The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error rates
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Past work has also found that ASRs perform somewhat worse on conversational speech from male speakers than female speakers, likely due to male speakers using more informal style with shorter, more reduced pronunciations and more disfluencies (28, 29).”
From Racial disparities in automated speech recognition (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“age and gender are also known to impact the performance of ASR systems (28, 29).”
From Racial disparities in automated speech recognition (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
(2011) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 · Cited by 8,010
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801686 · Cited by 3,253
Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 · Cited by 1,982
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 · Cited by 1,817
A Maximum Entropy Model for Part-Of-Speech Tagging
Ratnaparkhi, A. (1996) · Cited by 1,328
Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains
Fougeron, C., & Keating, P. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.418332 · Cited by 1,002
Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2618 · Cited by 828
Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses
(2005) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b138696 · Cited by 707
Minimum Phone Error and I-smoothing for improved discriminative training
Povey, D., & Woodland, P. C. (2002) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2002.5743665 · Cited by 623
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–163 of 163
Exploring the Correlation of Pitch Accents and Semantic Slots for Spoken Language Understanding
Stehwien, S., & Vu, N. T. (2016) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2016-511 · Cited by 4
Language Identification with Deep Bottleneck FeaturesPreprint
Ma, Z., & Yu, H. T. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.08909 · Cited by 4
Haider, F., Akira, H., Vogel, C. M., Campbell, N., & Luz, S. F. (2019) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2019.01.001 · Cited by 3
Modeling Homophone Noise for Robust Neural Machine Translation
Qin, W., Li, X., Sun, Y., Xiong, D., Cui, J., & Wang, B. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9413586 · Cited by 3
Do smart speaker skills support diverse audiences?
Shafei, H. A., & Tan, C. C. (2022) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.101716 · Cited by 3
Modeling the effect of linguistic predictability on speech intelligibility prediction
Edraki, A., Chan, W.-Y., Fogerty, D., & Jensen, J. (2023) · JASA Express Letters · doi:10.1121/10.0017648 · Cited by 3
CEASR : a corpus for evaluating automatic speech recognition
Ulasik, M. A., Hürlimann, M., Germann, F., Gedik, E., Benites, F., & Cieliebak, M. (2020) · Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) · doi:10.21256/zhaw-20125 · Cited by 3
Errors in automatic speech recognition versus difficulties in second language listening
Mirzaei, M. S., Meshgi, K., Akita, Y., & Kawahara, T. (2015) · EUROCALL Conference · doi:10.14705/rpnet.2015.000367 · Cited by 4
Acoustic-prosodic Entrainment in Structural Metadata Events
Cabarrão, V., Batista, F., Moniz, H., Trancoso, I. M., & Mata, A. I. (2018) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2018-2366 · Cited by 3
Un mot pour un autre ? Analyse et comparaison de huit plateformes de transcription automatique
Tancoigne, É., Corbellini, J.-P., Deletraz, G., Gayraud, L., Ollinger, S., & Valero, D. (2022) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/07591063221088322 · Cited by 3
Towards improving Disfluency Detection from Speech using Shifted Delta Cepstral Coefficients
Mehrotra, U., Garg, S., Gurugubelli, K., & Vuppala, A. K. (2022) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing · doi:10.1145/3549206.3549269 · Cited by 2
Song, J. Y., Rojas, C., & Pycha, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520111 · Cited by 3
Human annotation of ASR error regions: Is “gravity” a sharable concept for human annotators?
Luzzati, D., Grouin, C., Vasilescu, I., Adda‐Decker, M., Bilinski, É., Camelin, N., Kahn, J., Lailler, C., Lamel, L. F., & Rosset, S. (2014) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/2qoyid3337gv · Cited by 2
Effects of phonological neighborhood density on phonetic variation: The curious case of French
Yao, Y., & Meunier, C. (2014) · HAL · Cited by 2
Proceedings of the 2014 Joint Meeting of SIGMORPHON and SIGFSM
(2014) · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-28 · Cited by 2
Transcription automatique de la parole spontanée
Dufour, R. (2010) · HAL · Cited by 2
Performance Evaluation Using Lexical Data
Donaj, G., & Kačič, Z. (2016) · Springer briefs in electrical and computer engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41607-6_3 · Cited by 1
Enhancing token boundary detection in disfluent speech
Srivastava, M., Ferro, M., Pirrelli, V., & Coro, G. (2025) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200614 · Cited by 1
Feng, J., Yasuda, Y., & Toda, T. (2026) · APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1108/atsip-12-2025-0109 · Cited by 1
Design, creation, and analysis of Czech corpora for structural metadata extraction from speech
Kolář, J. (2010) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-010-9126-8 · Cited by 1
ASR technology to empower partial and synchronized caption for L2 listening development
Mirzaei, M. S., & Kawahara, T. (2015) · ISCA Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE) · doi:10.21437/slate.2015-12 · Cited by 1
Prediction of a hotspot pattern in keyword search results
Gao, J., Radeva, A., Shen, C., Wang, S., Wang, Q., & Passonneau, R. J. (2017) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2017.10.005 · Cited by 1
On the use of acoustic features for automatic disambiguation of homophones in spontaneous German
Schuppler, B., & Schrank, T. (2018) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2017.12.011 · Cited by 1
Which ASR errors are hard to detect?
