Cited by 710Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure

Oades, J.M.·1993·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oades, J. M.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Oades, J.M.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-03
Volume
56
Issue
1-4
Pages
377-400
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110475725
Cited by
710
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoderma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil structure, soil structure formation, soil structure stabilization, soil structure degradation, soil organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review