Cited by 1,901Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Soil carbon storage informed by particulate and mineral-associated organic matter

Cotrufo, M. Francesca, Ranalli, Maria Giovanna, Haddix, Michelle L., Six, Johan, Lugato, Emanuele·2019·Nature Geoscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41561-019-0484-6

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research suggests SOC is more dynamic than once believed, with stabilization and turnover influenced by climate, microbial activity, and land use.

    “Recent research suggests SOC is more dynamic than once believed, with stabilization and turnover influenced by climate, microbial activity, and land use (Cotrufo et al., 2019;Hansen et al., 2024).”
  • Globally grass and cropland soils are highly degraded and thus have a long-term sequestration potential.

    “However, globally grass and cropland soils are highly degraded and thus have a long-term sequestration potential (Cotrufo et al., 2019;Yang et al., 2019;Lavallee et al., 2020).”
  • Carbon stock alone does not allow conclusions about soil C storage capacity, which can be better informed by the relative distribution of soil C between MAOM and POM.

    “Further, carbon stock alone does not allow us to make conclusions about soil C storage capacity, which can be better informed by the relative distribution of soil C between mineralassociated OM (MAOM) and particulate OM (POM) (Cotrufo et al., 2019).”
  • MAOM saturates in soils because of the finite availability of mineral surfaces to sorb OM.

    “MAOM also saturates in soils because of the finite availability of mineral surfaces to sorb OM.”
  • Results presented by Cotrufo et al. (2019) and others lead us to question the certainty of soil C saturation in grassland soils.

    “Further, results presented by Cotrufo et al. (2019) and others (West and Six, 2007;Jagadamma et al., 2014;Nicoloso et al., 2018) lead us to question the certainty of soil C saturation in grassland soils.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cotrufo, M. F., Ranalli, M. G., Haddix, M. L., Six, J., & Lugato, E.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Joint Research Centre (IT)
Corresponding author
Cotrufo, M. Francesca
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2019-11-18
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
989-994
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2985814312
Cited by
1,901
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 456 · 2025: 476 · 2024: 342 · 2023: 259 · 2022: 187 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 1
FWCI
72.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Biological Resource Management for Sustainable Agricultural Systems a fellowship
  • EC | Joint Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil carbon storage, mineral-associated organic matter, particulate organic matter, C/N ratio, nitrogen requirements, carbon sequestration, grassland, topsoil carbon stocks, land management, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review