Cited by 371Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant Disease Management Techniques

Distinct roles for soil fungal and bacterial communities associated with the suppression of vanilla Fusarium wilt disease

Open access
Xiong, Wu, Li, Rong, Ren, Yi, Liu, Chen, Zhao, Qingyun, Wu, Huasong, Jousset, Alexandre, Shen, Qirong·2017·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Characterizing microbial communities associated with disease-suppressive soil is an important first step toward understanding the potential of microbiota to protect crops against plant pathogens. In the present study, we compared microbial communities in suppressive- and conducive-soils associated with Fusarium wilt disease in a vanilla long-term continuous cropping system. Suppressive soil was associated with higher fungal diversity and lower bacterial diversity. The fungal phyla Zygomycota and Basidiomycota, and the bacterial phyla Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were strongly enriched in the suppressive soil. Notably, suppressive soil was dominated by the fungal genus Mortierella, accounting for 37% of the total fungal sequences. The hyper-dominance of Mortierella spp. in suppressive soil suggests that this taxon may serve as an indicator and enhancer of Fusarium wilt disease suppression in vanilla. In addition, Molecular Ecological Network analysis revealed that fungal communities were more connected and showed more co-occurrence relationships in the suppressive versus conducive soils. Our results indicate that fungal communities may be important in the development of soil suppressiveness against vanilla Fusarium wilt disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiong, W., Li, R., Ren, Y., Liu, C., Zhao, Q., Wu, H., Jousset, A., & Shen, Q.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Shen, Qirong
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
107
Pages
198-207
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580913846
Cited by
371
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3
FWCI
21.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150506)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31572212, 31672242)
  • Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (S2016G0053)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20150059)
  • Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Solid Organic Waste Utilization (BM201101302)
  • Qing Lan Project
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
Keywords
vanilla, Fusarium wilt, disease-suppressive soil, soil microbial communities, soil fungal diversity, soil bacterial diversity, Mortierella, fungal co-occurrence networks, continuous cropping, plant disease suppression, soil microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review