Cited by 20Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Wildland fire ash enhances short-term CO2 flux from soil in a Southern African savannah

Open access
Sánchez-García, Carmen, Santín, Cristina, Doerr, Stefan H., Strydom, Tercia, Urbanek, Emilia·2021·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Savannah fires are the largest contributor to global carbon (C) emissions from vegetation fires as a result of their high frequency and the large area burnt each year. Fires not only emit CO₂ during the combustion process, they can also lead to enhanced CO₂ fluxes from affected soils and vegetation, especially during the initial post-fire recovery period. Wildland fire ash is a ubiquitous product of vegetation fires known to enrich the nutrient content and pyrogenic C (PyC) of the underlying soil, and is expected to stimulate soil C fluxes in the post-fire period. However, the role of ash in post-fire soil C fluxes has rarely been examined. Thus, we investigated the effects of fire and wildland fire ash on CO₂ fluxes from fire-affected savannah soils. Soil and ash material were sampled from three sites in an African savannah in the Kruger National Park (South Africa) before and immediately after experimental fires. CO₂ fluxes from homogenised natural soils and ash were continuously monitored for 28 d in a laboratory incubation experiment under controlled conditions (20 °C, 60% water-holding capacity). Wildland fire ash enhanced CO₂ emissions by up to 3 times compared with pre- and post-fire soils (without ash), likely as a result of the high content of readily available nutrients in the ash. Our results also show that as much as 40% of the total C released over 28 d occurred during a short-lived burst of CO₂ (lasting between 20 and 61 h) following wetting of the post-fire soil with ash samples. This study, although based on homogenised soil and ash material, shows that not considering wildland fire ash during post-fire soil C observations will likely misrepresent natural conditions and might lead to underestimations of short-term post-fire C fluxes. The large differences observed between the post-fire soil with ash, and both the pre- and post-fire soil without ash, clearly suggest that ash is a key player in C fluxes and should be taken into account in post-fire C cycling studies. Our results also highlight the importance of high frequency observations during the short-term period following wetting of fire-affected soils, since bursts of CO₂ upon wetting of burnt soil can comprise a substantial fraction of total C emissions from burnt savannah soil.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108334

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the South African sub-tropical savanna sites (SAPB1, SAPB3, SAMB), total C contents in ash were an order of magnitude higher than in pre- and post-burn soils.

    “Similarly, for the study sites from the sub-tropical savanna in South Africa (SAPB1, SAPB3 and SAMB), we observed total C contents in the ash an order of magnitude higher than in the pre-and post-burn soils (Sánchez-García et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Forbes, M. S., Raison, R. J., Skjemstad, J. O. (2006). Formation, transformation and transport of black carbon (charcoal) in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 370, 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.007 · DOI
  2. Kutiel, P., Naveh, Z. (1987). Soil properties beneath Pinus halepensis and Quercus calliprinos trees on burned and unburned mixed forest on Mt. Carmel, Israel. Forest Ecology and Management, 20, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90147-2 · DOI
  3. Maestrini, B., Abiven, S., Singh, N., Bird, J., Torn, M. S., Schmidt, M. W. I. (2014). Carbon losses from pyrolysed and original wood in a forest soil under natural and increased N deposition. Biogeosciences, 11, 5199-5213. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5199-2014 · DOI
  4. Meisner, A., Bååth, E., Rousk, J. (2013). Microbial growth responses upon rewetting soil dried for four days or one year. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 66, 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.07.014 · DOI
  5. Naisse, C., Girardin, C., Davasse, B., Chabbi, A., Rumpel, C. (2015). Effect of biochar addition on C mineralisation and soil organic matter priming in two subsoil horizons. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15, 825-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1002-5 · DOI
  6. Shakesby, R. A., Bento, C. P. M., Ferreira, C. S. S., Ferreira, A. J. D., Stoof, C. R., Urbanek, E., Walsh, R. P. D. (2015). Impacts of prescribed fire on soil loss and soil quality: An assessment based on an experimentally-burned catchment in central Portugal. Catena, 128, 278-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.03.012 · DOI
  7. Singh, R. S. (1994). Changes in soil nutrients following burning of dry tropical savanna. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 4, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF9940187 · DOI
  8. Vlamis, J., Gowans, K. D. (1961). Availability of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulfur after Brush Burning. Journal of Range Management, 14, 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3894829 · DOI
  9. Zhuravleva, A. I., Myakshina, T. N., Blagodatskaya, E. V. (2011). The effect of pyrogenically modified substrates on mineralizing activity and growth strategies of microorganisms of grey forest soil. Microbiology, 80, 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261711020202 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez-García, C., Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Strydom, T., & Urbanek, E.
Affiliations
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • South African National Parks (ZA)
Corresponding author
Sánchez-García, Carmen
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
160
Pages
108334
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168901222
Cited by
20
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Spanish Scientific Research Council
  • The Royal Society (DH110189, RG120366, RGF\\EA\\180262)
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2014-095)
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (663830)
  • South African National Parks
  • Horizon 2020
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R011125/1, SANTC1488)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Keywords
savanna burning, soil CO2 flux, pyrogenic carbon, soil respiration, fire-affected soil, soil wetting, Kruger National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review