Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression
Open accessAbstract
Neuronal activation induces rapid transcription of immediate early genes (IEGs) and longer-term chromatin remodeling around secondary response genes (SRGs). Here, we use high-resolution chromosome-conformation-capture carbon-copy sequencing (5C-seq) to elucidate the extent to which long-range chromatin loops are altered during short- and long-term changes in neural activity. We find that more than 10% of loops surrounding select IEGs, SRGs, and synaptic genes are induced de novo during cortical neuron activation. IEGs Fos and Arc connect to activity-dependent enhancers via singular short-range loops that form within 20 min after stimulation, prior to peak messenger RNA levels. By contrast, the SRG Bdnf engages in both pre-existing and activity-inducible loops that form within 1-6 h. We also show that common single-nucleotide variants that are associated with autism and schizophrenia are colocalized with distinct classes of activity-dependent, looped enhancers. Our data link architectural complexity to transcriptional kinetics and reveal the rapid timescale by which higher-order chromatin architecture reconfigures during neuronal stimulation.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using 5C-seq across activity states and time points in mouse cortical neurons, this study shows that neuronal activation rapidly reconfigures long-range chromatin loops around immediate early genes and slower secondary response genes. It links de novo versus pre-existing loop classes to distinct transcriptional kinetics and to schizophrenia- or autism-associated noncoding variants.
Key findings
- Within 12.2 Mb queried around *Arc*, *Bdnf*, *Fos*, *Nrxn1*, *Syt1*, and *Nlgn3*, the authors detected 215 activity-invariant, 29 activity-induced, and 9 activity-decommissioned loops; more than 10% of loops surrounding select IEGs, SRGs, and synaptic genes were induced de novo.
- Activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers (class 1, n = 11) connected to genes with a 24-fold activity-dependent expression increase, whereas pre-existing loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers (class 2, n = 41) connected to genes with a 1.3-fold increase.
- *Fos* and *Arc* formed singular short-range loops with activity-dependent enhancers that peaked by 20 min after stimulation, before peak mRNA at 60 min; *Bdnf* engaged in longer class 1 loops of 840 kb and 1,700 kb and class 2 loops that formed at 60–360 min, with maximum signal at 360 min.
- Schizophrenia-associated noncoding SNVs (n = 80, P < 5 × 10−8) preferentially colocalized with class 3 loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers, while autism-associated SNVs (n = 126, P < 10−4) colocalized with class 2 loops anchored by activity-inducible enhancers.
Methods
- Primary murine cortical neurons were cultured for 15 days in vitro and treated for 24 h with 10 μM bicuculline, 1 μM tetrodotoxin, or left untreated; acute time-course experiments used 24 h TTX followed by 0, 5, 20, 60, or 360 min of bicuculline.
- The authors generated high-resolution 5C-seq maps across 12.2 Mb around selected genes, plus H3K27ac ChIP–seq, total RNA-seq, and reanalyzed published mouse and human Hi-C data; loops were called with 3DeFDR and Hi-C loop-calling methods, and enhancer–gene links were modeled with an adapted activity-by-contact approach.
- Disease-variant analyses used GWAS summary statistics for schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders, SNP matching, Fisher’s exact tests, and LD score regression.
Limitations
- The paper states that future functional dissection with genome editing is required to test whether disease-associated variants disrupt enhancers or loop structure, and that genome-wide Hi-C under diverse activity-induction conditions is needed to estimate class effects more precisely.
- The paper notes that published Hi-C data represent only the untreated activity state, so activity-induced class 1 loops could not be assessed genome-wide; it also calls for future human activity-dependent loop maps.
- Evident from the text: the main architectural findings come from an in vitro mouse cortical neuron system and 5C maps limited to 12.2 Mb around selected loci, and the disease-variant results are colocalization/enrichment analyses rather than causal tests.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Class 3 loops showed strong and unchanged interaction frequency.
“Activity-invariant loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers showed a strong and unchanged interaction frequency (class 3, Fig. 3f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Fos and Arc loops form prior to peak mRNA levels.
“IEGs Fos and Arc connect to activity-dependent enhancers via singular short-range loops that form within 20 min after stimulation, prior to peak messenger RNA levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Total sum interaction frequency made by each gene shows no correlation with gene expression.
“whereas the total sum interaction frequency made by each gene showed no correlation with gene expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Class 2 pre-existing loops connect genes involved in general cellular functions such as RNA processing to activity-induced enhancers.
“Class 2 pre-existing loops connect genes involved in several general cellular functions such as RNA processing to activity-induced enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
At enhancers connected through these loops to activity-upregulated genes, H3K27ac signal consistently increases.
“as well as a consistent increase in H3K27ac signal at enhancers that connected through these loops to activity-upregulated genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Class 1 loops corresponded to a 24-fold increase in activity-induced expression.
“although class 1 loops are a rare occurrence, they corresponded to a 24-fold increase in activity-induced expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Class 2 loops on average displayed a modest 1.3-fold increase in expression in active neurons.
“Comparatively more genes engaged in class 2 loops but on average displayed a modest 1.3-fold increase in expression in active neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Class 3 pre-existing loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers connect genes linked to synaptic organization and regulation of synaptic activity.
“class 3 pre-existing loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers connect genes linked to synaptic organization and the regulation of synaptic activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingnone given
Pre-existing class 2 and class 3 loops are markedly more abundant in number than class 1 loops.
“Pre-existing class 2 and class 3 loops are markedly more abundant in number than class 1 loops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Class 2 loops are activity-invariant loops pre-wired in inactive neurons and anchored by activity-induced enhancers, n = 41.
“activity-invariant loops pre-wired in inactive neurons and anchored by activity-induced enhancers (n = 41) (class 2)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Activity-dependent changes in promoter H3K27ac signal correlate with gene expression.
“We noticed a strong correlation between activity-dependent changes in promoter H3K27ac signal and gene expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
H3K27ac peaks were stratified into activity-invariant (n = 14,424), activity-induced (n = 6,014), and activity-decommissioned (n = 5,402) putative enhancers.
“We first stratified H3K27ac peaks into activity-invariant (n = 14,424), activity-induced (n = 6014), and activity-decommissioned (n = 5402) putative enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Activity-induced and activity-decommissioned loops show two- to threefold upregulations or downregulations of interaction frequency, respectively.
“activity-induced and activity-decommissioned loops showed two- to threefold upregulations or downregulations of interaction frequency, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes connected to activity-induced enhancers via activity-invariant loops (class 2) display a modest but significant upregulation in expression after neuronal activation genome-wide.
“genes connected to activity-induced enhancers via activity-invariant loops (Class 2) displayed a modest but significant upregulation in expression after neuronal activation when we queried genome-wide loops”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Maximum Bdnf upregulation occurred after 6 h in the re-analyzed RNA-seq time course.
“whereas maximum Bdnf upregulation occurred after 6 h”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Tyssowski, K. M. et al. Different neuronal activity patterns induce different gene expression programs. Neuron 98, 530–546 e511 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
More than 10% of loops surrounding select immediate early genes, secondary response genes, and synaptic genes are induced de novo during cortical neuron activation.
“We find that more than 10% of loops surrounding select IEGs, SRGs, and synaptic genes are induced de novo during cortical neuron activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At the subset of maximum ABC-thresholded loops, interaction strength strongly increases at the most strongly activity-upregulated genes.
“we observed a strong increase in interaction strength at the most strongly activity-upregulated genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Common single-nucleotide variants associated with autism and schizophrenia are colocalized with distinct classes of activity-dependent, looped enhancers.
“We also show that common single-nucleotide variants that are associated with autism and schizophrenia are colocalized with distinct classes of activity-dependent, looped enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Class 1 loops underwent a 2.2-fold change in interaction frequency after 24 h Bic treatment.
“activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers (class 1) underwent a 2.2-fold change in interaction frequency after 24 h of Bic treatment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cohort of genes undergoing decreased expression in class 3 loops is predominantly involved in synapse organization and signaling, including Gria1.
“We found that the cohort of genes undergoing decreased expression in class 3 loops were predominantly involved in synapse organization and signaling, including Gria1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
A long-range enhancer model markedly increases the variance of activity-dependent expression explained.
“Our third, ‘long-range enhancer’ model markedly increased the variance of activity-dependent expression explained”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Bdnf engages in both pre-existing and activity-inducible loops.
“By contrast, the SRG Bdnf engages in both pre-existing and activity-inducible loops that form within 1–6 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Re-analysis of a published RNA-seq time course found maximum activation of the immediate early genes Fos and Arc by 60 min.
