A method for classifying red signal approaches using train operational data
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PPE alone is not sufficient without thorough safety procedures and training, as persons wearing PPE may engage in risky behaviors thinking that they are protected.
“suggesting that PPE alone is not sufficient without thorough safety procedures and training, as persons wearing PPE may engage in risky behaviors thinking that they are protected (Liu et al. 2022; Gyekye and Salminen 2021; Solis and Philips 2018; Neitzel et al. 2009).”
From Impact of risk mitigation strategies on non-fatal injuries in the construction sector in qatar: a retrospective analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Solis and Philips 2018
The retrieved passages (labelled Abstract) identify the source as a study of classifying red-signal approaches using train operational data; they do not address personal protective equipment. Searches for PPE, risky behaviour, safety procedures and training returned no relevant passage from our copy, so it cannot verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soubra, L., Al-Mohannadi, A., Berzan, Y., Consunji, R., El‑Menyar, A., Al‑Thani, H., Al-Marri, M. A., & Al-Hajri, H. S. (2025) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-025-02126-x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Stow, J., & Harrison, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Huddersfield (GB)
- Rail Safety and Standards Board (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Yunshi
- Venue
- Safety Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 67-74
- ISSN
- 0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772935841
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.hud.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Safety Science (publishedVersion)
- Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Transportation Systems and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
- Keywords
- railway signaling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
