Cited by 102Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyTraffic and Road SafetyIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems

Driving and telephoning: relative accident risk when using hand-held and hands-free mobile phones

Backer-Grøndahl, Agathe, Sagberg, Fridulv·2011·Safety Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.009

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problematic cell-phone use includes continuation of the behavior despite negative effects or personal malaise.

    “A continuation of the behavior is observed despite the negative effects or the personal malaise caused (50, 51).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [51]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Backer-Grøndahl, A., & Sagberg, F.
Affiliations
Institute of Transport Economics (NO)
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
324-330
ISSN
0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088995130
Cited by
102
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Safety Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › IoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Keywords
mobile phone use while driving, crash risk, cognitive distraction, driver distraction, road safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review