“we re-analyzed a recently published RNA-seq time course during pharmacological neuronal activation9 and found maximum activation of the IEGs Fos and Arc by 60 min”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Tyssowski, K. M. et al. Different neuronal activity patterns induce different gene expression programs. Neuron 98, 530–546 e511 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Fos was upregulated more than 100-fold after 24 h Bic treatment.
“Fos was upregulated more than 100-fold”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Class 1 loops connect Fos, Bdnf, and Tmed10 to activity-inducible enhancers.
“Class 1 loops connect Fos, Bdnf, and Tmed10 to activity-inducible enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Class 1 loops are activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers, n = 11.
“activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers (n = 11) (class 1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
The Fos and Arc loops form within 20 min after stimulation.
“IEGs Fos and Arc connect to activity-dependent enhancers via singular short-range loops that form within 20 min after stimulation, prior to peak messenger RNA levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fos and Arc connect to activity-dependent enhancers via singular short-range loops.
“IEGs Fos and Arc connect to activity-dependent enhancers via singular short-range loops that form within 20 min after stimulation, prior to peak messenger RNA levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bdnf loops form within 1-6 h.
“By contrast, the SRG Bdnf engages in both pre-existing and activity-inducible loops that form within 1–6 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genome-wide Hi-C maps in primary cortical neurons identify 24,937 loops.
“We applied published methods17 to identify 24,937 loops in cortical neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Bonev, B. et al. Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell 171, 557–572 e524 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Adding H3K27ac signal at the nearest enhancer only marginally increases model performance.
“By adding the covariate of the H3K27ac signal at the nearest enhancer, we only marginally increased the performance of the model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Activity-induced and activity-decommissioned loops are lower in overall looping strength than activity-invariant contacts.
“but were still lower in overall looping strength than the activity-invariant contacts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Class 3 loops are activity-invariant loops pre-wired in inactive neurons and anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers that lose H3K27ac signal upon chronic neuronal activation, n = 15.
“activity-invariant loops pre-wired in inactive neurons and anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers that lose their H3K27ac signal upon chronic neuronal activation (n = 15) (class 3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Promoter H3K27ac alone explains 51.7% of the variance in gene expression after neuronal activation in the 5C regions.
“Promoter H3K27ac alone explained 51.7% of the variance in gene expression after neuronal activation in our 5C regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Models using loop strength or ABC value between selected enhancer and promoter correlate similarly well with gene expression changes.
“models that used loop strength (Fig. 2i) or the ABC value (loop strength × enhancer H3K27ac) between the selected enhancer and promoter (Fig. 2j) as covariates correlated similarly well with gene expression changes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Genes looped to activity-decommissioned enhancers via activity-invariant loops (class 3) genome-wide exhibit a slight reduction in expression after neural activation.
“genes looped to activity-decommissioned enhancers via activity-invariant loops (class 3) genome-wide exhibited a slight reduction in expression after neural activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Class 2 interaction strength further strengthens after neuronal stimulation.
“interaction strength further strengthens after neuronal stimulation in the case of activity-invariant loops pre-wired to activity-induced enhancers (class 2, Fig. 3f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IEGs connect to enhancers via singular short-range loops that occur de novo after activation.
“Here, we unexpectedly observed that IEGs connect to enhancers via singular short-range loops that occur de novo after activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bdnf is connected into a complex network of multiple long-distance class 1 and class 2 loops.
“connected into a complex network of multiple long-distance class 1 and class 2 loops”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When class 3 loops overlap schizophrenia- or autism spectrum disorder-associated single-nucleotide variants, their target genes are preferentially downregulated by activity.
“By contrast, when class 3 loops overlap schizophrenia- or ASD-associated SNVs, we observe that their target genes are preferentially downregulated by activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
Noncoding single-nucleotide variants associated with schizophrenia (n = 80, P < 5 × 10−8) preferentially colocalize with class 3 loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers.
“We found that noncoding SNVs associated with schizophrenia38 (n = 80, P < 5 × 10−8, see Supplementary Methods) preferentially colocalize with class 3 loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 511, 421–427 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
There are striking differences in loop and enhancer induction kinetics for IEGs and SRGs in the 5C regions.
“We observed striking differences in loop and enhancer induction kinetics for IEGs and SRGs in our 5C regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Autism spectrum disorder-associated single-nucleotide variants (n = 126, P < 10−4) colocalize with class 2 loops anchored by activity-inducible enhancers.
“whereas ASD-associated SNVs (n = 126, P < 10−4, see Supplementary Methods) colocalize with class 2 loops anchored by activity-inducible enhancers39”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Meta-analysis of GWAS of over 16,000 individuals with autism spectrum disorder highlights a novel locus at 10q24.32 and a significant overlap with schizophrenia. Mol. Autism 8, 21 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
Bdnf class 1 loops did not interact until 60 or 360 minutes after stimulation.
“Bdnf class 1 loops did not interact until 60 (Figs. 4h and 5e,g, ‘Enhancer 1’) or 360 minutes (Figs. 4g and 5f,h, ‘Enhancer 2’) after stimulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bdnf loops include at least two class 2 activity-invariant loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers.
“at least two class 2 activity-invariant loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bdnf was upregulated 30-fold after neuronal activation.
“SRG Bdnf was upregulated 30-fold after neuronal activation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Activity-inducible enhancers engage in either de novo (class 1) or pre-existing (class 2) loops.
“we demonstrate that activity-inducible enhancers engage in either de novo (class 1) or pre-existing (class 2) loops”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Findingown data
Enhancer-promoter loop strength for immediate early genes peaks before maximum mRNA levels occur at 60 min after stimulation.
“observed that the enhancer–promoter loop strength for IEGs peaks before maximum mRNA levels occur (60 min after stimulation)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Arc was upregulated more than 12-fold after neural activation.
“Arc was upregulated more than 12-fold after neural activation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fos engages in different short-range loops after 5 min, 20 min, and 24 h of neural activation, shifting interaction strength from a nearby enhancer to one that is more distal.
“We note that Fos engages in different short-range loops after 5 min, 20 min, and 24 h of neural activation, shifting interaction strength from a nearby enhancer to one that is more distal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
24,544 unique loops were identified from published Hi-C data created in human brain tissue derived from the germinal zone and cortical plate.
“We identified 24,544 unique loops from published Hi-C data created in human brain tissue derived from the germinal zone and cortical plate41”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Won, H. et al. Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523–527 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Enhancers and loops surrounding Fos and Arc peak in signal strength roughly 20 min after the induction of neuronal activity, before peak mRNA levels.
“For example, enhancers and loops surrounding Fos and Arc peak in signal strength roughly 20 min after the induction of neuronal activity, before peak mRNA levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a unique set of loops that are anchored by enhancers that decrease in activity during chronic stimulation.
“Here, we identify a unique set of loops that are anchored by enhancers that decrease in activity during chronic stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
4,098 class 2 and 3,822 class 3 loops were classified from human brain tissue.
“We lifted-over our activity-dependent enhancer classes to the human genome and classified 4,098 class 2 and 3,822 class 3 loops from human brain tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
Genome-wide, rapid response immediate early genes form significantly fewer loops than both translation-independent and -dependent secondary response genes.
“we found that rapid response IEGs form significantly fewer loops (Fig. 4k), shorter loops (Fig. 4l), and connect to a lower number of activity-induced putative enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genome-wide, rapid response immediate early genes form shorter loops than both translation-independent and -dependent secondary response genes.
“we found that rapid response IEGs form significantly fewer loops (Fig. 4k), shorter loops (Fig. 4l), and connect to a lower number of activity-induced putative enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Class 1 loops surrounding Fos and Arc achieved peak contact frequency as quickly as 20 min after initiating stimulation.
“We found that the class 1 loops surrounding Fos and Arc achieved peak contact frequency as quickly as 20 min after initiating stimulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At early time points, Fos interacted with an additional enhancer (Enhancer 2) compared to its loop induced by 24 h of activity (Enhancer 1).
“at early time points Fos interacted with an additional enhancer (Fig. 5a, ‘Enhancer 2’) compared to its loop induced by 24 h of activity (Fig. 4d, ‘Enhancer 1’)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When class 2 loops overlap schizophrenia- or autism spectrum disorder-associated single-nucleotide variants, they connect activity-inducible enhancers to target genes that are preferentially upregulated after neural activation.
