Cited by 27Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningWomen's cancer prevention and managementHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Macro-contextual determinants of cancer screening participation and inequalities: A multilevel analysis of 29 European countries

Open access
Jolidon, Vladimir, Bracke, Piet, Burton-Jeangros, Claudine·2021·SSM - Population Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little attention has been devoted to the role of macro-level determinants in preventive health inequalities, particularly in cancer screening participation. Research has evidenced inequalities in cancer screening uptake yet has mainly focused on the screening programmes' moderating role at the macro-level. To address this gap, this study examines how welfare provision and healthcare system features modify cancer screening uptake and inequalities across European countries. METHODS: Data from 99 715 (Pap smear) and 54 557 (mammography) women in 29 countries from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2014 wave and Swiss Health Interview Survey (SHIS) 2012 wave was analysed. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models, including cross-level interactions, to examine whether social protection expenditure in particular policy areas and healthcare system characteristics explained cross-country differences in Pap smear and mammography uptake and inequalities. RESULTS: Main findings revealed that GP gatekeeping systems were associated with reduced screening uptake likelihood in both Pap smear and mammography, and so were stronger primary care systems in Pap smear, while higher expenditures on old age and survivors were associated with increased mammography uptake. Cross-level interactions showed that in countries with higher expenditures on sickness/healthcare, disability, social exclusion and public health, and a higher number of GPs, educational inequalities in both Pap smear and mammography uptake were smaller, while higher out-of-pocket payments had the opposite effect of increasing inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results show that social protection policies and healthcare system features affect cancer screening participation. We conclude that institutional and policy arrangements interact with individuals' (educational) resources and, through the (re)distribution of valued goods and resources at the macro level, these arrangements may contribute to enhancing preventive healthcare use and mitigating screening uptake inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100830

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the European Union, gatekeeping systems where a physician referral is required for screening were barriers to BC and CC screening.

    “In the European Union, an international survey study revealed that gatekeeping systems where a physician referral is required for screening were barriers to BC and CC screening [37].”

