The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolating organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates in temperate agricultural soils – A comprehensive method comparison
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Fractionation of soil organic carbon (SOC) is crucial for mechanistic understanding and modeling of soil organic matter decomposition and stabilization processes. It is often aimed at separating the bulk SOC into fractions with varying turnover rates, but a comprehensive comparison of methods to achieve this is lacking. In this study, a total of 20 different SOC fractionation methods were tested by participating laboratories for their suitability to isolate fractions with varying turnover rates, using agricultural soils from three experimental sites with vegetation change from C3 to C4 22–36 years ago. Enrichment of C4-derived carbon was traced and used as a proxy for turnover rates in the fractions. Methods that apply a combination of physical (density, size) and chemical (oxidation, extraction) fractionation were identified as most effective in separating SOC into fractions with distinct turnover rates. Coarse light SOC separated by density fractionation was the most C4-carbon enriched fraction, while oxidation-resistant SOC left after extraction with NaOCl was the least C4-carbon enriched fraction. Surprisingly, even after 36 years of C4 crop cultivation in a temperate climate, no method was able to isolate a fraction with more than 76% turnover, which challenges the link to the most active plant-derived carbon pools in models. Particles with density >2.8 g cm−3 showed similar C4-carbon enrichment as oxidation-resistant SOC, highlighting the importance of sesquioxides for SOC stabilization. The importance of clay and silt-sized particles (
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
nlme : Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models
DebRoy, S. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,009
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
HUmus Chemistry Genesis, Composition, Reactions
Stevenson, F. J. (1982) · Cited by 4,737
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633
Self-citationThe contentious nature of soil organic matter
Lehmann, J., & Kleber, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16069 · Cited by 4,525
Humus Chemistry—Genesis, Composition, Reactions
Parsons, J. W. (1983) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198302000-00014 · Cited by 4,063
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., & Paustian, K. (2000) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00179-6 · Cited by 3,397
Self-citationLützow, M. V., Kögel‐Knabner, I., Ekschmitt, K., Matzner, E., Guggenberger, G., Marschner, B., & Flessa, H. (2006) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.x · Cited by 2,938
Aggregate Structure and Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in Native and Cultivated Soils
Elliott, E. T. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030017x · Cited by 2,499
Kögel-Knabner, I. (2002) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(01)00158-4 · Cited by 1,993
Cited by
Lavallee, J. M., Soong, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14859 · Cited by 2,477
Self-citationSoil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter
Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J., & Lugato, E. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6 · Cited by 1,901
Self-citationSoil carbon saturation: what do we really know?
Georgiou, K., Angers, D., Champiny, R. E., Cotrufo, M. F., Craig, M. E., Doetterl, S., Grandy, A. S., Lavallee, J. M., Lin, Y., Lugato, E., et al. (2025) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.70197 · Cited by 153
Self-citationHansen, P. M., Even, R., King, A. E., Lavallee, J., Schipanski, M., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2024) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17080 · Cited by 150
Self-citationMidwood, A. J., Hannam, K. D., Gebretsadikan, T., Emde, D., & Jones, M. D. (2021) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115185 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Poeplau, C., Don, A., Six, J., Kaiser, M., Benbi, D., Chenu, C., Cotrufo, M. F., Derrien, D., Gioacchini, P., Grand, S., Gregorich, E., Griepentrog, M., Gunina, A., Haddix, M., Kuzyakov, Y., Kühnel, A., Macdonald, L. M., Soong, J., Trigalet, S., Vermeire, M.-L., Rovira, P., van Wesemael, B., Wiesmeier, M., Yeasmin, S., Yevdokimov, I., & Nieder, R.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 125
- Pages
- 10-26
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2874479369
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 30.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolating organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates in temperate agricultural soils – A comprehensive method comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.025
- The paper
- Poeplau, C., Don, A., Six, J., Kaiser, M., Benbi, D., Chenu, C., Cotrufo, M. F., Derrien, D., Gioacchini, P., Grand, S., Gregorich, E., Griepentrog, M., Gunina, A., Haddix, M., Kuzyakov, Y., Kühnel, A., Macdonald, L. M., Soong, J., Trigalet, S., . . . Nieder, R. (2018). Isolating organic carbon fractions with varying turnover rates in temperate agricultural soils – A comprehensive method comparison. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.