“In cases in which class 2 loops overlap schizophrenia- or ASD-associated SNVs, we observe that they connect activity-inducible enhancers to target genes that are preferentially upregulated after neural activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
SRGs connect to multiple activity-inducible enhancers via a complex network of invariant and de novo loops.
“whereas SRGs connect to multiple activity-inducible enhancers via a complex network of invariant and de novo loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loops connected by Bdnf are significantly longer than those connected by Fos and Arc.
“Loops connected by Bdnf were significantly longer than those connected by Fos and Arc”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genome-wide, rapid response immediate early genes connect to a lower number of activity-induced putative enhancers than both translation-independent and -dependent secondary response genes.
“we found that rapid response IEGs form significantly fewer loops (Fig. 4k), shorter loops (Fig. 4l), and connect to a lower number of activity-induced putative enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Slc4a10 loops downstream to a schizophrenia-associated single-nucleotide variant that overlaps a region of activity-decommissioned H3K27ac.
“One such gene is Slc4a10 (ref. 45), which loops downstream to a schizophrenia-associated SNV (Extended Data Fig. 10f) that overlaps a region of activity-decommissioned H3K27ac”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Sinning, A., Liebmann, L. & Hubner, C. A. Disruption of Slc4a10 augments neuronal excitability and modulates synaptic short-term plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 223 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Findingown data
Arc is connected in a singular loop with an activity-induced enhancer.
“also connected in a singular loop with an activity-induced enhancer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Bdnf loops and enhancers gain strength in parallel with mRNA levels over a longer time of sustained stimulation (360 min).
“By contrast, Bdnf loops and enhancers gain strength in parallel with mRNA levels over a longer time of sustained stimulation (360 min).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only a single 40-kb-sized class 1 loop with an activity-induced enhancer was identified for Fos after 24 h Bic treatment.
“we identified only a single 40-kb-sized class 1 loop with an activity-induced enhancer”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ASD-associated SNVs preferentially colocalize with class 2 loops that connect activity-inducible enhancers to activity-upregulated target genes.
“By contrast, ASD-associated SNVs preferentially colocalize with class 2 loops that connect activity-inducible enhancers to activity-upregulated target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Activity-induced loops are not present earlier in cortical neuron differentiation.
“Activity-induced loops are not present earlier in cortical neuron differentiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
5C data correlations cluster by condition.
“5C data correlateions cluster by condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genes in the 'regulation of trans-synaptic signaling' and 'synapse organization' GO terms are enriched in activity downregulated class 3 genes.
“Genes found in the ‘regulation of trans-synaptic signaling’ and ‘synapse organization’ GO terms enriched in activity downregulated class 3 genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The donut expected model approach often overestimated the expected background at short-range interactions (less than 100 kb) owing to extremely high on-diagonal counts.
“However, owing to the extremely high on-diagonal counts we found this approach often overestimated the expected background at short-range interactions (less than 100 kb).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Foxp1 and Slc4a10 fall opposite disease-associated variants in conserved classified loops.
“Foxp1 and Slc4a10 fall opposite disease-associated variants in conserved classified loops.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Promoters often formed several loops, interacting with multiple enhancers.
“Often, promoters formed several loops, interacting with multiple enhancers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher-order chromatin architecture reconfigures rapidly during neuronal stimulation.
“Our data link architectural complexity to transcriptional kinetics and reveal the rapid timescale by which higher-order chromatin architecture reconfigures during neuronal stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Loops are highly reproducible across four 5C replicates taken across two independent batches of neuronal cultures.
“We confirmed high reproducibility of loops across four 5C replicates taken across two independent batches of neuronal cultures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A previously reported activity-dependent enhancer-promoter loop at Fos via 3C-PCR was classified as an activity-induced loop.
“We confirmed that an enhancer–promoter loop that has been reported previously as activity-dependent at Fos via 3C-PCR (ref. 36) was classified here as an activity-induced loop”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Joo, J. Y., Schaukowitch, K., Farbiak, L., Kilaru, G. & Kim, T. K. Stimulus-specific combinatorial functionality of neuronal c-fos enhancers. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 75–83 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Class 3 loops and activity-decommissioned enhancers may facilitate homeostatic plasticity during chronic high neural activity.
“These results reveal a potential mechanistic role for class 3 loops and activity-decommissioned enhancers in facilitating homeostatic plasticity during chronic high neural activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
Genes connected to activity-induced enhancers via rare de novo loops show the largest effect size in activity-dependent expression.
“our data reveal that the genes connected to activity-induced enhancers via rare de novo loops show the largest effect size in activity-dependent expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
Long-range enhancers and loop strength provide significant improvement in prediction of activity-dependent expression compared to proximal, nearby enhancers.
“Together, these data indicate that long-range enhancers and loop strength can provide significant improvement in the prediction of activity-dependent expression compared to proximal, nearby enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
The observation that class 1 activity-induced enhancers and loops connect rapidly to immediate early genes before mRNA levels peak supports the assertion that the two are functionally linked.
“our observation that class 1 activity-induced enhancers and loops connect rapidly to IEGs before mRNA levels peak supports the assertion that the two are functionally linked”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Defects in enhancer decommissioning might contribute to synaptic plasticity defects in neuropsychiatric diseases.
“the colocalization of schizophrenia-associated SNVs with class 3 loops suggests that defects in enhancer decommissioning might contribute to synaptic plasticity defects in neuropsychiatric diseases47.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Luscher, C. & Malenka, R. C. NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a005710 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Pre-wired and de novo loops anchored by activity-inducible enhancers connect to target genes that exhibit activity-dependent upregulation.
“our data show that pre-wired and de novo loops that are anchored by activity-inducible enhancers connect to target genes that exhibit activity-dependent upregulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
Neuronal activity results in dynamic changes in the 3D genome that may inform precise temporal control of activity-dependent gene expression over short and long time scales.
“Here, we show that neuronal activity results in dynamic changes in the 3D genome that may inform precise temporal control of activity-dependent gene expression over short and long time scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Invariant loops anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers connect to genes that are downregulated after neuronal activity.
“Conversely, invariant loops that are anchored by activity-decommissioned enhancers connect to genes that are downregulated after neuronal activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
Specific common single-nucleotide variants associated with neuropsychiatric diseases colocalize with loops that connect distinct activity-dependent enhancer classes to unique target genes.
“These data reveal that specific common SNVs associated with neuropsychiatric diseases colocalize with loops that connect distinct activity-dependent enhancer classes to unique target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
- Interpretationreasoning
Some disease-specific neuronal phenotypes may arise from noncoding SNVs that have different effects depending on the class of loops that they anchor.
“These results are striking as they suggest that some disease-specific neuronal phenotypes may arise from noncoding SNVs that have different effects depending on the class of loops that they anchor”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Poised or pre-existing loops that connect to target genes in advance of activity-induced enhancer activation are abundant but have a modest effect on gene expression.
“Our 5C and genome-wide Hi-C results support our working model in which poised or pre-existing loops that connect to target genes in advance of activity-induced enhancer activation are abundant but have a modest effect on gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
H3K27ac signal at distal looped enhancers is a notably better predictor of activity-dependent target gene expression than nearest enhancers.
“We find that H3K27ac signal at distal looped enhancers is a notably better predictor of activity-dependent target gene expression than nearest enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Interpretationown data
Enhancer-target gene prediction would be facilitated by the use of chromatin architecture maps instead of relying on the enhancer that is closest on the linear genome.
“Together, these data suggest that enhancer–target gene prediction would be facilitated by the use of chromatin architecture maps, instead of relying on the enhancer that is closest on the linear genome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
- Study design and conductown data
Background loops displayed the same loop distances and loop sizes as the real loop set.
“Background loops were confirmed to display the same loop distances and loop sizes as the real loop set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Activity-induced and activity-invariant loops are reproducible across condition replicates.
“Activity-induced and activity-invariant loops are reproducible across condition replicates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
5C is subject to specific biases, such as primer GC content resulting in annealing or PCR biases, that methods such as Hi-C are not.
“5C is subject to specific biases, such as primer GC content resulting in annealing or PCR biases, that methods such as Hi-C are not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Interaction scores have proven to be informatively comparable across replicates and conditions.
“Interaction scores have proven to be informatively comparable across replicates and conditions21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281–1295 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The eRNA signature captures enhancer activity dynamics.
“Verification of the eRNA signature captures enhancer activity dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Extreme enrichment of single primer-primer pairs does not resemble the broader distribution of elevated counts, spanning clusters of neighboring primer-primer pairs, that exists at bona fide looping interactions across 5C and Hi-C data.