    From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results report that GP referral combined with capitation was associated with lower Pap smear (CC) and mammography (BC) uptake. The claim omits capitation and describes an observed association as a barrier. The Methods (Data; Measures) also show that the 29-country sample included non-EU countries, so the study was not confined to the European Union. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Beckfield J. Krieger N. Epi+ demos+ cracy: Linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities—evidence, gaps, and a research agenda Epidemiologic Reviews 31 2009 152 177 19474091
  2. Bergqvist K. Yngwe M.A. Lundberg O. Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities - an analytical review BMC Public Health 13 2013 1234 24369852 PMC3909317
  3. de Breij S. Huisman M. Deeg D.J.H. Macro-level determinants of post-retirement health and health inequalities: A multilevel analysis of 18 European countries Social Science & Medicine 245 2020 112669 31739142
  4. Bremer P. Forgone care and financial burden due to out-of-pocket payments within the German health care system Health Econ. Rev. 4 2014 36 26208936 PMC4502068
  5. Brennenstuhl S. Quesnel-Vallee A. McDonough P. Welfare regimes, population health and health inequalities: A research synthesis Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 66 2012 397 409 22080814
  6. Burstrom B. The attack on universal health coverage in Europe: Different effects in different parts of Europe The European Journal of Public Health 25 2015 366 367 25999463
  7. Caplan L.S. McQueen D.V. Qualters J.R. Leff M. Garrett C. Calonge N. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 12 2003 1182 1187 14652278
  8. Carrin G. Mathauer I. Xu K. Evans D.B. Universal coverage of health services: Tailoring its implementation Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86 2008 857 863 19030691 PMC2649543
  9. Castles F.G. What welfare states do: A disaggregated expenditure approach Journal of Social Policy 38 2009 45 62
  10. Council of the European Union Council recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening 2003 Official Journal of the European Union
  11. Dahl E. van der Wel K.A. Educational inequalities in health in European welfare states: A social expenditure approach Social Science & Medicine 81 2013 60 69 23305722
  12. Damiani G. Basso D. Acampora A. Bianchi C.B. Silvestrini G. Frisicale E.M. The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis Preventive Medicine 81 2015 281 289 26408405
  13. De Prez V. Jolidon V. Willems B. Cullati S. Burton-Jeangros C. Bracke P. Cervical cancer (over)screening in Belgium and Switzerland: Trends and social inequalities The European Journal of Public Health 30 2020 410 415 32155248
  14. Detollenaere J. Hanssens L. Vyncke V. De Maeseneer J. Willems S. Do we reap what we sow? Exploring the association between the strength of European primary healthcare systems and inequity in unmet need PloS One 12 2017 PMC5207486 28046051
  15. van Doorslaer E. Masseria C. Koolman X. Group O.H.E.R. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries Canadian Medical Association Journal: Canadian Medical Association Journal 174 2006 177 183 16415462 PMC1329455
  16. Frohlich K.L. Abel T. Environmental justice and health practices: Understanding how health inequities arise at the local level Sociology of Health & Illness 36 2014 199 212 24372359
  17. Frohlich K.L. Potvin L. Transcending the known in public health practice: The inequality paradox: The population approach and vulnerable populations American Journal of Public Health 98 2008 216 221 18172133 PMC2376882
  18. Gesthuizen M. Huijts T. Kraaykamp G. Explaining health marginalisation of the lower educated: The role of cross-national variations in health expenditure and labour market conditions Sociology of Health & Illness 34 2012 591 607 21834939
  19. Guessous I. Gaspoz J.M. Theler J.M. Wolff H. High prevalence of forgoing healthcare for economic reasons in Switzerland: A population-based study in a region with universal health insurance coverage Preventive Medicine 55 2012 521 527 22940614
  20. Heisig J.P. Schaeffer M. Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction European Sociological Review 35 2019 258 279
  21. Israel S. How social policies can improve financial accessibility of healthcare: A multi-level analysis of unmet medical need in European countries International Journal for Equity in Health 15 2016 41 26944542 PMC4779225
  22. Jolidon V. De Prez V. Willems B. Bracke P. Cullati S. Burton-Jeangros C. Never and under cervical cancer screening in Switzerland and Belgium: Trends and inequalities BMC Public Health 20 2020 1517 10.1186/s12889-020-09619-z PMC7542418 33028278 · DOI
  23. Jusot F. Or Z. Sirven N. Variations in preventive care utilisation in Europe European Journal of Ageing 9 2012 15 25 28804404 PMC5547316
  24. Kim S.E. Perez-Stable E.J. Wong S. Gregorich S. Sawaya G.F. Walsh J.M. Association between cancer risk perception and screening behavior among diverse women Archives of Internal Medicine 168 2008 728 734 18413555 PMC4031902
  25. Kim T.J. Vonneilich N. Ludecke D. von dem Knesebeck O. Income, financial barriers to health care and public health expenditure: A multilevel analysis of 28 countries Social Science & Medicine 176 2017 158 165 28153752
  26. Kringos D.S. Boerma W. van der Zee J. Groenewegen P. Europe's strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending Health Affairs 32 2013 686 694 23569048
  27. Kuitto K. More than just money: Patterns of disaggregated welfare expenditure in the enlarged Europe Journal of European Social Policy 21 2011 348 364
  28. Mackenbach J.P. Stirbu I. Roskam A.J.R. Schaap M.M. Menvielle G. Leinsalu M. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries New England Journal of Medicine 358 2008 2468 2481 18525043