Ghannay, S., Camelin, N., & Estève, Y. (2015) · HAL · Cited by 1
Detecting the Most Insightful Parts of Documents Using a Regularized Attention-Based Model
Modarresi, K. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50420-5_20 · Cited by 1
The First Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Medical and Healthcare Fields
Aramaki, E., & Morita, M. (2013) · Cited by 1
Aftab, H., Shah, S. H. H., & Habli, I. (2021) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti210253 · Cited by 1
Towards a Typology of ASR Errors via Syntax-Prosody Mapping
Santiago, F., Dutrey, C., & Adda‐Decker, M. (2015) · HAL · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.3176.1360 · Cited by 1
Studying variation in Romanian: deletion of the definite article -l in continuous speech
Vasilescu, I., Chițoran, I., Vieru, B., Adda‐Decker, M., Candea, M., Lamel, L. F., & Niculescu, O. (2019) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2017-0046 · Cited by 1
Hutin, M., Weng, C., Adda‐Decker, M., & Lamel, L. F. (2022) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202213810004 · Cited by 1
Automatic Text and Speech Processing for the Detection of Dementia
Fraser, K. (2016) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
Fraundorf, S. H., Arnold, J., & Langlois, V. J. (2014) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0189 · Cited by 1
McCrocklin, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51447-0_30-1 · Cited by 1
Tomashenko, N. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9321e219z572az4822z8fffz3a7e47751802 · Cited by 1
One-Step Error Detection and Correction Approach for Voice Word Processor
Choi, J., Ryu, S., Lee, K., & Lee, G. G. (2015) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2014edp7392
Smith, M. T. (2010) · Massey Research Online (Massey University)
Naturalistic Dialogue Management for Noisy Speech Recognition
Passonneau, R. J., Epstein, S. L., & Ligorio, T. (2012) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2012.2229964
Selouani, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9685-5_2
Approches empiriques et modélisation statistique de la parole
Adda, G. (2011) · HAL
Incorporación de información suprasegmental en el proceso de reconocimiento automático del habla
Evin, D. (2011) · Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)
Traduire la parole: le cas des TED Talks
Segal, N. A., Bonneau-Maynard, H., & Yvon, F. (2015) · HAL
Confirmation detection in human-agent interaction using non-lexical speech cuesPreprint
Brandt, M., Wrede, B., Kümmert, F., & Schillingmann, L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.00171
Modeling the Perceptual Learning of Novel Dialect Features
Tatman, R. (2017) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Arnold, T., & Fuller, H. J. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care · doi:10.1177/2327857919081067
Adaptação acústico-prosódica local em Português Europeu
Cabarrão, V., Batista, F., Moniz, H., Trancoso, I. M., & Mata, A. I. (2019) · Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística · doi:10.26334/2183-9077/rapln5ano2019a7
Error Types in Natural Language Processing in Inflectional Languages
Donaj, G., & Maučec, M. S. (2020) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch006
Mena, C. D. H., Meza, I., Ramirez-Orta, J., & Herrera-Camacho, J. A. (2020) · Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/resla.18002.her
Modeling Homophone Noise for Robust Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Qin, W., Li, X., Sun, Y., Xiong, D., Cui, J., & Wang, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08396
A Simple and Lightweight Algorithm for Social Robot Speech Turn Taking
González, A. L., & Young, J. E. (2020) · Mspace (University of Manitoba)
Selouani, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9685-5_1
PHONEME RECOGNITION AND CONFUSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS
Jachova, Z., Ristovska, L., Kovacevic, J., & Krasniqi, N. (2023) · Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation · doi:10.21554/hrr.042312
Caregiver-infant interactions and child vocabulary
van der Klis, A. (2024) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/2121
Using Confidence Scores to Improve Eyes-free Detection of Speech Recognition Errors
Nowrin, S., & Vertanen, K. (2025) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3733155.3734896
Designing a Smart Typo Correction and Sentiment Prediction Tool for Social Media Texts
Babu, C. V. S., Tamilvanddan, R., Kumar, S. N., & Barath, K. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3048-8.ch007
Aziz, S. (2025) · Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/s00034-025-03349-6
Automatic Speech Recognition for Intelligibility Assessment in Children With Dysarthria
Choi, J., Moya‐Galé, G., Hwang, K., Hirschberg, J., & Levy, E. S. (2026) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2025_jslhr-25-00562 · Cited by 1
Jacob, A. M., Li, S., Aatly, P. P., Pedrosa, S., Arbuckle, B., Takawira, I., & Ali, M. E. (2026) · Voice and Speech Review · doi:10.1080/23268263.2026.2640633
Mdhaffar, S. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/28b4a15cz050bz4a00zaa9aze0fb920868d5
Automatic speech and language processing for precision medicine in Huntington’s disease
Riad, R. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1044c136z4a18z4b78zb00dz314b3b823381 · Cited by 1
Zeidan, D. E. B. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/68d87bdczbe74z443aza16az2ef25f9030ac
Eshgarf, N., Carpenter, Z., & Anderson, C. G. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29755-6_44
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldwater, S., Jurafsky, D., & Manning, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goldwater, Sharon
- Venue
- Speech Communication
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-200
- ISSN
- 0167-6393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131694695
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- speech recognition errors, prosody, disfluency, discourse markers, speaker differences, conversational speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review