“Such an extreme enrichment of single primer–primer pairs does not resemble the broader distribution of elevated counts, spanning clusters of neighboring primer–primer pairs, that exists at bona fide looping interactions across 5C and Hi-C data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
An eFDR of 6.6% was achieved for Bic-only (activity-induced) loops using a difference threshold of 6.75, a significance threshold of −10 × log2(0.08), and a cluster size threshold of 5.
“Through this approach we achieved an eFDR of 6.6% for Bic-only (activity-induced) loops using a difference threshold of 6.75, a significance threshold of −10 × log2(0.08) (that is, a P value of 0.08 resulting from the logistic fit to the observed over expected data), and a cluster size threshold of 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of differentially expressed genes in class 2 versus class 3 loops are upregulated and downregulated, respectively, due to activity.
“The majority of differentially expressed genes in class 2 versus class 3 loops were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, due to activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataGenome-wide loops were stratified into class 2 (n = 4,764) and class 3 (n = 3,259) groups.
“stratify them into class 2 (n = 4,764) and class 3 (n = 3,259) groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataImmediate early genes in the 5C regions form simple short-range loops with activity-dependent enhancers and fall nearly exclusively in the class 1 category.
“IEGs in our 5C regions form simple short-range loops with activity-dependent enhancers, and thus fall nearly exclusively in the class 1 category”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin the 12.2 Mb queried, there are 215 activity-invariant, 29 activity-induced, and 9 activity-decommissioned loops.
“resulting in the sensitive detection of 215 activity-invariant, 29 activity-induced, and 9 activity-decommissioned loops within the 12.2 Mb of the genome queried”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpecific genes involved in homeostatic plasticity, such as Gria1, are connected in class 3 loops to activity-decommissioned enhancers and are downregulated during chronic high activity.
“we find that specific genes that are involved in homeostatic plasticity, such as Gria1, are connected in class 3 loops to activity-decommissioned enhancers and are downregulated during chronic high activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLD score regression confirmed a stronger enrichment of autism spectrum disorder-associated heritability in class 2 loop anchors than class 3, whereas schizophrenia heritability displayed the opposite trend.
“Our LD score regression analysis confirmed a stronger enrichment of ASD-associated heritability in class 2 loop anchors than that for class 3, whereas heritability for schizophrenia displayed the opposite trend”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBdnf enhancers and expression were upregulated in parallel with loops and did not reach maximum signal until 360 min of stimulated activity.
“Bdnf enhancers and expression were upregulated in parallel with loops and did not reach maximum signal in our time course until 360 min of stimulated activity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSchizophrenia-associated SNVs are enriched at class 3 loops and are connected to downregulated genes after synaptic activity.
“We also observe that schizophrenia-associated SNVs are enriched at class 3 loops and are connected to downregulated genes after synaptic activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBdnf loops include at least two class 1 activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers, spanning 840 kb and 1,700 kb.
“at least two class 1 activity-induced loops anchored by activity-induced enhancers, but spanning longer distances (840 kb and 1,700 kb) than those formed with IEGs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBdnf loops preferentially target its first promoter, from which the highest transcription and strongest upregulation after 24 h Bic-induced neuronal activation were observed.
“The loops formed by Bdnf preferentially targeted its first promoter, from which we observed the highest level of transcription and strongest upregulation after 24 h of Bic-induced neuronal activation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFoxp1 displays mouse-human conservation of local genome architecture and loops to several autism spectrum disorder-associated single-nucleotide variants and activity-induced enhancers.
“Foxp1, which has been found previously to regulate brain development and synaptic plasticity44, displays remarkable mouse–human conservation of local genome architecture, and loops to several ASD-associated SNVs (Extended Data Fig. 10c) and activity-induced enhancers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Araujo, D. J. et al. Foxp1 in forebrain pyramidal neurons controls gene expression required for spatial learning and synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 37, 10917–10931 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEnhancers that loop to both Fos and Arc peak in activity 20 min after neuronal activity and exhibit lower activity at all other time points.
“The enhancers that loop to both Fos and Arc peak in activity 20 min after neuronal activity, and exhibit lower activity at all other time points”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClass 1 and class 2 loops connect to genes exhibiting a 24- and 1.3-fold activity-dependent increase in expression, respectively.
“Class 1 and class 2 loops connect to genes exhibiting a 24- and 1.3-fold activity-dependent increase in expression, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown data25,722 background loops were identified as Hi-C contact matrix entries with P > 0.99 and interaction frequency > 0 in both cortical plate and germinal zone data sets.
“In addition, 25,722 ‘background loops’ were identified as those Hi-C contact matrix entries that had a P value of >0.99 and an interaction frequency count of >0 in both cortical plate and germinal zone data sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were 2,139 Class 2 genes.
“N = 2139 Class 2 genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationMerging cortical plate and germinal zone loops created a master set of 24,544 loops spanning the two brain tissues.
“Cortical plate and germinal zone loops were then merged to create a master set of 24,544 loops spanning the two brain tissues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Won, H. et al. Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523–527 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data5C maps from mature primary cortical neurons are highly correlated with and exhibit similar loops as published Hi-C maps from ES cell-derived cortical neurons.
“5C maps from our mature primary cortical neurons were highly correlated with and exhibited similar loops as published Hi-C maps from ES cell-derived cortical neurons”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Bonev, B. et al. Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell 171, 557–572 e524 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWithin the 5C regions, activity-induced loops are rare and connect to genes with large activity-dependent increases in expression, whereas pre-existing loops are more abundant but correlate with only minor gene expression changes.
“These results suggest that, within our 5C regions, activity-induced loops are rare and connect to genes with large activity-dependent increases in expression, whereas pre-existing loops are more abundant but correlate with only minor gene expression changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningLoop dysfunction could be possible owing to common SNVs in sporadic ASD and schizophrenia.
“thus loop dysfunction could be possible owing to common SNVs in sporadic ASD and schizophrenia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn the ABC model, the multiplication of enhancer activity and 3D interaction frequency was the best predictor of enhancer-target gene pairs.
“In the ABC model, the multiplication of enhancer activity and 3D interaction frequency was the best predictor of enhancer–target gene pairs37.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Fulco, C. P. et al. Activity-by-contact model of enhancer-promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations. Nat. Genet. 51, 1664–1669 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenome misfolding has been reported in fragile X syndrome, the leading monogenic cause of ASD, as well as other human diseases.
“Genome misfolding has been reported in fragile X syndrome48, the leading monogenic cause of ASD, as well as other human diseases49”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Sun, J. H. et al. Disease-associated short tandem repeats co-localize with chromatin domain boundaries. Cell 175, 224–238.e15 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Norton, H. K. & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. Crossed wires: 3D genome misfolding in human disease. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3441–3452 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataH3K27ac enrichment was confirmed before sequencing by qPCR enrichment of primer pairs designed to the Arc, synaptotagmin 1, and Tcf25 promoter regions.
“H3K27ac enrichment was confirmed before sequencing by querying the immunoprecipitation or input quantitative PCR (qPCR) enrichment of primer pairs designed to the Arc, synaptotagmin 1, and Tcf25 promoter regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Arc interaction falls below the 30-kb distance threshold and is not formally added to the class 1 loop list.
“We note that the Arc interaction falls below our 30-kb distance threshold and therefore is not formally added to the class 1 loop list”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMore than 90% of disease-associated single-nucleotide variants are localized in noncoding regions with unknown target genes.
“More than 90% of disease-associated SNVs (daSNVs) are localized in noncoding regions with unknown target genes40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Maurano, M. T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–1195 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLoops that are induced by neural stimulation are relatively rare but exhibit a markedly higher effect on activity-dependent upregulation of distal target genes.
“Moreover, our 5C results suggest that loops that are induced by neural stimulation are relatively rare but exhibit a markedly higher effect on activity-dependent upregulation of distal target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSecondary response genes engage in a complex network of long-range loops, whereas immediate early genes form simple, short-range loops to activity-induced enhancers to facilitate rapid activation independent of new protein synthesis.
“Together, these data are consistent with our working model in which SRGs engage in a complex network of long-range loops, whereas IEGs form simple, short-range loops to activity-induced enhancers to facilitate rapid activation independent of new protein synthesis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataRapid activity-induced enhancer switching via alternative looping might be a mechanistic aspect of IEG upregulation.
