The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Rural livelihoods and land reform in South Africa: An intersectional perspective on women's lived experiences
Open accessAbstract
Through racialised discrimination under colonialism and apartheid, black people in South Africa were dispossessed of their land. They were often forced into cheap labour for the new mining economic complex and industrial sector. Land dispossession was thus about economic deprivation, eradication of subsistence agriculture, and degradation of the black communities. This resulted in a racialised unequal land distribution, culminating in historical inequalities and poverty along race lines. The 1994 democratic government introduced the land reform programme. The land reform process took the form of restitution, redistribution, and tenure reform. Women were also earmarked for prioritisation and seeking to redress racial inequalities in land access and ownership. The paper utilises an intersectionality approach to explore women farmers' lived experiences of the land reform programme. The paper argues that intersectionality is suitable for exploring gender, class, and age dynamics necessary for understanding women's lived experiences. Particular attention is paid to how the women gained access to and ownership of land and the unique challenges and constraints they experienced as women of a specific class. The paper further aims to examine whether the amendment of the constitution of South Africa with the inclusion of Land Expropriation Without Compensation will help address gender, class, and age differences in land ownership. The paper draws from existing literature and secondary…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many evaluations of South African land reform emphasize administrative indicators such as claims settled, neglecting outcome quality, gender equity, and tenure security.
“Many evaluations emphasize administrative indicators such as claims settled, neglecting outcome quality, gender equity, and tenure security [16,21].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Gender disparities persist in South Africa's land reform, with women frequently underrepresented as beneficiaries.
“Gender disparities also persist, with women frequently underrepresented as beneficiaries of land reform initiatives [15,16].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Historically, apartheid policies entrenched racialized land ownership, leaving Black women doubly marginalized, first by race and then by gender.
“Historically, apartheid policies entrenched racialized land ownership, leaving Black women doubly marginalized-first by race and then by gender [16,29].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
While reforms aimed to empower marginalized groups and broaden land access, weak post-settlement support, insecure tenure, and gender disparities persist.
“While reforms aimed to empower marginalized groups and broaden land access, weak post-settlement support, insecure tenure, and gender disparities persist [12,16,69].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Access to land for rural women is not only gendered but also classed, meaning ordinary rural Black women are at a disadvantage due to their limited education, class, lack of economic privilege, and lack of power.
“Access to land for rural women is not only gendered, but also classed, which means ordinary rural Black women are at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing land due to their limited education, class, lack of economic privilege, and lack of power [16].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
There is a notable disparity between men and women in the ownership of land, with men owning more land than women.
“Despite the initiation of the land reform program, there is a notable disparity between men and women in the ownership of land, with men owning more land than women [16,49,65].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
For women who live in former homelands and those who live and work on white commercial farms, tenure security and land ownership is still reliant on relationships with men, whether husbands, fathers, or brothers.
“Due to customary law and patriarchal norms and values that are still prevalent in South Africa and rural areas, for women who live in former homelands and those who live and work on white commercial farms, tenure security and land ownership is still reliant on relationships with men, whether husbands, fathers, or brothers [16,49].”
From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Persistent challenges in South Africa's land redistribution include bureaucratic delays, elite capture, under-resourced post-settlement support, gender and youth exclusion, weak institutional capacity, and continued reliance on market-led acquisition models.
“Persistent challenges include bureaucratic delays, elite capture, under-resourced post-settlement support, gender and youth exclusion, weak institutional capacity, and continued reliance on market-led acquisition models.”
From Over three decades of land distribution in South Africa: a review of progress, challenges and prospects (2026) · cites this paper as Makhetha, 2024
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Akinola, 2018, Women, Culture and Africa’s Land Reform Agenda, Front. Psychol., 9, 2234, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02234 · DOI
- Akinola, 2020, Land reform in South Africa: Interrogating the securitisation of land expropriation without compensation, Politik, 47, 215, 10.1080/02589346.2020.1715178 · DOI
- Aspers, P., Corte, U. 2019. What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology 42, 2: 139–160. · DOI · Paper page
- Beinart, 2014, The historical context and legacy of the Natives land Act of 1913, Journal of Southern African Studies, 40, 4, 10.1080/03057070.2014.930623 · DOI
- Bob, 2000, Gender, the role of the chieftaincy and rural women's access to land under the land reform programme in KwaZulu-natal, Alternation, 7, 48
- Bradstock, 2006, Land reform and livelihoods in South Africa's Northern Cape province, Land Use Policy, 23, 247, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.01.002 · DOI
- Braun, 2011, Left high and dry: An international analysis of gender, dams, and development in Lesotho, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13, 2, 10.1080/14616742.2011.560037 · DOI
- Chipuriro, 2018, Unsung heroines and violence for the land: Narratives of elderly women farmers' experiences in South Africa and Zimbabwe, Agenda, 117
- Cousins, B. (2018). ‘South Africa’s land debate is clouded by misrepresentation and lack of data’, Conversation, March 8. · DOI
- Crenshaw, 1992, Race, gender and sexual harassment, Southern California Law Review, 65, 1467
- Dodson, 2013, The native land Act of 1913 and its legacy, Johannesburg Bar, 26, 29
- Graneheim, 2004, Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness, Nurse Education Today, 24, 105, 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray, 2008, Diminished Access, Diverted Exclusion: Women and Land Tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Gray, 1999, Diminished access, diverted exclusion: Women and land tenure in sub-Saharan Africa, African Studies Review, 42, 15, 10.2307/525363 · DOI
- Groenmeyer, 2011, Intersectionality in Apartheid and Post-apartheid South Africa: Unpacking the Narratives of Two Working Women, Gender, Technology and Development, 15, 249, 10.1177/097185241101500204 · DOI
- Gumede, 2014, Land reform in post-apartheid South Africa: Should South Africa follow Zimbabwe's footsteps?, International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 9, 1, 10.1080/18186874.2014.916877 · DOI
- Hall, R. 2001. “Globalisation and Farm Workers: Why do Women Bear the Brunt?” Agenda: South African Feminist Journal. No 48. May 2001.
