The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133
Cited by
A Social Virtual Reality Based Construction Safety Education System for Experiential Learning
Le, Q. T., Pedro, A., & Park, C. S. (2015) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z · Cited by 326
Behavior-based safety on construction sites: A case study
Choudhry, R. M. (2014) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.007 · Cited by 279
Self-citationRowlinson, S., YunyanJia, A., Li, B., & ChuanjingJu, C. (2014) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.011 · Cited by 176
(2010) · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.002 · Cited by 112
Chan, A. P. C., Yi, W., Wong, D. P., Yam, M. C. H., & Chan, D. W. M. (2012) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.006 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Choudhry, R. M., & Fang, D.
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 566-584
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009770593
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
- The paper
- Choudhry, R. M., & Fang, D. (2008). Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