“suggesting that rapid activity-induced enhancer switching via alternative looping might be a mechanistic aspect of IEG upregulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBdnf loop and enhancer dynamics are significantly delayed compared to those of Fos and Arc, corroborating the model that slower interaction kinetics may contribute to secondary response gene delayed expression.
“Thus, Bdnf loop and enhancer dynamics are significantly delayed in comparison to those of Fos and Arc, corroborating our model that slower interaction kinetics may contribute to SRGs delayed expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SRG Nr4a3 engages in multiple long-range contacts over several hundred kb after neuronal stimulation.
“Consistent with our observations, another study reported—using H3K4me3 proximity ligation assisted ChIP–seq (PLAC-seq)—that the SRG Nr4a3 engages in multiple long-range contacts over several hundred kb after neuronal stimulation26.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Yamada, T. et al. Sensory experience remodels genome architecture in neural circuit to drive motor learning. Nature 569, 708–713 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataResults were consistent across 2 culture batches, 4 total 5C replicates, 3 RNA-seq replicates, and H3K27ac ChIP replicate analyzed.
“Results were consistent across 2 culture batches, 4 total 5C replicates, 3 RNA-seq replicates, and H3K27ac ChIP replicate analyzed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTreatment conditions were evenly distributed across culture batches and treatments were randomly assigned to culture dishes within each batch.
“Treatment conditions were evenly distributed across culture batches and treatments were randomly assigned to culture dishes within each batch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationNo statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes, but the sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications.
“No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications17,27,28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Beagan, J. A. et al. YY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment. Genome Res 27, 1139–1152 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Beagan, J. A. et al. Local genome topology can exhibit an incompletely rewired 3D-folding state during somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem. Cell 18, 611–624 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenResulting P values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
“Resulting P values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.
“Data collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResiduals were plotted to confirm approximate normal distributions.
“Residuals were plotted to confirm approximate normal distributions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningGenes were not considered if they fell within 200 kb of the edges of our 5C regions because we could not accurately capture their looping profiles.
“In addition, genes were not considered if they fell within 200 kb of the edges of our 5C regions because we could not accurately capture their looping profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenNo animals or data points were excluded from the analyses.
“No animals or data points were excluded from the analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThree replicates spanning two culture batches were prepared, pooled, and sequenced to depths of greater than 60 million reads per library to minimize and identify technical variation.
“To minimize and identify technical variation, three replicates spanning two culture batches were prepared, pooled, and sequenced to depths of greater than 60 million reads per library.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
H3K27ac signal correlates with enhancer and promoter activity.
“As the histone mark H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) correlates with enhancer and promoter activity”
The paper relies on this without support.
Activity-dependent enhancer classes identified in mouse cortical neurons correspond to functionally equivalent regulatory elements in human brain.
“We lifted-over our activity-dependent enhancer classes to the human genome and classified 4,098 class 2 and 3,822 class 3 loops from human brain tissue”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 3D genome is actively regulated during learning and memory formation.
“There is now emerging evidence that the 3D genome is actively regulated during learning and memory formation”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
The 3D genome plays an important role in neuronal gene expression and function.
“The 3D genome plays an important role in neuronal gene expression and function”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rapid IEGs are assigned two different source-category names
MinorThe methods identify the rapid IEG category in reference 9 as "rIEGs," while the Extended Data caption identifies it as "rPRGs."
“We analyzed rapid IEGs (defined as rIEGs in ref. 9), translation-independent SRGs (tiSRG, defined as dPRG in ref. 9) and translation-dependent SRGs (tdSRG, defined as SRG in ref. 9)”
“rapid immediate early genes (rIEGs, as defined as rPRGs in Tyssowski et al.9)”
Cites
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A., & Kingsford, C. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4197 · Cited by 12,700 · see citing works
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · see citing works
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898 · see citing works
deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis
Ramírez, F., Ryan, D. P., Grüning, B., Bhardwaj, V., Kilpert, F., Richter, A. S., Heyne, S., Dündar, F., & Manke, T. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw257 · Cited by 8,096 · see citing works
An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11632 · Cited by 7,711 · see citing works
Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13595 · Cited by 7,577 · see citing works
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · see citing works
LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Loh, P.-R., Finucane, H. K., Ripke, S., Yang, J., Patterson, N., Daly, M. J., Price, A. L., & Neale, B. M. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3211 · Cited by 5,559 · see citing works
Systematic Localization of Common Disease-Associated Variation in Regulatory DNA
Maurano, M. T., Humbert, R., Rynes, E., Thurman, R. E., Haugen, E., Wang, H., Reynolds, A. P., Sandstrom, R., Qu, H., Brody, J., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222794 · Cited by 3,716 · see citing works
Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments
Durand, N. C., Shamim, M., Machol, I., Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Lander, E., & Aiden, E. L. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002 · Cited by 3,553 · see citing works
Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations
The International HapMap 3 Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09298 · Cited by 3,026 · see citing works
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895 · see citing works
Stimulation of 3T3 cells induces transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene
Greenberg, M., & Ziff, E. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/311433a0 · Cited by 2,650 · see citing works
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing.
Servant, N., Varoquaux, N., Lajoie, B. R., Viara, E., Chen, C.-J., Vert, J.-P., Heard, E., Dekker, J., & Barillot, E. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x · Cited by 2,565 · see citing works
Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers
Kim, T.-K., Hemberg, M., Gray, J. M., Costa, A. M., Bear, D. M., Wu, J., Harmin, D. A., Laptewicz, M., Barbara-Haley, K., Kuersten, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09033 · Cited by 2,450 · see citing works
Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty
Pimentel, H., Bray, N. L., Puente, S., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4324 · Cited by 1,534 · see citing works
Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization
Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., McCord, R. P., Naumova, N., Goloborodko, A., Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2148 · Cited by 1,423 · see citing works
Induction of c-fos gene and protein by growth factors precedes activation of c-myc
Müller, R., Bravo, R., Burckhardt, J., & Curran, T. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312716a0 · Cited by 1,369 · see citing works
Multiscale 3D Genome Rewiring during Mouse Neural Development
Bonev, B., Mendelson Cohen, N., Szabo, Q., Fritsch, L., Papadopoulos, G. L., Lubling, Y., Xu, X., Lv, X., Hugnot, J.-P., Tanay, A., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.043 · Cited by 1,338 · see citing works
Aligning Short Sequencing Reads with Bowtie
Langmead, B. (2010) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1107s32 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Lyford, G. L., Yamagata, K., Kaufmann, W. E., Barnes, C. A., Sanders, L. K., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A., Lanahan, A. A., & Worley, P. F. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90299-6 · Cited by 1,212 · see citing works
Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, J., Vasaikar, S. V., Shi, Z., Greer, M., & Zhang, B. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx356 · Cited by 1,161 · see citing works
Activity-by-contact model of enhancer–promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations
Fulco, C. P., Nasser, J., Jones, T. R., Munson, G., Bergman, D. T., Subramanian, V., Grossman, S. R., Anyoha, R., Doughty, B. R., Patwardhan, T. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0538-0 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD).
Luscher, C., & Malenka, R. C. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005710 · Cited by 1,110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the colocalization of schizophrenia-associated SNVs with class 3 loops suggests that defects in enhancer decommissioning might contribute to synaptic plasticity defects in neuropsychiatric diseases 47 .”
BackgroundTetrodotoxin Blockage of Sodium Conductance Increase in Lobster Giant Axons
Narahashi, T., Moore, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1964) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.47.5.965 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods
Hnisz, D., Weintraub, A. S., Day, D. S., Valton, A.-L., Bak, R. O., Li, C. H., Goldmann, J., Lajoie, B. R., Fan, Z. P., Sigova, A. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9024 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
The cell biology of synaptic plasticity: AMPA receptor trafficking
Shepherd, J. D., & Huganir, R. L. (2007) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123516 · Cited by 978 · see citing works
Self-citationFlavell, S. W., & Greenberg, M. E. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125631 · Cited by 832 · see citing works
Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA Receptors
Shepherd, J. D., Rumbaugh, G., Wu, J., Chowdhury, S., Plath, N., Kuhl, D., Huganir, R. L., & Worley, P. F. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.034 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatodendritic expression of an immediate early gene is regulated by synaptic activity.