- Hall, 2013, Farm workers and farm dwellers in Limpopo province, South Africa, Journal of Agrarian Change, 13, 47, 10.1111/joac.12002 · DOI
- Hall, 2014, Land reform and its aftermath in South Africa, Journal of Agrarian Change, 14, 121
- Holvino, 2010, Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies, Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 3, 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00400.x · DOI
- Jacobs, 2002, Land Reform: Still a goal worth pursuing for rural women?, Journal of Development Studies, 14, 887
- Jordan-Zachery, 2007, Am I a black woman or a woman who is black? A few thoughts on the meaning of intersectionality, Politics and Gender, 3, 2, 10.1017/S1743923X07000074 · DOI
- Lyne, 2014, Two decades of land reform in South Africa. Agricultural economics research, policy and practice in southern Africa, Agrekon, 53, 1, 10.1080/03031853.2014.975413 · DOI
- Makhetha, 2017, Hunger for farmland among female farmers in Limpopo Province: bodies, violence and land, Agenda, 32, 4
- Makhetha, 2018, Hunger for farmland among female farmers in Limpopo province: Bodies, violence, and land, Agenda, 34, 4
- Mazvirevesa, C. R and Batisai, K. 2018. "Unsung heroines and violence for the land: narratives of elderly women farmers’ experiences in South Africa and Zimbabwe." Agenda 32, no. 4 (October 2, 2018): 54–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2018.1535081. · DOI
- Mbatha, 2012, A cooperative benefits framework in South Africa's land redistri-bution process: The case of sugarcane farmland transfers, Agrekon: Agricultural Economics Research, Policy and Practice in Southern Africa, 51, 81, 10.1080/03031853.2012.741207 · DOI
- Meer, 2013, Land reform and women's land rights in South Africa, Perspectives: Political Analyses and Commentary from Africa, 2, 13
- Moyo, 2013, Land reform and redistribution in Zimbabwe since 1980. Land and agrarian reform in Zimbabwe, Beyond White-settler, Capitalism, 29
- Mubecua, 2019, Land expropriation without compensation: The challenges of black South African women in land ownership, Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa (JGIDA), 8, 7, 10.31920/2050-4284/2019/8n3a1 · DOI · Paper page
- Nkomo, S.N. 2012. Looking for Maria, her sisters, daughters and sons. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies: Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 7, 2: 96–107. · DOI
- Pheko, 2014, Women, land and livelihoods in South Africa’s land reform programme, Policy Brief, Policy and Analysis Programme, (1).
- Rangan, 2002, Gender, traditional authority, and the politics of rural reform in South Africa, Development and Change, 33, 633, 10.1111/1467-7660.00273 · DOI
- Sim, 2019, Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges, Quality & quantity, 53, 3003, 10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5 · DOI
- Songca, 2018, Land, violence and womxn's bodies: An overview of implications of land reform and customary law on the rights of women in South Africa, Agenda, 32, 3, 10.1080/10130950.2018.1549828 · DOI
- Thamaga-Chitja, 2010, Is the South African land reform programme gender sensitive to women's food security and livelihood efforts?, Agenda, 24, 121
- Tshuma, 2012, The land reform programme (LRP) as a poverty alleviation and national reconciliation tool: The South African story, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, 1970, 10.5897/AJARX11.075 · DOI
- Valentine, 2007, Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography*, The Professional Geographer, 59, 10, 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x · DOI
- Walker, 2003, Piety in the sky? Gender policy and land reform in South Africa, Journal of Agrarian Change, 3, 113, 10.1111/1471-0366.00052 · DOI · Paper page
- Walker, 2005, Women, gender policy and land reform in South Africa. South african Journal of political studies, 32, 297
- Walker, C. 2009. Elusive Equality: Women, Property Rights and Land Reform in South Africa. South African Journal on Human Rights, 25,3: 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2009.11865213. · DOI
- Yngstrom, 2010, Women, wives and land rights in Africa: Situating gender beyond the household in the debate over land policy and changing tenure systems, Oxford Development Studies, 30, 21, 10.1080/136008101200114886 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Makhetha, E.
- Affiliations
- Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Makhetha, Esther
- ORCID
- Makhetha, Esther
- Venue
- Social Sciences & Humanities Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 101037
- ISSN
- 2590-2911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401215573
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Sciences & Humanities Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
- Keywords
- land reform, rural livelihoods, women farmers, intersectionality, land dispossession, apartheid, land restitution, land redistribution, land tenure reform, class inequality, age inequality, Limpopo Province, post-apartheid South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review