Cited by 13Efficiency Analysis Using DEAOccupational Health and Safety ManagementOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Measuring efficiency of safe work environment from the perspective of the decent work Agenda

Gomes, Rodrigo F.S., Lacerda, Daniel P., Camanho, Ana S., Piran, Fabio A.S., Silva, Debora O.·2023·Safety Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106277

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomes, R. F. S., Lacerda, D. P., Camanho, A. S., Piran, F. A. S., & Silva, D. O.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
167
Pages
106277
ISSN
0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385156742
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Safety Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
safe working conditions, decent work, directional distance function, efficiency measurement, efficacy, occupational safety, benchmarking, social protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review