Link, W., Konietzko, U., Kauselmann, G., Krug, M., Schwanke, B., Frey, U., & Kuhl, D. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.12.5734 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Activity-Regulated Transcription: Bridging the Gap between Neural Activity and Behavior
Yap, E.-L., & Greenberg, M. E. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.013 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Ultrastructural Details of Mammalian Chromosome Architecture
Krietenstein, N., Abraham, S., Venev, S. V., Abdennur, N., Gibcus, J., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Parsi, K. M., Yang, L., Maehr, R., Mirny, L. A., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.003 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
The Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2017) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-017-0137-9 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Ultrastructural details of mammalian chromosome architecture
Krietenstein, N., Abraham, S., Venev, S. V., Abdennur, N. A., Gibcus, J., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Parsi, K., Yang, L.-Y., Maehr, R., Mirny, L., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/639922 · Cited by 555
Curran, T., & Morgan, J. I. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.4035354 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Different Neuronal Activity Patterns Induce Different Gene Expression Programs
Tyssowski, K. M., DeStefino, N. R., Cho, J.-H., Dunn, C. J., Poston, R. G., Carty, C. E., Jones, R. D., Chang, S. M., Romeo, P., Wurzelmann, M. K., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.001 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains
Beagan, J. A., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0561-1 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationSNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser
Arnold, M., Raffler, J., Pfeufer, A., Suhre, K., & Kastenmüller, G. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu779 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
YY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment
Beagan, J. A., Duong, M. T., Titus, K. R., Zhou, L., Cao, Z., Ma, J., Lachanski, C. V., Gillis, D. R., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.215160.116 · Cited by 299 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…the intrinsic biases in 5C data, binned maps to 4-kb matrix resolution, and applied our previously published modeling approaches to identify loops with statistically significant interaction frequency above the local distance-dependence and TAD or subTAD background 27,28,34 (Extended Data Fig.”
MethodSelf-citationStatic and Dynamic DNA Loops form AP-1-Bound Activation Hubs during Macrophage Development
Phanstiel, D. H., Van Bortle, K., Spacek, D., Hess, G. T., Shamim, M. S., Machol, I., Love, M. I., Aiden, E. L., Bassik, M. C., & Snyder, M. P. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.006 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Stimulus-specific combinatorial functionality of neuronal c-fos enhancers
Joo, J.-Y., Schaukowitch, K., Farbiak, L., Kilaru, G., & Kim, T.-K. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4170 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Genome-wide identification and characterization of functional neuronal activity–dependent enhancers
Malik, A. N., Vierbuchen, T., Hemberg, M., Rubin, A. A., Ling, E., Couch, C. H., Stroud, H., Spiegel, I., Farh, K. K., Harmin, D. A., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3808 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Kawashima, T., Okuno, H., Nonaka, M., Adachi-Morishima, A., Yagishita-Kyo, N., Okamura, M., Takemoto‐Kimura, S., Worley, P. F., & Bito, H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0806518106 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries
Sun, J. H., Zhou, L., Emerson, D. J., Phyo, S. A., Titus, K. R., Gong, W., Gilgenast, T. G., Beagan, J. A., Davidson, B. L., Tassone, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.005 · Cited by 249 · cited 3× · see citing works
“5C reactions were carried out as previously described 29,48,56 .”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRegulation of Primary Response Genes
Fowler, T., Sen, R., & Roy, A. L. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.014 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Lohs-Schardin, M., Cremer, T., Hager, H. D., & Lang, M. (1985) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00388452 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Neuronal activity modifies the chromatin accessibility landscape in the adult brain
Su, Y., Shin, J., Zhong, C., Wang, S. Z., Roychowdhury, P., Lim, J., Kim, D. S., Ming, G., & Song, H. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4494 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
CTCF Is Required for Neural Development and Stochastic Expression of Clustered Pcdh Genes in Neurons
Hirayama, T., Tarusawa, E., Yoshimura, Y., Galjart, N., & Yagi, T. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.06.014 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
SNPsnap: a Web-based tool for identification and annotation of matched SNPs
Pers, T. H., Timshel, P. N., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu655 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Gabriele, M., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Germain, P.-L., Vitriolo, A., Kumar, R., Douglas, E., Haan, E., Kosaki, K., Takenouchi, T., Rauch, A., et al. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.05.006 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
De Novo Mutations in the Genome Organizer CTCF Cause Intellectual Disability
Gregor, A., Oti, M., Kouwenhoven, E. N., Hoyer, J., Sticht, H., Ekici, A. B., Kjærgaard, S., Rauch, A. M., Stunnenberg, H. G., Uebe, S., et al. (2013) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.007 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
LADL: light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control
Kim, J. H., Rege, M., Valeri, J., Dunagin, M. C., Metzger, A., Titus, K. R., Gilgenast, T. G., Gong, W., Beagan, J. A., Raj, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0436-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationBeagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of Bicuculline as a GABA Antagonist
Straughan, D. W., Neal, M. J., Simmonds, M. A., Collins, G. G. S., & Hill, R. G. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/233352a0 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
My5C: web tools for chromosome conformation capture studies
Lajoie, B. R., van Berkum, N. L., Sanyal, A., & Dekker, J. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1009-690 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Sensory experience remodels genome architecture in neural circuit to drive motor learning
Yamada, T., Yang, Y., Valnegri, P., Juric, I., Abnousi, A., Markwalter, K. H., Guthrie, A. N., Godec, A., Oldenborg, A., Hu, M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1190-7 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Pintchovski, S. A., Peebles, C., Kim, H. J., Verdin, E., & Finkbeiner, S. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5575-08.2009 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Araujo, D. J., Toriumi, K., Escamilla, C. O., Kulkarni, A., Anderson, A. G., Harper, M., Usui, N., Ellegood, J., Lerch, J. P., Birnbaum, S. G., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1005-17.2017 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Crossed wires: 3D genome misfolding in human disease
Norton, H. K., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201611001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationDisruption of Slc4a10 augments neuronal excitability and modulates synaptic short-term plasticity
Sinning, A., Liebmann, L., & Hübner, C. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00223 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Unraveling architecture of the pluripotent genome
Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2014) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2014.04.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, J. H., Titus, K. R., Gong, W., Beagan, J. A., Cao, Z., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2018) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.05.005 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationSystematic Evaluation of Statistical Methods for Identifying Looping Interactions in 5C Data
Gilgenast, T. G., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.02.006 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationFernandez, L. R., Gilgenast, T. G., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02061-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kundaković, M., & Rocks, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101010 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
DNA G-quadruplex structures: more than simple roadblocks to transcription?
