Cited by 134Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Local Genome Topology Can Exhibit an Incompletely Rewired 3D-Folding State during Somatic Cell Reprogramming

Open access
Beagan, Jonathan A., Gilgenast, Thomas G., Kim, Jesi, Plona, Zachary, Norton, Heidi K., Hu, Gui, Hsu, Sarah C., Shields, Emily J. +6 more·2016·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

Pluripotent genomes are folded in a topological hierarchy that reorganizes during differentiation. The extent to which chromatin architecture is reconfigured during somatic cell reprogramming is poorly understood. Here we integrate fine-resolution architecture maps with epigenetic marks and gene expression in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), neural progenitor cells (NPCs), and NPC-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We find that most pluripotency genes reconnect to target enhancers during reprogramming. Unexpectedly, some NPC interactions around pluripotency genes persist in our iPSC clone. Pluripotency genes engaged in both "fully-reprogrammed" and "persistent-NPC" interactions exhibit over/undershooting of target expression levels in iPSCs. Additionally, we identify a subset of "poorly reprogrammed" interactions that do not reconnect in iPSCs and display only partially recovered, ESC-specific CTCF occupancy. 2i/LIF can abrogate persistent-NPC interactions, recover poorly reprogrammed interactions, reinstate CTCF occupancy, and restore expression levels. Our results demonstrate that iPSC genomes can exhibit imperfectly rewired 3D-folding linked to inaccurately reprogrammed gene expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 134

Authors
Beagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., Hochedlinger, K., Corces, V. G., Dekker, J., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
611-624
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2345818719
Cited by
134
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007954)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (DP2MH110247)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003143)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM035463)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
3D genome organization, chromatin structure, somatic cell reprogramming, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural progenitor cells, embryonic stem cells, pluripotency genes, enhancer-promoter interactions, gene expression regulation, chromatin looping
MeSH terms
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Animals, Chromatin, Clone Cells, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, Repressor Proteins, Genome, Cell Lineage, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Neural Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review