Cited by 30Soil erosion and sediment transportSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Sediment-bound total organic carbon and total organic nitrogen losses from conventional and strip tillage cropping systems

Open access
Endale, Dinku M., Potter, Thomas L., Strickland, Timothy C., Bosch, David D.·2017·Soil and Tillage Research

Abstract

Global carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles are closely linked to erosion and hydrologic processes. By reducing tillage erosion and runoff, sediment-bound C and N losses can be reduced. Published studies represent only a few soil types and regions and rarely directly compare tillage practices. The objective of this study was to quantify concentrations and sediment-bound total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen (TON) loads and enrichment ratios in runoff from 0.2-ha fields in rotational cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) production during a 7-yr study within a southeastern USA coastal plain landscape. The Ultisoils at the study site have loamy sand to sandy loam texture surface horizons. The fields were in either continuous conventional tillage (CT) or strip tillage (ST) and were at upper, middle, and lower landscape positions. Sediment-bound TON and TOC concentrations were significantly greater from ST than CT fields as were the TOC and TON enrichment ratios. However, due to greater surface runoff and sediment loss, TON and TOC loads were significantly greater from CT than ST fields. The CT and ST loads were significantly different at the upper and middle but not at the lower landscape position. Enrichment ratios, 14 to 19 for TON and 8 to 12 for TOC, were several-fold greater than reported in the limited available literature, where studies focused on finer textured surface soils. Our findings have highlighted the site-specific nature of erosion processes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.still.2017.04.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher dissolved N and lower particulate and total N loads in fertilized grassland and cotton/peanut rotations may be attributed to light-textured loamy sands and utilization of winter cover crops in the peanut-cotton rotation studies.

    “This may be attributed to light-textured loamy sands and utilization of winter cover crops in the peanut-cotton rotation studies (Bosch et al. 2015;Endale et al. 2017).”

    From Nutrient Runoff From Agricultural Lands in North American Ecoregions (2025) · cites this paper as Endale et al. 2017

  • The surprising result occurred even though preplant application for the studies in the Southeastern USA Plains tended to incorporate fertilizer with tillage and thus increased soil disturbance, which can increase erosion and particulate N and P losses.

    “This surprising result occurred even though preplant application for the studies in the Southeastern USA Plains tended to incorporate fertilizer with tillage (Endale et al. 2017) and thus increased soil disturbance, which can increase erosion and particulate N and P losses.”

    From Nutrient Runoff From Agricultural Lands in North American Ecoregions (2025) · cites this paper as Endale et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Endale, D. M., Potter, T. L., Strickland, T. C., & Bosch, D. D.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Endale, Dinku M.
Venue
Soil and Tillage Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
171
Pages
25-34
ISSN
0167-1987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611838376
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Soil and Tillage Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
USDA-Agricultural Research Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
strip tillage, conventional tillage, erosion, surface runoff, enrichment ratio, Ultisol, sandy soil, landscape position, erosion models, coastal plain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review