Robinson, J., Raguseo, F., Nuccio, S. P., Liano, D., & Antonio, M. D. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab609 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Functional inference of gene regulation using single-cell multi-omics
Kartha, V. K., Duarte, F. M., Hu, Y., Ma, S., Chew, J. G., Lareau, C. A., Earl, A., Burkett, Z. D., Kohlway, A. S., Lebofsky, R., et al. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100166 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Cell-type specialization is encoded by specific chromatin topologies
Winick‐Ng, W., Kukalev, A., Harabula, I., Zea-Redondo, L., Szabó, D., Meijer, M., Serebreni, L., Zhang, Y., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04081-2 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The spatial organization of transcriptional control
Hafner, A., & Boettiger, A. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00526-0 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Carullo, N. V. N., Phillips, R. A., III, Simon, R. C., Soto, S. A. R., Hinds, J. E., Salisbury, A. J., Revanna, J. S., Bunner, K. D., Ianov, L., Sultan, F. A., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa671 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length
Calderon, L., Weiss, F. D., Beagan, J. A., Oliveira, M. S., Georgieva, R., Wang, Y.-F., Carroll, T. S., Dharmalingam, G., Gong, W., Tossell, K., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76539 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationDileep, V., Boix, C. A., Mathys, H., Marco, A., Welch, G. M., Meharena, H. S., Loon, A., Jeloka, R., Peng, Z., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.038 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Chakraborty, S., Kopitchinski, N., Zuo, Z., Eraso, A., Awasthi, P., Chari, R., Mitra, A., Tobias, I. C., Moorthy, S. D., Dale, R. K., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01295-6 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
RNA polymerase II dynamics shape enhancer–promoter interactions
Barshad, G., Lewis, J. J., Chivu, A. G., Abuhashem, A., Krietenstein, N., Rice, E. J., Ma, Y., Wang, Z., Rando, O. J., Hadjantonakis, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01442-7 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
G-quadruplexes associated with R-loops promote CTCF binding
Wulfridge, P., Yan, Q., Rell, N., Doherty, J. K., Jacobson, S., Offley, S. R., Deliard, S., Feng, K., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Gardini, A., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.009 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationPollex, T., Rabinowitz, A. H., Gambetta, M. C., Marco-Ferreres, R., Viales, R. R., Jankowski, A., Schaub, C., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01678-x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
TCF-1 promotes chromatin interactions across topologically associating domains in T cell progenitors
Wang, W., Chandra, A., Goldman, N., Yoon, S., Ferrari, E. K., Nguyen, S. C., Joyce, E., & Vahedi, G. (2022) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-022-01232-z · Cited by 53 · see citing works
A molecular and cellular perspective on human brain evolution and tempo
Lindhout, F. W., Krienen, F. M., Pollard, K. S., & Lancaster, M. A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07521-x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Engineering 3D genome organization
Wang, H., Han, M., & Qi, L. S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00325-5 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Reed, K. S. M., Davis, E. S., Bond, M. L., Cabrera, A., Thulson, E., Quiroga, I. Y., Cassel, S., Woolery, K. T., Hilton, I. B., Won, H., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111567 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Song, Y., Liang, Z., Zhang, J., Hu, G.-C., Wang, J.-H., Li, Y.-Y., Guo, R., Dong, X.-T., Babarinde, I. A., Ping, W., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110626 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Zhong, J., Niu, L., Lin, Z., Bai, X., Chen, Y., Luo, F., Hou, C., & Xiao, C. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36899-x · Cited by 58 · see citing works
High-throughput Oligopaints identifies druggable 3D genome regulators
Park, D. S., Nguyen, S. C., Isenhart, R. L., Shah, P., Kim, W., Barnett, R. J., Chandra, A., Luppino, J. M., Harke, J., Wai, M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06340-w · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation3D genome, on repeat: Higher-order folding principles of the heterochromatinized repetitive genome
Haws, S. A., Simándi, Z., Barnett, R. J., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.052 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationThompson, J. J., Lee, D. J., Mitra, A., Frail, S., Dale, R. K., & Rocha, P. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31938-5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Stefano, M. D., Paulsen, J., Jost, D., & Martí-Renom, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics and Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.10.004 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Chromatin gene-gene loops support the cross-regulation of genes with related function
Pollex, T., Marco-Ferreres, R., Ciglar, L., Ghavi-Helm, Y., Rabinowitz, A. H., Viales, R. R., Schaub, C., Jankowski, A., Girardot, C., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.023 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Cohesin couples transcriptional bursting probabilities of inducible enhancers and promoters
Robles-Rebollo, I., Cuartero, S., Cañellas-Socias, A., Wells, S., Karimi, M. M., Mereu, E., Chivu, A. G., Heyn, H., Whilding, C., Dormann, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31192-9 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Joslin, A. C., Sobreira, D. R., Hansen, G. T., Sakabe, N. J., Aneas, I., Montefiori, L. E., Farris, K. M., Gu, J., Lehman, D. M., Ober, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25614-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
DNA Methylation and Establishing Memory
Bernstein, C. (2022) · Epigenetics Insights · doi:10.1177/25168657211072499 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Sánchez-Priego, C., Hu, R., Boshans, L. L., Lalli, M. A., Janas, J. A., Williams, S., Dong, Z., & Yang, N. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110877 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Sex-specific multi-level 3D genome dynamics in the mouse brain
Rocks, D., Shukla, M., Ouldibbat, L., Finnemann, S. C., Kalluchi, A., Rowley, M. J., & Kundaković, M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30961-w · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Chromatin compaction precedes apoptosis in developing neurons
Rose, R., Peschke, N., Nigi, E., Gelléri, M., Ritz, S., Cremer, C. G., Luhmann, H. J., & Sinning, A. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03704-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Understanding and Engineering Chromatin as a Dynamical System across Length and Timescales
Johnstone, C. P., Wang, N., Sevier, S. A., & Galloway, K. E. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.011 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kwon, D. Y., Xu, B., Zhao, Y.-T., Beagan, J. A., Beagan, J. A., Cui, Y., Xu, B., Zaitseva, D., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Blendy, J. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27571-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation3D spatial genome organization in the nervous system: From development and plasticity to disease
Fujita, Y., Pather, S. R., Ming, G., & Song, H. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.06.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Intronic enhancer region governs transcript-specific Bdnf expression in rodent neurons
Tuvikene, J., Esvald, E., Rähni, A., Uustalu, K., Zhuravskaya, A., Avarlaid, A., Makeyev, E. V., & Timmusk, T. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65161 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
High-resolution dynamic imaging of chromatin DNA communication using Oligo-LiveFISH
Zhu, Y., Balaji, A., Han, M., Andronov, L. P., Roy, A. R., Wei, Z., Chen, C., Miles, L., Cai, S., Gu, Z., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.032 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kaplow, I. M., Schäffer, D. E., Wirthlin, M. E., Lawler, A. J., Brown, A. R., Kleyman, M., & Pfenning, A. R. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08450-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Spatially coordinated heterochromatinization of long synaptic genes in fragile X syndrome
Malachowski, T., Chandradoss, K., Boya, R., Zhou, L., Cook, A. L., Su, C., Pham, K., Haws, S. A., Kim, J. H., Ryu, H.-S., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.019 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationCTCF depletion decouples enhancer-mediated gene activation from chromatin hub formation
Karpińska, M. A., Zhu, Y., Ghazvini, Z. F., Ramasamy, S., Barbieri, M., Cao, T. B. N., Varahram, N., Aljahani, A., Lidschreiber, M., Papantonis, A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1038/s41594-025-01555-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Comparative chromatin accessibility upon BDNF stimulation delineates neuronal regulatory elements
Ibarra, I. L., Ratnu, V. S., Gordillo, L., Hwang, I., Mariani, L., Weinand, K., Hammarén, H. M., Heck, J., Bulyk, M. L., Savitski, M. M., et al. (2022) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202110473 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Ribeiro, A. C. R., Jahr, F. M., Hawkins, E., Kronfol, M. M., Younis, R. M., McClay, J. L., & Deshpande, L. S. (2021) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119765 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
p53 rapidly restructures 3D chromatin organization to trigger a transcriptional response
Serra, F., Nieto-Aliseda, A., Fanlo, L., Rovirosa, L., Cabrera-Pasadas, M., Lazarenkov, A., Urmeneta, B., Alcalde-Merino, A., Nola, E., Okorokov, A. L., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46666-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Huang, X.-H., Wang, Y.-J., Zhang, S.-Q., Pei, L., You, J., Long, Y., Li, J.-Y., Zhang, X.-L., Zhu, L., & Wang, M.-J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55309-4 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Environmental Enrichment Induces Epigenomic and Genome Organization Changes Relevant for Cognition
Espeso-Gil, S., Holik, A., Bonnin, S., Jhanwar, S., Chandrasekaran, S., Pique-Regi, R., Albaigès-Ràfols, J., Maher, M., Permanyer, J., Irimia, M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.664912 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Harris, N., Bates, S. G., Zhuang, Z., Bernstein, M., Stonemetz, J. M., Hill, T. J., Yu, Y. V., Calarco, J. A., & Sengupta, P. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.073 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Neuronal enhancers fine-tune adaptive circuit plasticity
Griffith, E. C., West, A. E., & Greenberg, M. E. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.002 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Contributions of 3D chromatin structure to cell-type-specific gene regulation
Schaeffer, M., & Nöllmann, M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2023.102032 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Cristancho, A. G., & Marsh, E. D. (2020) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-020-09344-z · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The dynamics of chromatin architecture in brain development and function
Harabula, I., & Pombo, A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.12.008 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Topoisomerase-Mediated DNA Damage in Neurological Disorders
Crewe, M., & Madabhushi, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.751742 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
MeCP2 gates spatial learning-induced alternative splicing events in the mouse hippocampus
Brito, D. V. C., Karaca, K. G., Kupke, J., Frank, L., & Oliveira, A. M. M. (2020) · Molecular Brain · doi:10.1186/s13041-020-00695-1 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Activation-induced chromatin reorganization in neurons depends on HDAC1 activity
