Cited by 60Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Using ChatGPT for academic support: managing cognitive load and enhancing learning efficiency – a phenomenological approach

Open access
Patac, Louida P., Patac, Adriano V.·2025·Social Sciences & Humanities Open

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the effects of ChatGPT on the management of students' cognitive load and learning outcomes. Participants used ChatGPT for answering particular questions, checking information, and solving complex problems involving equations. Results show that ChatGPT lowers intrinsic and extrinsic cognitive load with very detailed responses and efficient search for information, even though it has difficulties in entering mathematical notation. Students consider that ChatGPT is a tool able to enhance understanding, engage, and promote critical thinking. These findings underline that the level of AI assistance must be balanced against independent learning and critical evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101301

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patac, L. P., & Patac, A. V.
Affiliations
North Eastern Mindanao State University (PH)
Corresponding author
Patac, Louida P.
Venue
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
Volume
11
Pages
101301
ISSN
2590-2911 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406605478
Cited by
47
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 19
FWCI
49.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Sciences & Humanities Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, cognitive load, academic support, learning efficiency, intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load, mathematical notation, critical thinking, student perceptions, self-directed learning, AI-assisted learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review