  29. Merlo J. Chaix B. Ohlsson H. Beckman A. Johnell K. Hjerpe P. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: Using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60 2006 290 297 16537344 PMC2566165
  30. Mielck A. Kiess R. Knesebeck O. Stirbu I. Kunst A.E. Association between forgone care and household income among the elderly in five Western European countries - analyses based on survey data from the SHARE-study BMC Health Services Research 9 2009 52 19309496 PMC2666678
  31. Missinne S. Neels K. Bracke P. Reconsidering inequalities in preventive health care: An application of cultural health capital theory and the life-course perspective to the take-up of mammography screening Sociology of Health & Illness 36 2014 1259 1275 25470325
  32. Muntaner C. Borrell C. Ng E. Chung H. Espelt A. Rodriguez-Sanz M. Politics, welfare regimes, and population health: Controversies and evidence Sociology of Health & Illness 33 2011 946 964 21899562
  33. Osamor P.E. Grady C. Women's autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: A synthesis of the literature Int. J. Womens Health 8 2016 191 202 27354830 PMC4908934
  34. Palencia L. Espelt A. Rodriguez-Sanz M. Puigpinos R. Pons-Vigues M. Pasarin M.I. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: Influence of the type of screening program International Journal of Epidemiology 39 2010 757 765 20176587
  35. Phelan J.C. Link B.G. Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Theory, evidence, and policy implications Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51 Suppl 2010 S28 S40 20943581
  36. Priaulx J. Turnbull E. Heijnsdijk E. Csanadi M. Senore C. de Koning H.J. The influence of health systems on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: An overview of systematic reviews using health systems and implementation research frameworks Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 25 2020 49 58 31284772
  37. Ramjan L. Cotton A. Algoso M. Peters K. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disability: A review Women & Health 56 2016 141 156 26325597
  38. Raphael D. Bryant T. The welfare state as a determinant of women's health: Support for women's quality of life in Canada and four comparison nations Health Policy 68 2004 63 79 15033554
  39. Rauscher G.H. Johnson T.P. Cho Y.I. Walk J.A. Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: A meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 17 2008 748 757 18381468
  40. Reeves A. McKee M. Stuckler D. The attack on universal health coverage in Europe: Recession, austerity and unmet needs The European Journal of Public Health 25 2015 364 365 25999461 PMC4440451
  41. Reibling N. Healthcare systems in Europe: Towards an incorporation of patient access Journal of European Social Policy 20 2010 5 18
  42. Reibling N. Wendt C. Regulating patients' access to healthcare services International Journal of Public and Private Healthcare Management and Economics 1 2011 1 16
  43. Ross C.E. Mirowsky J. Sex differences in the effect of education on depression: Resource multiplication or resource substitution? Social Science & Medicine 63 2006 1400 1413 16644077
  44. Sabates R. Feinstein L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in britain Social Science & Medicine 62 2006 2998 3010 16403597
  45. Sarma E.A. Barriers to screening mammography Health Psychology Review 9 2015 42 62 25793490
  46. Schafer W.L. Boerma W.G. Murante A.M. Sixma H.J. Schellevis F.G. Groenewegen P.P. Assessing the potential for improvement of primary care in 34 countries: A cross-sectional survey Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93 2015 161 168 25883409 PMC4371491
  47. Silles M.A. The causal effect of education on health: Evidence from the United Kingdom Economics of Education Review 28 2009 122 128
  48. Sjoberg O. Positive welfare state dynamics? Sickness benefits and sickness absence in Europe 1997-2011 Social Science & Medicine 177 2017 158 168 28167341
  49. Terraneo M. Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: Evidence from 12 European countries Social Science & Medicine 126 2015 154 163 25562311
  50. Trein P. Healthy or sick?: Coevolution of health care and public health in a comparative perspective 2018 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
  51. Walsh B. Silles M. O'Neill C. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: A comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15 Health Policy 101 2011 269 276 21420755
  52. Willems B. Bracke P. The education gradient in cancer screening participation: A consistent phenomenon across Europe? International Journal of Public Health 63 2018 93 103 29063122
  53. Willems B. Cullati S. Prez V. Jolidon V. Burton-Jeangros C. Bracke P. Cancer screening participation and gender stratification in Europe Journal of Health and Social Behavior 61 2020 377 395 32686508
  54. Wubker A. Explaining variations in breast cancer screening across European countries The European Journal of Health Economics 15 2014 497 514 23744174
  55. Wuebker A. Who gets a mammogram amongst European women aged 50-69 years? Health Econ Rev 2 2012 6 22828268 PMC3402934

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jolidon, V., Bracke, P., & Burton-Jeangros, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Jolidon, Vladimir
Venue
SSM - Population Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
15
Pages
100830
ISSN
2352-8273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3171875532
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSM - Population Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (176115)
  • FWO (FWOOPR2018005701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
cancer screening uptake, health disparities, macro-level determinants, social protection expenditure, primary care, Pap smear, mammography, educational inequality, out-of-pocket costs, cross-national comparison, preventive medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review