Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dominant ground frequency and soil characteristics have important influences on the optimum parameters, effectiveness and stroke displacement of MTMD.
“Bekdaş and Nigdeli [132], Bekdaş and Nigdeli [153] represented that the dominant ground frequency and soil characteristics have important influences on the optimum parameters, effectiveness and stroke displacement of the MTMD; and the MTMD can be applied to the structures with the controlled natural frequency less than predominant earthquake frequency (Figure 10).”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bekdaş and Nigdeli [153]
MTMD can be applied to structures with a controlled natural frequency less than the predominant earthquake frequency.
“Bekdaş and Nigdeli [132], Bekdaş and Nigdeli [153] represented that the dominant ground frequency and soil characteristics have important influences on the optimum parameters, effectiveness and stroke displacement of the MTMD; and the MTMD can be applied to the structures with the controlled natural frequency less than predominant earthquake frequency (Figure 10).”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bekdaş and Nigdeli [153]
The dominant frequency of ground motion has a smaller effect on MTMD efficiency in suppressing structural acceleration response than in controlling displacement response.
“They also did that the dominant frequency of ground motion has little smaller effect on the efficiency of the MTMD in the case of suppressing the structural acceleration response in contrast with the case of controlling the displacement response.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bekdaş and Nigdeli [153]
Cites
Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers
Rana, R., & Soong, T. T. (1998) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00078-3 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Liu, S., Lu, Z., Li, P., Ding, S., & Wan, F. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110531 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bekdaş, G., & Nigdeli, S. M.
- Venue
- Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 443-461
- ISSN
- 0267-7261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2556415540
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Istanbul Üniversitesi (31688)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
- Keywords
- tuned mass damper, soil-structure interaction, metaheuristic optimization, harmony search algorithm, bat algorithm, seismic response reduction, displacement minimization, high-rise buildings, seismic excitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
