Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 623

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust

Islam, Tahir, Islam, Rauf, Pitafi, Abdul Hameed, Xiaobei, Liang, Rehmani, Mahmood, Irfan, Muhammad, Mubarak, Muhammad Shujaat·2021·Sustainable Production and Consumption

Abstract

Abstract Corporate social responsibility has been extensively discussed and linked to the firm performance by the researchers. However, a significant research gap remains unexplored and that is measuring the association between corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in the developing countries’ context. Drawing on the resource-based view and stakeholder theory, the present research develops the underlying mechanism through which corporate social responsibility influences the customer loyalty by simultaneously including corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and customer trust as mediators, and corporate abilities as a moderator. Data were collected from telecom users. The findings demonstrate that corporate social responsibility initiatives are significantly and positively associated with corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and customer trust. Moreover, the mediating results reveal that corporate reputation, customer trust, and customer satisfaction have mediated the relationship between corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty. Additionally, the moderating result reveals that corporate abilities play a significant role in strengthening the association between corporate social responsibility initiatives and customer loyalty because high corporate abilities with well-executed corporate social responsibility initiatives lead to high loyalty. The research highlights the significance of the corporate social responsibility actions are mandatory for organizational success and guides the policymakers, managers, and scholars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 119 references

Cited by

See all 623

Metadata

Authors
Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S.
Venue
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
25
Pages
123-135
ISSN
2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048135576
Cited by
623
References
119
FWCI
86.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019
The paper
Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.