Authoritarianism and support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election
Abstract
The emergence of authoritarianism as a core political value has been emphasized by recent scholarship on the political behavior of the American electorate. This paper adds to this literature by examining the effect of authoritarianism in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Given the campaign style of Trump and the issues that he made salient in his campaign, it is hypothesized that authoritarianism should have a substantial effect on vote choice of whites. Using data from the American National Election Studies (ANES), logistic regression models of presidential vote choice of white respondents are estimated to ascertain the effect of authoritarianism in presidential elections from 1992 to 2016, controlling for party identification, ideology and several standard demographic control variables. Findings indicate that authoritarianism had the largest effect on white vote choice in 2016 than in any prior election that was analyzed. The candidacy of Trump appears to have been the triggering mechanism given that authoritarianism was a less salient predictor of U.S. House vote choice in 2016. Moreover, this relationship was true for both college and non-college educated whites. Authoritarianism also seems to have been primed by Trump appealing to racial animus, anti-immigration sentiment, nativism, and anti-Muslim prejudice. Authoritarianism is likely to remain a salient determinant of vote choice during the Trump era. Indeed, a widening and deepening of this cleavage means its effec…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, whereas liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.
“Whereas conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [169]
Decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders.
“In addition, decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented (that is, supportive of group-based hierarchies) than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders107,149,163–169.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [169]
Cites
Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics
Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802331 · Cited by 910 · cited 10× · see citing works
“…suggesting that authoritarianism emerged as a salient cleavage in the American electorate that may in large measure be at the fulcrum of the partisan polarization evident in recent American politics (Cizmar, Layman, McTague, Pearson-Merkowitz, & Spivey, 2014; Hetherington & Weiler, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCrowson, H. M., & Brandes, J. A. (2017) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294117697089 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
- Authors
- Knuckey, J., & Hassan, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knuckey, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Knuckey, Jonathan
- Venue
- The Social Science Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-27
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-60
- ISSN
- 0362-3319 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-5355
- OpenAlex
- W2963099393
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 28.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Social Science Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- authoritarianism, Donald Trump, 2016 US presidential election, vote choice, white voters, racial animus, anti-immigrant sentiment, nativism, Islamophobia, political cleavages, party identification, political ideology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review