The risks and impacts of space weather: Policy recommendations and initiatives
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current understanding of the physical phenomenon of a solar flare causing geomagnetic storms is not adequate to make reliable forecasts.
“The physical phenomenon of a solar flare causing geomagnetic storms is complicated and the current understanding is not yet adequate to make reliable forecasts [154,160].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [154]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
“The physical phenomenon of a solar flare causing geomagnetic storms is complicated and the current understanding is not yet adequate to make reliable forecasts [154,160].”
BackgroundThe economic impact of space weather: where do we stand?
Eastwood, J. P., Biffis, E., Hapgood, M. A., Green, L., Bisi, M. M., Bentley, R. D., Wicks, R., McKinnell, L. ‐., Gibbs, M., & Burnett, C. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12765 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Tree-rings reveal two strong solar proton events in 7176 and 5259 BCE
Brehm, N., Christl, M., Knowles, T. D. J., Casanova, E., Evershed, R. P., Adolphi, F., Muscheler, R., Synal, H.-A., Mekhaldi, F., Paleari, C. I., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28804-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fry, E. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fry, Emma Kiele
- Venue
- Space Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-184
- ISSN
- 0265-9646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019617291
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Space Policy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universität Rostock
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Keywords
- space weather, space weather policy, coronal mass ejections, solar energetic particles, geomagnetic disturbances, geomagnetic induction, satellite damage, astronaut radiation exposure, space weather forecasting, disaster preparedness, infrastructure resilience, public safety, space weather mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
