Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GTAC enables parallel genotyping of multiple genomic loci with chromatin accessibility profiling in single cells

Turkalj, Sven, Jakobsen, Niels Asger, Groom, Angus, Metzner, Marlen, Riva, Simone G., Gür, E. Ravza, Usukhbayar, Batchimeg, Salazar, Mirian Angulo, Hentges, Lance D., Mickute, Gerda, Clark, Kevin, Sopp, Paul, Davies, James O.J., Hughes, Jim R., Vyas, Paresh·2023·Cell Stem Cell

Abstract

Understanding clonal evolution and cancer development requires experimental approaches for characterizing the consequences of somatic mutations on gene regulation. However, no methods currently exist that efficiently link high-content chromatin accessibility with high-confidence genotyping in single cells. To address this, we developed Genotyping with the Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin (GTAC), enabling accurate mutation detection at multiple amplified loci, coupled with robust chromatin accessibility readout. We applied GTAC to primary acute myeloid leukemia, obtaining high-quality chromatin accessibility profiles and clonal identities for multiple mutations in 88% of cells. We traced chromatin variation throughout clonal evolution, showing the restriction of different clones to distinct differentiation stages. Furthermore, we identified switches in transcription factor motif accessibility associated with a specific combination of driver mutations, which biased transformed progenitors toward a leukemia stem cell-like chromatin state. GTAC is a powerful tool to study clonal heterogeneity across a wide spectrum of pre-malignant and neoplastic conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.012

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rodriguez-Meira, 2022, Deciphering TP53 mutant cancer evolution with single-cell multi-omics, bioRxiv
  2. Woolley, 2021, INPP4B promotes leukemia by restricting leukemic stem cell differentiation through regulation of lysosomal functions, bioRxiv
  3. Myers, 2022, Integrated single-cell genotyping and chromatin accessibility charts JAK2 V617F human hematopoietic differentiation, bioRxiv

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Turkalj, S., Jakobsen, N. A., Groom, A., Metzner, M., Riva, S. G., Gür, E. R., Usukhbayar, B., Salazar, M. A., Hentges, L. D., Mickute, G., Clark, K., Sopp, P., Davies, J. O. J., Hughes, J. R., & Vyas, P.
Venue
Cell Stem Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
722-740.e11
ISSN
1934-5909
Cited by
20
References
120
Language
en
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (106130/Z/14/Z)
  • Clarendon Fund
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00029/8, MR/R002258/1)
  • Blood Cancer UK (13008)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
  • Lady Tata Memorial Trust (MC_UU_00029/3)
  • National Institutes of Health (R24DK106766)
  • Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.