamore Alessandro, Leontiadis Ilias, Grunenberger Yan, Mellia Marco, Munafò Maurizio, Papagiannaki Konstantina, Steenkiste Peter. The cost of the ”s” in https. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM international on conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies. 2014, p. 133–40. · DOI
  9. Emmert-Streib, 2020, An introductory review of deep learning for prediction models with big data, Front Artif Intell, 3, 4, 10.3389/frai.2020.00004 · DOI
  10. Sherstinsky, 2020, Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network, Physica D, 404, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Sun, 2017, Learning pooling for convolutional neural network, Neurocomputing, 224, 96, 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.049 · DOI
  12. Baldi, 2013, Understanding dropout, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 26, 2814
  13. Potdar, 2017, A comparative study of categorical variable encoding techniques for neural network classifiers, Int J Comput Appl, 175, 7
  14. Amari, 1993, Backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent method, Neurocomputing, 5, 185, 10.1016/0925-2312(93)90006-O · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Malard, F., Danner, L., Rouzies, E., Meyer, J. G., Lescop, E., & Olivier-Van Stichelen, S.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
SoftwareX
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
19
Pages
101140
ISSN
2352-7110 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284706491
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
software paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SoftwareX (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • National Institutes of Health (R00 HD087430)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Computational Physics and Python Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
artificial neural networks, educational software, Python, neural network implementation, API design, data preparation, machine learning education, teaching materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review