Cited by 11Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

Breastfeeding practices in an Australian tertiary care hospital: A retrospective study

Open access
Vasilevski, Vidanka, Arnold, Tara, Halliday, Kathleen, Hughes, Jessica, Dwyer, Narelle, Sweet, Linda·2021·Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization recommend that infants be exclusively breastfed until six months of age. The Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI) was developed for protecting, promoting, and supporting breastfeeding. The BFHI global criteria guides hospital practice for supporting infant feeding and reducing disparities in breastfeeding outcomes.Aim The aim of this study was to analyse 2019 data to identify factors that predict exclusive breastfeeding vs non-exclusive breastfeeding on discharge to determine areas for intervention in relation to BFHI guidelines.Material and methods A retrospective chart review of 5836 neonates born at an Australian tertiary hospital in 2019 was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to report exclusive breastfeeding rates. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding and non-exclusive breastfeeding on discharge.Results A total of 69% of neonates were exclusively breastfed on discharge in 2019. When excluding admissions to Newborn Services, 75% of neonates were exclusively breastfed on discharge, achieving the BFHI benchmark. Predictors which significantly reduced the odds of exclusive breastfeeding on discharge were maternal country of birth (Vietnam, p < 0.001, Sudan p < 0.001, Samoa p < 0.01, Philippines p < 0.05), main language (Other, p < 0.05), birth type (caesarean or assisted vaginal birth p < 0.001), first-feed type (mixed feeding or formula p < 0.001), and Newborn Services admission (p < 0.001).Conclusions Examining breastfeeding outcomes is an important quality assurance process for health services. Understanding groups of mothers who commence breastfeeding but do not exclusively breastfeed upon discharge enables identification of areas for intervention to achieve BFHI targets and reduce breastfeeding disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100671

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasilevski, V., Arnold, T., Halliday, K., Hughes, J., Dwyer, N., & Sweet, L.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Western Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Vasilevski, Vidanka
Venue
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
30
Pages
100671
ISSN
1877-5756 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206165555
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
exclusive breastfeeding, Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, breastfeeding practices, neonatal discharge, breastfeeding disparities, maternal country of birth, mother tongue, caesarean birth, tertiary care hospital, infant feeding
MeSH terms
Australia, Breast Feeding, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mothers, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review