Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review
Abstract
Soils are the most heterogeneous parts of the biosphere, with an extremely high differentiation of properties and processes within nano- to macroscales. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of input of labile organics by plants creates microbial hotspots over short periods of time – the hot moments. We define microbial hotspots as small soil volumes with much faster process rates and much more intensive interactions compared to the average soil conditions. Such hotspots are found in the rhizosphere, detritusphere, biopores (including drilosphere) and on aggregate surfaces, but hotspots are frequently of mixed origin. Hot moments are short-term events or sequences of events inducing accelerated process rates as compared to the average rates. Thus, hotspots and hot moments are defined by dynamic characteristics, i.e. by process rates.For this hotspot concept we extensively reviewed and examined the localization and size of hotspots, spatial distribution and visualization approaches, transport of labile C to and from hotspots, lifetime and process intensities, with a special focus on process rates and microbial activities. The fraction of active microorganisms in hotspots is 2–20 times higher than in the bulk soil, and their specific activities (i.e. respiration, microbial growth, mineralization potential, enzyme activities, RNA/DNA ratio) may also be much higher. The duration of hot moments in the rhizosphere is limited and is controlled by the length of the input of labile organics. It can last a few hours up to a few days. In the detritusphere, however, the duration of hot moments is regulated by the output – by decomposition rates of litter – and lasts for weeks and months. Hot moments induce succession in microbial communities and intense intra- and interspecific competition affecting C use efficiency, microbial growth and turnover. The faster turnover and lower C use efficiency in hotspots counterbalances the high C inputs, leading to the absence of strong increases in C stocks. Consequently, the intensification of fluxes is much stronger than the increase of pools. Maintenance of stoichiometric ratios by accelerated microbial growth in hotspots requires additional nutrients (e.g. N and P), causing their microbial mining from soil organic matter, i.e. priming effects. Consequently, priming effects are localized in microbial hotspots and are consequences of hot moments. We estimated the contribution of the hotspots to the whole soil profile and suggested that, irrespective of their volume, the hotspots are mainly responsible for the ecologically relevant processes in soil. By this review, we raised the importance of concepts and ecological theory of distribution and functioning of microorganisms in soil.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such compounds are favorable for a rapid growth of zymogenous (fermentative) microorganisms with short half-lives of a few days.
“Such compounds are favorable for a rapid growth of zymogenous (fermentative) microorganisms (Kuzyakov and Blagodatskaya, 2015) with short half-lives of a few days (Cochran et al., 1988).”
From Potential of Wheat Straw, Spruce Sawdust, and Lignin as High Organic Carbon Soil Amendments to Improve Agricultural Nitrogen Retention Capacity: An Incubation Study (2018) · cites this paper as Kuzyakov and Blagodatskaya, 2015
Cites
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074 · see citing works
The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure
Oades, J. M. (1993) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges
Berg, G., Rybakova, D., Fischer, D., Cernava, T., Vergès, M.-C. C., Charles, T., Chen, X., Cocolin, L., Eversole, K., Corral, G. H., et al. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 · Cited by 2,275 · see citing works
Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Biochars and the plant-soil interface
Lehmann, J., Kuzyakov, Y., Pan, G., & Ok, Y. S. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2658-3 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationReichel, R., Wei, J., Islam, M. S., Schmid, C., Wissel, H., Schröder, P., Schloter, M., & Brüggemann, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00900 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Chen, G., Fang, Y., Van Zwieten, L., Xuan, Y., Tavakkoli, E., Wang, X., & Zhang, R. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108139 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Zhou, J., Feng, W., Jia, R., Liu, C., Fu, T., Xue, S., Yi, Z., Guillaume, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12990 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…general, the root zone is characterized as a microbial hotspot where enhanced plant- derived C inputs are likely easily metabolized by microorganisms, resulting in an intense turnover of microbial biomass and a larger accumulation of necromass (Angst et al., 2021; Kuzyakov & Blagodatskaya, 2015).”
BackgroundRegional biogeography versus intra-annual dynamics of the root and soil microbiome
Bell-Dereske, L. P., Benucci, G. M. N., da Costa, P. B., Bonito, G., Friesen, M. L., Tiemann, L. K., & Evans, S. E. (2023) · Environmental Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40793-023-00504-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuzyakov, Y., & Blagodatskaya, E.
- Affiliations
- Kazan Federal University (RU)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Kuzyakov, Yakov
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 83
- Pages
- 184-199
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088494848
- Cited by
- 1,872
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 297 · 2025: 245 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 16
- FWCI
- 127.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- zvestiya of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (National Academy of Sciences of Belarus) (submittedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Russian Science Foundation (14-14-00625)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- microbial hotspots, hot moments, soil microbial activity, labile carbon, rhizosphere, detritusphere, biopore, drilosphere, soil aggregates, microbial succession, microbial competition, carbon use efficiency, priming effect, soil organic matter mineralization, soil carbon stocks, soil heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review