Panic buying in the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country examination
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying in recent surveys.
“recent surveys assessing individuals from the US, China, India, and Pakistan found that greater perception of the risk and severity of COVID-19, greater news monitoring, and perceived scarcity were associated with more panic buying (Clemens et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020; Oosterhoff and Palmer, 2020; Zhang and Zhou, 2021).”
From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Islam et al., 2020
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314 · see citing works
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190 · see citing works
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions
Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-x · Cited by 1,940 · see citing works
The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis
Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037409 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naeem, M., & Ozuem, W. (2022) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2021-0061 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
David, J., Visvalingam, S., & Norberg, M. M. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114062 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Islam, T., Pitafi, A. H., Arya, V., Wang, Y., Akhtar, N., Mubarik, S., & Xiaobei, L.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Hefei University of Technology (CN)
- Youngstown State University (US)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xiaobei, Liang
- Venue
- Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 102357
- ISSN
- 0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093985617
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 102.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- panic buying, COVID-19 pandemic, emotional arousal, impulse buying, social media use, cross-cultural consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review