Grabowska, A. K., Sas‐Nowosielska, H., Wojtaś, B., Holm-Kaczmarek, D., Januszewicz, E., Yushkevich, Y., Czaban, I., Trzaskoma, P., Krawczyk, K., Gielniewski, B., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110352 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Pumo, G., Kitazawa, T., & Rijli, F. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2022.911023 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Chawla, A., Nagy, C., & Turecki, G. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22147612 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Chromatin Alterations in Neurological Disorders and Strategies of (Epi)Genome Rescue
Janowski, M., Milewska, M., Zare, P., & Pękowska, A. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14080765 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin architecture datasets for aging and Alzheimer’s disease
Meng, G.-F., Xu, H., Lu, D., Li, S.-S., Zhao, Z.-Z., Li, H.-H., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-01948-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Remembering through the genome: the role of chromatin states in brain functions and diseases
Arzate‐Mejía, R. G., & Mansuy, I. M. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02415-4 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bond, M. L., Davis, E. S., Quiroga, I. Y., Dey, A., Kiran, M., Love, M. I., Won, H., & Phanstiel, D. H. (2023) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.277397.122 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Transcription and epigenetic factor dynamics in neuronal activity-dependent gene regulation
Sugo, N., Atsumi, Y., & Yamamoto, N. (2025) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2024.12.008 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Enhancer-Mediated Gene Activation in the Context of the 3D Genome
Papantonis, A., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2025) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-120423-012301 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Chromatin Network Analyses: Towards Structure-Function Relationships in Epigenomics
Pancaldi, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2021.742216 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Yang, Y., Li, C., Chen, Z.-Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, Q., Sun, M.-L., Zhang, S., Yu, M., & Wang, G. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad025 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Cell-type-specific loops linked to RNA polymerase II elongation in human neural differentiation
Titus, K. R., Simándi, Z., Chandrashekar, H., Paquet, D., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100606 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationRegulatory landscape in brain development and disease
Spiess, K., & Won, H. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin organization in brain function and dysfunction
Dileep, V., & Tsai, L.-H. (2021) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.04.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ma, Y., Bendl, J. M., Hartley, B. J., Fullard, J. F., Abdelaal, R., Ho, S., Kosoy, R., Gochman, P., Rapoport, J. L., Hoffman, G. E., et al. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.07.003 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Enhancers are genes that express organizational RNAs
Mattick, J. S. (2023) · Frontiers in RNA Research · doi:10.3389/frnar.2023.1194526 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Understanding Regulatory Mechanisms of Brain Function and Disease through 3D Genome Organization
Liu, W., Zhong, W., Chen, J. C., Huang, B., Hu, M., & Li, Y. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13040586 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Chehrazi, P., Lee, K. K. Y., Lavertu-Jolin, M., Abbasnejad, Z., Carreño-Muñoz, M. I., Chattopadhyaya, B., & Cristo, G. D. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.04.019 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Pratt, B. M., & Won, H. (2021) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.08.013 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Vahedi, G. (2021) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12942 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cell-type specialization in the brain is encoded by specific long-range chromatin topologiesPreprint
Winick‐Ng, W., Kukalev, A., Harabula, I., Redondo, L. Z., Szabó, D., Meijer, M., Serebreni, L., Zhang, Y., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.02.020990 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Avarlaid, A., Esvald, E., Koppel, I., Parkman, A., Zhuravskaya, A., Makeyev, E. V., Tuvikene, J., & Timmusk, T. (2023) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24463 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A novel intergenic enhancer that regulates Bdnf expression in developing cortical neurons
Brookes, E., Cruz, B. M. D. L., Boulasiki, P., Au, H. Y. A., Varsally, W., Barrington, C., Hadjur, S., & Riccio, A. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105695 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Crewe, M., Segev, A., Rueda, R., & Madabhushi, R. (2023) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-023-03762-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Peter, M., Aschauer, D. F., Rose, R., Sinning, A., Groessl, F., Kargl, D., Kraitsy, K., Burkard, T. R., Luhmann, H. J., Haubensak, W. E., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244038 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Heffel, M. G., Zhou, J., Zhang, Y., Lee, D.-S., Hou, K., Pastor-Alonso, O., Abuhanna, K. D., Schmitt, A. D., Li, T., Haeussler, M., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.07.511350 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The spatial position effect: synthetic biology enters the era of 3D genomics
Zhou, L., Yang, H. S., Wang, Y., Chou, S., & He, J. L. (2021) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.09.001 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Chandrashekar, H., Simándi, Z., Choi, H., Ryu, H.-S., Waldman, A. J., Nikish, A., Muppidi, S. S., Gong, W., Paquet, D., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.27.582395 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationTünnermann, J., Roth, G., Cramard, J., & Giorgetti, L. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.26.645410 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Marco, A. (2022) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.324834 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Exploring the interplay between enhancer–promoter interactions and transcription
Kittle, R., & Levo, M. (2025) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2024.102303 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
FISHnet: detecting chromatin domains in single-cell sequential Oligopaints imaging data
Patel, R. V., Pham, K., Chandrashekar, H., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02688-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationMega-enhancers compartmentalize transcriptionally active long genes in the brain
Zhao, Z., Parra, O. A. P., Fujita, S.-I., Musella, F., Alvarado, N. J. S., Alber, F., Yang, Y., & Yamada, T. (2026) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-026-02043-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Davis, O. (2022) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-022-03106-9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Transient promoter interactions modulate developmental gene activation
Mahara, S., Prüssing, S., Smialkovska, V., Krall, S., Holliman, S., Blum, B., Dachtler, V., Borgers, H., Sollier, E., Plass, C., et al. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.10.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Pumo, G., & Rijli, F. M. (2025) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2025.103024 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Zhu, T., Li, C., & Chu, X. (2024) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02453 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Weng, J., Zhu, Y.-Y., Liao, L., Yang, X.-T., Dong, Y., Meng, W., Sun, D., Liu, Y., Peng, W.-Z., & Jiang, Y. P. (2024) · Cell Biology and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s10565-024-09875-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fundamental insights into the correlation between chromosome configuration and transcription
Senapati, S., Irshad, I. U., Sharma, A. K., & Kumar, H. (2023) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/ace8e5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Making of BDNF: role of promoters, enhancers, and untranslated regions
Esvald, E., Avarlaid, A., Koppel, I., Tuvikene, J., & Timmusk, T. (2026) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2026.01.007 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Logeman, B. L., Grieco, S. F., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-03056-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Porter, R. S., & Iwase, S. (2023) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20220889 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ramirez, M., Robert, R., Yeung, J., Wu, J., Abdalla-Wyse, A., & Goldowitz, D. (2023) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09368-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The chromatin conformation landscape of Alzheimer’s diseasePreprint
Nativio, R., Lan, Y., Donahue, G. D., Shcherbakova, O., Barnett, N., Titus, K., Chandrashekar, H., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Bonini, N. M., & Berger, S. L. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.09.588722 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, Y., Chang, Y., Cho, Y., Kowalczyk, M., Dragoiescu, A., Pacis, A., Kailasam, S., Lefebvre, F., Zhang, Q., Gao, X. J., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.07.020 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
DNA Instability in Neurons: Lifespan Clock and Driver of Evolution
Dyakonova, V. E. (2023) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297923110044 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A novel enhancer that regulates Bdnf expression in developing neuronsPreprint
Brookes, E., Au, H. Y. A., Varsally, W., Barrington, C., Hadjur, S., & Riccio, A. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.18.469096 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pollex, T., Rabinowitz, A. H., Gambetta, M. C., Marco-Ferreres, R., Viales, R. R., Jankowski, A., Schaub, C., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.07.519443 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A single dose of cocaine rewires the 3D genome structure of midbrain dopamine neuronsPreprint
Szabó, D., Franke, V., Bianco, S., Batiuk, M. Y., Paul, E. J., Kukalev, A., Pfisterer, U., Irastorza-Azcárate, I., Chiariello, A. M., Demharter, S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.10.593308 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Revisiting models of enhancer–promoter communication in gene regulationPreprint
Barshad, G., & Danko, C. G. (2025) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.278389.123 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Learning induces persistent chromatin loops underlying robust gene expression during memory recallPreprint
Xu, P., Chandradoss, K. R., Lukasak, B. J., Paranjapye, A., Waldman, A. J., Pham, K., Ryu, H.-S., Liu, C., Titus, K. R., Sureka, R., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.30.678146 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Beagan, J. A., Pastuzyn, E. D., Fernandez, L. R., Guo, M. H., Feng, K., Titus, K. R., Chandrashekar, H., Shepherd, J. D., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shepherd, Jason D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2020-05-25
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 707-717
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC7558717
- OpenAlex
- W3027029189
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-07-23)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL129998)
- National Institute of Mental Health (DP2MH110247, R01MH112766)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS114226)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32EB009384)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- 3D genome organization, activity-dependent gene expression, immediate early genes, FOS, Arc, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional kinetics, single nucleotide variants, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, cortical neurons
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bicuculline, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Tetrodotoxin, Time Factors, Gene Expression, Genome, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review