Cited by 125Spinal Cord Injury ResearchPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Transplanted Human Stem Cell-Derived Interneuron Precursors Mitigate Mouse Bladder Dysfunction and Central Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury

Open access
Fandel, Thomas M., Trivedi, Alpa, Nicholas, Cory R., Zhang, Haoqian, Chen, Jiadong, Martinez, Aida F., Noble-Haeusslein, Linda J., Kriegstein, Arnold R.·2016·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

Neuropathic pain and bladder dysfunction represent significant quality-of-life issues for many spinal cord injury patients. Loss of GABAergic tone in the injured spinal cord may contribute to the emergence of these symptoms. Previous studies have shown that transplantation of rodent inhibitory interneuron precursors from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) enhances GABAergic signaling in the brain and spinal cord. Here we look at whether transplanted MGE-like cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC-MGEs) can mitigate the pathological effects of spinal cord injury. We find that 6 months after transplantation into injured mouse spinal cords, hESC-MGEs differentiate into GABAergic neuron subtypes and receive synaptic inputs, suggesting functional integration into host spinal cord. Moreover, the transplanted animals show improved bladder function and mitigation of pain-related symptoms. Our results therefore suggest that this approach may be a valuable strategy for ameliorating the adverse effects of spinal cord injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2016.08.020

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fandel, T. M., Trivedi, A., Nicholas, C. R., Zhang, H., Chen, J., Martinez, A. F., Noble-Haeusslein, L. J., & Kriegstein, A. R.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fandel, Thomas M.
  • Kriegstein, Arnold R.
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
544-557
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2523628475
Cited by
125
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC1NS068200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain, bladder dysfunction, human embryonic stem cells, medial ganglionic eminence, GABAergic interneurons, cell transplantation, GABAergic neurotransmission, functional integration, mouse model
MeSH terms
Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Animals, Urinary Bladder, Cell Differentiation, Cell Movement, Cell Survival, Female, Humans, Interneurons, Neuralgia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cell Lineage, Stem Cell Transplantation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review